期刊论文详细信息
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Mediators of the effect of the JUMP-in intervention on physical activity and sedentary behavior in Dutch primary schoolchildren from disadvantaged neighborhoods
Mai JM Chinapaw2  Dirk L Knol3  Willem van Mechelen2  Marcel F van der Wal1  Saskia J te Velde3  Judith de Meij1  Maartje M van Stralen2 
[1] Department of Epidemiology, Documentation and Health Promotion, Municipal Health Service Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research and the Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
关键词: Television;    Sitting;    Sedentary;    Sport;    Physical activity;    Intervention;    Youth;    Working mechanisms;    Mediating;   
Others  :  811522
DOI  :  10.1186/1479-5868-9-131
 received in 2012-03-14, accepted in 2012-10-24,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Important health benefits can be achieved when physical activity in children from low socio-economic status is promoted and sedentariness is limited. By specifying the mediating mechanisms of existing interventions one can improve future physical activity interventions. This study explored potential mediators of the long-term effect of the school-based multicomponent JUMP-in intervention on sport participation, outdoor play and screen time in Dutch primary schoolchildren from disadvantaged neighborhoods.

Methods

In total, 600 primary schoolchildren (aged 9.8 ± 0.7, 51% girls, 13% Dutch ethnicity, 35% overweight) from 9 intervention and 10 control schools were included in the analyses. JUMP-in was developed using Intervention Mapping, and targeted psychological and environmental determinants of physical activity. Outcome behaviors were self-reported sport participation, outdoor play, TV-viewing behavior and computer use. Potential mediators were self-reported psychological, social and physical environmental factors.

Results

JUMP-in was effective in improving sport participation after 20 months, but not in improving outdoor play, or reducing TV-viewing or computer time. JUMP-in was not effective in changing hypothesized mediators so no significant mediated effects could be identified. However, changes in self-efficacy, social support and habit strength were positively associated with changes in sport participation, and changes in social support, self-efficacy, perceived planning skills, enjoyment and habit strength were positively associated with changes in outdoor play. Changes in enjoyment was positively associated with changes in TV-viewing while parental rules were negatively associated. Having a computer in the bedroom and enjoyment were positively associated with changes in computer use, while changes in parental rules were negatively associated.

Conclusions

Besides a significant positive effect on sports participation, no significant intervention effect on outdoor play, screen time or any of the potential mediators was found. This suggest that other (unmeasured) factors operated as mediating mechanisms of the intervention, that we used unsuccessful intervention strategies, that the strategies were inappropriately implemented, or that children are unable to accurately recall past activities and cognitions. Additionally, the school setting might not be the sole channel to influence leisure time activities. Still, several personal and environmental constructs were found to be relevant in predicting change in sport participation, outdoor play and screen behavior and seem to be potential mediators. Future interventions are recommended including more effective strategies targeting these relevant constructs, addressing different constructs (e.g. pedagogic skills of parents), and focusing on different implementation settings.

