Motivations for active commuting: a qualitative investigation of the period of home or work relocation

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

David Ogilvie¹  Caroline HD Jones² 

[1] MRC Epidemiology Unit and UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), Box 296, Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 OSR, UK;Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK

关键词: Residential self-selection;    Habit discontinuity;    Relocation;    Qualitative;    Active commuting;   

Others  :  811860
DOI  :  10.1186/1479-5868-9-109

 received in 2012-02-28, accepted in 2012-09-04,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Promoting walking or cycling to work (active commuting) could help to increase population physical activity levels. According to the habit discontinuity and residential self-selection hypotheses, moving home or workplace is a period when people (re)assess, and may be more likely to change, their travel behavior. Research in this area is dominated by the use of quantitative research methods, but qualitative approaches can provide in-depth insight into the experiences and processes of travel behavior change. This qualitative study aimed to explore experiences and motivations regarding travel behavior around the period of relocation, in an effort to understand how active commuting might be promoted more effectively.

Methods

Participants were recruited from the Commuting and Health in Cambridge study cohort in the UK. Commuters who had moved home, workplace or both between 2009 and 2010 were identified, and a purposive sample was invited to participate in semi-structured interviews regarding their experiences of, and travel behavior before and after, relocating. A grounded theory approach was taken to analysis.

Results

Twenty-six commuters participated. Participants were motivated by convenience, speed, cost and reliability when selecting modes of travel for commuting. Physical activity was not a primary motivation, but incidental increases in physical activity were described and valued in association with active commuting, the use of public transport and the use of park-and-ride facilities.

