期刊论文详细信息
Implementation Science
Comparing traditional and participatory dissemination of a shared decision making intervention (ADAPT-NC): a cluster randomized trial
Michael Dulin2  Sveta Mohanan1  Diane Derkowski3  Jacquie Halladay4  Thamara Alkhazraji2  Yhenneko Taylor2  Lindsay Kuhn1  Thomas Ludden2  Andrew McWilliams1  Hazel Tapp1 
[1]Department of Family Medicine, Carolinas HealthCare System, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 400 Mercy Medical Plaza, Charlotte 28207, NC, USA
[2]Dickson Advanced Analytics, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, USA
[3]Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, USA
[4]Department of Family Medicine, UNC Chapel Hill and The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill, USA
关键词: Decision aids;    Dissemination;    Facilitated implementation;    Shared decision making;    Asthma;   
Others  :  1139503
DOI  :  10.1186/s13012-014-0158-0
 received in 2014-09-17, accepted in 2014-10-07,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Asthma is a common disease that affects people of all ages and has significant morbidity and mortality. Poor outcomes and health disparities related to asthma result in part from the difficulty of disseminating new evidence and care delivery methods such as shared decision making (SDM) into clinical practice.

This 3-year study explores the ideal framework for rapid dissemination of an evidence-based SDM toolkit for asthma management. The study leverages a partnership between the North Carolina (NC) statewide Medicaid network and the NC Network Consortium of practice-based research networks (PBRNs).

Methods/design

This non-blinded study will randomize 30 primary care clinics in NC stratified by four PBRNs. We will test dissemination across these practices using a facilitator-led participatory approach to dissemination (FLOW), a novel method of participatory dissemination involving key principles of community-based participatory research, and a more typical ¿lunch and learn¿ dissemination method. Specifically, we will use cluster randomization to assign each of the 30 practices to one of three arms: (1) control, no dissemination; (2) traditional dissemination, one didactic session a year and distribution of educational material; and (3) FLOW dissemination. We hypothesize that at the unit of randomization, the clinic, patients in the FLOW dissemination arm will be more likely to share in their treatment decisions compared to patients in the traditional dissemination or control arms. All outcomes will be measured at the level of the clinic. Adoption of the SDM approach will be evaluated by 1) asthma exacerbations, 2) level of patient involvement in the decision making process, and 3) qualitative assessments from patients and providers.

The research question is: What dissemination strategy most effectively increases practice level adoption of a shared decision making approach to asthma management? This study will provide important data to support best practices in dissemination of an evidence-based toolkit and implementation of shared decision making into primary care practices.

Trial registration

The trial was registered on January 27, 2014 through the United States National Institutes of Health¿s ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02047929 webcite and funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI).

