Comparative analysis of plant use in peri-urban domestic gardens of the Limpopo Province, South Africa

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

Martin J Potgieter³  Alfred Maroyi¹  Gabolwelwe KE Mosina² 

[1] Medicinal Plants and Economic Development (MPED) Research Center; Department of Botany, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa;Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology; Forestry, Agriculture and Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Lynnwood Road, Alice, South Africa;Department of Biodiversity, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga 0727, South Africa

关键词: Useful plants;    Urbanisation;    Peri-urban;    Livelihoods;    Limpopo Province;    Cultivated plants;   

Others  :  804139
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-4269-10-35

 received in 2013-11-30, accepted in 2014-03-26,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Relatively little has been researched or published on the importance of peri-urban domestic gardens as part of a household livelihood strategy in South Africa. Due to lack of comprehensive data on peri-urban domestic gardens, their potential value as luxury green space, provision of food, income and ecosystem services to the fast growing urban population in South Africa is not clearly known. The aim of this study was to document differences and similarities in plant use and diversity in domestic gardens of two peri-urban communities in the Limpopo Province that differ in proximity to an urban area.

Methods

Data on plant use categories of 62 domestic gardens in the peri-urban areas of the Limpopo Province were collected in Seshego and Lebowakgomo. Semi-structured interviews, observation and guided field walks with 62 participants were employed between May and October 2012.

Results

A total of 126 plant species were recorded for both Seshego and Lebowakgomo. Domestic gardens in the more remote areas of Lebowakgomo were characterized by higher percentage of food plants (47 species, 83.8% of the total food plants recorded) and medicinal plants (31 species, 83.7%). Lebowakgomo domestic gardens were also characterized by higher numbers of indigenous plants (76.7%) showing similarities to the natural surrounding vegetation in terms of plant species. On the contrary, domestic gardens of Seshego on the periphery of the city centre were characterized by higher percentage of exotic species (81.8%) and ornamental plants (73%), with food plants playing a supplementary role. Comparison of the two areas demonstrated a remarkable difference in plant use and composition.

