Women’s injection drug practices in their own words: a qualitative study

Harm Reduction Journal

Ellen Tuchman¹ 

[1] Silver School of Social Work, New York University, 1 Washington Square North, Room 402, New York 1003, NY, USA

关键词: Qualitative;    Gender differences;    Syringe exchange;    Harm reduction;    Women;    Self-injection;    Initiation;    Injection drug practices;   

Others  :  1149828
DOI  :  10.1186/s12954-015-0041-6

 received in 2014-08-05, accepted in 2015-02-11,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

There are significant gender differences in injection drug practices and relative risks involved for women who inject drug compared with men. This qualitative study aims to explore the social, contextual, and behavioral dimensions of injecting practices among women who inject drugs.

Methods

Participants were selected by purposive venue-based sampling from a syringe exchange program in 2012–2013. In-depth interviews were conducted with 26 women to elicit detailed perspectives regarding injection drug use practices and women-focused decision-making. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed with Atlas.ti.

Results

Participant’s mean age was 43.2 years, 48% Caucasian, 36% African American, and 16% Latina, poorly educated, mostly single, and heroin self-injectors. Three themes emerged; a) transitioning from non-injection to injection drug use; b) patterns and variations of initiation to injecting; and c) shifting toward autonomy or reliance on others. Women were predominantly influenced to transition to injection drug use by other women with their claims that injecting was a way to curtail their daily drug expenditure. More than half the women received their first injection from another woman in their social network rather than a male sexual partner. Self-injecting women exhibited agency around the circumstances of injection safety and potential risks. Other women revealed that their inability to inject themselves could and did make them dependent on others for unsafe injection practices.

Conclusions

The finding that many women were influenced to transition to injection drug use and receive the first injection from a woman is contrary to literature claims that male sexual partners introduce and initiate women to injection drug use. Self-injecting women possessed capacity to act in a way that produced the results they wanted, not sharing prepared drugs or injecting equipment. In stark contrast, women assisted with injections could and did make them vulnerable to unsafe injecting. Findings support early prevention strategies that discourage women’s transition from non-injection to injection and development of female peer-driven experiential interventions to dispel myths for non-injection women and to increase personal capability to self-inject for women who require assistance with injecting, to reduce injection-related harm.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Tuchman; licensee BioMed Central.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Roberts A, Mathers B, Degenhardt L: Women who inject drugs: A review of their risks, experiences and needs. A report prepared on behalf of the Reference Group to the United Nations on HIV and Injecting Drug Use. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), University of New South Wales, Australia Sydney; 2010.
• [2]Des Jarlais DC, Feelemyer JP, Modi SN, Arasteh K, Hagan H: Are females who inject drugs as higher risk for HIV infection than males who inject drugs: an international systematic review of high seroprevalence areas. Drug Alcohol Depend 2012, 124:95-107.
• [3]Fitzgerald T, Lundgren L, Chassler D: Factors associated with HIV/AIDS high-risk behaviours among female injection drug users. AIDS Care 2007, 19:67-74.
• [4]Spittal PM, Craib KJP, Wood E, Laliberte N, Li K, Tyndall MW, et al.: Risk factors for elevated HIV incidence rates among female injection drug users in Vancouver. CMAJ Open 2002, 166:894-9.
• [5]Aceijas C, Stimson GV, Hickman M, Rhodes T: Global overview of injecting drug use and HIV infection among injecting drug users. AIDS 2004, 18:2295-303.
• [6]Center for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS and women. 2010b. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/women/.
• [7]Center for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance report. 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/wk/mm6021.pdf.
• [8]Center for Disease Control and Prevention: HIV infection among injection-drug users—34 states, 2004–2007 Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009, 58:1291-5.
• [9]Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Phillips B, Wiessing L, Hickman M, Strathdee SA, et al.: Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. Lancet 2008, 372:1733-45.
• [10]Hunt N, Stillwell G, Taylor C, Griffiths P: Evaluation of a brief intervention to reduce initiation into injecting. Drugs Educ Prev Policy 1998, 5:85-94.
• [11]Epele ME: Gender, violence, and HIV: women’s survival in the streets. Cult Med Psychiatry 2002, 26:33-54.
• [12]MacRae R, Aalto E: Gendered power dynamics and the HIV risk in drug using sexual relationships. AIDS Care 2000, 12:505-15.
• [13]Doherty MC, Garfein RS, Monterroso E, Brown D, Vlahov D: Correlates of HIV infection among young adult short-term injection drug users. AIDS 2000, 14:717-26.
• [14]Roy E, Haley N, Leclerc P, Cédras L, Boivin J: Drug injection among street youth: the first time. Addiction 2002, 97:1003-9.
• [15]Sheard L, Tompkins C: Contradictions and misperception: an exploration of injecting practices, cleanliness, risk and partnership in the lives of women drug users. Qual Health Res 2008, 18:1546-7.
• [16]Epele ME: Scars, harm, and pain: about being injected among drug-using Latina women. J Ethn Subst Abuse 2002, 1:47-58.
• [17]Fairbairn N, Small W, Van Borek N, Wood E, Kerr K: Social structural factors that shape assisted injecting practices among injection drug users in Vancouver. Canada: a qualitative study. Harm Reduct J 2010, 7:20. BioMed Central Full Text
• [18]Creswell JW: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA; 1998.
• [19]Charmaz K: Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage, London; 2006.
• [20]Strauss AL, Corbin J: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, London; 1990.
• [21]Padgett DK: Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research. 2nd edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA; 2008.
• [22]Frajzyngier VM, Neaigus A, Gyarmathy VA, Miller M, Friedman SR: Gender differences in injection risk behaviors at the first injection episode. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007, 89:145-52.
• [23]Bryant J, Treloar C: The gendered context of initiation to injecting drug use: evidence for women as active initiates. Drug Alcohol Rev 2007, 26:287-93.
• [24]Vidal‐Trecan GM, Varescon‐Pousson I, Boissonnas A: Injection risk behaviors at the first and at the most recent injections among drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002, 66:107-9.
• [25]Doherty MC, Garfein RS, Monterroso E, Latkin C, Vlahov D: Gender differences in the initiation of injection drug use among young adults. J Urban Health 2000, 77:396-414.
• [26]Evans JL, Hahn JA, Page-Shafer K, Lum PJ, Stein ES, Davidson PJ, et al.: Gender differences in sexual injection risk behavior among active young injection drug users in San Francisco (the UFO study). J Urban Health 2003, 80:137-46.
• [27]Bennett GA, Velleman RD, Barter G, Bradbury C: Gender differences in sharing injecting equipment by drug users in England. AIDS Care 2000, 12:77-87.
• [28]Tuchman E: Women and substance abuse: the importance of gender issues in drug addiction research. J Addict Dis 2010, 29:1-12.
• [29]El-Bassel N, Shaw SA, Dasgupta A, Strathdee S: People who inject drugs in intimate relationships: it takes two to combat HIV. Current HIV/AIDS Reports 2014, 11:45-51.
• [30]Pinkham S, Stoicescu C, Myers B: Developing effective health interventions for women who inject drugs: key areas and recommendations for program development and policy. Adv Prev Med 2012, 269:123-33.