期刊论文详细信息
Trials
Evaluation of two prevention programs ‘Early Steps’ and ‘Faustlos’ in daycare centers with children at risk: the study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial
Tamara Fischmann2  Bernhard Rüger1  Marianne Leuzinger-Bohleber2  Katrin Luise Laezer2 
[1] Institute for Statistics, Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany;University of Kassel, Sigmund-Freud-Institut, IDeA Center, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
关键词: Area deprivation;    Socioeconomic status;    Poverty;    Children at risk;    Prevention;    Early childhood intervention;   
Others  :  1093177
DOI  :  10.1186/1745-6215-14-268
 received in 2012-10-30, accepted in 2013-08-08,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

While early programs to prevent aggression and violence are widely used, only a few controlled trials of effectiveness of psychoanalytically based prevention programs for preschoolers have been evaluated. This study compares ‘Faustlos’ (a violence prevention program) and ‘Early Steps’ (a psychoanalytically based, whole daycare center intervention to prevent violence) in daycare centers in socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods.

Methods/Design

Preschoolers in 14 daycare centers in Frankfurt, Germany, participate in a cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT). The daycare centers were randomly chosen from a representative baseline survey of all Frankfurt’s daycare centers carried out in 2003 (n = 5,300) with the following stratifying factors: children’s aggressiveness, hyperactivity, anxiety and socioeconomic status. Additionally, the geographic identification of socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods regarding low-income children was taken from the Frankfurt Municipality Statistics. Children’s attachment classification and children’s aggressiveness, hyperactivity, anxiety and social competence are measured as outcome criteria before and after 2 years of intervention. The programs in the study aim to reach a high-risk population. Therefore, the combination of a random sampling of daycare centers out of a representative baseline survey in all daycare centers in Frankfurt and the application of official data on the local distribution of low-income children are unique features offered by the EVA study design. Data on preschooler’s attachment representations are collected in socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods for the first time.

