期刊论文详细信息
Health Research Policy and Systems
Public reporting improves antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections in primary care: a matched-pair cluster-randomized trial in China
Xinping Zhang2  Xi Yin2  Lijun Wang2  Chaojie Liu1  Lianping Yang2 
[1] School of Public Health, La Trobe University, 1 Kingsbury Dr, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia;School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.13. Hangkong Road, Wuhan, Hubei province 430030, PR China
关键词: Upper respiratory tract infection;    Public reporting;    Primary care;    China;    Antibiotics;   
Others  :  1142547
DOI  :  10.1186/1478-4505-12-61
 received in 2014-06-15, accepted in 2014-09-25,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Inappropriate use and overuse of antibiotics is a serious concern in the treatment of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), especially in developing countries. In recent decades, information disclosure and public reporting (PR) has become an instrument for encouraging good practice in healthcare. This study evaluated the impact of PR on antibiotic prescribing for URTIs in a sample of primary care institutions in China.

Methods

A matched-pair cluster-randomized trial was undertaken in QJ city, with 20 primary care institutions participating in the trial. Participating institutions were matched into pairs before being randomly assigned into a control and an intervention group. Prescription statistics were disclosed to patients, health authorities, and health workers monthly within the intervention group, starting from October 2013. Outpatient prescriptions for URTIs were collected from both groups before (1st March to 31st May, 2013) and after the intervention (1st March to 31st May, 2014). A total of 34,815 URTI prescriptions were included in a difference-in-difference analysis using multivariate linear or logistic regression models, controlling for patient attributes as well as institutional characteristics.

Results

Overall, 90% URTI prescriptions required antibiotics and 21% required combined use of antibiotics. More than 77% of URTI prescriptions required intravenous (IV) injection or infusion of drugs. PR resulted in a 9 percentage point (95% CI -17 to -1) reduction in the use of oral antibiotics (adjusted RR =39%, P =0.027), while the use of injectable antibiotics remained unchanged. PR led to a 7 percentage point reduction (95% CI -14 to 0; adjusted RR =36%) in combined use of antibiotics (P =0.049), which was largely driven by a significant reduction in male patients (-7.5%, 95% CI -14 to -1, P =0.03). The intervention had little impact on the use of IV injections or infusions, or the total prescription expenditure.

