Barriers and facilitators to using NHS Direct: a qualitative study of ‘users’ and ‘non-users’

BMC Health Services Research

Nasreen Ali³  Angel M Chater⁴  Andy Guppy¹  Shirley Large²  Gurch Randhawa³  Erica J Cook¹ 

[1] Department of Psychology, University of Bedfordshire, Park Square, Luton, UK;NHS England, Horley, UK;Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Putteridge Bury, Hitchin Road, Luton, UK;UCL School of Pharmacy, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, UK

关键词: Qualitative research;    Barriers;    Non-adoption;    Patients’ perspectives;    NHS Direct;    Telephone-based healthcare;   

Others  :  1118265
DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-014-0487-3

 received in 2014-04-29, accepted in 2014-10-03,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

NHS Direct, introduced in 1998, has provided 24/7 telephone-based healthcare advice and information to the public in England and Wales. National studies have suggested variation in the uptake of this service amongst the UK’s diverse population. This study provides the first exploration of the barriers and facilitators that impact upon the uptake of this service from the perspectives of both ‘users’ and ‘non- users’.

Methods

Focus groups were held with NHS Direct ‘users’ (N = 2) from Bedfordshire alongside ‘non-users’ from Manchester (N = 3) and Mendip, Somerset (N = 4). Each focus group had between five to eight participants. A total of eighty one people aged between 21 and 94 years old (M: 58.90, SD: 22.70) took part in this research. Each focus group discussion lasted approximately 90 minutes and was audiotape-recorded with participants’ permission. The recordings were transcribed verbatim. A framework approach was used to analyse the transcripts.

Results

The findings from this research uncovered a range of barriers and facilitators that impact upon the uptake of NHS Direct. ‘Non-users’ were unaware of the range of services that NHS Direct provided. Furthermore, ‘non-users’ highlighted a preference for face-to face communication, identifying a lack of confidence in discussing healthcare over the telephone. This was particularly evident among older people with cognitive difficulties. The cost to telephone a ‘0845’ number from a mobile was also viewed to be a barrier to access NHS Direct, expressed more often by ‘non-users’ from deprived communities. NHS Direct ‘users’ identified that awareness, ease of use and convenience were facilitators which influenced their decision to use the service.

