Factors associated with health-related quality of life among Indian women in mining and agriculture

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Ganesha Somayaji¹  Subrahmanya Nairy Karkada³  Melba Sheila D’Souza² 

[1] Department of Sociology, Goa University, TaleigaoPlatuea, Goa, India;Department of Adult Health and Critical Care, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, GSM, Al-Khoud, PO 66, Muscat 123, Sultanate of Oman;Department of Business Studies, Higher College of Technology, Al Khuwair, Ministry of Manpower, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman

关键词: Mining;    Nursing;    Coping;    Women’s health;    Perceived health;    Well-being;    Health-related quality of life;    SF-36;   

Others  :  824127
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7525-11-9

 received in 2012-05-30, accepted in 2013-01-11,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Women facing social and economic disadvantage in stressed communities of developing countries are at greater risk due to health problems. This paper investigates the relationships between structural, health and psychosocial predictors among women in mining and agricultural communities. This paper is a report of a study of the predictors of the health-related quality of life among Indian women in mining and agricultural communities.

Methods

A descriptive cross-sectional research design was used. The instruments used are SF-36 Health Survey and Coping Strategy Checklist. ANOVA, MANOVA and GLM were used in the analysis. The study was conducted between January-September 2008 with randomly selected women in a mining (145) and an agricultural community (133) in India.

Results

Women in the agricultural community had significantly increased Physical Health, Mental Health and SF36 scores compared with those in the mining community. Years of stay, education and employment were significant predictors among women in the agricultural community. 39% (33%) and 40% (26%) of the variance in Physical and Mental health respectively among women in agricultural and mining communities are predicted by the structural, health and psychosocial variables.