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Tapp et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150321153222614.pdf 851KB PDF download
Figure 3. 47KB Image download
Figure 2. 22KB Image download
Figure 1. 43KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Akinbami L, Moorman J, Lui X: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Health Statistics Reports. Asthma prevalence, health care use, and mortality: United states 2005¿2009 2011, 32:1-16. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/dara/nhsr/nhsr032.pdf
  • [2]Akinbami LJ, Moorman JE, Bailey C, Zahran HS, King M, Johnson CA, Liu X: Trends in asthma prevalence, health care use, and mortality in the United States, 2001¿2010. NCHS Data Brief 2012, 94:1-8.
  • [3][http:/ / www.lung.org/ finding-cures/ our-research/ trend-reports/ asthma-trend-report.pdf] webcite Trends in asthma morbidity and mortality.Trends in Asthma Morbidity and Mortality. American Lung Association, Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, Research and Health Education Division; 2012.
  • [4]Meltzer EO, Blaiss MS, Nathan RA, Doherty DE, Murphy KR, Stoloff SW: Asthma burden in the United States: results of the 2009 Asthma Insight and Management survey. Allergy Asthma Proc 2012, 33:36-46.
  • [5]Flores G, Bridon C, Torres S, Perez R, Walter T, Brotanek J, Lin H, Tomany-Korman S: Improving asthma outcomes in minority children: a randomized, controlled trial of parent mentors. Pediatrics 2009, 124:1522-1532.
  • [6]van der Meer V, Bakker MJ, van den Hout WB, Rabe KF, Sterk PJ, Kievit J, Assendelft WJ, Sont JK, Group SS: Internet-based self-management plus education compared with usual care in asthma: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151:110-120.
  • [7]Wilson SR, Strub P, Buist AS, Knowles SB, Lavori PW, Lapidus J, Vollmer WM: Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010, 181:566-577.
  • [8][http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13268] webcite For the public¿s health: investing in a healthier future. Committee on Public Health Strategies to Improve Health; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practices; Institute of Medicine; 2012. The National Academies Press at
  • [9][http://archive.ahrq.gov/funding/arra/factsheets/osfsdti.html] webcite US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency For Healthcare Research and Quality. Fact Sheet: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Investments in Comparative Effectiveness Research for dissemination, translation, and implementation. 2010
  • [10]Grol R, Grimshaw J: From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients¿ care. Lancet 2003, 362:1225-1230.
  • [11]Grol R, Grimshaw J: Evidence-based implementation of evidence-based medicine. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1999, 25:503-513.
  • [12]Grol R, Zwaard A, Mokkink H, Dalhuijsen J, Casparie A: Dissemination of guidelines: which sources do physicians use in order to be informed? Int J Qual Health Care 1998, 10:135-140.
  • [13]Knapp JF, Simon SD, Sharma V: Does active dissemination of evidence result in faster knowledge transfer than passive diffusion?: An analysis of trends of the management of pediatric asthma and croup in US emergency departments from 1995 to 2009. Pediatr Emerg Care 2014, ?:?. Epub ahead of print
  • [14]Prior M, Guerin M, Grimmer-Somers K: The effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies¿a synthesis of systematic review findings. J Eval Clin Pract 2008, 14:888-897.
  • [15]Legare F, O¿Connor AM, Graham ID, Saucier D, Cote L, Blais J, Cauchon M, Pare L: Primary health care professionals¿ views on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework in practice. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 63:380-390.
  • [16]Pakhale S, Doucette S, Vandemheen K, Boulet LP, McIvor RA, Fitzgerald JM, Hernandez P, Lemiere C, Sharma S, Field SK, Alvarez GG, Dales RE, Aaron SD: A comparison of obese and nonobese people with asthma: exploring an asthma-obesity interaction. Chest 2010, 137:1316-1323.
  • [17]Labonte I, Hassan M, Risse PA, Tsuchiya K, Laviolette M, Lauzon AM, Martin JG: The effects of repeated allergen challenge on airway smooth muscle structural and molecular remodeling in a rat model of allergic asthma. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2009, 297:L698-L705.
  • [18]Guerra S, Sherrill DL, Martinez FD, Barbee RA: Rhinitis as an independent risk factor for adult-onset asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002, 109:419-425.
  • [19]Tapp H, Hebert L, Dulin M: Comparative effectiveness of asthma interventions within a practice based research network. BMC Health Serv Res 2011, 11:188. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [20]Tapp H, Kuhn L, Alkhazraji T, Steuerwald M, Ludden T, Wilson S, Mowrer L, Mohanan S, Dulin MF: Adapting community based participatory research (CBPR) methods to the implementation of an asthma shared decision making intervention in ambulatory practices. J Asthma 2014, 51:380-390.
  • [21]Tapp H, Dulin M: The science of primary health-care improvement: potential and use of community-based participatory research by practice-based research networks for translation of research into practice. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2010, 235:290-299.
  • [22]Peterson KA, Lipman PD, Lange CJ, Cohen RA, Durako S: Supporting better science in primary care: a description of practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in 2011. J Am Board Fam Med 2012, 25:565-571.
  • [23]Stanford RH, Shah MB, D¿Souza AO, Schatz M: Predicting asthma outcomes in commercially insured and Medicaid populations? Am J Manag Care 2013, 19:60-67.
  • [24]Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS: Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 1988, 44:1049-1060.
  • [25]Hayes RJ, Bennett S: Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials. Int J Epidemiol 1999, 28:319-326.
  • [26]Cloutier MM, Hall CB, Wakefield DB, Bailit H: Use of asthma guidelines by primary care providers to reduce hospitalizations and emergency department visits in poor, minority, urban children. J Pediatr 2005, 146:591-597.
  • [27]Flores E, Espinoza P, Jacobellis J, Bakemeier R, Press N: The greater Denver Latino Cancer Prevention/Control Network. Prevention and research through a community-based approach. Cancer 2006, 107:2034-2042.
  • [28]Hong R, Baumann B, Boudreaux E: The emergency department for routine healthcare: race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and perceptual factors. J Emerg Med 2007, 32:149-158.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:12次 浏览次数:19次