Inequity in costs of seeking sexual and reproductive health services in India and Kenya

International Journal for Equity in Health

Jolene Skordis-Worrall³  Peter Gichangi⁵  Wilkister Ombidi⁵  Sushena Reza-Paul⁴  Anuradha Roy⁴  Letitia Rambally⁶  Mags Beksinska⁶  Yves Lafort²  Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brännström¹  Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli³ 

[1] Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden;International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium;Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK;Ashodaya Samithi (Ashodaya), Mysore, India;International Centre for Reproductive Health Association (ICRHK), Mombasa, Kenya;MatCH (Maternal, Adolescent and Child Health), University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa

关键词: Catastrophic spending;    Kakwani index;    Inequity;    Sexual and reproductive health services;   

Others  :  1231432
DOI  :  10.1186/s12939-015-0216-5

 received in 2014-12-17, accepted in 2015-09-12,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Objective

This study aims to assess inequity in expenditure on sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in India and Kenya. In addition, this analysis aims to measure the extent to which payments are catastrophic and to explore coping mechanisms used to finance health spending.

Methods

Data for this study were collected as a part of the situational analysis for the “Diagonal Interventions to Fast Forward Enhanced Reproductive Health” (DIFFER) project, a multi-country project with fieldwork sites in three African sites; Mombasa (Kenya), Durban (South Africa) and Tete (Mozambique), and Mysore in India. Information on access to SRH services, the direct costs of seeking care and a range of socio-economic variables were obtained through structured exit interviews with female SRH service users in Mysore (India) and Mombasa (Kenya) (n = 250). The costs of seeking care were analysed by household income quintile (as a measure of socio-economic status). The Kakwani index and quintile ratios are used as measures of inequitable spending. Catastrophic spending on SRH services was calculated using the threshold of 10 % of total household income.

Results

The results showed that spending on SRH services was highly regressive in both sites, with lower income households spending a higher percentage of their income on seeking care, compared to households with a higher income. Spending on SRH as a percentage of household income ranged from 0.02 to 6.2 % and 0.03–7.5 % in India and Kenya, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of spending on SRH services across income quintiles in both settings. In India, the poorest households spent two times, and in Kenya ten times, more on seeking care than the least poor households. The most common coping mechanisms in India and Kenya were “receiving [money] from partner or household members” (69 %) and “using own savings or regular income” (44 %), respectively.

