The influence of social networks on self-management support: a metasynthesis

BMC Public Health

Jan Koetsenruijter²  Anne Kennedy¹  Anne Rogers¹  Ivaylo Vassilev¹ 

[1] NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK;Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), UMC St Radboud, Nijmegen, Netherlands

关键词: Metasynthesis;    Network mechanisms;    Chronic illness;    Self-management;    Social network;   

Others  :  1129004
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-719

 received in 2014-05-06, accepted in 2014-07-01,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

There is increasing recognition that chronic illness management (CIM) is not just an individual but a collective process where social networks can potentially make a considerable contribution to improving health outcomes for people with chronic illness. However, the mechanisms (processes, activities) taking place within social networks are insufficiently understood. The aim of this review was to focus on identifying the mechanisms linking social networks with CIM. Here we consider network mechanisms as located within a broader social context that shapes practices, behaviours, and the multiplicity of functions and roles that network members fulfil.

Methods

A systematic search of qualitative studies was undertaken on Medline, Embase, and Web for papers published between 1^st January 2002 and 1^st December 2013. Eligible for inclusion were studies dealing with diabetes, and with conditions or health behaviours relevant for diabetes management; and studies exploring the relationship between social networks, self-management, and deprivation. 25 papers met the inclusion criteria. A qualitative metasynthesis was undertaken and the review followed a line of argument synthesis.

Results

The main themes identified were: 1) sharing knowledge and experiences in a personal community; 2) accessing and mediation of resources; 3) self-management support requires awareness of and ability to deal with network relationships. These translated into line of argument synthesis in which three network mechanisms were identified. These were network navigation (identifying and connecting with relevant existing resources in a network), negotiation within networks (re-shaping relationships, roles, expectations, means of engagement and communication between network members), and collective efficacy (developing a shared perception and capacity to successfully perform behaviour through shared effort, beliefs, influence, perseverance, and objectives). These network mechanisms bring to the fore the close interdependence between social and psychological processes in CIM, and the intertwining of practical and moral dilemmas in identifying, offering, accepting, and rejecting support.

