BMC Pediatrics | |
Validation of computerized wheeze detection in young infants during the first months of life | |
Gerd Schmalisch1  Simon Godfrey3  Jakob Usemann2  Silke Wilitzki1  Hendrik S Fischer1  Lia C Puder1  | |
[1] Department of Neonatology, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany;Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany;Emeritus Professor of Pediatrics, Hadassah-Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel | |
关键词: Infants; Computerized wheeze detection; Wheezing; Phonopneumography; Auscultation; Lung sound; | |
Others : 1121218 DOI : 10.1186/1471-2431-14-257 |
|
received in 2014-04-17, accepted in 2014-09-22, 发布年份 2014 | |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Several respiratory diseases are associated with specific respiratory sounds. In contrast to auscultation, computerized lung sound analysis is objective and can be performed continuously over an extended period. Moreover, audio recordings can be stored. Computerized lung sounds have rarely been assessed in neonates during the first year of life. This study was designed to determine and validate optimal cut-off values for computerized wheeze detection, based on the assessment by trained clinicians of stored records of lung sounds, in infants aged <1 year.
Methods
Lung sounds in 120 sleeping infants, of median (interquartile range) postmenstrual age of 51 (44.5–67.5) weeks, were recorded on 144 test occasions by an automatic wheeze detection device (PulmoTrack®). The records were retrospectively evaluated by three trained clinicians blinded to the results. Optimal cut-off values for the automatically determined relative durations of inspiratory and expiratory wheezing were determined by receiver operating curve analysis, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated.
Results
The optimal cut-off values for the automatically detected durations of inspiratory and expiratory wheezing were 2% and 3%, respectively. These cutoffs had a sensitivity and specificity of 85.7% and 80.7%, respectively, for inspiratory wheezing and 84.6% and 82.5%, respectively, for expiratory wheezing. Inter-observer reliability among the experts was moderate, with a Fleiss’ Kappa (95% confidence interval) of 0.59 (0.57-0.62) for inspiratory and 0.54 (0.52 - 0.57) for expiratory wheezing.
Conclusion
Computerized wheeze detection is feasible during the first year of life. This method is more objective and can be more readily standardized than subjective auscultation, providing quantitative and noninvasive information about the extent of wheezing.
【 授权许可】
2014 Puder et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20150211022824685.pdf | 419KB | download | |
Figure 3. | 112KB | Image | download |
Figure 2. | 109KB | Image | download |
Figure 1. | 53KB | Image | download |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Pasterkamp H, Kraman SS, Wodicka GR: Respiratory sounds. Advances beyond the stethoscope. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997, 156:974-987.
- [2]Ellington LE, Gilman RH, Tielsch JM, Steinhoff M, Figueroa D, Rodriguez S, Caffo B, Tracey B, Elhilali M, West J, Checkley W: Computerised lung sound analysis to improve the specificity of paediatric pneumonia diagnosis in resource-poor settings: protocol and methods for an observational study. BMJ Open 2012, 2:e000506.
- [3]Prodhan P, Dela Rosa RS, Shubina M, Haver KE, Matthews BD, Buck S, Kacmarek RM, Noviski NN: Wheeze detection in the pediatric intensive care unit: comparison among physician, nurses, respiratory therapists, and a computerized respiratory sound monitor. Respir Care 2008, 53:1304-1309.
- [4]Loudon R, Murphy RL: Lung sounds. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984, 130:663-673.
- [5]Elphick HE, Ritson S, Rodgers H, Everard ML: When a “wheeze” is not a wheeze: acoustic analysis of breath sounds in infants. Eur Respir J 2000, 16:593-597.
- [6]Gavriely N, Shee TR, Cugell DW, Grotberg JB: Flutter in flow-limited collapsible tubes: a mechanism for generation of wheezes. J Appl Physiol 1989, 66:2251-2261.
- [7]Baughman RP, Loudon RG: Quantitation of wheezing in acute asthma. Chest 1984, 86:718-722.
- [8]Tenero L, Tezza G, Cattazzo E, Piacentini G: Wheezing in preschool children. Early Hum Dev 2013, 89(Suppl 3):S13-S17.
- [9]Beck R, Elias N, Shoval S, Tov N, Talmon G, Godfrey S, Bentur L: Computerized acoustic assessment of treatment efficacy of nebulized epinephrine and albuterol in RSV bronchiolitis. BMC Pediatr 2007, 7:22. BioMed Central Full Text
- [10]Ren CL, Konstan MW, Rosenfeld M, Pasta DJ, Millar SJ, Morgan WJ, Fibrosis IaCotESoC: Early childhood wheezing is associated with lower lung function in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2014, 49:745-750.
- [11]Kiyan G, Gocmen B, Tugtepe H, Karakoc F, Dagli E, Dagli TE: Foreign body aspiration in children: the value of diagnostic criteria. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009, 73:963-967.
- [12]Saikia B, Sharma PK, Sharma R, Gagneja V, Khilnani P: Isolated severe bilateral bronchomalacia. Indian J Pediatr 2014, 81:707-708.
