期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
Knowledge and use of medicinal plants by local specialists in an region of Atlantic Forest in the state of Pernambuco (Northeastern Brazil)
Ulysses Paulino de Albuquerque1  Reinaldo Farias Paiva de Lucena1  Luiz Rodrigo Saldanha Gazzaneo1 
[1] Departamento de Biologia, Área de Botânica, Laboratório de Etnobotânica Aplicada, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros s/n, Dois Irmãos, Recife, Pernambuco, 52171-030, Brazil
关键词: traditional knowledge;    medicinal plants;    Atlantic Forest;    ethnobotany;   
Others  :  866047
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-4269-1-9
 received in 2005-09-01, accepted in 2005-11-01,  发布年份 2005
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The study of local knowledge about natural resources is becoming increasingly important in defining strategies and actions for conservation or recuperation of residual forests. This study therefore sought to: collect information from local populations concerning the use of Atlantic Forest medicinal plants; verify the sources of medicinal plants used; determine the relative importance of the species surveyed, and; calculate the informant consensus factor in relation to medicinal plant use. Data was obtained using semi-structured forms to record the interviewee's personal information and topics related to the medicinal use of specific plants. The material collected represent 125 plants, distributed among 61 botanical families, with little participation of native plants. This study demonstrated that local people tend to agree with each other in terms of the plants used to treat blood-related problems, but cite a much more diverse group of plants to treat problems related to the respiratory and digestive systems – two important categories in studies undertaken in different parts of the world. The local medicinal flora is largely based on plants that are either cultivated or obtained from anthropogenic zones, possibly due to the use and access restrictions of the legally protected neighboring forest. Despite these restrictions, the species with the highest use-value by this community was Pithecellobium cochliocarpum (Gomez) Macb., a native plant of the Atlantic Forest.

【 授权许可】

   
2005 Gazzaneo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140726101357937.pdf 482KB PDF download
86KB Image download
【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Consórcio Mata Atlântica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas: Reserva da Biosfera da Mata Atlântica. Plano de Ação. Referências Básicas; 1992.
  • [2]Hanazaki N, Tamashiro JY, Leitão-Filho HF, Begossi A: Diversity of plant uses in two Caiçaras communities from the Atlantic Forest coast, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 2000, 9:597-615.
  • [3]Rossato SC, Leitão-Filho H, Begossi A: Ethnobotany of caiçaras of the Atlantic Forest Coast (Brasil). Economic Botany 1999, 53:387-395.
  • [4]Prance GT: What is ethnobotany today? Journal of Ethnopharmacology 1991, 32:209-216.
  • [5]FIAM – Fundação de Desenvolvimento Municipal do Interior de Pernambuco: Perfil Municipal de Igarassu, Pernambuco. 1997.
  • [6]FIDEM: Diagnóstico das Reservas Ecológicas: Região Metropolitana do Grande Recife. Recife. 2001.
  • [7]SECTAM: Diagnósticos das Reservas Ecológicas da Região Metropolitana do Recife. Recife. 2001.
  • [8]FIDEM: Monitoramento das Reservas Ecológicas da Região Metropolitana do Grande Recife. Recife. 1993.
  • [9]Davis A, Wagner JR: Who Knows? On the Importance of Identifying "Experts" When Researching Local Ecological Knowledge. Human Ecology 2003, 31:463-489.
  • [10]Albuquerque UP, Lucena RFP: Seleção e escolha dos informantes. In Métodos e técnicas na pesquisa etnobotânica. Edited by Albuquerque UP, Lucena RFP. Recife: Editora NUPEEA; 2004:19-35.
  • [11]Bailey K: Methods of social research. 4th edition. New York: The Free Press; 1994.
  • [12]Heinrich M, Ankli A, Frei B, Weimann C, Sticher O: Medicinal plants in Mexico: Healers'consensus and cultural importance. Social Science and Medicine 1998, 47:1863-1875.
  • [13]Phillips O, Gentry AH, Reynel C, Wilki P, Gávez-Durand CB: Quantitative ethnobotany and Amazonian conservation. Conservation Biology 1994, 8:225-248.
  • [14]Almeida CFCBR, Albuquerque UP: Uso e conservação de plantas e animais medicinais no Estado de Pernambuco (Nordeste do Brasil): um estudo de caso. Interciencia 2002, 27:276-285.
  • [15]Bennett BC, Prance GT: Introduced plants in the indigenous pharmacopoeia of Northern South America. Economic Botany 2000, 54:90-102.
  • [16]Di Stasi LC, Oliveira GP, Carvalhaes MA, Queiroz-Junior M, Tien OS, Kakinami SH, Reis MS: Medicinal plants popularly used in the Brazilian Tropical Atlantic Forest. Fitoterapia 2002, 73:69-91.
  • [17]Voeks RA: Tropical Forest healers and habitat preference. Economic Botany 1996, 50:382-400.
  • [18]Stepp JR, Moerman DE: The importance of weeds in ethnopharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2001, 75:19-23.
  • [19]Stepp JR: The role of weeds as sources of pharmaceuticals. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2004, 92:163-166.
  • [20]Almeida CFCBR, Silva TCL, Amorim ELC, Albuquerque UP: Life strategy and chemical composition as predictors of the selection of medicinal plants from the caatinga (Northeast Brazil). Journal of Arid Environments 2005, 62:127-142.
  • [21]Parente CET, Rosa MMT: Plantas comercializadas como medicinais no Município de Barra do Piraí, RJ. Rodriguésia 2001, 52:47-59.
  • [22]Amorozo MCM: Uso e diversidade de plantas medicinais em Santo Antônio de Leverger, MT, Brasil. Acta Botânica Brasílica 2002, 16:189-203.
  • [23]Albuquerque UP, Andrade LHC: Uso de recursos vegetais da caatinga: o caso do agreste do Estado de Pernambuco (Nordeste do Brasil). Interciencia 2002, 27:336-345.
  • [24]Zschocke S, Rabe T, Staden J: Plant part substitution – a way to conserve endangered medicinal plants? Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2000, 71:281-292.18.
  • [25]Begossi A, Hanazaki N, Tamashiro JY: Medicinal Plants in the Atlantic Forest (Brasil): Knowledge, Use and Conservation. Human Ecology 2002, 30:281-299.
  • [26]Anklin A, Sticher O, Heinrich M: Medical ethnobotany of the Yucatec Maya: Healter's consensus as a quantitative criterion. Economic Botany 1999, 53:144-160.
  • [27]Albuquerque UP, Andrade LHC, Silva ACO: Use of plant resources in a seasonal dry forest (northeastern Brazil). Acta Botânica Brasilic 2005, 19:27-38.
  • [28]Figueiredo GM, Leitão-Filho HF, Begossi A: Ethnobotany of Atlantic Forest coastal communities: diversity of plant uses in Gamboa (Itacuruçá Island, Brazil). Human Ecology 1993, 21:419-430.
  • [29]Figueiredo GM, Leitão-Filho HF, Begossi A: Ethnobotany of Atlantic Forest Coastal Communities: II. Diversity of plant uses at Sepetiba Bay (SE Brasil). Human Ecology 1997, 25:353-360.
  • [30]Hanazaki N, Leitão-Filho HF, Begossi A: Uso de recursos na Mata Atlântica: o caso da Ponta do Almada (Ubatuda, Brasil). Interciencia 1996, 21:268-276.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:4次