Trail registration

ISRCTN17489378

【 授权许可】

   
2012 van Stralen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140709065105200.pdf 1148KB PDF download
Figure 4. 36KB Image download
Figure 3. 40KB Image download
Figure 2. 46KB Image download
Figure 1. 23KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Biddle SJ, Asare M: Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: a review of reviews. Br J Sports Med 2011, 45:886-895.
  • [2]Fedewa AL, Ahn S: The effects of physical activity and physical fitness on children's achievement and cognitive outcomes: a meta-analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport 2011, 82:521-535.
  • [3]Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo MJ, Sjostrom M: Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008, 32:1-11.
  • [4]Reilly JJ: Descriptive epidemiology and health consequences of childhood obesity. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005, 19:327-341.
  • [5]Chinapaw MJ, Proper KI, Brug J, van Mechelen W, Singh AS: Relationship between young peoples' sedentary behaviour and biomedical health indicators: a systematic review of prospective studies. Obes Rev 2011, 12:e621-e632.
  • [6]Brug J, van Stralen MM, Chinapaw MJ, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Lien N, Bere E, et al.: Differences in weight status and energy-balance related behaviors according to ethnic background among adolescents in seven countries in Europe: The ENERGY-project. Pediatric Obesity 2012, 7(5):399-411.
  • [7]Brug J, Lien N, Klepp KI, van Lenthe FJ: Exploring overweight, obesity and their behavioural correlates among children and adolescents: results from the health-promotion through obesity prevention across Europe project. Public Health Nutr 2010, 13:1676-1679.
  • [8]Delva J, O'Malley PM, Johnston LD: Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status differences in overweight and health-related behaviors among American students: national trends 1986–2003. J Adolesc Health 2006, 39:536-545.
  • [9]Gordon-Larsen P, Adair LS, Popkin BM: The relationship of ethnicity, socioeconomic factors, and overweight in US adolescents. Obes Res 2003, 11:121-129.
  • [10]Haug E, Rasmussen M, Samdal O, Iannotti R, Kelly C, Borraccino A, et al.: Overweight in school-aged children and its relationship with demographic and lifestyle factors: results from the WHO-collaborative health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study. Int J Public Health 2009, 54(Suppl 2):167-179.
  • [11]Lobstein T, Frelut ML: Prevalence of overweight among children in Europe. Obes Rev 2003, 4:195-200.
  • [12]Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC: A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2000, 32:963-975.
  • [13]van der Horst K, Oenema A, Velde SJT, Brug J: Gender, ethnic and school type differences in overweight and energy balance-related behaviours among Dutch adolescents. Int J Pediatr Obes 2009, 4:371-380.
  • [14]Summerbell CD, Waters E, Edmunds LD, Kelly S, Brown T, Campbell KJ: Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005, 3:CD001871.
  • [15]Waters E, de Silva-Sanigorski A, Hall BJ, Brown T, Campbell KJ, Gao Y, et al.: Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, 12:CD001871.
  • [16]Baranowski T, Anderson C, Carmack C: Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions. How are we doing? How might we do better? Am J Prev Med 1998, 15:266-297.
  • [17]Mackinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS: Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol 2007, 58:593-614.
  • [18]Hafeman DM, Schwartz S: Opening the black Box: a motivation for the assessment of mediation. Int J Epidemiol 2009, 38:838-845.
  • [19]van Stralen MM, Yildirim M, te Velde SJ, Brug J, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ: What works in school-based energy balance behaviour interventions and what does not? A systematic review of mediating mechanisms. Int J Obes (Lond) 2011, 35:1251-1265.
  • [20]Robinson T, Borzekowski DLG: Effects of the SMART classroom curriculum to reduce child and family screen time. J Commun 2006, 56:1-26.
  • [21]de Meij JS, Chinapaw MJ, Kremers SP, van der Wal MF, Jurg ME, van Mechelen W: Promoting physical activity in children: the stepwise development of the primary school-based JUMP-in intervention applying the RE-AIM evaluation framework. Br J Sports Med 2010, 44:879-887.
  • [22]de Meij JS, Chinapaw MJ, van Stralen MM, van der Wal MF, van Dieren L, van Mechelen W: Effectiveness of JUMP-in, a Dutch primary school-based community intervention aimed at the promotion of physical activity. Br J Sports Med 2011, 45:1052-1057.
  • [23]Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Fernandez ME: Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. 3rd edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2011.
  • [24]Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM: Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999, 89:1322-1327.
  • [25]de Vries H, Mudde AN, Dijkstra A, Willemsen MC: Differential beliefs, perceived social influences, and self-efficacy expectations among smokers in various motivational phases. Prev Med 1998, 27:681-689.
  • [26]Kremers SP, de Bruijn GJ, Visscher TL, van Mechelen W, de Vries NK, Brug J: Environmental influences on energy balance-related behaviors: a dual-process view. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2006, 3:9. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [27]Jurg ME, Kremers SP, Candel MJ, van der Wal MF, de Meij JS: A controlled trial of a school-based environmental intervention to improve physical activity in Dutch children: JUMP-in, kids in motion. Health Promot Int 2006, 21:320-330.
  • [28]Jurg ME, de Meij JS, van der Wal MF, Koelen MA: Using health promotion outcomes in formative evaluation studies to predict success factors in interventions: an application to an intervention for promoting physical activity in Dutch children (JUMP-in). Health Promot Int 2008, 23:231-239.
  • [29]Swinburn B, Egger G, Raza F: Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Prev Med 1999, 29:563-570.
  • [30]Sallis JF: Self-report measures of children's physical activity. J Sch Health 1991, 61:215-219.
  • [31]Sallis JF, Strikmiller PK, Harsha DW, Feldman HA, Ehlinger S, Stone EJ, et al.: Validation of interviewer- and self-administered physical activity checklists for fifth grade students. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996, 28:840-851.
  • [32]Tremblay MS, Inman JW, Willms JD: Preliminary evaluation of a video questionnaire to assess activity levels of children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001, 33:2139-2144.
  • [33]Welk GJ, Corbin CB, Dale D: Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000, 71:S59-S73.
  • [34]Sirard JR, Pate RR: Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Sports Med 2001, 31:439-454.
  • [35]Muthén LK, Muthén BO: Mplus User's guide. 5th edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2009.
  • [36]Cerin E, Mackinnon DP: A commentary on current practice in mediating variable analyses in behavioural nutrition and physical activity. Public Health Nutr 2009, 12:1182-1188.
  • [37]Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: Using multivariate statistics. 5th edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2007.
  • [38]Hu LT, Bentler PM: Cutoff criteria for Fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus New alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling-A Multidisciplinary Journal 1999, 6:1-55.
  • [39]De Meij JS, van der Wal MF, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ: A mixed methods process evaluation of the implementation of JUMP-in, a multi-level school-based intervention aimed at physical activity promotion. Health promotion practice; in press
  • [40]Biddle SJ, Marshall SJ, Gorely T, Cameron N: Temporal and environmental patterns of sedentary and active behaviors during adolescents' leisure time. Int J Behav Med 2009, 16:278-286.
  • [41]Cerin E, Barnett A, Baranowski T: Testing theories of dietary behavior change in youth using the mediating variable model with intervention programs. J Nutr Educ Behav 2009, 41:309-318.
  • [42]Lubans DR, Foster C, Biddle SJ: A review of mediators of behavior in interventions to promote physical activity among children and adolescents. Prev Med 2008, 47:463-470.
  • [43]Brown H, Hume C, ChinAPaw M: Validity and reliability of instruments to assess potential mediators of children's physical activity: A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport 2009, 12:539-548.
  • [44]Thaler R, Sunstein C: Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Penguin Books Ltd; 2009.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:81次 浏览次数:18次