Trial registration

DRKS-ID: DRKS00003500

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Laezer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150130161047573.pdf 962KB PDF download
Figure 2. 60KB Image download
Figure 1. 94KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Hölling H, Kurth BM, Rothenberger A, Becker A, Schlack R: Assessing psychopathological problems of children and adolescents from 3–17 years in a nationwide representative sample: results of the German health interview and examination survey for children and adolescents (KIGGS). Eur Child Psychiatry 2008, 1:34-41.
  • [2]Bøe T, Overland S, Lundervold AJ, Hysing M: Socioeconomic status and children’s mental health: results from the Bergen Child Study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2012, 47:1557-1566.
  • [3]Merikangas KR, He JP, Brody D, Fisher PW, Bourdon K, Koretz DS: Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders among US children in the 2001–2004 NHANES. Pediatrics 2010, 125:75-81.
  • [4]Hackman DA, Farah MJ, Meaney MJ: Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nat Rev Neurosci 2010, 11:651.
  • [5]Reijneveld SA, Brugman E, Verhulst FC, Verloove-Vanhorick SP: Area deprivation and child psychosocial problems - a national cross-sectional study among school-aged children. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2005, 40:18-23.
  • [6]Flouri E, Mavroveli S, Tzavidis N: Modeling risks: effect of area deprivation, family socio-economic disadvantage and adverse life events on young children’s psychopathology. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2010, 45:611-619.
  • [7]Flouri E, Mavroveli S, Tzavidis N: Cognitive ability, neighbourhood deprivation, and young children’s emotional and behavioral problems. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2012, 47:985-992.
  • [8]Hanson MJ, Miller AD, Diamond K, Odom S, Lieber J, Butera G, Horn E, Palmer S, Fleming K: Neighbourhood community risk influences on preschool children’s development and school readiness. Infant Young Child 2011, 24:87-100.
  • [9]Yoshikawa H: Prevention as cumulative protection: effects of early family support and education on chronic delinquency and its risks. Psychol Bull 1994, 115:28-54.
  • [10]Ludwig J, Phillips DA: Long-term effects of head start on low-income children. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008, 1136:257-268.
  • [11]Knudsen EI, Heckmann JJ, Cameron JL, Shonkoff JP: Economic, neurobiological, and behavioral perspectives on building America’s future workforce. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:10155-10162.
  • [12]Shonkoff J, Phillips DA: From Neurons to Neighborhoods. Washington DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2000.
  • [13]Heckman J, Masterov D: The Productivity Argument for Investing in Young Children. Washington DC, USA: Committee for Economic Development; 2004.
  • [14]Nelson G, Prilleltensky I, Peters RDV: Mental health promotion and the prevention of mental health problems in the community. In Abnormal Psychology: Perspectives. Edited by Firestone P, Marshall W. Scarborough, Canada: Prentice-Hall; 2003:462-479.
  • [15]Prilleltensky I, Nelson G, Peirson L: (Eds): Promoting Family Wellness and Preventing Child Maltreatment: Fundamentals for Thinking and Action. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press; 2001.
  • [16]Nelson G, Westhues A, MacLeod J: A meta-analysis of longitudinal research on preschool prevention programs for children. Prevent Treat 2003, 6:1-67.
  • [17]Barnett WS: Long-term cognitive and academic effects of early childhood education on children in poverty. Prev Med 1998, 24:204-207.
  • [18]Campbell FA, Ramey CT: Effects of early intervention on intellectual and academic achievement: a follow-up study of children from low-income families. Child Dev 1994, 65:684-698.
  • [19]Nation M, Crusto C, Wandersman A, Kumpfer KL, Seybolt D, Morrissey-Kane E, Davino K: What works in prevention: principles of effective prevention programs. Am Psychol 2003, 58:449-456.
  • [20]Weissberg RP, Greenberg MT: School and community competence-enhancement and prevention programs. In Handbook of Child Psychology (Volume 4: Child Psychology in Practice). Edited by Damon W, Sigel IE, Renninger KA. New York, NY: Wiley; 1998:877-954.
  • [21]Zigler E, Taussig C, Black K: Early childhood intervention: a promising preventative for juvenile delinquency. Am Psychol 1992, 47:997-1006.
  • [22]MacLeod J, Nelson G: Programs for the promotion of family wellness and the prevention of child maltreatment: a meta-analytic review. Child Abuse Neglect 2000, 24:1127-1149.
  • [23]Cohen N, Radford J: The Impact of Early Childhood Intervention on Later Life. Toronto, Canada: Hincks-Dellcrest Institute; 1999.
  • [24]Ramey CT, Landesman Ramey S: Early intervention and early experience. Am Psychol 1998, 53:109-120.
  • [25]Lee V, Brooks-Gunn J, Schnur E, Liaw F: Are head start effects sustained? A longitudinal follow-up comparison of disadvantaged children attending Head Start, no preschool, and other preschool programs. Child Dev 1990, 61:495-507.
  • [26]Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Fischmann T: Attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD): a field for contemporary psychoanalysis?: Some clinical, conceptual and neurobiological considerations based on the Frankfurt Prevention Study. In Assessing Change in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy of Children and Adolescents. Edited by Tsiantis J, Trowell J. London, UK: Karnac Books; 2010:139-176.