Conclusions

This study revealed that there are differences in utilization of plant resources between households on the edge of an urban centre and those in the more remote areas. Food and medicinal plants play an important role in remote areas; while ornamental plants play an important role in urban domestic gardens. But the collective desire for food, medicinal and ornamental plants by both communities on the edge of an urban centre and those in the more remote areas highlight the importance of plant resources in domestic gardens.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Mosina et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Fernandes ECM, Nair PKR: An evaluation of the structure and function of tropical homegardens. Agrofor Syst 1986, 21:279-310.
• [2]Nair PKR: Whither homegardens? In Tropical Homegardens: A Time-tested Example of Sustainable Agroforestry. Edited by Kumar BM, Nair PKR. Dordrecht: Springer Science; 2006:355-370.
• [3]High C, Shackleton CM: The comparative value of wild and domestic plants in homegardens of a South African rural village. Agrofor Syst 2000, 48:141-156.
• [4]Molebatsi LY, Siebert SJ, Cilliers SS, Lubbe CS, Davoren NE: The Tswana tshimo: A home garden system of useful plants, with a specific layout and function. Afr J Agr Res 2010, 5:2952-2963.
• [5]Nemudzudzanyi AO, Siebert SJ, Zobolo AM, Molebatsi LY: The Zulu muzi: A home garden system of useful plants with a specific layout and function. Afr J Indig Knowl Syst 2010, 9:57-72.
• [6]Paumgarten F, Shackleton CM, Cocks ML: Growing of trees in homegardens by rural households in the Eastern Cape and Limpopo provinces, South Africa. Int J Sust Devel World Ecol 2005, 12:1-19.
• [7]Shackleton CM, Paumgarten F, Cocks ML: Household attributes promote diversity of tree holdings in rural areas, South Africa. Agrofor Syst 2008, 72:221-230.
• [8]The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystem services and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Washington D.C: Island Press; 2003. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.765.aspx.pdf webcite, accessed on 29 January 2014
• [9]Dunnett N, Qasim M: Perceived benefits to human well-being of urban gardens. Hort Technol 2000, 10:40-45.
• [10]Marco A, Lavergne S, du Toit T, Bertaudiere-Montes V: From the backyard to the backcountry: How ecological and biological traits explain the escape of garden plants into Mediterranean old fields. Biol Invasions 2010, 12:761-779.
• [11]Takano T, Nakamura K, Watanabe M: Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable green spaces. J Epidemiol Comm Health 2002, 56:913-918.
• [12]Wu J, Jenerette GD, David J: Linking land-use change with ecosystem processes: A hierarchical patch dynamic model. In Integrated Land Use and Environmental Models. Edited by Guhathakurta S. Berlin: Springer; 2003:99-119.
• [13]Kuruneri-Chitepo C, Shackleton CM: The distribution, abundance and composition of street trees in selected towns of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Urb For Urb Greening 2011, 10:247-254.
• [14]Maroyi A: Traditional homegardens and rural livelihoods in Nhema, Zimbabwe: A sustainable agroforestry system. Int J Sust Develop World Ecol 2009, 16:1-8.
• [15]Nair PKR: An Introduction to Agroforestry. London: Academic Publishers; 1993.
• [16]Reichard SH, White P: Horticultural introductions of invasive plant species: A North American perspective. In The Great Reshuffling: Human Dimensions of Invasive Alien Species. Edited by McNeely JA. Gland: IUCN; 2001:161-170.
• [17]Berrisford S, DeGroot D, Kihato M, Marrengane N, Mhlanga Z, van den Brink R: Search of Land and Housing in the New South Africa: The Case of Entembalethu. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2008.
• [18]McConnachie MM, Shackleton CM: Public green space inequality in small towns in South Africa. Habitat Int 2010, 34:244-248.
• [19]Barry M: Peri-urban tenure management in South Africa. In Federation Internationale des Geometres (FIG), FIG 2nd Regional Conference: Urban–rural Interrelationship for Sustainable Development, 02–05 December 2003. Morroco: Marrakech; 2003. https://www.fig.net/pub/morocco/proceedings/TS1/TS1_1_barry.pdf? webcite[accessed 10 September 2013]
• [20]Ladzani WM, Netswera FG: Support for rural small businesses in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Devel Southern Afr 2009, 26:225-239.
• [21]Steytler N: District municipalities: giving effect to shared authority in local government. Law, Democracy and Devel 2003, 7:227-242.
• [22]Aliber M, De Swardt C, Du Toit A, Mbhele T, Mthethwa T: Trends and Policy Challenges in the Rural Economy. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council; 2005.
• [23]Statistics South Africa: General household survey metadata. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa; 2013. http://www.statssa.gov.za webcite, accessed on 4 November 2013
• [24]Donaldson SE, Boshoff E: Household linkages in dispersed settlement around Pietersburg and implication for household resources management. J Fam Ecol Cons Sci 2001, 29:20-27.
• [25]Limpopo State of the Environment Report: State of the Environment Reports. Pretoria: Department of Environmental Affairs; 2005. http://www.environment.gov.za/soer/reports/limpopo.html webcite, accessed on 18 May 2013
• [26]M’Marete CK: Climate and Water Resources in the Limpopo Province. Polokwane: Limpopo Department of Agriculture; 2003.
• [27]Mucina L, Rutherford MC: The Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelizia 19. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute; 2006.
• [28]Bridson D, Foreman L: The Herbarium Handbook. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew: Richmond; 1998.
• [29]Victor JE, Koekemoer M, Fish L, Smithies SJ, Mössmer M: Herbarium Essentials: The Southern African Herbarium User Manual. SABONET Report no. 25. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute; 2004.
• [30]Chambers R: The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Develop 1994, 22:953-969.
• [31]Cavanagh S: Content analysis: Concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher 1997, 4:5-16.
• [32]Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Rejmanek M, Webster GL, Williamson M, Kirschner J: Alien plants in checklists and flora: Towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 2004, 53:131-143.
• [33]United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP): Alien Species That Threaten Ecosystems, Habitats or Species. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity; 2002. https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=7197 webcite, accessed on 21 July 2013
• [34]Germishuizen G, Meyer NL, Steenkamp Y, Keith M: A Checklist of South African Plants. Southern African Botanical Diversity Network Report No. 41. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute; 2006.
• [35]McKinney ML: Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Cons 2006, 127:247-260.
• [36]Lubbe CS, Siebert SJ, Cilliers SS: Floristic analysis of domestic gardens in the Tlokwe City Municipality, South Africa. Bothalia 2011, 41:351-361.
• [37]Gilmore MR: Importance of ethnobotanical investigation. Amer Anthropol 1932, 34:320-327.
• [38]Maroyi A: Use and management of home garden plants in Zvishavane District, Zimbabwe. Trop Ecol 2013, 54:191-203.
• [39]Eichemberg MT, Amorozo MC, de Moura LC: Species composition and plant use in old urban homegardens in Rio Claro, Southeast of Brazil. Acta Bot Bras 2009, 23:1057-1075.
• [40]Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO): Report on the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome: FAO; 1996.
• [41]Kumar BM, Nair PKR: The enigma of tropical home gardens. Agrofor Syst 2004, 61:135-152.
• [42]Africa S: Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act no. 43 of 1983. Pretoria: Government Printer; 1983.
• [43]Heywood VH: Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
• [44]Bigirimana J, Bogaert J, De Canniere C, Bigendako M-J, Parmentier I: Domestic garden plant diversity in Bujumbura, Burundi: Role of the socio-economical status of the neighborhood and alien species invasion risk. Landscape Urb Plan 2012, 107:118-126.
• [45]Bigirimana J, Bogaert J, De Canniere C, Lejoly J, Parmentier I: Alien plant species dominate the vegetation in a city of Sub-Saharan Africa. Landscape Urb Plan 2011, 100:251-267.
• [46]Maroyi A: Use of weeds as traditional vegetables in Shurugwi District, Zimbabwe. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2013, 9:60. BioMed Central Full Text
• [47]Semenya SS, Potgieter MJ, Tshisikhawe MP, Shava S, Maroyi A: Medicinal utilization of exotic plants by Bapedi traditional healers to treat human ailments in Limpopo Province, South Africa. J Ethnopharmacol 2012, 144:646-655.