期刊论文详细信息
BMC Veterinary Research
Use of dicarboxylic acids and polyphenols to attenuate reticular pH drop and acute phase response in dairy heifers fed a high grain diet
Severino Segato2  Igino Andrighetto2  Rebecca Ricci2  Ehsan Khafipour1  Shucong Li1  Jan C Plaizier1  Giorgio Marchesini2  Roberta De Nardi2 
[1] Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada;Department of Animal Medicine Production and Health, University of Padova, Legnaro (PD) 35020, Italy
关键词: Heifer;    High grain diet;    Polyphenol;    Fumarate-malate;    Acute phase protein;    Reticular pH;   
Others  :  1103394
DOI  :  10.1186/s12917-014-0277-5
 received in 2014-08-13, accepted in 2014-11-10,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The aim of this study was to determine the ability of two feed additives, a fumarate-malate (FM) and a polyphenol-essential oil mixture (PM), in attenuating the drop of ruminal pH and the metabolic and immune response resulting from an excessively high grain diet. Six heifers were used in a 3 × 3 Latin square experiment and fed a low starch (LS) diet for 14 d, followed by a high starch (HS) diet for 8 d (NDF 33.6%, starch 30.0% DM). In the last 5 days of each period, barley meal was added to decrease rumen pH. During HS feeding all animals were randomly assigned to one of the following three dietary treatments: no supplement/control (CT), a daily dose of 60 g/d of FM, or 100 g/d of PM. Reticular pH was continuously recorded using wireless boluses. On d 21 of each period, rumen fluid was collected by rumenocentesis (1400 h), together with blood (0800 h) and fecal samples (0800, 1400, and 2100 h).

Results

The correlation coefficient of pH values obtained using the boluses and rumenocentesis was 0.83. Compared with CT and PM, the FM treatment led to a lower DMI. Nadir pH was lowest during CT (5.40, 5.69, and 5.62 for CT, FM and PM, respectively), confirming the effectiveness of both supplements in reducing the pH drop caused by high grain feeding. This result was confirmed by the highest average time spent daily below 5.6 pH (199, 16 and 18 min/d) and by the highest acetate to propionate ratio of the CT fed heifers. The PM decreased the concentrations of neutrophils (2.9, 3.2, and 2.8 109/L) and acute phase proteins: SAA (37.1, 28.6 and 20.1 μg/mL), LBP (4.1, 3.8, and 2.9 μg/mL), and Hp (675, 695 and 601 μg/mL). Free lipopolysaccharides (LPS) were detected in blood and feces, but their concentrations were not affected by treatments, as the remaining blood variables.

Conclusions

Data suggest that both additives could be useful in attenuating the effects of excessive grain feeding on rumen pH, but the PM supplement was more effective than FM in reducing the inflammatory response compared to CT.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 De Nardi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150201030334781.pdf 248KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Krause KM, Oetzel GR: Understanding and preventing subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2006, 126:215-236.
  • [2]Khafipour E, Li S, Plaizier JC, Krause DO: Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75:7115-7124.
  • [3]Nordlund KV, Garrett EF, Oetzel GR: Herd-based rumenocentesis: a clinical approach to the diagnosis of subacute rumen acidosis. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1995, 17:S48-S56.
  • [4]Esposito G, Irons PC, Webb EC, Chapwanya A: Interactions between negative energy balance, metabolic diseases, uterine health and immune response in transition dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2014, 144:60-71.
  • [5]Aikman PC, Henning PH, Humphries DJ, Horn CH: Rumen pH and fermentation characteristics in dairy cows supplemented with Megasphaera elsdenii NCIMB 41125 in early lactation. J Dairy Sci 2011, 94:2840-2849.
  • [6]Plaizier JC, Krause DO, Gozho GN, McBride BW: Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows: the physiological causes, incidence and consequences. Vet J 2008, 176:21-31.
  • [7]Marchesini G, De Nardi R, Gianesella M, Stefani AL, Morgante M, Barberio A, Andrighetto I, Segato S: Effect of induced ruminal acidosis on blood variables in heifers. BMC Vet Res 2013, 9:1-9. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [8]Enemark JMD: The monitoring, prevention and treatment of subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA): a review. Vet J 2008, 176:32-43.
