Does the 12-item General Health Questionnaire contain multiple factors and do we need them?

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Yin-Bun Cheung⁶  Shu-Chuen Li³  Calvin Fones¹  Julian Thumboo⁴  Nan Luo²  Fei Gao⁵ 

[1] Department of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, 119074, Singapore;Institute of Health Economics, #1200, 10450 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3N4, Canada;Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, 117543, Singapore;Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore;Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre, 11 Hospital Drive, 169610, Singapore;MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, IDEU, ITD, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK

关键词: psychological health;    factor structure;    GHQ;   

Others  :  1216926
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7525-2-63

 received in 2004-10-26, accepted in 2004-11-11,  发布年份 2004

【 摘 要 】

Background

The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is widely used as a unidimensional instrument, but factor analyses tended to suggest that it contains two or three factors. Not much is known about the usefulness of the GHQ-12 factors, if they exist, in revealing between-patient differences in clinical states and health-related quality of life.

Methods

We addressed this issue in a cross-sectional survey of out-patients with psychological disorders in Singapore. The participants (n = 120) completed the GHQ-12, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Short-Form 36 Health Survey. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare six previously proposed factor structures for the GHQ-12. Factor scores of the best-fitting model, as well as the overall GHQ-12 score, were assessed in relation to clinical and health-related quality of life variables.

Results

The 3-factor model proposed by Graetz fitted the data better than a unidimensional model, two 2-factor models, and two other 3-factor models. However, the three factors were strongly correlated. Their values varied in a similar fashion in relation to clinical and health-related quality of life variables.

Conclusions

The 12-item General Health Questionnaire contains three factors, namely Anxiety and Depression, Social Dysfunction, and Loss of Confidence. Nevertheless, using them separately does not offer many practical advantages in differentiating clinical groups or identifying association with clinical or health-related quality of life variables.

【 授权许可】

   
2004 Gao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Ustun TB, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Chatterji S, Mathers C, Murray CJ: Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000. Br J Psychiatry 2004, 184:386-392.
• [2]Wiggins RD, Schofield P, Sacker A, Head J, Bartley M: Social position and minor psychiatric morbidity over time in the British Household Panel Survey 1991–1998. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004, 58:779-787.
• [3]Corti L: For better or worse? Annual change in smoking, self-assessed health and subjective well-being. In In Changing Households: The British Household Panel Survey 1990–1992. Edited by Buck N, Gershuny J, Rose D, Scott J. Colchester: University of Essex; 1994:199-219.
• [4]Politi PL, Piccinelli M, Wilkinson G: Reliability, validity and factor structure of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire among young males in Italy. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1994, 90:432-437.
• [5]Andrich D, van Schoubroeck L: The General Health Questionnaire: a psychometric analysis using latent trait theory. Psychol Med 1989, 19:469-485.
• [6]Graetz B: Multidimensional properties of the General Health Questionnaire. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1991, 26:132-138.
• [7]Martin AJ: Assessing the multidimensionality of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Rep 1999, 84(3 Pt 1):927-935.
• [8]Worsley A, Gribbin CC: A factor analytic study of the twelve-item General Health Questionnaire. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1977, 11:260-272.
• [9]Werneke U, Goldberg DP, Yalcin I, Ustun BT: The stability of the factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire. Psy Med 2000, 30:823-829.
• [10]Cheung YB: A confirmatory factor analysis of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire among older people. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002, 17:739-744.
• [11]Kalliath TJ, O'Driscoll MP, Brough P: A confirmatory factor analysis of the General Health Questionnaire-12. Stress and Health 2004, 20:11-20.
• [12]French DJ, Tait RJ: Measurement invariance in the General Health Questionnaire-12 in young Australian adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004, 13:1-7.
• [13]Campbell A, Walker J, Farrell G: Confirmatory factor analysis of the GHQ-12: can I see that again? Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2003, 37:475-483.
• [14]Goldberg DP, Williams P: A User's Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1988.
• [15]Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA: An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988, 56:893-897.
• [16]Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B: SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
• [17]Chan DW, Chan TS: Reliability, validity and the structure of the General Health Questionnaire in a Chinese context. Psychol Med 1983, 13:363-371.
• [18]Pan PC, Goldberg DP: A comparison of the validity of GHQ-12 and CHQ-12 in Chinese primary care patients in Manchester. Psychol Med 1990, 20:931-940.
• [19]Chan DW: The Chinese version of the General Health Questionnaire: does language make a difference? Psychol Med 1985, 15:147-155.
• [20]Luo N, Fones CS, Thumboo J, Li SC: Factors influencing health-related quality of life of Asians with anxiety disorders in Singapore. Qual Life Res 2004, 13:557-565.
• [21]McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994, 32:40-66.
• [22]Lam CLK, Gandek B, Ren XS, Chan MS: Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51:1139-1147.
• [23]Thumboo J, Feng PH, Soh CH, Boey ML, Thio ST, Fong KY: Validation of the Chinese SF-36 for quality of life assessment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2000, 9:708-712.
• [24]Thumboo J, Fong KY, Machin D, Chan SP, Leong KH, Feng PH, Thio ST, Boe ML: A community based study of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the English (UK) and Chinese (HK) SF-36 in Singapore. Qual Life Res 2001, 10:175-188.
• [25]Thumboo J, Fong KY, Chan SP, Machin D, Feng PH, Thio ST, Boey ML: The equivalence of English and Chinese SF-36 versions in bilingual Singapore Chinese. Qual Life Res 2002, 11:495-503.
• [26]Marsh HW, Balla JR, Hau KT: An evaluation of incremental fit indices: a clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. In In Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques. Edited by Marcoulides GA, Schumacker RE. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996:315-354.
• [27]Hu L, Bentler P: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999, 1:1-55.
• [28]Marsh HW, Hau KT, Wen Z: In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling 2004, 11:320-341.
• [29]Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW: Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003, 41:582-592.