- [13]Bentur L, Beck R, Shinawi M, Naveh T, Gavriely N: Wheeze monitoring in children for assessment of nocturnal asthma and response to therapy. Eur Respir J 2003, 21:621-626.
- [14]Cane RS, Ranganathan SC, McKenzie SA: What do parents of wheezy children understand by “wheeze”? Arch Dis Child 2000, 82:327-332.
- [15]Brand PL, Baraldi E, Bisgaard H, Boner AL, Castro-Rodriguez JA, Custovic A, de Blic J, de Jongste JC, Eber E, Everard ML, Frey U, Gappa M, Garcia-Marcos L, Grigg J, Lenney W, Le Souëf P, McKenzie S, Merkus PJ, Midulla F, Paton JY, Piacentini G, Pohunek P, Rossi GA, Seddon P, Silverman M, Sly PD, Stick S, Valiulis A, van Aalderen WM, Wildhaber JH, et al.: Definition, assessment and treatment of wheezing disorders in preschool children: an evidence-based approach. Eur Respir J 2008, 32:1096-1110.
- [16]Peterson-Carmichael SL, Rosenfeld M, Ascher SB, Hornik CP, Arets HG, Davis SD, Hall GL: Survey of clinical infant lung function testing practices. Pediatr Pulmonol 2014, 49:126-131.
- [17]Brooks D, Thomas J: Interrater reliability of auscultation of breath sounds among physical therapists. Phys Ther 1995, 75:1082-1088.
- [18]Elphick HE, Lancaster GA, Solis A, Majumdar A, Gupta R, Smyth RL: Validity and reliability of acoustic analysis of respiratory sounds in infants. Arch Dis Child 2004, 89:1059-1063.
- [19]Guntupalli KK, Alapat PM, Bandi VD, Kushnir I: Validation of automatic wheeze detection in patients with obstructed airways and in healthy subjects. J Asthma 2008, 45:903-907.
- [20]Levy ML, Godfrey S, Irving CS, Sheikh A, Hanekom W, Bush A, Lachman P: Wheeze detection: recordings vs. assessment of physician and parent. J Asthma 2004, 41:845-853.
- [21]Oliveira A, Marques A: Respiratory sounds in healthy people: a systematic review. Respir Med 2014, 108:550-570.
- [22]Marques A, Oliveira A, Jácome C: Computerized adventitious respiratory sounds as outcome measures for respiratory therapy: a systematic review. Respir Care 2014, 59:765-776.
- [23]Bentur L, Beck R, Berkowitz D, Hasanin J, Berger I, Elias N, Gavriely N: Adenosine bronchial provocation with computerized wheeze detection in young infants with prolonged cough: correlation with long-term follow-up. Chest 2004, 126:1060-1065.
- [24]Eising JB, Uiterwaal CS, van der Ent CK: Nocturnal wheeze measurement in preschool children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2014, 49:257-262.
- [25]Schmalisch G, Wilitzki S, Roehr CC, Proquitté H, Bührer C: Differential effects of immaturity and neonatal lung disease on the lung function of very low birth weight infants at 48–52 postconceptional weeks. Pediatr Pulmonol 2013, 48:1214-1223.
- [26]Schmalisch G, Wilitzki S, Roehr CC, Proquitté H, Bührer C: Development of lung function in very low birth weight infants with or without bronchopulmonary dysplasia: longitudinal assessment during the first 15 months of corrected age. BMC Pediatr 2012, 12:37. BioMed Central Full Text
- [27]Reichenheim ME: Confidence intervals for the kappa statistics. Stata J 2004, 4:421-428.
- [28]Lati J, Pellow V, Sproule J, Brooks D, Ellerton C: Examining interrater reliability and validity of a paediatric cardiopulmonary physiotherapy discharge tool. Physiother Can 2014, 66:153-159.
- [29]Wipf JE, Lipsky BA, Hirschmann JV, Boyko EJ, Takasugi J, Peugeot RL, Davis CL: Diagnosing pneumonia by physical examination: relevant or relic? Arch Intern Med 1999, 159:1082-1087.
- [30]Brooks D, Wilson L, Kelsey C: Accuracy and reliability of ‘specialized’ physical therapists in auscultating tape-recorded lung sounds. Physiother Can 1993, 45:21-24.
- [31]Wilkins RL, Dexter JR, Murphy RL, DelBono EA: Lung sound nomenclature survey. Chest 1990, 98:886-889.
- [32]Anonymous: American Thoracic Society Ad Hoc Commitee on Pulmonary Nomenclature - Updated nomenclature for membership reaction. Am Thoracic Soc News 1977, 3:5-6.
- [33]Mikami R, Murao M, Cugell DW, Chretien J, Cole P, Meier-Sydow J, Murphy RL, Loudon RG: International Symposium on Lung Sounds. Synopsis of proceedings Chest 1987, 92(2):342-345.
- [34]Sovijärvi AR, Dalmasso F, Vanderschoot J, Malmberg LP, Righini G, Stoneman S: Definition of terms for applications of respiratory sounds. Eur Respir Rev 2000, 10:597-610.