Conclusion

Perceived health status should be recognised as an important assessment of Physical and Mental Health among women in rural stressed communities. Cognitive, emotional and behavioural coping strategies are significant predictors of health related quality of life. Implications. Nurses should use the SF-36 as a diagnostic tool for assessing health related quality of life among women and discuss coping strategies, so that these can target women’s adaptive behaviour. This should be an essential part of the nursing process for facilitating adaptive process for improved health related quality of life.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 D'Souza et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Walters V, Lenton R, McKeary M: Women’s health in the context of women’s lives. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada; 1995.
• [2]Walters V, McDonough P, Strohschein L: The influence of work, household structure, social, personal and material resources on gender differences in health: an analysis of the 1994 Canadian national population health survey. Soc Sci Med 2002, 54(5):677-692.
• [3]Umberson D, Chen MD, House JS, Hopkins K, Slaten E: The effect of social relationships on psychological well-being: are men and women really so different? Am Sociol Rev 1996, 61:837-857.
• [4]Babu BV, Kar SK: Domestic violence in Eastern India: factors associated with victimization and perpetration. Public Health 2010, 124:136-148.
• [5]Denton M, Walters V: Gender differences in structural and behaviorual determinants of health: an analysis of the social production of health. Soc Sci Med 1999, 48:1220-1235.
• [6]Denton M, Prus S, Walters V: Gender differences in health: a Canadian study of the psychosocial, structural and behavioural determinants of health. Soc Sci Med 2004, 58:2585-2600.
• [7]Hunt K, Annadale E: Relocating gender and morbidity: examining men’s and women’s health in contemporary Western societies. Introduction to social issue on gender and health. Soc Sci Med 1999, 48:1-5.
• [8]Macintyre H, Sweeting H: Gender differences in health: are things really as simple as they seem? Soc Sci Med 1996, 42(4):617-624.
• [9]Smith KR, Waitzman N: Double jeopardy: interaction effects of martial and poverty status on the risk of mortality. Demography 2010, 31:487-507.
• [10]Ware JEJ, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36 item short form health survey (SF 36): conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 1992, 30:473-483.
• [11]Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A: Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF 36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the medical outcomes study. Medical Care 1995, 33:AS264-AS279.
• [12]Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Forsberg CD, Elinson J: Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. Am J Cardiol 1984, 54(7):908-913.
• [13]Chang Y: Psychometric validity of the problem focused style of coping scale in relation to self-efficacy and life satisfaction among nursing staff in Taiwan. J Adv Nurs 2011, 67(7):1625-1631.
• [14]Chen KH, Ku NP: Relationship among stressors, coping behaviours and life satisfaction of adults after heart transplantation. Nurs Res 1997, 5(1):41-51.
• [15]Hu HL: The relationship between social support and coping in critical care patients in Taiwan. Veterans Nurs J 1992, 9(2):194-200.
• [16]Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK: Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Personal Soc Psychol 1989, 56(2):267-283.
• [17]Endler NS, Parker JDA: Multidimensional assessment of coping: a critical evaluation. J Personal Soc Psychol 1990, 58:844-854.
• [18]Tauli Corpuz V: The globalisation of mining and its impact and challenges for women. Baguio: International conference on women and mining; 1997.
• [19]WISE News Communique’ report: Water resource Management’s bulletin. 71st edition. 2003, 50-78. Retrieved May 28 2005. http://www.wrm.org.uy/bulletin/71/women.html webcite
• [20]Defending Our Lives, Demanding Our Rights: International women & mining conference. Mines minerals and people. 2004. http://www.mmpindia.org/womenandminigreport.pdf webcite
• [21]India: Women’s response to devastating mining. 2005. http://www.wrm.org.uy/bulletin/80/India.html webcite
• [22]Women in mining struggles in India: The invisibility of gender concerns in mining struggles. 2003. http://www.minesandcommunities.org webcite
• [23]Nair J: Representing labour in Old Mysore: kolar gold fields strike of 1930. Econ Political Weekly 1990, 25(30):73-86.
• [24]Bhanumathi K: The status of women affected by mining in India women: mining and communities. Tunnel Vision 2002, 1:1. http://www.caa.org.au/campaigns/mining/women/tunnelvisionpapers/kbhanumathi.html webcite
• [25]Silitonga NRA, Wignall FS: Mining and HIV in west Papua: mining, HIV/AIDS and women in timika, Papua province, Indonesia. Down to Earth 2003, 57(2):76-89. http://www.caa.org.au/campaigns/mining webcite
• [26]Robinson K: The soroaka nickel project: a healthy development. Int J Health Sci 2000, 15(2):67-89.
• [27]Hogue CJR: Gender, race and class: from epidemiologic association to etiologic hypotheses. In Women and Health. Edited by Goldman MB, Hatch MC. San Diego: Academic; 2000:15-23.
• [28]Williams K, Umberson D: Women stress, and health. In Women and health. Edited by Goldman MB, Hatch MC. San Diego: Academic; 2000:553-562.
• [29]The Energy and Resources Institute: Areawide environmental quality management plan for the mining belt of Goa. Report 96/EE/63, Directorate of planning statistics and evaluation. Goa: Government of Goa; 1997.
• [30]The Energy and Resources Institute: Environmental social performance indicators and sustainability markers in minerals development: reporting progress towards improved health and human well being phase I, Report 97WR52. 1999. Goa: The Energy and Resources Institute; 1999.
• [31]The Energy and Resources Institute: Environmental social performance indicators and sustainability markers in minerals development: Reporting progress towards improved health and human well being Phase II, Report 2000WR41. Goa: The Energy and Resources Institute; 2002.
• [32]Roy C: The Roy adaptation model. In Conceptual models for nursing practice. Edited by Riehl JP, Roy C. Norwalk: Appleton: Century Crofts; 1980.
• [33]Alligood MR, Tomey AM: Nursing theorists and their work. 7th edition. Maryland Heights, Mo: Mosby Elsevier Publishers; 2009.
• [34]Faul F, Albrechts C, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Albert-Georg L: Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009, 41(4):1149-1160.
• [35]Faul F, Albrechts C, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A: G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007, 39(2):175-191.
