Applying knowledge translation tools to inform policy: the case of mental health in Lebanon

Health Research Policy and Systems

Fadi El Jardali²  Farah Yehia¹ 

[1] Knowledge to Policy (K2P) Center, American University of Beirut, Riad El-Solh 1107 2020, Beirut, Lebanon;Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton L8S 4L8, Ontario, Canada

关键词: Primary healthcare;    Mental illness;    Mental health;    Knowledge translation;    Evidence-informed policymaking;   

Others  :  1217378
DOI  :  10.1186/s12961-015-0018-7

 received in 2014-12-31, accepted in 2015-05-26,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Many reform efforts in health systems fall short because the use of research evidence to inform policy remains scarce. In Lebanon, one in four adults suffers from a mental illness, yet access to mental healthcare services in primary healthcare (PHC) settings is limited. Using an “integrated” knowledge framework to link research to action, this study examines the process of influencing the mental health agenda in Lebanon through the application of Knowledge Translation (KT) tools and the use of a KT Platform (KTP) as an intermediary between researchers and policymakers.

Methods

This study employed the following KT tools: 1) development of a policy brief to address the lack of access to mental health services in PHC centres, 2) semi-structured interviews with 10 policymakers and key informants, 3) convening of a national policy dialogue, 4) evaluation of the policy brief and dialogue, and 5) a post-dialogue survey.

Results

Findings from the key informant interviews and a comprehensive synthesis of evidence were used to develop a policy brief which defined the problem and presented three elements of a policy approach to address it. This policy brief was circulated to 24 participants prior to the dialogue to inform the discussion. The policy dialogue validated the evidence synthesized in the brief, whereby integrating mental health into PHC services was the element most supported by evidence as well as participants. The post-dialogue survey showed that, in the following 6 months, several implementation steps were taken by stakeholders, including establishing national taskforce, training PHC staff, and updating the national essential drug list to include psychiatric medications. Relationships among policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders were strengthened as they conducted their own workshops and meetings after the dialogue to further discuss implementation, and their awareness about and demand for KT tools increased.