Conclusions

An understanding of the barriers and facilitators which impact on the access and uptake of telephone-based healthcare is essential to move patients towards the self-care model. This research has highlighted the need for telephone-based healthcare services to increase public awareness; through the delivery of more targeted advertising to promote the service provision available.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Cook et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1][http:/ / webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ +/ www.dh.gov.uk/ en/ MediaCentre/ Pressreleases/ DH_118861] webcite The New Number for the Future of Non-Emergency Health Services []
• [2]Calkin S: NHS Direct to Close at the End of the Financial Year. EMAP Publishing Limited, London, UK; 2013.
• [3]Practice Guideline: Telepractice. Standards of Care, Ontario; 2009.
• [4]Stacey D, Noorani HZ, Fisher A, Robinson D, Joyce J, Pong RW: Telephone Triage Services: Systematic Review and a Survey of Canadian Call Centre Programs. Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment, Ottawa; 2003.
• [5]Roland M: Nurse-led telephone advice. Med J Aust 2002, 176:96.
• [6]Goodwin S: Telephone nursing: an emerging practice area. Nurs Leadersh 2007, 20:37-45.
• [7]A Modern and Dependable NHS. HMSO, London; 1997.
• [8]A Plan for Investment- A Plan for Reform. HMSO, London; 2000.
• [9]Beveridge W: Social Insurance and Allied Services. HMSO (Cmnd 6404), London; 1942.
• [10]Wanless D: Securing our Future: Taking a Long-Term View - the Wanless Report. HM Treasury, London; 2002.
• [11]Self Care - A Real Choice. HMSO, London; 2005.
• [12]O’Cathain A, Goode J, Luff D, Strangleman T, Hanlon G, Greatbatch D: Does NHS Direct empower patients? Soc Sci Med 2005, 61:1761-1777.
• [13]Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K: Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 2002, 288(19):2469-2475.
• [14]Purdy S: Avoiding Hospital Admissions: What Does the Research Evidence Say?. The King’s Fund, London, UK; 2010.
• [15]Self Care Support: Baseline Study of Activity and Development in Self Care Support in PCT’s and Local Areas. HMSO, London; 2005.
• [16]Mark AL, Shepherd IDH: Leadership in a Leading Healthcare Organisation - the Development of NHS Direct West London. Middlesex University Business School, London; 2007.
• [17][http://www.politics.co.uk/reference/nhs-direct] webcite NHS Direct []
• [18]Public Attitudes to Self Care Baseline Survey. HMSO, London; 2005.
• [19]Hsu W, Bath PA, Large S, Williams S: Older people’s use of NHS Direct. Age Ageing 2011, 40:335-340.
• [20]Cook E, Randhawa G, Large S, Guppy A, Chater A: Who uses telephone based helplines? Relating deprivation indices to users of NHS Direct. Health Policy Technol 2013, 2:69-74.
• [21]Cook E, Randhawa G, Large S, Guppy A, Chater A: A UK case study of who uses NHS Direct? Investigating the impact of age, gender and deprivation on the utilisation of NHS Direct. Telemed J E Health 2012, 18:693-698.
• [22]Bibi M, Attwell RW, Fairhurst RJ, Powell SC: The usage of NHS Direct by different ethnic and gender groups in an urban population. J Chronic Dis 2008, 23:235-241.
• [23]Davis FD: User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions, and behavioral impacts. Int J Man Mach Stud 1993, 38:475-487.
• [24]Cook E: Who Uses NHS Direct? Factors That Impact on Telephone Based Healthcare. University of Bedfordshire, Luton; 2013.
• [25]Topacan U, Basoglu N, Daim T: Health information service adoption: case of telemedicine. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: 2009; Hawaii, USA 2009.
• [26]Walker RH, Johnson LW: Why consumers use and do not use technology-enabled services. J Serv Mark 2006, 20(2):125-135.
• [27]NHS Direct: understanding barriers amongs younger and older people In Qualitative Research. Works R, Hatfield, UK; 2009.
• [28]Kitzinger J: Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995, 311:299-302.
• [29]Powell RA, Single HM: Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 1996, 8:499-504.
• [30]Foster J, Dale J, Jessopp L: A qualitative study of older people’s views of out-of-hours services. Br J Gen Pract 2001, 51:719-723.
• [31]Campbell SM, Rowland MO: Why do people consult the doctor? Fam Pract 1998, 13(1):75-83.
• [32]Neale J, Worrell M, Randhawa G: Barriers to accessing mental health support services: A qualitative study among young South Asian and African Caribbean communities. J Public Ment Health 2009, 8:15-25.
• [33]Patton MQ: Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA; 2002.
• [34]Morgan DL: The Focus Group Guidebook. Sage Publications, London; 1998.