• [36]Joshi AV, Nau DP, Kalsekar IK: An appraisal of health-related quality of life instruments for use in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus disease. Value Health 2001, 4(2):136.
• [37]Lima MG, Barros MBA, César CLG, Goldbaum M, Carandina L, Ciconelli RM: Health related quality of life among the elderly: a population-based study using SF-36 survey. Cad Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro 2009, 25(10):2159-2167.
• [38]Shapiro D, Tambashe O: Employment, education, and fertility behavior in Kinshasa: some preliminary evidence. Populat Res Policy Rev 1997, 16(3):259-287.
• [39]Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Dewey JE: Version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey. Quality Metric Incorporated: Lincoln, RI; 2003.
• [40]Ware JE, Gandek B: The SF-36 health survey: development and use in mental health research and the IQOLA project. Int J Ment Heal 1994, 23:49-73.
• [41]Ware JE: Measuring patients’ views: the optimum outcome measure. British Med J 1993, 306:1429-1430.
• [42]Ware JJ: SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
• [43]Jenkinson A, Layte L, Wright R, Coulter A: The UK SF-36: An analysis and interpretation manual: A guide to health status measurement with particular reference to the short form 36 health survey. Oxford: Health Services Research Unit; 1996.
• [44]Lyons RA, Wareham K, Lucas M, Price D, William J, Hutchings HA: SF36 scores vary by method of administration: implications for study design. J Public Health 1999, 21:41-45.
• [45]Möller PH, Smith R, Petr P: The SF-36 questionnaire: a tool to assess health-related quality of life. : ; 2000. Retrieved 12 May 2008. http:// webcitewww.zsf.jcu.cz/structure/departments/kvz/…/12DotaznikSF36.doc/ webcite
• [46]Ware JE Jr, Hays RD: Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. Medical Care 1998, 26:393-402.
• [47]Wilson D, Parsons J, Tucke G: The SF-36 summary scales: problems and solutions. Soz Praventivmed 2000, 45:239-246.
• [48]Folkman S, Lazarus R: S: Manual for the ways of coping questionnaire. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1988.
• [49]Folkman S, Moskowitz JT: Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annu Rev Psychol 2004, 55(1):745-774.
• [50]Lazarus RS, Folkman S: Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer; 1984.
• [51]D’Souza MS, Somayaji G, Nairy KS: Determinants of reproductive health and related quality of life among Indian women in mining communities. J Adv Nurs 2011, 67(9):1963-1975.
• [52]Indian Council of Medical Research: Ethical guidelines for biomedical research on human participants. New Delhi: ICMR; 2000. Retrieved April 7, 2005, from http://www.icmr.nic.in/bioethics.html webcite
• [53]Babbie E: The basics of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 2002.
• [54]Homan R: The ethics of social research. London: Longman; 1991.
• [55]Stark R, Robert L: Contemporary social research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth & Thomson; 2002.
• [56]Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple JD, Block G, Humphreys MH: Association among SF36 quality of life measures and nutrition, hospitalization, and mortality in hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001, 12(12):2797-2806. Retrieved from January 2, 2007. http://www.nephrology.rei.edu/qol.htm webcite
• [57]MANOVA and ANOVA : ; Retrieved December 6 2007 http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/manova.htm webcite
• [58]Stevens J: Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 4th edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002.
• [59]Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: Using multivariate statistics. 5th edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2006.
• [60]Karlsson I, Berglin E, Larsson PA: Sense of coherence: quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass surgery: a longitudinal study. J Adv Nurs 2000, 31(6):1383-1392.
• [61]Panagopoulou E, Montgomery A, Benos A: Quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting: evaluating the influence of preoperative physical and psychosocial functioning. J Psychosom Res 2006, 60:639-644.
• [62]Rumsfeld JS, MaWhinney S, McCarthy M Jr, Shroyer ALW, VillaNuev CB, O’Brien M: Health related quality of life as a predictor of mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 1999, 281(140):1298-1303.
• [63]Tung HH, Anita H, Jen W: Coping, anxiety and quality of life after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Adv Nurs 2008, 61(6):651-663.
• [64]Hwang SL, Liao WC, Hwag SF, Chang Y, Hwang TY: Coping with the stress before and after heart surgery: a follow-up study. Thui-Zi Med J 1997, 9(1):53-61.
• [65]Gielen AC, O'Campo PJ, Faden RR, Kass NE, Xue X: Interpersonal conflict and physical violence during the childbearing year. Soc Sci Med 1994, 39(6):781-787.
• [66]Krishnan S, Corinne H, Rocca A, Hubbard E, Subbiah K, Edmeades J, Padian NS: Do changes in spousal employment status lead to domestic violence? Insights from a prospective study in Bangalore, India. Soc Sci Med 2010, 70:136-143.
• [67]Williams DR, Collins C: US socioeconomic and racial differences in health: patterns and explanations. Annu Rev Sociol 1995, 21:349-386.
• [68]Williams DR: Race and health: Basic questions, emerging directions. Ann Epidemiol 1997, 7:322-333.
• [69]Wilson IB, Cleary PD: Linking clinical variables with health related quality of life: a conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA 1995, 273(1):59-65.
• [70]Yu ES, Liu W: US national health data on Asian Americans and pacific islanders: a research agenda for the 1990s. Am J Public Health 1992, 82:1645-1652.
• [71]Panda P, Agarwal B: Marital violence, human development and women’s property status in India. World Dev 2005, 33(5):823-850.
• [72]Patel V, Kirkwood B, Pednekar A: Gender disadvantage and reproductive health risk factors for common mental disorders in women. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006, 63:404-413.
• [73]Firestone JM, Harris RJ, Vega WA: The impact of gender role ideology, male expectancies, and acculturation on wife abuse. Int J Law Psych 2003, 26:549-564.
• [74]Mohamadian H, Eftekhar H, Rahimi A, Mohamad HT, Shojaiezade D, Montazeri A: Predicting health related quality of life by using a health promotion model among Iranian adolescent girls: A structural equation modeling approach. Nurs Heal Sci 2011, 13:141-148.
• [75]Karlsen B, Oftedala B, Bru E: The relationship between clinical indicators coping styles, perceived support and diabetes related distress among adults with type 2 diabetes. J Adv Nurs 2011, 68(2):391-401.
• [76]Welbourne JL, Eggerth D, Hartley TA, Andrew ME, Sanchez F: Coping strategies in the workplace: relationships with attributional style and job satisfaction. J Vocat Behav 2007, 70:312-325.