Conclusions

This case study showed that the use of KT tools in Lebanon to help generate evidence-informed programs is promising. This experience provided insights into the most helpful features of the tools. The role of the KTP in engaging stakeholders, particularly policymakers, prior to the dialogue and linking them with researchers was vital in securing their support for the KT process and uptake of the research evidence.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Yehia and El-Jardali.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining knowledge translation. CMAJ. 2009; 181:165-8.
• [2]El Jardali F, Lavis J, Moat K, Pantoja T, Ataya N. Capturing lessons learned from evidence-to-policy initiatives through structured reflection. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014; 12:2. BioMed Central Full Text
• [3]Moat KA, Lavis JN, Clancy SJ, El-Jardali F, Pantoja T. Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt. Bull World Health Organ. 2014; 92:20-8.
• [4]Lavis JN, Permanand G, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009; 7:S13. BioMed Central Full Text
• [5]Lavis JN, Boyko JA, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 14: organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009; 7:S14. BioMed Central Full Text
• [6]Lavis JN, Lomas J, Hamid M, Sewankambo NK. Assessing country-level efforts to link research to action. Bull World Health Organ. 2006; 84:620-8.
• [7]Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J, Baxter AJ, Ferrari AJ, Erskine HE et al.. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2013; 382:1575-86.
• [8]Karam EG, Mneimneh ZN, Dimassi H, Fayyad JA, Karam AN, Nasser SC et al.. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in Lebanon: first onset, treatment, and exposure to war. PLoS Med. 2008; 5:579-86.
• [9]World Health Organization (WHO). NCD Country Profiles: Lebanon. 2011. http://www.who.int/nmh/countries/lbn_en.pdf.
• [10]Knapp M, Funk M, Curran C, Prince M, Grigg M, McDaid D. Economic barriers to better mental health practice and policy. Health Policy Plan. 2006; 21:157-70.
• [11]World Health Organization (WHO): Mental health financing. Mental Health Policy and Service Guidance Package 2003. http://www.who.int/mental_health/policy/essentialpackage1/en/index.html. Accessed May 2, 2015.
• [12]Dixon A, McDaid D, Knapp M, Curran C. Financing mental health services in low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy Plan. 2006; 21:171-82.
• [13]Chahine LM, Chemali Z. Mental healthcare in Lebanon: policy, plans and programmes. East Mediterr Health J. 2009; 15:1596-612.
• [14]Karam EG, Mneimneh ZN, Karam AN, Fayyad JA, Nasser SC, Chatterji S et al.. Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders in Lebanon: a national epidemiological survey. Lancet. 2006; 367:1000-6.
• [15]Farhood LF, Dimassi H. Prevalence and predictors for post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and general health in a population from six villages in South Lebanon. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012; 47:639-49.
• [16]World Health Organization & Ministry of Health Lebanon. WHO-AIMS report on mental health system in Lebanon. 2010. http://www.who.int/mental_health/who_aims_report_lebanon.pdf.
• [17]Kerbage H, El Chammay R, Richa S. Mental Health Legislation in Lebanon: Nonconformity to international standards and clinical dilemmas in psychiatric practice. Int J Law Med, in press.
• [18]Hijazi Z, Weissbecker I, Chammay R. The integration of mental health into primary healthcare in Lebanon. Intervention. 2011; 9:265-78.
• [19]Yehia F, Nahas Z, Saleh S. A roadmap to parity in mental health financing: the case of Lebanon. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2014; 17:131-41.
• [20]Walt G, Shiffman J, Schneider H, Murray SF, Brugha R, Gilson L. ‘Doing’ health policy analysis: methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges. Health Policy Plan. 2008; 23:308-17.
• [21]National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Developing and using policy briefs: the SURE guides. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University; 2014. http://www.nccmt.ca/registry/view/eng/211.html. Accessed May 2, 2015.
• [22]World Health Organization. Mental health atlas 2011 country profiles. 2011. http://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/atlas/. Accessed May 2, 2015.
• [23]El-Jardali F, Yehia F. K2P Policy Brief: securing access to quality mental health services in primary health care in Lebanon. Beirut: Knowledge to Policy (K2P) Center; 2014. http://www.aub.edu.lb/k2p/products/Pages/k2pbriefs.aspx. Accessed May 2, 2015.
• [24]World Organization of National Colleges, Academies & Academic Associations of General Practitioners-Family Physicians. Integrating mental health into primary healthcare: A global perspective. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
• [25]Kakuma R, Minas H, van Ginneken N, Dal Poz MR, Desiraju K, Morris JE et al.. Human resources for mental healthcare: current situation and strategies for action. Lancet. 2011; 378:1654-63.
• [26]Reilly S, Planner C, Gask L, Hann M, Knowles S, Druss B et al.. Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 11: Article ID CD009531
• [27]Butler M, Kane RL, McAlpine D, Kathol RG, Fu SS, Hagedorn H et al.. Integration of mental health/substance abuse and primary care. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2008; 173:1-362.
• [28]Sterne A. Expansion of liaison psychiatry in primary care. Gütersloh, Germany. Health Policy Monitor 2009. http://hpm.org/en/Surveys/Brookdale_Institute_-_Israel/13/Expansion_of_Liaison_Psychiatry_in_Primay_Care.html. Accessed January 15, 2015.
• [29]van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Van Os TW, Van Marwijk HW, Leentjens AF. Effect of psychiatric consultation models in primary care. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Psychosom Res. 2010; 68:521-33.
• [30]Thota AB, Sipe TA, Byard GJ, Zometa CS, Hahn RA, McKnight-Eily LR et al.. Collaborative care to improve the management of depressive disorders: a community guide systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42:525-38.
• [31]Craven MA, Bland R. Better practices in collaborative mental healthcare: an analysis of the evidence base. Can J Psychiatry. 2006; 51:7S-2.
• [32]Moat KA, Lavis JN, Abelson J. How contexts and issues influence the use of policy-relevant research syntheses: a critical interpretive synthesis. Milbank Q. 2013; 91:604-48.
• [33]Boyko JA, Lavis JN, Abelson J, Dobbins M, Carter N. Deliberative dialogues as a mechanism for knowledge translation and exchange in health systems decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 75:1938-45.
• [34]Lavis JN, Boyko JA, Gauvin FP. Evaluating deliberative dialogues focussed on healthy public policy. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:1287.