Perceptions of health professionals towards the management of back pain in the context of work: a qualitative study

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Tom Sanders¹  Majid Artus¹  Jemma Cowen¹  Annette Bishop¹  Bie Nio Ong¹  Danielle van der Windt¹  Gwenllian Wynne-Jones¹ 

[1] Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire ST55BG, UK

关键词: Qualitative;    Primary care;    Health professionals;    Musculoskeletal pain;    Sickness absence;    Fit note;   

Others  :  1125539
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-15-210

 received in 2014-02-06, accepted in 2014-06-12,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Musculoskeletal complaints have a significant impact on work in terms of reduced productivity, sickness absence and long term incapacity for work. This study sought to explore GPs’ and physiotherapists’ perceptions of sickness certification in patients with musculoskeletal problems.

Methods

Eleven (11) GPs were sampled from an existing general practice survey, and six (6) physiotherapists were selected randomly using ‘snowball’ sampling techniques, through established contacts in local physiotherapy departments. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with respondents lasting up to 30 minutes. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim, following which they were coded using N-Vivo qualitative software and analysed thematically using the constant comparative methodology, where themes were identified and contrasted between and within both groups of respondents.

Results

Three themes were identified from the analysis: 1) Approaches to evaluating patients’ work problems 2) Perceived ability to manage ‘work and pain’, and 3) Policies and penalties in the work-place. First, physiotherapists routinely asked patients about their job and work difficulties using a structured (protocol-driven) approach, whilst GPs rarely used such structured measures and were less likely to enquire about patients’ work situation. Second, return to work assessments revealed a tension between GPs’ gatekeeper and patient advocacy roles, often resolved in favour of patients’ concerns and needs. Some physiotherapists perceived that GPs’ decisions could be influenced by patients’ demand for a sick certificate and their close relationship with patients made them vulnerable to manipulation. Third, the workplace was considered to be a specific source of strain for patients acting as a barrier to work resumption, and over which GPs and physiotherapists could exercise only limited control.

Conclusion

We conclude that healthcare professionals need to take account of patients’ work difficulties, their own perceived ability to offer effective guidance, and consider the ‘receptivity’ of employment contexts to patients’ work problems, in order to ensure a smooth transition back to work.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Wynne-Jones et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Phillips C, Main CJ, Buck R, Aylward M, Wynne-Jones G, Farr A: Prioritising pain in policy making: the need for a whole systems perspective. Health Policy 2008, 88:166-175.
• [2]Waddell G, Burton AK: Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-Being?. London: The Stationary Office; 2006.
• [3]Bevan S, Quadrello T, McGee R, Mahdon M, Vavrovsky A, Barham A: Fit for work? Musculoskeletal disorders in the European workforce. In The Work Foundation Report. London: The Work Foundation; 2012.
• [4]Nguyen TH, Randolph DC: Nonspecific low back pain and return to work. Am Fam Physician 2007, 15;76(10):1497-1502.
• [5]Department for Work and Pensions, Office of Public Sector Information: Explanation memorandum to the social security terms and conditions of employment: The Social Security (Medical Evidence) and Statutory Sick Pay (Medical Evidence) (Amendment) Regulations No. 137. London: Department for Work and Pensions; 2010. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/em/uksiem_20100137_en.pdf [Accessed 19th June 2013]
• [6]National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Public health guidance 19: Management of long-term sickness absence and incapacity for work. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2009. http://www.nice.org.uk/ph19 webcite [accessed 19th June 2013]
• [7]Bremander AB, Heubertsson J, Petersson IF, Grahn B: Education and benchmarking among physicians may facilitate sick-listing practice. J Occup Rehabil 2012, 22(1):78-87.
• [8]Hann M, Sibbald B: General Practitioners’ attitudes towards patients’ health and work, 2010–12. In Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 835. London: Department for Work and Pensions; 2013.
• [9]Thomson L, Hampton R: Fit for work? Changing fit note practice among GPs. Br J Gen Pract 2012, 62(595):147-150.
• [10]Morrison J: Work, fit notes and occupational health. Br J Gen Pract 2010, 60(579):715-716.
• [11]Welsh VK, Mallen CD, Wynne-Jones G, Jinks C: Exploration of the GPs’ views and use of the fit note: a qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2012, 62(598):363-370.
• [12]Black C: Review of the health of Britain’s working age population: working for a healthier tomorrow. London: The Stationary Office; 2008.
• [13]Allied Health Professions Foundationhttp://www.cot.co.uk/ahp-advisory-fitness-work-report webcite (accessed 18th July 2013)
• [14]Wynne-Jones G, Mallen CD, Main CJ, Dunn KM: Sickness certification and the general practitioner: what really happens in general practice? Fam Pract 2010, 27(3):344-350.
• [15]Blakeman T, Macdonald WJ, Bower PJ, Gately C, Chew-Graham CA: A qualitative study of GPs’ attitudes to self-management of chronic disease. Br J Gen Pract 2006, 56(527):407-414.
• [16]Blakeman T, Chew-Graham C, Reeves D, Rogers A, Bower P: The quality and outcomes framework and self-management dialogue in primary care consultations: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2011, 61(591):666-673.
• [17]Breen A, Austin H, Campion-Smith C, Carr E, Mann E: “You feel so hopeless”: a qualitative study of GP management of acute back pain. Eur J Pain 2007, 11(1):21-29.
• [18]Swartling M, Wahlström R: Isolated specialist or system integrated physician-different views on sickness certification among orthopaedic surgeons: an interview study. BMC Health Serv Res 2008, 8:273. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Baum FE, Legge DG, Freeman T, Lawless A, Labonté R, Jolley GM: The potential for multi-disciplinary primary health care services to take action on the social determinants of health: actions and constraints. BMC Public Health 2013, 13:460. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Baker-McClearn D, Greasley K, Dale J, Griffith F: Absence management and presenteeism: the pressures on employees to attend work and the impact of attendance on performance. Hum Resour Manage J 2010, 20(3):311-328.
• [21]Wynne-Jones G, Webb K, Buck R, Cooper L, Button L, Main CJ, Phillips CJ: What happens to work if you’re unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in public sector organisations. J Occup Rehabil 2011, 21(1):31-42.
• [22]Collins A, Cartwright S: Why come into work ill? Individual and organizational factors underlying presenteeism. Employee Relat 2012, 34(4):429-442.
• [23]Nettleton S: ‘I just want permission to be ill’: towards a sociology of medically unexplained symptoms. Soc Sci Med 2006, 62(5):1167-1178.
• [24]Pinder R: Bringing back the body without the blame? The experience of ill and disabled people at work. Sociol Health Illn 1995, 17(5):331-605.