期刊论文详细信息
BMC Veterinary Research
Evaluation of the nasal microbiota in slaughter-age pigs and the impact on nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage
Robert Friendship2  Mohammad Jalali1  Mackenzie Slifierz1  J Scott Weese1 
[1] Department of Pathobiology and Centre for Public Health and Zoonoses, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G2W1, Canada;Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G2W1, Canada
关键词: Staphylococci;    Antimicrobial resistance;    Microbiota;   
Others  :  1119301
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-6148-10-69
 received in 2013-12-05, accepted in 2014-03-12,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The nasal microbiota of pigs has been poorly assessed but could play a role in carriage of important microorganisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The objectives of this study were to describe the nasal microbiota in slaughter age pigs, to evaluate the impact of farm management on the nasal microbiota and to provide a preliminary assessment of the influence of the microbiota on MRSA carriage.

Results

Nasal swabs were collected from five MRSA positive and eight MRSA negative pigs on one farm that used a liquid feeding system and routine tylosin treatment, and seven MRSA negative pigs from an antibiotic-free farm that used conventional feeding. A total of 946310 sequences passed all quality control filters. The number of sequences per sample ranged from 4307 to 165656 (mean 56092, SD 40007). CatchAll analysis of richness predicted a mean of 1749 OTUs (range 213–3736, SD 996). Overall, 6291 OTUs were identified, yet 5125 (81%) were identified less than 10 times and the 12 most abundant OTUs accounted for 80.7% of sequences. Proteobacteria predominated in all but two samples. Liquid-fed/tylosin-exposed pigs had significantly lower relative abundances of Verrucomicrobia (P = 0.004), Fibrobacteres (P = <0.0001) and sequences unclassified at the phylum level (P = 0.028). When comparing only liquid-fed pigs, MRSA carriers had significantly more Bacteroidetes (P = 0.037) than MRSA negative pigs. 124 genera were identified, with Moraxella accounting for 35.4% of sequences. In the Jaccard index tree, five of eight MRSA positive pigs clustered closely together, as did six of the seven conventionally-fed pigs. A significant difference was identified between conventional and liquid-fed pigs using parsimony test with the Jaccard (P < 0.001) but not the Yue&Clayton (P = 0.26) index. There were no significant differences between MRSA positive and negative pigs (P = 0.133 and 0.175). OTUs belonging to Firmicutes were the main indicators of MRSA negative pigs, including Lactobacillus and another Lactobacillaceae and Staphylococcus.

Conclusions

Farm management can influence the nasal microbiota in pigs, but no impact of the microbiota on MRSA carriage was identified. Studies that further define the impact of management on the microbiota, and the impact of the microbiota on pathogen carriage are indicated.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Weese et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150208053332594.pdf 1032KB PDF download
Figure 5. 33KB Image download
Figure 4. 41KB Image download
Figure 3. 51KB Image download
Figure 2. 46KB Image download
Figure 1. 103KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Woods GT, Jensen AH, Gossling J, Rhoades HE, Nickelson WF: The effect of medicated feed on the nasal microflora and weight gain of pigs. Can J Comp Med 1972, 36(1):49-54.
  • [2]Lowe BA, Marsh TL, Isaacs-Cosgrove N, Kirkwood RN, Kiupel M, Mulks MH: Defining the “core microbiome” of the microbial communities in the tonsils of healthy pigs. BMC Microbiol 2012, 12:20. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [3]Voss A, Loeffen F, Bakker J, Klaassen C, Wulf M: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming. Emerging Infect Dis 2005, 11(12):1965-1966.
  • [4]Khanna T, Friendship R, Dewey C, Weese J: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in pigs and pig farmers. Vet Microbiol 2008, 128:298-303.
  • [5]Broens EM, Graat EAM, van der Wolf PJ, van de Giessen AW, de Jong MCM: Prevalence and risk factor analysis of livestock associated MRSA-positive pig herds in The Netherlands. Prev Vet Med 2011, 102:41-49.
  • [6]Van Duijkeren E, Ikawaty R, Broekhuizen-Stins MJ, Jansen MD, Spalburg EC, De Neeling AJ, Allaart JG, Van Nes A, Wagenaar JA, Fluit AC: Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains between different kinds of pig farms. Vet Microbiol 2008, 126:383-389.
  • [7]van Rijen MM, Bosch T, Heck ME, Kluytmans JA: Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus epidemiology and transmission in a Dutch hospital. J Hosp Infect 2009, 72(4):299-306.
  • [8]Huse SM, Ye Y, Zhou Y, Fodor AA: A core human microbiome as viewed through 16S rRNA sequence clusters. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(6):e34242.
  • [9]Kobayashi Y, Itoh A, Miyawaki K, Koike S, Iwabuchi O, Iimura Y, Kobashi Y, Kawashima T, Wakamatsu J, Hattori A, Marakami H, Morimatsu F, Nakaebisu T, Hishinuma T: Effect of liquid whey feeding on fecal microbiota of mature and growing pigs. Anim Sci J 2011, 82(4):607-615.
  • [10]Schmidt B, Mulder IE, Musk CC, Aminov RI, Lewis M, Stokes CR, Bailey M, Prosser JI, Gill BP, Pluske JR, Kelly D: Establishment of normal gut microbiota is compromised under excessive hygiene conditions. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(12):e28284.
  • [11]Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R: QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 2010, 7(5):335-336.
  • [12]Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF: Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75(23):7537-7541.
  • [13]Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R: UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 2011, 27(16):2194-2200.
  • [14]Bunge J, Woodard L, Bohning D, Foster JA, Connolly S, Allen HK: Estimating population diversity with CatchAll. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:1045-1047.
  • [15]Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO: The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 4:D590-D596.
  • [16]Lozupone C, Hamady M, Knight R: UniFrac–an online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context. BMC Bioinforma 2006, 7:371. BioMed Central Full Text
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:32次 浏览次数:0次