Conclusions

Emphasizing and improving the relative convenience, cost, speed and reliability of active commuting may be a more promising approach to promoting its uptake than emphasizing the health benefits, at least around the time of relocation. Providing good quality public transport and free car parking within walking or cycling distance of major employment sites may encourage the inclusion of active travel in the journey to work, particularly for people who live too far from work to walk or cycle the entire journey. Contrary to a straightforward interpretation of the self-selection hypothesis, people do not necessarily decide how they prefer to travel, relocate, and then travel in their expected way; rather, there is constant negotiation, reassessment and adjustment of travel behavior following relocation which may offer an extended window of opportunity for travel behavior change.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Jones and Ogilvie; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]NHS IC (Information Centre): Statistics on Obesity, Physical Activity and Diet England; 2011. http://www.ic.nhs.uk/webfiles/publications/003_Health_Lifestyles/opad11/Statistics_on_Obesity_Physical_Activity_and_Diet_England_2011_revised_Aug11.pdf webcite
• [2]Kingham S, Dickinson J, Copsey S: Travelling to work: will people move out of their cars. Transport Policy 2001, 8:151-160.
• [3]Merom D, Miller YD, van der Ploeg HP, Bauman A: Predictors of initiating and maintaining active commuting to work using transport and public health perspectives in Australia. Prev Med 2008, 47:342-346.
• [4]Wen LM, Rissel C: Inverse associations between cycling to work, public transport, and overweight and obesity: findings from a population based study in Australia. Prev Med 2008, 46:29-32.
• [5]Wen LM, Orr N, Millet C, Rissel C: Driving to work and overweight and obesity: findings from the 2003 New South Wales Health Survey, Australia. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006, 30:782-786.
• [6]Hendriksen IJM, Simons M, Garre FG, Hildebrandt VH: The association between commuter cycling and sickness absence. Prev Med 2010, 51:132-135.
• [7]Hamer M, Chida Y: Active commuting and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med 2008, 46:9-13.
• [8]Oja P, Titze S, Bauman A, de Geus B, Krenn P, Reger-Nash B, Kohlberger T: Health benefits of cycling: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2011, 21:496-509.
• [9]Department for Transport 2010. http://www.dft.gov.uk/statistics/series/transport-statistics-great-britain/ webcite
• [10]Panter JR, Jones A: Attitudes and the environment as determinants of active travel in adults: what do and don’t we know? J Phys Act Health 2010, 7:551-561.
• [11]Eriksson L, Garvill J, Nordlund AM: Interrupting habitual car use: The importance of car habit strength and moral motivation for personal car use reduction. Transport Res F 2008, 11:10-23.
• [12]Wood W, Tam L, Witt MG: Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. J Pers Soc Psychol 2005, 88:918-933.
• [13]Verplanken B, Aarts H, van Knippenberg A: Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices. Eur J Soc Psychol 1997, 27:539-560.
• [14]Verplanken B, Walker I, Davis A, Jurasek M: Context change and travel mode choice: Combining the habit discontinuity and self-activation hypothesis. J Env Psychol 2008, 28:121-127.
• [15]Verplanken B, Wood W: Interventions to break and create consumer habits. J Public Policy Marketing 2006, 25:90-103.
• [16]Saelens BE, Handy SL: Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40(Suppl 7):S550-S566.
• [17]Ewing R, Cervero R: Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. J Am Plann Assoc 2010, 76:265-294.
• [18]Frank LD, Sallis JF, Conway TL, Chapman JE, Saelens BE, Bachman W: Many pathways from land use to health: associations between neighborhood workability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. J Am Plann Assoc 2006, 72:75-87.
• [19]Chatman DG: Residential choice, the built environment, and nonwork travel: evidence using new data and methods. Env Plan A 2009, 41:1072-1089.
• [20]Cao X, Mokhtarian PL, Handy S: Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings. Transport Rev 2009, 29:359-395.
• [21]Kirby J, Inchley J: Active travel to school: views of 10–13 year old schoolchildren in Scotland. Health Education 2009, 109:169-183.
• [22]Ogilvie D, Mitchell R, Mutrie N, Petticrew M, Platt S: Shoe leather epidemiology: active travel and transport infrastructure in the urban landscape. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010, 7:43. BioMed Central Full Text
• [23]Aldred R: ‘On the outside’: constructing cycling citizenship. Soc Cultural Geog 2010, 11:35-52.
• [24]Guell C, Panter J, Jones N, Ogilvie D: Towards a differentiated understanding of active travel behaviour: using social theory to explore everyday commuting. Soc Sci Med 2012, 75:233-239.
• [25]Baum F: Researching public health: behind the qualitative-quantitative methodological debate. Soc Sci Med 1995, 40:459-468.
• [26]Paluck EL: The promising integration of qualitative methods and field experiments. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 2010, 628:59-71.
• [27]Pooley CG, Turnbull J: Modal choice and modal change: the journey to work in Britain since 1890. J Transport Geog 2000, 8:11-24.
• [28]Ogilvie D, Griffin S, Jones A, Mackett R, Guell C, Panter J, Jones N, Cohn S, Yang L, Chapman C: Commuting and health in Cambridge: a study of a ‘natural experiment’ in the provision of new transport infrastructure. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:703. BioMed Central Full Text
• [29]Geoplan: About Postcodes. http://www.geoplan.com/GIS_Mapping/How_Postcodes_Work webcite
• [30]Creswell JW: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications; 2007.
• [31]Bamberg S, Rolle D, Weber C: Does habitual car use not lead to more resistance to change of travel mode? Transportation 2003, 30:97-108.
• [32]Besser LM, Dannenberg AL: Walking to public transit: steps to help meet physical activity recommendations. Am J Prev Med 2005, 29:273-280.
• [33]Villenueva K, Giles-Corti B, McCormack G: Achieving 10,000 steps: a comparison of public transport users and drivers in a University setting. Prev Med 2008, 47:338-341.
• [34]Wener RE, Evans GW: A morning stroll: levels of physical activity in car and mass transit commuting. Env Behav 2007, 39:62-74.
• [35]MacDonald JM, Stokes RJ, Cohen DA, Kofner A, Ridgeway GK: The effect of light rail transit of body mass index and physical activity. Am J Prev Med 2010, 39:105-112.
• [36]Wilson RW: Estimating the travel and parking demand effects of employer-paid parking. Reg Sci Urban Econ 1992, 22:133-145.
• [37]Wilson RW, Shoup DC: Parking subsidies and travel choices: assessing the evidence. Transportation 1990, 17:141-157.
• [38]Goodman A, Guell C, Panter J, Jones N, Ogilvie D: Healthy travel and the socio-economic structure of car commuting in Cambridge, UK: A mixed-methods analysis. Soc Sci Med 2012, 74:1929-1938.
• [39]National Travel Survey 2009. http://www2.dft.gov.uk/pgr/statistics/datatablespublications/nts/ webcite
• [40]Parkhurst G: Influence of bus-based park and ride facilities on users’ car traffic. Transport Policy 2000, 7:159-172.