Conclusion

Highly regressive spending on SRH services highlights the heavier burden borne by the poorest when seeking care in resource-constrained settings such as India and Kenya. The large proportion of service users, particularly in India, relying on money received from family members to finance care seeking suggests that access would be more difficult for those with weak social ties, small social networks or weak bargaining positions within the family - although this requires further study.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Haghparast-Bidgoli et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]van Doorslaer E, O’Donnell O, Rannan-Eliya RP, Somanathan A, Adhikari SR, Garg CC, Harbianto D, Herrin AN, Huq MN, Ibragimova S et al.. Effect of payments for health care on poverty estimates in 11 countries in Asia: an analysis of household survey data. Lancet. 2006; 368:1357-1364.
• [2]Xu K, Evans DB, Kawabata K, Zeramdini R, Klavus J, Murray CJ. Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis. Lancet. 2003; 362:111-117.
• [3]Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Catastrophe and impoverishment in paying for health care: with applications to Vietnam 1993-1998. Health Econ. 2003; 12:921-934.
• [4]Limwattananon S, Tangcharoensathien V, Prakongsai P. Catastrophic and poverty impacts of health payments: results from national household surveys in Thailand. Bull World Health Organ. 2007; 85:600-606.
• [5]Anderson I, Axelson H, Tan BK. The other crisis: the economics and financing of maternal, newborn and child health in Asia. Health Policy Plan. 2011; 26:288-297.
• [6]O’Donnell O, van Doorslaer E, Rannan-Eliya RP, Somanathan A, Adhikari SR, Akkazieva B, Harbianto D, Garg CC, Hanvoravongchai P, Herrin AN et al.. Who pays for health care in Asia? J Health Econ. 2008; 27:460-475.
• [7]Flores G, Krishnakumar J, O’Donnell O, van Doorslaer E. Coping with health-care costs: implications for the measurement of catastrophic expenditures and poverty. Health Econ. 2008; 17:1393-1412.
• [8]Leive A, Xu K. Coping with out-of-pocket health payments: empirical evidence from 15 African countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2008; 86:849-856.
• [9]Russell S. Ability to pay for health care: concepts and evidence. Health Policy Plan. 1996; 11:219-237.
• [10]Xu K, Evans DB, Carrin G, Aguilar-Rivera AM, Musgrove P, Evans T. Protecting households from catastrophic health spending. Health Aff. 2007; 26:972-983.
• [11]Guda A, Akalu T, Tamiru M, Mariam DH. Disparity of out of pocket expenditure on reproductive health related disorders across gender and life course. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2012; 26:258-264.
• [12]Skordis-Worrall J, Pace N, Bapat U, Das S, More NS, Joshi W, Pulkki-Brannstrom AM, Osrin D. Maternal and neonatal health expenditure in Mumbai slums (India): a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:150. BioMed Central Full Text
• [13]Bonu S, Bhushan I, Rani M, Anderson I. Incidence and correlates of ‘catastrophic’ maternal health care expenditure in India. Health Policy Plan. 2009; 24:445-456.
• [14]Puri M, Horstman R, Matthews Z, Falkingham J, Padmadas S, Devkota S. Examining Out-of-Pocket Expenditures on Reproductive and Sexual Health among the Urban Population of Nepal. Population Review. 2008;47:50–66.
• [15]Tran BX, Duong AT, Nguyen LT, Hwang J, Nguyen BT, Nguyen QT, Nong VM, Vu PX, Ohinmaa A. Financial burden of health care for HIV/AIDS patients in Vietnam. Trop Med Int Health. 2013; 18:212-218.
• [16]AbouZahr C, Vaughan JP. Assessing the burden of sexual and reproductive ill-health: questions regarding the use of disability-adjusted life years. Bull World Health Organ. 2000; 78:655-666.
• [17]Jamison D, Breman G, Measham A, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans D, et al. Disease control priorities in developing countries (Disease Control Priorities Project). 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press; World Bank; 2006.
• [18]The World Development Report 1993. World Bank, Washington DC; 1993.
• [19]Glasier A, Gulmezoglu AM, Schmid GP, Moreno CG, Van Look PF. Sexual and reproductive health: a matter of life and death. Lancet. 2006; 368:1595-1607.
• [20]Su TT, Kouyate B, Flessa S. Catastrophic household expenditure for health care in a low-income society: a study from Nouna District, Burkina Faso. Bull World Health Organ. 2006; 84:21-27.
• [21]Vaishnavi SD, Dash U. Catastrophic Payments for Health Care among Households in Urban Tamil Nadu, India. J Int Dev. 2009; 21:169-184.
• [22]Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 3rd ed. J. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J; 2003.
• [23]Kakwani N. Measurement of tax progressivity: an international comparison. Econ J. 1977; 87:71-80.
• [24]O’Donnell O, van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M. Analyzing health equity using household survey data : a guide to techniques and their implementation. World Bank, Washington, D.C; 2008.
• [25]Akazili J, Gyapong J, McIntyre D. Who pays for health care in Ghana? Int J Equity Health. 2011; 10:26. BioMed Central Full Text
• [26]Uga MA, Santos IS. An analysis of equity in Brazilian health system financing. Health Aff. 2007; 26:1017-1028.
• [27]Yu CP, Whynes DK, Sach TH. Equity in health care financing: The case of Malaysia. Int J Equity Health. 2008; 7:15. BioMed Central Full Text
• [28]Chuma J, Maina T. Catastrophic health care spending and impoverishment in Kenya. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12:413. BioMed Central Full Text
• [29]Russell S. The economic burden of illness for households in developing countries: a review of studies focusing on malaria, tuberculosis, and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2004; 71(2 Suppl):147-155.
• [30]Chuma J, Okungu V. Viewing the Kenyan health system through an equity lens: implications for universal coverage. Int J Equity Health. 2011; 10:22. BioMed Central Full Text
• [31]Mondal M. Health care services in India: A few questions on equity. Health. 2013; 5:53-61.
• [32]Munge K, Briggs AH. The progressivity of health-care financing in Kenya. Health Policy Plan. 2014; 29:912-920.
• [33]Prinja S, Aggarwal AK, Kumar R, Kanavos P. User charges in health care: evidence of effect on service utilization & equity from north India. Indian J Med Res. 2012; 136(5):868-876.
• [34]World Bank: World Development Indicators: Health systems. World Bank, 2014. Access from http://wdi.worldbank.org/table/2.15 (Date accessed: 03/05/2014)
• [35]Nahar S, Costello A. The hidden cost of ‘free’ maternity care in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan. 1998; 13:417-422.
• [36]Apanga S, Punguyire D, Adjei G. Estimating the cost to rural ambulating HIV/AIDS patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in rural Ghana: a pilot study. Pan Afr Med J. 2012; 12:21.
• [37]Moses S, Manji F, Bradley JE, Nagelkerke NJ, Malisa MA, Plummer FA. Impact of user fees on attendance at a referral centre for sexually transmitted diseases in Kenya. Lancet. 1992; 340:463-466.
• [38]McIntyre D, Thiede M, Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. What are the economic consequences for households of illness and of paying for health care in low- and middle-income country contexts? Soc Sci Med. 2006; 62:858-865.
• [39]Aye R, Wyss K, Abdualimova H, Saidaliev S. Factors determining household expenditure for tuberculosis and coping strategies in Tajikistan. Trop Med Int Health. 2011; 16:307-313.
• [40]Namasivayam A, Osuorah DC, Syed R, Antai D. The role of gender inequities in women’s access to reproductive health care: a population-level study of Namibia, Kenya, Nepal, and India. International journal of women’s health. 2012; 4:351-364.
• [41]Furuta M, Salway S. Women’s position within the household as a determinant of maternal health care use in Nepal. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006; 32:17-27.
• [42]Sauerborn R, Adams A, Hien M. Household strategies to cope with the economic costs of illness. Soc Sci Med. 1996; 43:291-301.
• [43]Ensor T, San PB. Access and payment for health care: the poor of Northern Vietnam. Int J Health Plann Manag. 1996; 11:69-83.