Conclusions

CIM policy and interventions could be extended towards: raising awareness about the structure and organisation of personal communities; building individual and network capacity for navigating and negotiating relationships and CIM environments; maximising the possibilities for social engagement as a way of increasing the effectiveness of individual and network efforts for CIM.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Vassilev et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Carpiano RM: Neighbourhood social capital and adult health: an empirical test of Bourdieu-based model. Health Place 2007, 13:639-655.
• [2]Stafford M, De Silva M, Stansfeld S, Marmot M: Neighbourhood social capital and common mental disorder: testing the link in a general population sample. Health Place 2008, 14:394-405.
• [3]Thoits P: Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. J Health Hum Behav 2011, 52:145-161.
• [4]Bury M: The sociology of chronic illness: a review of research and prospects. Sociol Health Illn 1991, 13:451-468.
• [5]Townsend A, Wyke S, Hunt K: Self-managing and managing self: practical and moral dilemmas in accounts of living with chronic illness. Chronic Illness 2006, 2:185-194.
• [6]Rogers A, Vassilev I, Kennedy A, Blickem C, Reeves D, Brooks H: Why less may be more?: A mixed methods study of the work and relatedness of ‘weak’ ties in supporting long term condition self- management. Implementation Sci 2014, 9:19.
• [7]Entwistle V, France E, Wyke S, Jepson R, Hunt K, Ziebland S, Thompson A: How information about other people’s personal experiences can help with healthcare decision-making: a qualitative study. Patient Educ Counsel 2011, 85:e291-e298.
• [8]Christakis N, Fowler J: The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:370-379.
• [9]Fowler J, Christakis N: Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham heart study. BMJ 2008, 337:a2338.
• [10]Vassilev I, Rogers A, Sanders C, Kennedy A, Blickem C, Protheroe J, Bower P, Kirk S, Chew-Graham C, Morris R: Social networks, social capital and chronic illness self-management: a realist review. Chronic Illness 2011, 7:60-86.
• [11]Vassilev I, Rogers A, Blickem C, Brooks H, Kapadia D, Kennedy A, Sanders C, Kirk S, Reeves D: Social networks, and the ‘work’ and work force of chronic illness self-management: a survey analysis of personal communities. PlosONE 2013, 8:e59723.
• [12]Stoller E, Wisniewski A: The structure of lay consultation networks: managing illness in community settings. J Aging Health 2003, 15:482-507.
• [13]Granovetter M: The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 1973, 78:1360.
• [14]Granovetter M: The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociol Theory 1983, 1:201-233.
• [15]Valente T: Opinion leader interventions in social networks. BMJ 2006, 333:1082-1083.
• [16]Gallant MP, Spitze G, Grove JG: Chronic illness self-care and the family lives of older adults: a synthetic review across four ethnic groups. J Cross Cult Gerontol 2010, 25:21-43.
• [17]Lawton J, Rankin D, Elliott J, Heller S, Rogers H, De Zoysa N, Amiel S: DAFNE study group experiences, views, and support needs of family members of people with hypoglycemia unawareness: interview study. Diabetes Care 2014, 37:109-115.
• [18]Noblit GW, Hare RD: Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. London: Sage; 1988.
• [19]Paterson BL, Thorne SE, Canam C, Jillings C: Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis. London: Sage; 2001.
• [20]Blaxter M: Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research papers. Med Soc News 1996, 22:68-71.
• [21]Miller CK, Davis MS: The influential role of social support in diabetes management. Top Clin Nutrv 2005, 20:157-165.
• [22]Sparud-Lundin C, Ohrn I, Danielson E: Redefining relationships and identity in young adults with type 1 diabetes. J Adv Nurs 2010, 66:128-138.
• [23]White P, Smith SM, O’Dowd T: Living with type 2 diabetes: a family perspective. Diabet Med 2007, 24:796-801.
• [24]Beverly EA, Miller CK, Wray LA: Spousal support and food-related behavior change in middle-aged and older adults living with type 2 diabetes. Health Educ Behav 2008, 35:707-720.
• [25]Stone M, Pound E, Pancholi A, Farooqi A, Khunti K: Empowering patients with diabetes: a qualitative primary care study focusing on South Asians in Leicester, UK. Fam Pract 2005, 22:647-652.
• [26]Gorawara-Bhat R, Huang ES, Chin MH: Communicating with older diabetes patients: self-management and social comparison. Patient Educ Counsel 2008, 72:411-417.
• [27]Chesla CA, Chun KM: Accommodating type 2 diabetes in the Chinese American family. Qual Health Res 2005, 15:240-255.
• [28]Beverly EA, Wray LA: The role of collective efficacy in exercise adherence: a qualitative study of spousal support and type 2 diabetes management. Health Educ Res 2010, 25:211-223.
• [29]Laroche HH, Davis MM, Forman J, Palmisano G, Reisinger HS, Tanners C, Spencer M, Heister M: Children’s roles in parents’ diabetes self-management. Am J Prev Med 2009, 37:1-61.
• [30]Gallant MP, Spitze GD, Prohaska TR: Help or hindrance? How family and friends influence chronic illness self-management among older adults. Res Aging 2007, 29:375-409.
• [31]Carter-Edwards L, Skelly AH, Cagle CS, Appel SJ: “They care but don’t understand”: family support of African American women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educat 2004, 30:493-501.
• [32]Ruston A, Smith A, Fernando B: Diabetes in the workplace – diabetic’s perceptions and experiences of managing their disease at work: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2013, 13:386.
• [33]Jones RA, Utz SW, Williams IC, Hinton I, Alexander G, Moore C, Blankenship J, Steeves R, Oliver N: Family interactions among African Americans diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educat 2008, 34:318-326.
• [34]Sarkadi A, Rosenqvist U: Social network and role demands in women’s type 2 diabetes: a model. Health Care Women Int 2002, 23:600-611.
• [35]Essue BM, Jowsey T, Jeon YH, Mirzaei M, Pearce-Brown CL, Aspin C, Usherwood TP: Informal care and the self-management partnership: Implications for Australian health policy and practice. Aust Health Rev 2010, 34:414-422.
• [36]Laroche HH, Davis MM, Forman J, Palmisano G, Heister M: What about the children? The experience of families involved in an adult-focused diabetes intervention. Publ Health Nutr 2008, 11:427-436.
• [37]Kohinor MJ, Stronks K, Haafkens JA: Factors affecting the disclosure of diabetes by ethnic minority patients: a qualitative study among Surinamese in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health 2011, 11:399.
• [38]Kokanovic R, Manderson L: Social support and self-management of type 2 diabetes among immigrant Australian women. Chronic Illness 2006, 2:291-301.
• [39]Atkinson MJ, Boltri JM, vis-Smith M, Seale JP, Shellenberger S, Gonsalves D: A qualitative inquiry into the community and programmatic dimensions associated with successful implementation of church-based diabetes prevention programs. J Publ Health Manag Pract 2009, 15:264-273.
• [40]Chlebowy OD, Hood S, LaJoie AS: Facilitators and barriers to self-management of type 2 diabetes among urban African American adults: focus group findings. Diabetes Educat 2010, 36:897-905.
• [41]Jepson R, Harris F, Bowes A, Robertson R, Avan G, Sheikh A: Physical activity in South Asians: an in-depth qualitative study to explore motivations and facilitators. PlosONE 2012, 7:e45333.
• [42]Pistulka G, Winch P, Park H, Han HR, Kim M: Maintaining an outward image: a Korean immigrant’s life with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Qual Health Res 2012, 22:825-834.
• [43]Shaw J, Brown J, Khan B, Mau M, Dillard D: Resources, roadblocks and turning points: a qualitative study of American Indian/Alaska native adults with type 2 diabetes. J Community Health 2013, 38:86-94.
• [44]Thompson S, Chenhall R, Brimblecombe J: Indigenous perspectives on active living in remote Australia: a qualitative exploration of the socio-cultural link between health, the environment and economics. BMC Public Health 2013, 13:473.
• [45]Ward N, Jowsey T, Haora P, Aspin C, Yen L: With good intentions: complexity in unsolicited informal support for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. A qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2011, 11:686.
• [46]Jennings A: The use of available social support networks by older blacks. J Natl Black Nurses Assoc 1999, 10:4-13.
• [47]Berkman L, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman T: From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med 2000, 51:843-857.
• [48]Gesler WM: The Cultural Geography of Health Care. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press; 1991.
• [49]Duff C: The drifting city: the role of affect and repair in the development of “Enabling Environments”. Int J Drug Policy 2009, 20:202-208.