期刊论文详细信息
BMC Cancer
Meta-analysis of archived DNA microarrays identifies genes regulated by hypoxia and involved in a metastatic phenotype in cancer cells
Michael Pierre2  Benoît DeHertogh2  Anthoula Gaigneaux2  Bertrand DeMeulder2  Fabrice Berger2  Eric Bareke2  Carine Michiels1  Eric Depiereux2 
[1] Cell Biology Research Unit (URBC), University of Namur - FUNDP, Namur, Belgium
[2] Molecular Biology Research Unit (URBM), University of Namur - FUNDP, Namur, Belgium
Others  :  1081654
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2407-10-176
 received in 2009-07-30, accepted in 2010-04-30,  发布年份 2010
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Metastasis is a major cancer-related cause of death. Recent studies have described metastasis pathways. However, the exact contribution of each pathway remains unclear. Another key feature of a tumor is the presence of hypoxic areas caused by a lack of oxygen at the center of the tumor. Hypoxia leads to the expression of pro-metastatic genes as well as the repression of anti-metastatic genes. As many Affymetrix datasets about metastasis and hypoxia are publicly available and not fully exploited, this study proposes to re-analyze these datasets to extract new information about the metastatic phenotype induced by hypoxia in different cancer cell lines.

Methods

Affymetrix datasets about metastasis and/or hypoxia were downloaded from GEO and ArrayExpress. AffyProbeMiner and GCRMA packages were used for pre-processing and the Window Welch t test was used for processing. Three approaches of meta-analysis were eventually used for the selection of genes of interest.

Results

Three complementary approaches were used, that eventually selected 183 genes of interest. Out of these 183 genes, 99, among which the well known JUNB, FOS and TP63, have already been described in the literature to be involved in cancer. Moreover, 39 genes of those, such as SERPINE1 and MMP7, are known to regulate metastasis. Twenty-one genes including VEGFA and ID2 have also been described to be involved in the response to hypoxia. Lastly, DAVID classified those 183 genes in 24 different pathways, among which 8 are directly related to cancer while 5 others are related to proliferation and cell motility. A negative control composed of 183 random genes failed to provide such results. Interestingly, 6 pathways retrieved by DAVID with the 183 genes of interest concern pathogen recognition and phagocytosis.

Conclusion

The proposed methodology was able to find genes actually known to be involved in cancer, metastasis and hypoxia and, thus, we propose that the other genes selected based on the same methodology are of prime interest in the metastatic phenotype induced by hypoxia.