• [35]Shaw M, Dorling D, Brimblecombe N: Changing the map: health in Britain 1951–91. Sociol Health Illn 1998, 20(5):694-709.
• [36]Wohland P, Rees P: Life expectancy variation across England’s local areas by ethnic group in 2001. J Maps 2010, 39:354-359.
• [37][www.statistics.gov.uk] webcite Mid-2008 Population Estimates []
• [38]Life Expectancy at Birth (Years) and Rank Order, by Local Authority in the United Kingdom, With 95% Confidence Limits 1993–1995 and 2003–2005. Crown Copyright, UK; 2006.
• [39]Manchester: State of the City Report 2009/2010. Manchester City Council, Manchester; 2011.
• [40]Mendip Spatial Patterns: An Analysis of Spatial Variances in Social, Economic and Environmental Factors in Mendip District. Mendip District Council, Mendip; 2011.
• [41]Mosaic United Kingdom: The consumer classification for the UK. London, Experian Ltd; 2004.
• [42]Kreuter MW, McClure SM: The role of culture in health communication. Ann Rev Public Health 2004, 25:439-455.
• [43]Ullah W, Theivendra A, Sood V, Vasireddy A, Maryon-Davis A: Men and older people are less likely use NHS Direct. BMJ 2003, 326:710.
• [44]David OJ: NHS Direct and older people. Age Ageing 2005, 34:499-501.
• [45]Ritchie J, Spencer L: Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Analysing Qualitative Data. Edited by Bryman A, Burgess R. Routledge, London; 1994:173-194.
• [46]Ritchie J, Spencer L: Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Analyzing Qualitative Data. Edited by Bryman A, Burgess RG. Routledge, London; 1994.
• [47]Ritchie J, Lewis J: Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage, London; 2003.
• [48][http:/ / webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ 20080804123720/ direct.gov.uk/ en/ HealthAndWellBeing/ HealthServices/ PractitionersAndServices/ DG_10036716] webcite How To Contact NHS Direct []
• [49]George S: NHS Direct audited: customer satisfaction, but at what price. BMJ 2002, 324:558-559.
• [50]Flick U: Qualitative enquiries into social representations of health. J Health Psychol 2000, 5(3):315-324.
• [51]Virokannas H, Rahkonen M, Luoma I, Sorvari M: The 60-year-old female worker as user of new technology. Int J Ind Ergon 2000, 25(5):491-495.
• [52][http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1066] webcite Millward P: The‘grey digital divide’: Perception, exclusion and barriers of access to the Internet for older people. First Monday 2003, 8(7).
• [53]Dobransky K, Hargittai E: The disability divide in internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society 2006, 9:313-334.
• [54]Mollenkopf H, Kaspar R: Attitudes to technology in old age preconditions for acceptance or rejection. In Living in Old Age: Western World and Modernization. Edited by Guerci A, Consigliere S. Erga edizioni, Genova; 2002:134-144.
• [55]Morris MG, Venkatesh V: Age differences in technology adoption decisions: implications for a changing work force. Pers Soc Psychol 2000, 53(2):375-403.
• [56]Mollenkopf H: Assistive technology: potential and preconditions of useful applications. In Impact of Technology on Successful Ageing. Edited by Charness N, Schaie KW. Springer, New York; 2003:203-214.
• [57]Selwyn N, Gorard S, Furlong J, Madden L: Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing Soc 2003, 23:561-582.
• [58]Tacken M, Marcellini F, Mollenkopf H, Ruoppila I, Szeman Z: Use and acceptance of new technology by older people. Findings of the international MOBILATE survey:‘enhancing mobility in later life’. Gerontechnology 2005, 3:126-137.
• [59]Parent F, Coppieters Y, Parent M: Information technologies, health, and globalization: anyone excluded? J Medical Internet Res 2001, 3(1):e11.
• [60]Raynes N, Margiotta P, Lawson J, Pagidas D: The provision of information and advice for older people: what more do they want? Qual Ageing 2003, 4:23-29.
• [61]Psoinos M, Hatzidimitriadou E, Butler C, Barn R: Ethnic monitoring in healthcare services in the UK as a mechanism to address health disparities: a narrative review. Interprofessional Institute Health and Social Care, London; 2011.
• [62]Jones R: Making health information accessible to patients. Aslib Proc 2003, 55:334-338.
• [63]Ali N, Atkin K, Neal R: The role of culture in the general practice consultation process. Ethn Health 2006, 11:389-408.
• [64]Schouten BC, Meeuwesen L: Cultural differences in medical communication: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 64:21-34.
• [65]Bridges J: Listening Makes Sense: Understanding the Experiences of Older People and Relatives Using Urgent Care Services in England. City University London, London, UK; 2008.