  • [9]Li S, Khafipour E, Krause DO, Kroeker A, Rodriguez-Lecompte JC, Gozho GN, Plaizier JC: Effects of subacute ruminal acidosis challenges on fermentation and endotoxins in the rumen and hindgut of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012, 95:294-303.
  • [10]Plaizier JC, Khafipour E, Li S, Gozho GN, Krause DO: Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA), and endotoxin and health consequences. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2012, 172:9-21.
  • [11]Marchesini G, Segato S, Berzaghi P, Andrighetto I: Effect of non-forage roughage replacement on feeding behaviour and milk production in dairy cows. Ital J Anim Sci 2011, 10:171-175.
  • [12]De Nardi R, Marchesini G, Stefani A-L, Barberio A, Andrighetto I, Segato S: Effect of feeding fine maize particles on the reticular pH, milk yield and composition of dairy cows. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2014, 98(3):504-510.
  • [13]Golder HM, Celi P, Rabiee AR, Lean IJ: Effects of feed additives on rumen and blood profiles during a starch and fructose challenge. J Dairy Sci 2013, 97:985-1004.
  • [14]Bach A, Iglesias C, Devant M: Daily rumen pH pattern of loose-housed dairy cattle as affected by feeding pattern and live yeast supplementation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2007, 136:146-153.
  • [15]Long M, Feng WJ, Li P, Zhang Y, He RX, Yu LH, He JB, Jing WY, Li YM, Wang Z, Liu W: Effects of the acid-tolerant engineered bacterial strain Megasphaera elsdenii H6F32 on ruminal pH and the lactic acid concentration of simulated rumen acidosis in vitro. Res Vet Sci 2014, 96:28-29.
  • [16]Nisbet DJ, Callaway TR, Edrington TS, Anderson RC, Krueger N: Effects of the dicarboxylic acids malate and fumarate on E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica typhimurium populations in pure culture and in mixed ruminal microorganism fermentations. Curr Microbiol 2009, 58:488-492.
  • [17]Balcells J, Aris A, Serrano A, Seradj AR, Crespo J, Devant M: Effects of an extract of plant flavonoids (Bioflavex) on rumen fermentation and performance in heifers fed high-concentrate diets. J Anim Sci 2012, 90:4975-4984.
  • [18]Calsamiglia S, Busquet M, Cardozo PW, Castillejos L, Ferret A: Invited review: essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation. J Dairy Sci 2007, 90:2580-2595.
  • [19]Nisbet DJ, Martin SA: Effects of fumarate, L-malate, and an Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on D-lactate utilization by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Curr Microbiol 1993, 26:133-136.
  • [20]Martin SA: Manipulation of ruminal fermentation with organic acids: a review. J Anim Sci 1998, 76:3123-3132.
  • [21]Harborne JB, Williams CA: Advances in flavonoid research since 1992. Phytochem 2000, 55:481-504.
  • [22]Marchesini G, De Nardi R, Signorin E, Ricci R, Andrighetto I, Serva L, Segato S: Effects of carbohydrase-inhibiting compounds on in vitro rumen fermentation. Ital J Anim Sci 2014, 13:614-619.
  • [23]Martin SA, Streeter MN, Nisbet DJ, Hill GM, Williams SE: Effects of dl-malate on ruminal metabolism and performance of cattle fed a high-concentrate diet. J Anim Sci 1999, 77:1008-1015.
  • [24]Foley PA, Kenny DA, Callan JJ, Boland TM, O’Mara FP: Effect of dl-malic acid supplementation on feed intake, methane emission, and rumen fermentation in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2009, 87:1048-1057.
  • [25]AOAC International: Official Methods of Analysis (2ndrevision). 17th edition. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2003.
  • [26]Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA: Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991, 74:3583-3597.
  • [27]Official Methods of Analysis. 18th edition. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 2005.
  • [28]De Nardi R, Marchesini G, Gianesella M, Ricci R, Montemurro F, Contiero B, Andrighetto I, Segato S: Blood parameters modification at different ruminal acidosis conditions. Agric Conspec Sci 2013, 78:259-262.