  • [27]Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Canestri J, Target M: Early Development and its Disturbances: Clinical, Conceptual and Empirical Research on ADHD and Other Psychopathologies and its Epistemological Reflections. London, UK: Karnac Books; 2010.
  • [28]Leuzinger-Bohleber M: Psychoanalytic preventions/ interventions and playing “rough-and-tumble” games: alternatives to medical treatments of children suffering from ADHD. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies 2010, 7:332-338.
  • [29]Cierpka M: Faustlos - Ein Curriculum zur Förderung sozial-emotionaler Kompetenzen und zur Gewaltprävention für den Kindergarten. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe; 2004.
  • [30]Schick A, Cierpka M: Förderung sozial-emotionaler Kompetenzen mit Faustlos: Konzeption und Evaluation der Faustlos-Curricula. Bildung und Erziehung 2010, 63:277-292.
  • [31]Raikes HH, Emde R: Early head start: a bold new program for low-income infants and toddlers. In The Crisis in Youth Mental Health: Critical Issues and Effective Programs. Edited by Watt NV. Westport, CT: Praeger Press; 2006:181-206.
  • [32]Van IJzendoorn MH, Bakersmans-Kranenburg MJ, Juffer F: Why less is more. From the dodo bird verdict to evidence-based interventions on sensivity and early attachment. In Enhancing Early Attachment. Theory, Research, Intervention, and Policy. Edited by Berlin LJ, Ziv Y, Amaya-Jackson L, Greenberg MT. New York, NY: Guilford; 2005:297-312.
  • [33]Achenbach TM: Guide for the Caregiver-Teacher Report Form for Ages 2–5. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry; 1997.
  • [34]Arbeitsgruppe Deutsche Child Behavior Checklist: Fragebogen für ErzieherInnen von Klein- und Vorschulkindern (C-TRF 1½ -5). Köln, Germany: Arbeitsgruppe Kinder-, Jugend- und Familiendiagnostik (KJFD); 2002.
  • [35]Goodman R: Strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1997, 38:581-586.
  • [36]Koglin U, Barquero B, Mayer H, Scheithauer H, Petermann F: Deutsche Version des Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu): Psychometrische Qualität der Lehrer-/Erzieherversion für Kindergartenkinder. Diagnostica 2007, 53:175-183.
  • [37]Mayr T, Ulich M: Positive Entwicklung und Resilienz im Kindergartenalltag - Perik (2. Aufl.). Herder: Freiburg, Germany; 2009.
  • [38]Mayr T, Ulich M: Social-emotional well-being and resilience of children in early childhood settings - PERIK: an empirically based observation scale for practitioners. Early Years 2009, 29:45-57.
  • [39]Fonagy P, Gergely G, Jurist EL, Target M: Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self affect regulation. New York, NY: Other Press; 2002.
  • [40]Daudert E: Die reflective self functioning scale. In Klinische Bindungsforschung. Theorien - Methoden - Ergebnisse. Edited by Strauß B, Buchheim B, Kächele B. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer; 2002:55-67.
  • [41]Ricken G, Fritz A, Schuck KD, Preuß U: HAWIVA-III. Hannover-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für das Vorschulalter - III. Übersetzung und Adaption des WPPSITM-III von David Wechsler. Verlag Hans Huber: Bern, Switzerland; 2007.
  • [42]Green J, Stanley C, Smith V, Goldwyn R: A new method of evaluating attachment representations in young school-age children: the Manchester child attachment story task. Attach Hum Dev 2000, 2:48-70.
  • [43]Cassidy J, Shaver PR: (Eds): Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications . 2nd edition. London, UK: The Guilford Press; 2008.
  • [44]Berlin LJ, Whiteside-Mansell L, Roggman LA, Green BL, Robinson JA, Spieker S: Testing maternal depression and attachment style as moderators of early head start’s effects on parenting. Attach Hum Dev 2011, 13:49-67.
  • [45]Eldridge S, Ashby D, Kerry S: Sample size for cluster randomized trials: effect of coefficient of variation of cluster size and analysis method. Int J Epidemiol 2006, 35:1292-1300.
  • [46]Döpfner M, Berner W, Fleischmann T, Schmidt M: VBV 3–6 Verhaltensbeurteilungsbogen für Vorschulkinder. Göttingen, Germany: Beltz Verlag; 1993.
  • [47]Jacobs H: Frankfurter Sozialbericht Teil IX: Zukunft für Frankfurter Kinder sichern! SGB II-Leistungsbezug von Kindern und soziale Segregation in Frankfurt am Main - eine kleinräumige Analyse und Diskussion von Ansätzen zur Bekämpfung von Armut und Benachteiligung von Kindern. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Dezernat für Soziales, Senioren, Jugend und Recht, Stadt Frankfurt am Main; 2010.
  • [48]Bohin G, Hagekull B, Rydell AM: Attachment and social functioning. A longitudinal study from infancy to middle childhood. Soc Dev 2000, 9:24-39.
  • [49]Spieker SJ, Nelson DC, Petras A, Jolley A, Barnard C: Joint influences of child care and infant attachment security for cognitive and language outcomes of low-income toddlers. Infant Behav Dev 2003, 26:326-344.
  • [50]Lyons-Ruth K, Alpern L, Repacholi B: Disorganized infant attachment classification and maternal psychosocial problems as predictors of hostile-aggressive behavior in the preschool classroom. Child Dev 1993, 64:572-585.
  • [51]Moss E, Smolla N, Cyr C, Dubois-Comtois K, Mazzarello T, Berthiaume C: Attachment and behavior problems in middle childhood as reported by adult and child informants. Dev Psychopathol 2006, 18:425-444.
  • [52]Stacks AM, Oshio T: Disorganized attachment and social skills as indicators of head start children’s school readiness skills. Attach Hum Dev 2009, 11:143-164.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:11次