Conclusions

The results suggest that PR could improve prescribing practices in terms of reducing oral antibiotics and combined use of antibiotics; however, the impacts were limited. We suggest that PR would probably be enhanced by provider payment reform, management and training for providers, and health education for patients.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Yang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150328090119939.pdf 261KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Li Y: China’s misuse of antibiotics should be curbed. BMJ 2014, 348:g1083.
  • [2]Dong L, Yan H, Wang D: Drug prescribing indicators in village health clinics across 10 provinces of Western China. Fam Pract 2011, 28(1):63-67.
  • [3]Reynolds L, McKee M: Factors influencing antibiotic prescribing in China: an exploratory analysis. Health Policy 2009, 90(1):32-36.
  • [4]Swartz MN: Use of antimicrobial agents and drug resistance. New Engl J Med 1997, 337(7):491-492.
  • [5]Dellit TH, Owens RC, McGowan JE, Gerding DN, Weinstein RA, Burke JP, Huskins WC, Paterson DL, Fishman NO, Carpenter CF, Brennan PJ, Billeter M, Hooton TM, Infectious Diseases Society of America; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America: Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis 2007, 44(2):159-177.
  • [6]Quach C, Weiss K, Moore D, Rubin E, McGeer A, Low DE: Clinical aspects and cost of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae infections in children: resistant vs. susceptible strains. Int J Antimicrob Ag 2002, 20(2):113-118.
  • [7]Butler CC, Hood K, Kinnersley P, Robling M, Prout H, Houston H: Predicting the clinical course of suspected acute viral upper respiratory tract infection in children. Fam Pract 2005, 22(1):92-95.
  • [8]Ashworth M, Latinovic R, Charlton J, Cox K, Rowlands G, Gulliford M: Why has antibiotic prescribing for respiratory illness declined in primary care? A longitudinal study using the general practice research database. J Public Health (Oxf) 2004, 26(3):268-274.
  • [9]Scottish Medicines Consortium Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Group: Prudent Antimicrobial use in Primary Care – Respiratory (Paper 13). Glasgow: Scottish Medicines Consortium; 2009.
  • [10]Petersen I, Johnson AM, Islam A, Duckworth G, Livermore DM, Hayward AC: Protective effect of antibiotics against serious complications of common respiratory tract infections: retrospective cohort study with the UK General Practice Research Database. BMJ 2007, 335(7627):982.
  • [11]Arroll B: Antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Respir Med 2005, 99(3):255-261.
  • [12]Arroll B, Kenealy T: Antibiotics for the common cold and acute purulent rhinitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005, 3:D247.
  • [13]Hrisos S, Eccles M, Johnston M, Francis J, Kaner EF, Steen N, Grimshaw J: An intervention modelling experiment to change GPs' intentions to implement evidence-based practice: using theory-based interventions to promote GP management of upper respiratory tract infection without prescribing antibiotics #2. BMC Health Serv Res 2008, 8:10. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [14]The State Council of China: Implementation Plan for the Recent Priorities of the Health Care System Reform (2009–2011). http://www.china.org.cn/government/scio-press-conferences/2009-04/09/content_17575401.htm webcite
  • [15]Yang L, Liu C, Ferrier JA, Zhou W, Zhang X: The impact of the National Essential Medicines Policy on prescribing behaviours in primary care facilities in Hubei province of China. Health Policy Plan 2013, 28(7):750-760.
  • [16]Ketelaar NABM, Faber MJ, Flottorp S, Rygh LH, Deane KHO, Eccles MP: Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, 11:CD004538.
  • [17]Fung CH, Lim Y, Mattke S, Damberg C, Shekelle PG: Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann Intern Med 2008, 148(2):111-123.
  • [18]Mannion R, Davies HT: Reporting health care performance: learning from the past, prospects for the future. J Eval Clin Pract 2002, 8(2):215-228.
  • [19]Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, Brook RH: The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. JAMA 2000, 283(14):1866-1874.
  • [20]Leatherman S, McCarthy D: Public disclosure of health care performance reports: experience, evidence and issues for policy. Int J Qual Health Care 1999, 11(2):93-98.
  • [21]Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Davies HT, Smith PC: Public reporting on quality in the United States and the United Kingdom. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003, 22(3):134-148.
  • [22]Mukamel DB, Haeder SF, Weimer DL: Top-down and bottom-up approaches to health care quality: the impacts of regulation and report cards. Annu Rev Public Health 2014, 35:477-497.
  • [23]Lansky D: Improving quality through public disclosure of performance information. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002, 21(4):52-62.
  • [24]Frølich A, Talavera JA, Broadhead P, Dudley RA: A behavioral model of clinician responses to incentives to improve quality. Health Policy 2007, 80(1):179-193.
  • [25]McNamara P: Provider-specific report cards: a tool for health sector accountability in developing countries. Health Policy Plann 2006, 21(2):101-109.
  • [26]Hwang C, Lai Y, Liu T: A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Comput Oper Res 1993, 20(8):889-899.
  • [27]Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Tusler M: Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts? Health Aff (Millwood) 2003, 22(2):84-94.
  • [28]Yip W, Powell-Jackson T, Chen W, Hu M, Fe E, Hu M, Jian W, Lu M, Han W, Hsiao WC: Capitation combined with pay-for-performance improves antibiotic prescribing practices in rural China. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014, 33(3):502-510.
  • [29]Chakraborty A, Roy S, Loeffler J, Chaves RL: Comparison of the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of daptomycin in healthy adult volunteers following intravenous administration by 30 min infusion or 2 min injection. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009, 64(1):151-158.
  • [30]Chen M, Wang L, Chen W, Zhang L, Jiang H, Mao W: Does economic incentive matter for rational use of medicine? China’s experience from the essential medicines program. Pharmacoeconomics 2014, 32(3):245-255.
  • [31]Pratter MR: Cough and the common cold: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2006, 129(1 Suppl):72S-74S.
  • [32]Spinks A, Glasziou PP, Del MC: Antibiotics for sore throat. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, 11:D23.
  • [33]Glasziou PP, Del MC, Sanders SL, Hayem M: Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004, 1:D219.
  • [34]Abegunde D: Inefficiencies due to Poor Access to and Irrational Use of Medicines to Treat Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in Children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
  • [35]Hu S: Essential medicine policy in China: pros and cons. J Med Econ 2013, 16(2):289-294.
  • [36]Werner RM, Asch DA: The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. JAMA 2005, 293(10):1239-1244.
  • [37]Vaiana ME, McGlynn EA: What cognitive science tells us about the design of reports for consumers. Med Care Res Rev 2002, 59(1):3-35.
  • [38]Schneider EC, Epstein AM: Use of public performance reports: a survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. JAMA 1998, 279(20):1638-1642.
  • [39]Chinese Ministry of Health: Survey Report of Chinese Health Literacy. Beijing; 2009.
  • [40]Marshall MN, Romano PS, Davies HTO: How do we maximize the impact of the public reporting of quality of care? Int J Qual Health C 2004, 16:I57-I63.
  • [41]Liu C, Bartram T, Casimir G, Leggat SG: The link between Participation in Management Decision-making and Quality of Patient Care as Perceived by Chinese Doctors. Public Manage Rev 2014. In print
  • [42]Liu C, Liu W, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Wang P: Patient safety culture in China: a case study in an outpatient setting in Beijing. BMJ Qual Saf 2014, 23:556-564.
  • [43]Sherman KL, Gordon EJ, Mahvi DM, Chung J, Bentrem DJ, Holl JL, Bilimoria KY: Surgeons’ perceptions of public reporting of hospital and individual surgeon quality. Med Care 2013, 51(12):1069-1075.
  • [44]Mukamel DB, Glance LG, Dick AW, Osler TM: Measuring quality for public reporting of health provider quality: making it meaningful to patients. Am J Public Health 2010, 100(2):264-269.
  • [45]Ledikwe JH, Grignon J, Lebelonyane R, Ludick S, Matshediso E, Sento BW, Sharma A, Semo BW: Improving the quality of health information: a qualitative assessment of data management and reporting systems in Botswana. Health Res Policy Syst 2014, 12:7. BioMed Central Full Text
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次