Forage and breed effects on behavior and temperament of pregnant beef heifers

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

Charles F Rosenkrans¹  Glen E Aiken³  Wayne K Coblentz⁴  Kenneth P Coffey¹  Benjamin C Williamson²  Michael L Looper¹  Angela R Mays¹ 

[1] Department of Animal Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA;Department of Agricultural Sciences, Morehead State University, 327 Reed Hall, Morehead, KY, 40351, USA;USDA-ARS, Forage Animal Production Research Unit, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA;USDA-ARS, US Dairy Forage Research Center, Marshfield, WI, 54449, USA

关键词: Temperament;    Prolactin;    Grazing behavior;    Endophyte-infected tall fescue;    Cattle;   

Others  :  805503
DOI  :  10.1186/2049-1891-4-20

 received in 2013-03-15, accepted in 2013-05-23,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Integration of behavioral observations with traditional selection schemes may lead to enhanced animal well-being and more profitable forage-based cattle production systems. Brahman-influenced (BR; n = 64) and Gelbvieh × Angus (GA; n = 64) heifers consumed either toxic endophyte-infected tall fescue (E+) or one of two nontoxic endophyte-infected tall fescue (NT) cultivars during two yr. Heifers were weighed at midpoint and termination of grazing. Grazing behavior (grazing, resting in the shade, lying, or standing without grazing) was recorded (n = 13 visual observations per yr in June and July) for each pasture. During yr 2, exit velocity (EV) and serum prolactin (PRL) were determined.