  • [29]Gozho GN, Krause DO, Plaizier JC: Rumen lipopolysaccharide and inflammation during grain adaptation and subacute ruminal acidosis in steers. J Dairy Sci 2006, 89:4404-4413.
  • [30]Gozho GN, Plaizier JC, Krause DO, Kennedy AD, Wittenberg KM: Subacute ruminal acidosis induces ruminal lipopolysaccharide release and triggers an inflammatory response. J Dairy Sci 2005, 88:1399-1403.
  • [31]Dohme F, DeVries TJ, Beauchemin KA: Repeated ruminal acidosis challenges in lactating dairy cows at high and low risk for developing acidosis: ruminal pH. J Dairy Sci 2008, 91:3554-3567.
  • [32]Sato S, Ikeda A, Tsuchiya Y, Ikuta K, Murayama I, Kanehira M, Okada K, Mizuguchi H: Diagnosis of subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) by continuous reticular pH measurements in cows. Vet Res Commun 2012, 36:201-205.
  • [33]Duffield T, Plaizier JC, Bagg R, Vessie G, Dick P, Wilson J, Aramini J, McBride BW: Comparison of techniques for measurement of rumen pH in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2004, 87:59-66.
  • [34][http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/392371] webcite Gianesella M, Morgante M, Cannizzo C, Stefani A, Dalvit P, Messina V, Giudice E: Subacute ruminal acidosis and evaluation of blood gas analysis in dairy cow.Vet Med Int 2010. []
  • [35]Moran R: Considerations in the Simultaneous Measurement of Blood Gases, Electrolytes, and Related Analytes in Whole Blood: Proposed Guideline. NCCLC, Miami; 1993.
  • [36]Gozho GN, Krause DO, Plaizier JC: Ruminal lipopolysaccharide concentration and inflammatory response during grain-induced subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2007, 90:856-866.
  • [37]Khafipour E, Krause DO, Plaizier JC: A grain-based subacute ruminal acidosis challenge causes translocation of lipopolysaccharide and triggers inflammation. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:1060-1070.
  • [38]Li S, Khafipour E, Krause DO, Rodriguez-Lecompte JC, Plaizier JC: Free endotoxins in the feces of lactating dairy cows. Can J Anim Sci 2010, 90:591-594.
  • [39]Li S, Gozho GN, Gakhar N, Khafipour E, Krause DO, Plaizier JC: Evaluation of diagnostic measures for subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows. Can J Anim Sci 2012, 92:353-364.
  • [40]Steele MA, AlZahal O, Hook SE, Croom J, McBride BW: Ruminal acidosis and the rapid onset of ruminal parakeratosis in a mature dairy cow: a case report. Acta Vet Scand 2009, 51(1):39. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [41]Dong G, Liu S, Wu Y, Lei C, Zhou J, Zhang S: Diet-induced bacterial immunogens in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows: impacts on immunity and metabolism. Acta Vet Scand 2011, 53(1):48. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [42]Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM: Methane emissions from beef cattle: effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola. J Anim Sci 2006, 84:1489-1496.
  • [43]Nagaraja TG, Titgemeyer EC: Ruminal acidosis in beef cattle: the current microbiological and nutritional outlook. J Dairy Sci 2007, 90:E17-E38.
  • [44]Oetzel GR, Nordlund KV, Garrett EF: Effect of ruminal pH and stage of lactation on ruminal lactate concentrations in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1999, 82(Suppl. 1):38.
  • [45]Boccazzi P, Patterson J: Isolation and initial characterization of acetogenic ruminal bacteria resistant to acidic conditions. Agric Food Anal Bacteriol 2013, 2:129-144.
  • [46]Ceciliani F, Ceron JJ, Eckersall PD, Sauerwein H: Acute phase proteins in ruminants. J Proteomics 2012, 75:4207-4231.
  • [47]Tóthová C, Nagy O, Kováč G: The use of acute phase proteins as biomarkers of diseases in cattle and swine. In Acute Phase Proteins. Edited by Janciauskiene S. Tech Publisher, Rijeka, Croatia; 2013:103-138.
  • [48]Zebeli Q, Ametaj BN: Relationships between rumen lipopolysaccharide and mediators of inflammatory response with milk fat production and efficiency in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:3800-3809.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:4次