【 授权许可】

   
2010 Pierre et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20141203110437858.pdf 1075KB PDF download
Figure 5. 31KB Image download
Figure 4. 25KB Image download
Figure 3. 60KB Image download
Figure 2. 26KB Image download
Figure 1. 34KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Friedl P, Wolf K: Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer 2003, 3(5):362-374.
  • [2]Pantel K, Brakenhoff RH: Dissecting the metastatic cascade. Nat Rev Cancer 2004, 4(6):448-456.
  • [3]Gordan JD, Simon MC: Hypoxia-inducible factors: central regulators of the tumor phenotype. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2007, 17(1):71-77.
  • [4]Vaupel P: The role of hypoxia-induced factors in tumor progression. Oncologist 2004, 9(Suppl 5):10-17.
  • [5]Sullivan R, Graham CH: Hypoxia-driven selection of the metastatic phenotype. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2007, 26(2):319-331.
  • [6]Chan DA, Giaccia AJ: Hypoxia, gene expression, and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2007, 26(2):333-339.
  • [7]DeRisi JL, Iyer VR, Brown PO: Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 1997, 278(5338):680-686.
  • [8]Kronick MN: Creation of the whole human genome microarray. Expert Rev Proteomics 2004, 1(1):19-28.
  • [9]Fodor SP, Read JL, Pirrung MC, Stryer L, Lu AT, Solas D: Light-directed, spatially addressable parallel chemical synthesis. Science 1991, 251(4995):767-773.
  • [10]Affymetrix: Affymetrix Microarray Suite User Guide version 5.0. Santa Clara: Affymetrix Manual; 2001.
  • [11]Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO: Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 1995, 270(5235):467-470.
  • [12]Callow MJ, Dudoit S, Gong EL, Speed TP, Rubin EM: Microarray expression profiling identifies genes with altered expression in HDL-deficient mice. Genome Res 2000, 10(12):2022-2029.
  • [13]Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y: Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1995, 57:289-300.
  • [14]Student: The Probable Error of a Mean. Biometrika 1908, 6:1-25.
  • [15]Baldi P, Long AD: A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: regularized t-test and statistical inferences of gene changes. Bioinformatics 2001, 17(6):509-519.
  • [16]Cui X, Hwang JT, Qiu J, Blades NJ, Churchill GA: Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimates. Biostatistics 2005, 6(1):59-75.
  • [17]Jain N, Thatte J, Braciale T, Ley K, O'Connell M, Lee JK: Local-pooled-error test for identifying differentially expressed genes with a small number of replicated microarrays. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(15):1945-1951.
  • [18]Opgen-Rhein R, Strimmer K: Accurate ranking of differentially expressed genes by a distribution-free shrinkage approach. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2007, 6:Article9.
  • [19]Smyth GK: Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004, 3:Article3.
  • [20]Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G: Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98(9):5116-5121.
  • [21]Dai M, Wang P, Boyd AD, Kostov G, Athey B, Jones EG, Bunney WE, Myers RM, Speed TP, Akil H, et al.: Evolving gene/transcript definitions significantly alter the interpretation of GeneChip data. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33(20):e175.
  • [22]Gautier L, Moller M, Friis-Hansen L, Knudsen S: Alternative mapping of probes to genes for Affymetrix chips. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:111. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [23]Liu H, Zeeberg BR, Qu G, Koru AG, Ferrucci A, Kahn A, Ryan MC, Nuhanovic A, Munson PJ, Reinhold WC, et al.: AffyProbeMiner: a web resource for computing or retrieving accurately redefined Affymetrix probe sets. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(18):2385-2390.
  • [24]Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP: A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(2):185-193.
  • [25]Li C, Wong WH: Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98(1):31-36.
  • [26]Schadt EE, Li C, Ellis B, Wong WH: Feature extraction and normalization algorithms for high-density oligonucleotide gene expression array data. J Cell Biochem Suppl 2001, (Suppl 37):120-125.
  • [27]Hochreiter S, Clevert DA, Obermayer K: A new summarization method for Affymetrix probe level data. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(8):943-949.
  • [28]Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, Speed TP: Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 2003, 4(2):249-264.
  • [29]Wu Z, Irizarry R, Gentleman R, Murillo F, Spencer F: A model-based background adjustment for oligonucleotide expression arrays. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2004, 99:909-917.
  • [30]Yang IV, Chen E, Hasseman JP, Liang W, Frank BC, Wang S, Sharov V, Saeed AI, White J, Li J, et al.: Within the fold: assessing differential expression measures and reproducibility in microarray assays. Genome Biol 2002, 3(11):research0062.
  • [31]Gene Expression Omnibus [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/] webcite
  • [32]Rocca-Serra P, Brazma A, Parkinson H, Sarkans U, Shojatalab M, Contrino S, Vilo J, Abeygunawardena N, Mukherjee G, Holloway E, et al.: ArrayExpress: a public database of gene expression data at EBI. C R Biol 2003, 326(10-11):1075-1078.
  • [33]Hunter KW, Crawford NP, Alsarraj J: Mechanisms of metastasis. Breast Cancer Res 2008, 10(Suppl 1):S2. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [34]Chaudary N, Hill RP: Hypoxia and metastasis in breast cancer. Breast Dis 2006, 26:55-64.
  • [35]Berger F, De Hertogh B, Pierre M, Gaigneaux A, Depiereux E: The "Window t test": a simple and powerful approach to detect differentially expressed genes in microarray datasets. Central European Journal of Biology 2008, 3(3):327-344.
  • [36]Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, Lane HC, Lempicki RA: DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol 2003, 4(5):P3. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [37]Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA: Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 2009, 4(1):44-57.
  • [38]Ogata H, Goto S, Sato K, Fujibuchi W, Bono H, Kanehisa M: KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 1999, 27(1):29-34.
