期刊论文详细信息
Implementation Science
Implementation science in cancer prevention and control: a decade of grant funding by the National Cancer Institute and future directions
Cynthia Vinson1  Suzanne Heurtin-Roberts1  Margaret M Farrell1  Laurie Cynkin1  Bryan Leyva1  Siobhan M Phillips1  David A Chambers1  Michael A Sanchez1  Gila Neta1 
[1] Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 4E442, Rockville 20852, MD, USA
关键词: Study characteristics;    Implementation science;    Review;    Grants;   
Others  :  1139399
DOI  :  10.1186/s13012-014-0200-2
 received in 2014-09-25, accepted in 2014-12-19,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has supported implementation science for over a decade. We explore the application of implementation science across the cancer control continuum, including prevention, screening, treatment, and survivorship.

Methods

We reviewed funding trends of implementation science grants funded by the NCI between 2000 and 2012. We assessed study characteristics including cancer topic, position on the T2–T4 translational continuum, intended use of frameworks, study design, settings, methods, and replication and cost considerations.

Results

We identified 67 NCI grant awards having an implementation science focus. R01 was the most common mechanism, and the total number of all awards increased from four in 2003 to 15 in 2012. Prevention grants were most frequent (49.3%) and cancer treatment least common (4.5%). Diffusion of Innovations and Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) were the most widely reported frameworks, but it is unclear how implementation science models informed planned study measures. Most grants (69%) included mixed methods, and half reported replication and cost considerations (49.3%).

Conclusions

Implementation science in cancer research is active and diverse but could be enhanced by greater focus on measures development, assessment of how conceptual frameworks and their constructs lead to improved dissemination and implementation outcomes, and harmonization of measures that are valid, reliable, and practical across multiple settings.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Neta et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150321104942977.pdf 633KB PDF download
Figure 3. 18KB Image download
Figure 2. 19KB Image download
Figure 1. 50KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Miller SM, Bowen DJ, Croyle RT, Rowland JH: Handbook of Cancer Control and Behavioral Science: A Resource for Researchers, Practitioners, and Policy Makers. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC; 2009.
  • [2]Lenfant C: Shattuck lecture: clinical research to clinical practice - Lost in translation? N Engl J Med 2003, 349:868-74.
  • [3]Kerner JF, Guirguis-Blake J, Hennessy KD, Brounstein PJ, Vinson C, Schwartz RH, Myers BA, Briss P: Translating research into improved outcomes in comprehensive cancer control. Cancer Causes Control 2005, 16:27-40.
  • [4]Eccles MP, Mittman BS: Welcome to Implementation Science. Implement Sci 2006, 1:1. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [5]Woolf SH: The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA 2008, 299:211-3.
  • [6]Khoury MJ, Gwinn M, Ioannidis JP: The emergence of translational epidemiology: from scientific discovery to population health impact. Am J Epidemiol 2010, 172:517-24.
  • [7]Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health (R01) [http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-13-055.html]
  • [8]Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award (U54) [http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-07-007.html]
  • [9]Rabin BA, Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Kreuter MW, Weaver NL: A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. J Public Health Manag Pract 2008, 14:117-23.
  • [10]Dissemination and Diffusion Supplements [http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/is/custom_portfolio.asp?portfolio=dandd]
  • [11]Implementation Research Institute [http://cmhsr.wustl.edu/Training/IRI/Pages/IRI%202010.aspx]
  • [12]Training Institute for Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health [http://obssr.od.nih.gov/training_and_education/TIDIRH/2013/index.html]
  • [13]Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC: Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci 2013, 8:139. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [14]Neta G, Glasgow RE, Carpenter CR, Grimshaw JM, Rabin BA, Fernandez ME, Brownson RC: A framework for enhancing the value of research for dissemination and implementation. Am J Public Health 2015, 105:49-57.
  • [15]NCI’s Dissemination and Diffusion Administrative Supplement Program: lessons learned and recommendations [http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/IS/pdfs/Dissemination-and-Diffusion-Supplements-Analysis-Final.pdf]
  • [16]Hiatt RA, Rimer BK: A new strategy for cancer control research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999, 8:957-64.
  • [17]Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health (R03) [http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-13-056.html]
  • [18]Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health (R21) [http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-13-054.html]
  • [19]Meissner HI, Glasgow RE, Vinson CA, Chambers D, Brownson RC, Green LW, Ammerman AS, Weiner BJ, Mittman B: The U.S. training institute for dissemination and implementation research in health. Implement Sci 2013, 8:12. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [20]Proctor EK, Powell BJ, Baumann AA, Hamilton AM, Santens RL: Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients. Implement Sci 2012, 7:96. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [21]Tinkle M, Kimball R, Haozous EA, Shuster G, Meize-Grochowski R: Dissemination and implementation research funded by the US National Institutes of Health, 2005–2012. Nurs Res Pract 2013, 2013:909606.
  • [22]Glasgow RE, Riley WT: Pragmatic measures what they are and why we need them. Am J Prev Med 2013, 45:237-43.
  • [23]Rabin BA, Purcell P, Naveed S, Moser RP, Henton MD, Proctor EK, Brownson RC, Glasgow RE: Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures. Implement Sci 2012, 7:119. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [24]Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CHI: Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci 2013, 8:22. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [25]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. In The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General (Editor ed.^eds.). City: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.
  • [26]Green LW, Glasgow RE: Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research - Issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof 2006, 29:126-53.
  • [27]Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, Altman DG, Tunis S, Haynes B, Oxman AD, Moher D, Grp C, Practi PTH: Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Br Med J 2008, 337:1-8.
  • [28]Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, Treweek S, Furberg CD, Altman DG, Tunis S, Bergel E, Harvey I, Magid DJ, Chalkidou K: A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. Can Med Assoc J 2009, 180:E47-57.
  • [29]Chambers DA, Glasgow RE, Stange KC: The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implement Sci 2013, 8:117. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [30]Albright K, Gechter K, Kempe A: Importance of mixed methods in pragmatic trials and dissemination and implementation research. Acad Pediatr 2013, 13:400-7.
  • [31]Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Smith KC: Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences. Bethesda (Maryland), National Institutes of Health; 2011.
  • [32]Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC: Bridging research and practice models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med 2012, 43:337-50.
  • [33]GEM-Dissemination and Implementation Initiative (GEM-D&I) [https://www.gem-beta.org/public/wsoverview.aspx?wid=11&cat=8]
  • [34]Dissemination & Implementation Portal [http://tracs.unc.edu/index.php/d-iportal/d-i-portal]
  • [35]The SIRC instrument review project: a systematic review of Dissemination and Implementation Science Instruments [http://www.societyforimplementationresearchcollaboration.org/sirc-projects/sirc-instrument-project/]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:31次 浏览次数:10次