Plant management and biodiversity conservation in Náhuatl homegardens of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

José Blancas²  Ana Isabel Moreno-Calles¹  Mariana Vallejo²  Alejandro Casas²  Carolina Larios² 

[1] Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, UNAM, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8711, Col. San José de la Huerta Morelia, Michoacán 58190, México;Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, UNAM, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8711, Col. San José de la Huerta Morelia, Michoacán 58190, México

关键词: Tehuacán Valley;    Sustainable use;    Plant management;    Náhuatl people;    Homegardens;    Domestication;    Biodiversity conservation;   

Others  :  862057
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-4269-9-74

 received in 2013-09-16, accepted in 2013-10-28,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

The Tehuacán Valley is one of the areas of Mesoamerica with the oldest history of plant management. Homegardens are among the most ancient management systems that currently provide economic benefits to people and are reservoirs of native biodiversity. Previous studies estimated that 30% of the plant richness of homegardens of the region are native plant species from wild populations. We studied in Náhuatl communities the proportion of native plant species maintained in homegardens, hypothesizing to find a proportion similar to that estimated at regional level, mainly plant resources maintained for edible, medicinal and ornamental purposes.

Methods

We analysed the composition of plant species of homegardens and their similarity with surrounding Cloud Forest (CF), Tropical Rainforest (TRF), Tropical Dry forest (TDF), and Thorn-Scrub Forest (TSF). We determined density, frequency and biomass of plant species composing homegardens and forests through vegetation sampling of a total of 30 homegardens and nine plots of forests, and documented ethnobotanical information on use, management, and economic benefits from plants maintained in homegardens.

Results

A total of 281 plant species was recorded with 12 use categories, 115 ornamental, 92 edible, and 50 medicinal plant species. We recorded 49.8 ± 23.2 (average ± S.D.) woody plant species (shrubs and trees) per homegarden. In total, 34% species are native to the Tehuacán Valley and nearly 16% are components of the surrounding forests. A total of 176 species were cultivated through seeds, vegetative propagules or transplanted entire individual plants, 71 tolerated, and 23 enhanced. The highest species richness and diversity were recorded in homegardens from the CF zone (199 species), followed by those from the TRF (157) and those from the TDF (141) zones.