  • [39]Biocarta Pathways [http://www.biocarta.com/genes/index.asp] webcite
  • [40]Ihaka R, Gentleman R: R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1996, 5:299-314.
  • [41]Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, et al.: Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 2004, 5(10):R80. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [42]Entrez Global Query Cross-Database Search System [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/gquery] webcite
  • [43]Gur-Dedeoglu B, Konu O, Kir S, Ozturk AR, Bozkurt B, Ergul G, Yulug IG: A resampling-based meta-analysis for detection of differential gene expression in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2008, 8:396. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [44]Ma S, Huang J: Regularized gene selection in cancer microarray meta-analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:1. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [45]Ochsner SA, Steffen DL, Hilsenbeck SG, Chen ES, Watkins C, McKenna NJ: GEMS (Gene Expression MetaSignatures), a Web resource for querying meta-analysis of expression microarray datasets: 17beta-estradiol in MCF-7 cells. Cancer Res 2009, 69(1):23-26.
  • [46]Eferl R, Wagner EF: AP-1: a double-edged sword in tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 2003, 3(11):859-868.
  • [47]Jochum W, Passegue E, Wagner EF: AP-1 in mouse development and tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2001, 20(19):2401-2412.
  • [48]Shaulian E, Karin M: AP-1 in cell proliferation and survival. Oncogene 2001, 20(19):2390-2400.
  • [49]van Dam H, Castellazzi M: Distinct roles of Jun: Fos and Jun: ATF dimers in oncogenesis. Oncogene 2001, 20(19):2453-2464.
  • [50]Tomkova K, Tomka M, Zajac V: Contribution of p53, p63, and p73 to the developmental diseases and cancer. Neoplasma 2008, 55(3):177-181.
  • [51]Malaguarnera R, Vella V, Vigneri R, Frasca F: p53 family proteins in thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 2007, 14(1):43-60.
  • [52]Fabre-Guillevin E, Malo M, Cartier-Michaud A, Peinado H, Moreno-Bueno G, Vallee B, Lawrence DA, Palacios J, Cano A, Barlovatz-Meimon G, et al.: PAI-1 and functional blockade of SNAI1 in breast cancer cell migration. Breast Cancer Res 2008, 10(6):R100. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [53]Beeghly-Fadiel A, Shu XO, Long J, Li C, Cai Q, Cai H, Gao YT, Zheng W: Genetic polymorphisms in the MMP-7 gene and breast cancer survival. Int J Cancer 2009, 124(1):208-214.
  • [54]Fang YJ, Lu ZH, Wang GQ, Pan ZZ, Zhou ZW, Yun JP, Zhang MF, Wan DS: Elevated expressions of MMP7, TROP2, and survivin are associated with survival, disease recurrence, and liver metastasis of colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009, 24(8):875-884.
  • [55]Liu D, Nakano J, Ishikawa S, Yokomise H, Ueno M, Kadota K, Urushihara M, Huang CL: Overexpression of matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) correlates with tumor proliferation, and a poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2007, 58(3):384-391.
  • [56]Neufeld G, Cohen T, Gengrinovitch S, Poltorak Z: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors. Faseb J 1999, 13(1):9-22.
  • [57]Roskoski R Jr: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in tumor progression. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2007, 62(3):179-213.
  • [58]Tsunedomi R, Iizuka N, Tamesa T, Sakamoto K, Hamaguchi T, Somura H, Yamada M, Oka M: Decreased ID2 promotes metastatic potentials of hepatocellular carcinoma by altering secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor. Clin Cancer Res 2008, 14(4):1025-1031.
  • [59]Lofstedt T, Jogi A, Sigvardsson M, Gradin K, Poellinger L, Pahlman S, Axelson H: Induction of ID2 expression by hypoxia-inducible factor-1: a role in dedifferentiation of hypoxic neuroblastoma cells. J Biol Chem 2004, 279(38):39223-39231.
  • [60]Chandana SR, Movva S, Arora M, Singh T: Primary brain tumors in adults. Am Fam Physician 2008, 77(10):1423-1430.
  • [61]Kaliks RA, Del Giglio A: Management of advanced prostate cancer. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2008, 54(2):178-182.
  • [62]Alberts SR: Updated options for liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2008, 7(Suppl 2):S58-62.
  • [63]Petit V, Thiery JP: Focal adhesions: structure and dynamics. Biol Cell 2000, 92(7):477-494.
  • [64]Mitra SK, Hanson DA, Schlaepfer DD: Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005, 6(1):56-68.
  • [65]Tanoue T, Nishida E: Docking interactions in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. Pharmacol Ther 2002, 93(2-3):193-202.
  • [66]Biondi RM, Nebreda AR: Signalling specificity of Ser/Thr protein kinases through docking-site-mediated interactions. Biochem J 2003, 372(Pt 1):1-13.
  • [67]Hoeben A, Landuyt B, Highley MS, Wildiers H, Van Oosterom AT, De Bruijn EA: Vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis. Pharmacol Rev 2004, 56(4):549-580.
  • [68]Holbro T, Hynes NE: ErbB receptors: directing key signaling networks throughout life. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2004, 44:195-217.
  • [69]Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX: Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001, 2(2):127-137.
  • [70]Pollard TD: The cytoskeleton, cellular motility and the reductionist agenda. Nature 2003, 422(6933):741-745.
  • [71]Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL: Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004, 2(2):123-140.
  • [72]Kawai T, Akira S: Antiviral signaling through pattern recognition receptors. J Biochem 2007, 141(2):137-145.
  • [73]Dewas C, Fay M, Gougerot-Pocidalo MA, El-Benna J: The mitogen-activated protein kinase extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 pathway is involved in formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine-induced p47phox phosphorylation in human neutrophils. J Immunol 2000, 165(9):5238-5244.
  • [74]Kitaura J, Xiao W, Maeda-Yamamoto M, Kawakami Y, Lowell CA, Kawakami T: Early divergence of Fc epsilon receptor I signals for receptor up-regulation and internalization from degranulation, cytokine production, and survival. J Immunol 2004, 173(7):4317-4323.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:1次