Impact of mode of delivery on the birth experience in first-time mothers: a qualitative study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Francis Guillemin³  Michel Boulvain¹  Nasir Jamei¹  Christine Cedraschi⁴  Marie-Julia Guittier² 

[1] Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland;Professeure filière sage-femme, Haute Ecole de Santé, 47 Avenue de Champel, Geneva, 1206, Switzerland;Lorraine & Paris Descartes University, EA 4360 Apemac, Nancy, France;Divisions of General Medical Rehabilitation, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland

关键词: Vaginal delivery;    Caesarean section;    Qualitative study;    Delivery experience;    Mode of delivery;   

Others  :  1125745
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2393-14-254

 received in 2013-11-22, accepted in 2014-07-09,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The birth of a first child is an important event in a woman’s life. Delivery psychological impacts vary depending on whether delivery has been positively or negatively experienced. Delivery experience determinants have been identified but the understanding of their expression according to the mode of delivery is poorly documented. The purpose of the study was to determine important elements associated with women’s first delivery experience according to the mode of delivery: vaginal or caesarean section.

Methods

Qualitative approach using thematic content analysis of in-depth interviews conducted between 4 and 6 weeks’ postpartum, in 24 primiparous women who delivered at Geneva University Hospital in 2012.

Results

Perceived control, emotions, and the first moments with the newborn are important elements for the experience of childbirth. Depending on the mode of delivery these are perceived differently, with a negative connotation in the case of caesarean section. Other elements influencing the delivery experience were identified among all participants, irrespective of the mode of delivery. They included representations, as well as the relationship with caregivers and the father in the delivery room, privacy, unexpected sensory experiences, and ownership of the maternal role. Women’s and health professionals’ representations sometimes led to a hierarchy based on the mode of delivery and use of analgesia.