Conclusion

Homegardens provide a high diversity of resources for subsistence of local households and significantly contribute to conservation of native biodiversity. The highest diversity was recorded in homegardens where the neighbouring forests had the least diversity, suggesting that management of homegardens aims at compensating scarcity of naturally available plant resources. Cultivated species were markedly more abundant than plants under other management forms. Diversity harboured and management techniques make homegardens keystones in strategies for regional biodiversity conservation.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Larios et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Kumar BM, Nair PKR: The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agrofor Syst 2004, 61:135-152.
• [2]Budowski G: Agroforistería: una diciplina basada en el conocimiento tradicional. Rev Forestal Centroamericana 1993, 2:14-18.
• [3]Lok R: El huerto casero tropical tradicional en América Central. In Lok R (ed) Huertos Caseros Tradicionales de América Central: Características, Beneficios e Importancia, Desde un Enfoque Multidisciplinario. Turrialba, Costa Rica: Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE); 1998:7-28.
• [4]Nair PKR, Kumar BM: Introduction. In Tropical Homegardens: A Time-Tested Example of Sustainable Agroforestry. Edited by Kumar BM, Nair PKR. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2006:1-10.
• [5]Perfecto I, Vandermeer J: Biodiversity conservation in tropical agroecosystems: a new conservation paradigm. N.Y. Acad Sci 2008, 1134:173-200.
• [6]Blancas J, Casas A, Rangel-Landa S, et al.: Plant management in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley. Econ Bot 2010, 64:287-302.
• [7]Moreno-Calles A, Casas A, Blancas J, et al.: Agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation in arid zones: the case of the Tehuacán Valley, Central México. Agrofor Syst 2010, 80:315-331.
• [8]Parra F, Blancas J, Casas A: Landscape management and domestication of Stenocereus pruinosus (Cactaceae) in the Tehuacán Valley: human guided selection and gene flow. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2012, 8:32. BioMed Central Full Text
• [9]Blancas J, Casas A, Pérez-Salicrup D, Caballero J, Vega E: Ecological and sociocultural factors influencing plant management in Náhuatl communities of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2013, 9:39. BioMed Central Full Text
• [10]Otero-Arnaiz A, Casas A, Hamrick J, Cruse-Sanders J: Genetic variation and evolution of Polaskia chichipe (Cactaceae) under domestication in the Tehuacán Valley, central Mexico. Mol Ecol 2005, 14:1603-1611.
• [11]Casas A, Cruse J, Otero-Arnaiz A, Valiente-Banuet A: Maintenance of phenotypic diversity of Stenocereus stellatus (Cactaceae) by indigenous people in central México. Biodivers Conserv 2006, 15:879-898.
• [12]Parra F, Casas A, Peñaloza-Ramírez JM, et al.: Evolution under domestication: ongoing artificial selection and divergence of wild and managed Stenocereus pruinosus (Cactaceae) populations in the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. Ann Bot 2010, 106:483-496.
• [13]Caballero J: The Maya homegardens of the Yucatán peninsula: past, present and future. Etnoecológica 1992, 1:35-54.
• [14]Casas A, Vázquez MC, Viveros JL, Caballero J: Plant management among the Nahua and the Mixtec from the Balsas River Basin: and ethnobotanical approach to the study of plant domestication. Hum Ecol 1996, 24:455-478.
• [15]Casas A, Caballero J, Valiente-Banuet A, Soriano JA, Dávila P: Morphological variation and the process of domestication of Stenocereus stellatus (Cactaceae) in Central Mexico. Am J Bot 1999, 86:522-533.
• [16]Casas A, Valiente-Banuet A, Viveros JL, et al.: Plant resources of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. Econ Bot 2001, 55:129-166.
• [17]Casas A, Otero-Arnaiz A, Pérez-Negrón E, et al.: In situ management and domestication of plants in Mesoamerica. Ann Bot 2007, 100:1101-1115.
• [18]Casas A, Rangel-Landa S, Torres-García I, et al.: In situ management and conservation of plant resources in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico: an ethnobotanical and ecological approach. In Current Topics in Ethnobotany. Edited by Albuquerque UP, Alves-Ramos M. Kerala, India: Research Signpost; 2008:1-25.
• [19]Cruse-Sanders J, Friar E, Parker K, et al.: Managing diversity: domestication and gene flow in Stenocereus stellatus Riccob. in Mexico. Ecol and Evol 2013, 3:1340-1355.