Results

Grazing behavior was influenced (P < 0.05) by an interaction between fescue cultivar and breed type. Gelbvieh × Angus heifers assigned to E+ pastures had the lowest percentage of animals grazing and the largest percentage of animals resting in the shade. Brahman-influenced heifers had faster EV (P < 0.001) than GA heifers (0.52 vs. 0.74 ± 0.04 s/m, respectively). Body weight (BW) was affected (P < 0.01) by an interaction of tall fescue cultivar and d, and an interaction of tall fescue cultivar and breed type. Heifers grazing NT pastures were heavier (P < 0.01) than heifers grazing E+ pastures at midpoint and termination. Gelbvieh × Angus heifers grazing NT pastures were heavier (P < 0.01) than GA and BR heifers grazing E+ and BR heifers grazing NT pastures. An interaction of forage cultivar and breed type occurred on serum PRL (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Collectively fescue cultivar, EV, and concentrations of serum PRL were associated with grazing behavior. Heifers grazing NT pastures were observed to be grazing more than heifers assigned to E+ pastures, regardless of breed type, which may have contributed to changes in BW and average daily gain (ADG) in heifers. Integration of behavioral observations along with traditional selection schemes may lead to enhanced animal well-being and more profitable forage-based cattle production systems.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Mays et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Hoveland CS, McCann MA, Hill NS: Rotational vs. continuous stocking of beef cows and calves on mixed endophyte-free tall fescue-bermudagrass pasture. J Prod Agric 1997, 10:245-250.
• [2]Morgan-Jones G, Gams W: Notes on Hyphomycetes, XLI. An endophyte of Festuca arundinacea and the anamorph of Epichloe typhina, a new taxa in one of two new sections of Acremonium. Mycotaxon 1982, 15:311-318.
• [3]Browning R Jr: Effects of endophyte-infected tall fescue on indicators of thermal status and growth in Hereford and Senepol steers. J Anim Sci 2004, 82:634-643.
• [4]Burke NC, Scaglia G, Saker KE, Blodgett DJ, Swecker WS Jr: Influence of endophyte consumption and heat stress on intravaginal temperatures, plasma lipid oxidation, blood selenium, and glutathione redox of mononuclear cells in heifers grazing tall fescue. J Anim Sci 2007, 85:2932-2940.
• [5]Looper ML, Reiter ST, Williamson BC, Sales MA, Hallford DM, Rosenkrans CF Jr: Effects of body condition on measures of intramuscular and rump fat, endocrine factors, and calving rate of beef cows grazing common bermudagrass or endophyte-infected tall fescue. J Anim Sci 2010, 88:4133-4141.
• [6]Nihsen ME, Piper EL, West CP, Crawford RJ Jr, Denard TM, Johnson ZB, Roberts CA, Spiers DA, Rosenkrans CF Jr: Growth rate and physiology of steers grazing tall fescue inoculated with novel endophytes. J Anim Sci 2004, 82:878-883.
• [7]Strickland JR, Looper ML, Matthews JC: Rosenkrans Jr. CF, Flythe MD, Brown KR: BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: St. Anthony’s Fire in livestock: Causes, mechanisms and potential solutions. J Anim Sci 2011, 89:1603-1626.
• [8]Brown MA, Brown AH Jr, Jackson WG, Miesner JR: Genotype × environment interactions in Angus, Brahman, and reciprocal cross cows and their calves grazing common bermudagrass and endophyte-infected tall fescue pastures. J Anim Sci 1997, 75:920-925.
• [9]Brown MA, Tharel LM, Brown AH Jr, Jackson WG, Miesner JR: Milk production in Brahman and Angus cows on endophyte-infected fescue and common bermudagrass. J Anim Sci 1993, 71:1117-1122.
• [10]Looper ML, Rorie RW, Person CN, Lester TD, Hallford DM, Aiken GE, Roberts CA, Rottinghaus GE, Rosenkrans CF Jr: Influence of toxic endophyte-infected fescue on sperm characteristics and endocrine factors in yearling Brahman-influenced bulls. J Anim Sci 2009, 87:1184-1191.
• [11]Bouton JH, Latch GCM, Hill NS, Hoveland CS, McCann MA, Watson RH, Parish JA, Hawkins LL, Thompson FN: Reinfection of tall fescue cultivars with nonergot alkaloid-producing endophytes. Agron J 2002, 94:567-574.
• [12]Gunter SA, Beck PA: Novel endophyte-infected tall fescue for growing beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2004, 82:E75-82.
• [13]Voisinet BD, Grandin T, Tatum JD, Connor SFO, Struthers JJ: Feedlot cattle with calm temperaments have higher average daily gain than cattle with excitable temperaments. J Anim Sci 1997, 75:892-896.
• [14]Breuer K, Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Matthews LR, Coleman GJ: Behavioral response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2000, 66:273-288.
• [15]Hill NS, Rottinghaus GE, Agee CS, Schultz LM: Simplified sample preparation for HPLC analysis and ergovaline in tall fescue. Crop Sci 1993, 33:331-333.
• [16]Curley KO Jr, Paschal JC, Welsh TH Jr, Randel RD: Technical note: Exit velocity as a measure of cattle temperament is repeatable and associated with serum concentration of cortisol in Brahman bulls. J Anim Sci 2006, 84:3100-3101.
• [17]Bernard JK, Chestnut AB, Erickson BH, Kelly FN: Effects of prepartum consumption of endophyte-infected tall fescue on serum prolactin and subsequent milk production. J Dairy Sci 1993, 76:1928-1933.
• [18]Seman DH, Stuedemann JA, Hill NS: Behavior of steers grazing monocultures and binary mixtures of tall fescue. J Anim Sci 1999, 77:1402-1411.
• [19]Coffey KP, Moyer JL, Brazle FK, Lomas LW: Amount and diurnal distribution of grazing time by stocker cattle under different tall fescue management strategies. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1992, 33:121-135.
• [20]Lyons PC, Plattner RD, Bacon CW: Occurrence of peptide and clavinet ergot alkaloids in tall fescue. Science 1986, 232:487-489.
• [21]Porter JK: Analysis of endophyte toxins: Fescue and other grasses toxic to livestock. J Anim Sci 1995, 73:871-880.
• [22]Aiken GE, Looper ML, Tabler SF, Brauer DK, Strickland JR, Schrick FN: Influence of stocking rate and steroidal implants on growth rate of steers grazing toxic tall fescue and subsequent physiological responses. J Anim Sci 2006, 84:1626-1632.
• [23]Gadberry MS, Denard TM, Spiers DE, Piper EL: Effects of feeding ergovaline on lamb performance in a heat stress environment. J Anim Sci 2003, 81:1538-1545.
• [24]Tor-Agbidye J, Blythe LL, Craig AM: Correlation of endophyte toxins (ergovaline and lolitrem B) with clinical disease: Fescue foot and perennial ryegrass staggers. Vet Human Toxicol 2001, 43:140-146.
• [25]Ferrell CL, Garret WN, Hinma N, Grichting G: Energy utilization by pregnant and non-pregnant heifers. J Anim Sci 1976, 42:937-950.
• [26]Seman DH, Stuedemann JA, Anderson JE: Spectral analysis of bovine grazing behavior on Neotyphodium coenophialum infested tall fescue. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1997, 54:73-87.
• [27]Yayou K, It S, Yamamot N, Kitagawa S, Okamura H: Relationships of stress responses with plasma oxytocin and prolactin in heifer calves. Physiol Behav 2010, 99:362-369.
• [28]Burrow HM: Measurements of temperament and their relationships with performance traits of beef cattle. Anim Breed Abstr 1997, 65:477-495.