Conclusions

The mode of delivery directly impacts on certain key delivery experience determinants as perceived control, emotions, and the first moments with the newborn. The ability/inability of the woman to imagine a second pregnancy is a good indicator of the birth experience. Certain health professional gestures or attitudes can promote a positive delivery experience. We recommend to better prepare women during prenatal classes for the eventuality of a caesarean section delivery and to offer all women and, possibly, their partners, the opportunity to talk about the experience of childbirth during the postpartum period. The results of this study suggest that further research is required on the social representations of women and health professionals regarding the existence of a hierarchy associated with the mode of delivery.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Guittier et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Darvill R, Skirton H, Farrand P: Psychological factors that impact on women’s experiences of first-time motherhood: a qualitative study of the transition. Midwifery 2010, 26(3):357-366.
• [2]Fair CD, Morrison TE: The relationship between prenatal control, expectations, experienced control, and birth satisfaction among primiparous women. Midwifery 2012, 28(1):39-44.
• [3]Emmanuel E, St John W: Maternal distress: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2010, 66(9):2104-2115.
• [4]Nilsson C, Bondas T, Lundgren I: Previous birth experience in women with intense fear of childbirth. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2010, 39(3):298-309.
• [5]Burke L: The impact of maternal depression on familial relationships. Int Rev Psychiatry 2003, 15(3):243-255.
• [6]De Luca R, Boulvain M, Irion O, Berner M, Pfister RE: Incidence of early neonatal mortality and morbidity after late-preterm and term cesarean delivery. Pediatrics 2009, 123(6):e1064-e1071.
• [7]Lavender T, Walkinshaw SA, Walton I: A prospective study of women’s views of factors contributing to a positive birth experience. Midwifery 1999, 15(1):40-46.
• [8]Hodnett ED: Caregiver support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002, 1:CD000199.
• [9]Crowe K, Von Baeyer C: Predictors of a positive childbirth experience. Birth 1989, 16(2):59-63.
• [10]Ford E, Ayers S: Stressful events and support during birth: the effect on anxiety, mood and perceived control. J Anxiety Disord 2009, 23(2):260-268.
• [11]Bryanton J, Gagnon AJ, Johnston C, Hatem M: Predictors of women’s perceptions of the childbirth experience. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2008, 37(1):24-34.
• [12]Rijnders M, Baston H, Schonbeck Y, van der Pal K, Prins M, Green J, Buitendijk S: Perinatal factors related to negative or positive recall of birth experience in women 3 years postpartum in the Netherlands. Birth 2008, 35(2):107-116.
• [13]Salmon P, Drew NC: Multidimensional assessment of women’s experience of childbirth: relationship to obstetric procedure, antenatal preparation and obstetric history. J Psychosom Res 1992, 36(4):317-327.
• [14]Wiklund I, Edman G, Larsson C, Andolf E: First-time mothers and changes in personality in relation to mode of delivery. J Adv Nurs 2009, 65(8):1636-1644.
• [15]Blomquist JL, Quiroz LH, Macmillan D, McCullough A, Handa VL: Mothers’ satisfaction with planned vaginal and planned cesarean birth. Am J Perinatol 2011, 28(5):383-388.
• [16]Maine D, Wardlaw TM, Ward VM, McCarthy J, Birnbaum A, Akalin MZ, Brown JE: Lignes Directrices Pour la Surveillance de la Disponibilité et de l’utilisation de Services Obstétricaux. New York, NY, 10017: Fonds des Nations Unies pour l’Enfance; 2003:73.
• [17]Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF: Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol 2006, 30(5):235-241.
• [18]Bramadat IJ, Driedger M: Satisfaction with childbirth: theories and methods of measurement. Birth 1993, 20(1):22-29.
• [19]Green JM, Coupland VA, Kitzinger JV: Expectations, experiences, and psychological outcomes of childbirth: a prospective study of 825 women. Birth 1990, 17(1):15-24.
• [20]Waldenstrom U, Borg IM, Olsson B, Skold M, Wall S: The childbirth experience: a study of 295 new mothers. Birth 1996, 23(3):144-153.
• [21]Liamputtong P: Qualitative data analysis: conceptual and practical considerations. Health Promot J Austr 2009, 20(2):133-139.
• [22]Marshall MN: Sampling for qualitative research. Fam Pract 1996, 13(6):522-525.
• [23]Mays N, Pope C: Qualitative Research in Health Care. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 1996.
• [24]Spencer J, Ritchie L: Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. Edited by Bryman A, Burgess RG. London; 1994.
• [25]Strauss A, Corbin J: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques. London: Sage; 1990.
• [26]Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N: Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000, 320(7227):114-116.
• [27]Mays N, Pope C: Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 2000, 320(7226):50-52.
• [28]Whittemore R, Chase SK, Mandle CL: Validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res 2001, 11(4):522-537.
• [29]Clark JP: How to Peer Review a Qualitative Manuscript. In Peer Review in Health Sciences. Second edition. Edited by Godlee F, Jefferson T. London: BMJ Books; 2003:219-235.
• [30]Wiklund I, Edman G, Andolf E: Cesarean section on maternal request: reasons for the request, self-estimated health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among first-time mothers. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007, 86(4):451-456.
• [31]Schwartz N, Sudman S: Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research. New-York: Springer; 1992.
• [32]Wallston KA, Strudler Wallston B, Smith S, Dobbins CJ: Perceived control and health. Curr Psychol 1987, 6(1):5-25.
• [33]Larkin P, Begley CM, Devane D: Women’s experiences of labour and birth: an evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery 2009, 25(2):e49-e59.
• [34]Ferber SG, Makhoul IR: The effect of skin-to-skin contact (kangaroo care) shortly after birth on the neurobehavioral responses of the term newborn: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2004, 113(4):858-865.
• [35]Lundgren I: Swedish women’s experience of childbirth 2 years after birth. Midwifery 2005, 21(4):346-354.
• [36]Stern G, Kruckman L: Multi-disciplinary perspectives on post-partum depression: an anthropological critique. Soc Sci Med 1983, 17(15):1027-1041.
• [37]Green JM: Expectations and experiences of pain in labor: findings from a large prospective study. Birth 1993, 20(2):65-72.
• [38]Le Breton D: Expériences de la Douleur. Paris: Métailié edn; 2010.
• [39]Kannan S, Jamison RN, Datta S: Maternal satisfaction and pain control in women electing natural childbirth. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001, 26(5):468-472.
• [40]Lilja G, Edhborg M, Nissen E: Depressive mood in women at childbirth predicts their mood and relationship with infant and partner during the first year postpartum. Scand J Caring Sci 2012, 26(2):245-253.
• [41]Larkin P, Begley CM, Devane D: ‘Not enough people to look after you’: an exploration of women’s experiences of childbirth in the Republic of Ireland. Midwifery 2011.
• [42]Handelzalts JE, Fisher S, Lurie S, Shalev A, Golan A, Sadan O: Personality, fear of childbirth and cesarean delivery on demand. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012, 91(1):16-21.
• [43]Callister LC: Making meaning: women’s birth narratives. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2004, 33(4):508-518.
• [44]Chan KK, Paterson-Brown S: How do fathers feel after accompanying their partners in labour and delivery? J Obstet Gynaecol 2002, 22(1):11-15.