• [20]Blanckaert I, Swennen RL, Paredes-Flores M, et al.: Floristic composition, plant uses and management practices in homegardens of San Rafael Coxcatlán, Valley of Tehuacán-Cuicatlán, Mexico. J Arid Environ 2004, 57:39-62.
• [21]Montagnini F: Homegardens of Mesoamerica: biodiversity, food security, and nutrient management. In Tropical Homegardens: A Time Tested Example of Sustainable Agroforestry. Edited by Kumar BM, Nair PKR. The Netherlands: Springer; 2006:61-84.
• [22]Pulido MT, Pagaza-Calderón M, Martínez-Ballesté A, et al.: Home gardens as an alternative for sustainability: challenges and perspectives in Latin America. In Current Topics in Ethnobotany. Edited by Albuquerque UP, Alves-Ramos M. Kerala, India: Research Signpost; 2008:55-79.
• [23]Casas A, Caballero J, Mapes C, Zárate S: Manejo de la vegetación, domesticación de plantas y origen de la agricultura en Mesoamérica. Bol Soc Bot Méx 1997, 61:31-47.
• [24]Toledo VM, Barrera-Bassols N: La Memoria Biocultural: La Importancia Ecológica de las Sabidurías Tradicionales. Barcelona, Spain: Ed. Icaria; 2008.
• [25]Boege E: El Patrimonio Biocultural de los Pueblos Indígenas de México: Hacia la Conservación in Situ de la Biodiversidad y Agrobiodiversidad de los Territorios Indígenas. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e. México: Historia; 2008.
• [26]Van der Wal H, Bongers F: Biosocial and bionumerical diversity of variously sized homegardens in Tabasco, México. Agrofor Syst 2013, 87:93-107.
• [27]Altieri MA: Agroecology, small farms and food sovereignty. Mon Rev 2009, 61:102-113.
• [28]Godfray CH, Beddington JR, Crute R, et al.: Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 2010, 327:812-818.
• [29]Moreno-Calles A, Casas A, García-Frapolli E: Traditional agroforestry systems of multi-crop “milpa” and “chichipera” cactus forest in the arid Tehuacán Valley, Mexico: their management and role in people’s subsistence. Agrofor Syst 2012, 84:207-226.
• [30]Hernández-Xolocotzi E: Aspects of plant domestication in Mexico: a personal view. In Biological Diversity of Mexico. Edited by Ramamoorthy TP, Bye R, Lot A, Fa J. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993:733-753.
• [31]Toledo VM, et al.: Indigenous Peoples and Biodiversity. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Edited by Levins S. New York: Academic Press; 2000.
• [32]Berkes F, Folke C, Gadgil M: Traditional ecological knowledge, biodiversity, resilience and sustainability. In Biodiversity Conservation. Edited by Perrings. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995:281-299.
• [33]Camou-Guerrero A, Reyes-García V, Martínez-Ramos M, Casas A: Knowledge and use value of plant species in a Raramuri community: a gender perspective. Hum Ecol 2008, 36:259-272.
• [34]Dávila P, Arizmendi MC, Valiente-Banuet A, et al.: Biological diversity in the Tehuacan-Cuicatlan Valley, Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 2002, 11:421-442.
• [35]Mangel M, Hofman RJ, Norse EA, Twiss JR: Sustainability and ecological research. Ecol Appl 1993, 3:573-575.
• [36]Goodland R: The concept of enviromental sustaninability. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1995, 26:1.
• [37]Torquebiau E: Are tropical agroforestry homegardens sustainable? Agr Ecosyst Environ 1992, 41:189-207.
• [38]Torquebiau E, Penot E: Ecology Versus Economics in Tropical Multistrata Agroforests. In Tropical Homegardens: A Time Tested Example of Sustainable Agroforestry. Edited by Kumar BM, Nair PKR. The Netherlands: Springer; 2006:269-282.
• [39]Lira R, Casas A, Rosas-López R, et al.: Traditional knowledge and useful plant richness in the Tehuacán–Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico. Econ Bot 2009, 63:271-287.
• [40]Gliessman S: Agroecología: Procesos Ecológicos en Agricultura Sostenible. Turrialba, Costa Rica: LITOCAT; 2002.
• [41]Vivar D: Determinación de la Sustentabilidad en el Manejo del Quiotillal en el Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán. México. Bachellor Thesis. Mexico: Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2004.
• [42]Martin GJ: Ethnobotany: A Methods Manual. Cambridge, UK: Chapman & Hall; 1995.
• [43]Toledo VM, Ortiz-Espejel MB, Cortés ME, et al.: The multiple use of tropical forests by indigenous peoples in Mexico: a case of adaptive management. Conserv Ecol 2003, 7(3):9.
• [44]Barrera A: Sobre la unidad de habitación tradicional campesina y el manejo de recursos bióticos en el área Maya Yucatanense. Biotica 1980, 5:115-119.
• [45]Valiente-Banuet A, Casas A, Dávila P, Arizmendi MC, Solís L, Treviño J, Rangel S: La Vegetación del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán. CONABIO, Fundación Cuicatlán, México: UNAM; 2009.