Study on public perceptions and protective behaviors regarding Lyme disease among the general public in the Netherlands: implications for prevention programs

BMC Public Health

Hélene Antoine Claire Marie Voeten²  Jim Everardus van Steenbergen¹  Marloes Bults²  Desirée Jacqueline Mathieu Angélique Beaujean¹ 

[1] National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven 3720 BA, The Netherlands;Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC and University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, The Netherlands

关键词: Concern;    Knowledge;    Protective behavior;    Prevention;    General public;    Tick bites;    Ticks;    Lyme disease;    Perceptions;   

Others  :  1162455
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-225

 received in 2012-09-03, accepted in 2013-02-22,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Lyme disease (LD) is the most common tick-borne disease in the United States and in Europe. The aim of this study was to examine knowledge, perceived risk, feelings of anxiety, and behavioral responses of the general public in relation to tick bites and LD in the Netherlands.

Methods

From a representative Internet panel a random sample was drawn of 550 panel members aged 18 years and older (8-15 November 2010) who were invited to complete an online questionnaire.

Results

Response rate (362/550, 66%). This study demonstrates that knowledge, level of concern, and perceived efficacy are the main determinants of preventive behavior. 35% (n = 125/362) of the respondents reported a good general knowledge of LD. While 95% (n = 344/362) perceived LD as severe or very severe, the minority (n = 130/362, 36%) perceived their risk of LD to be low. Respondents were more likely to check their skin after being outdoors and remove ticks if necessary, than to wear protective clothing and/or use insect repellent skin products. The percentage of respondents taking preventive measures ranged from 6% for using insect repellent skin products, to 37% for wearing protective clothing. History of tick bites, higher levels of knowledge and moderate/high levels of worry were significant predictors of checking the skin. Significant predictors of wearing protective clothing were being unemployed/retired, higher knowledge levels, higher levels of worry about LD and higher levels of perceived efficacy of wearing protective clothing.

Conclusions

Prevention programs targeting tick bites and LD should aim at influencing people’s perceptions and increasing their knowledge and perceived efficacy of protective behavior. This can be done by strengthening motivators (e.g. knowledge, concern about LD, perceived efficacy of wearing protective clothing) and removing barriers (e.g. low perceived personal risk, not knowing how to recognize a tick). The challenge is to take our study findings and translate them into appropriate prevention strategies.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Beaujean et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Hofhuis A, Harms MG, Van der Giessen JWB, Sprong H, Notermans DW, van Pelt W: Ziekte van Lyme in Nederland 1994-2009. Infectieziektenbulletin 2010, 21:84-87.
• [2]Smith R, Takkinen J, Editorial Team: Lyme borreliosis: Europe wide coordinated surveillance and action needed? Eurosurveillance 2006, 25:2.
• [3]Heyman P, Cochez C, Hofhuis A, Van der Giessen J, Sprong H, Porter SR, Losson B, Saugerman C, Donoso-Mantke O, Niedrig M, Papa A: A clear present danger: tick-borne diseases in Europe. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2010, 8:33-50.
• [4]Gray JS: The ecology of ticks transmitting Lyme borreliosis. Exp Appl Acarol 1998, V22:249-258.
• [5]Signs and Symptoms of Lyme Disease. http://www.cdc.gov/lyme/signs_symptoms/index.html webcite
• [6]British Infection Association: The epidemiology, prevention, investigation and treatment of Lyme borreliosis in Unites Kingdom patients: A position statement by the British Infection Association. J Infect 2011, 62:329-338.
• [7]LCI (Coordinator Infectious Diseases Netherlands): : LCI-guideline Lymeborreliose, May 2005. Available from: http://www.rivm.nl/richtlijnlyme webcite
• [8]Poland GA: Prevention of Lyme Disease: a review of the evidence. Mayo Clin Proc 2001, 76:13-24.
• [9]Heller JE, Benito-Garcia E, Maher NE, Chibnik LB, Maher CP, Shadick NA: Behavioral and attitudes survey about Lyme disease among a Brazilian population in the endemic area of Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts. J Immigr Minor Health 2010, 12(3):377-383. Epub 2008 Sep 16
• [10]Hannah GL, Nelson Randall S, Griffith Kevin S, Hayes Edward B, Piesman J, Mead Paul S, Cartter Mathhew L: Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding Lyme disease prevention among Connecticut residents, 1999-2004. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2008, 8(6):769-776. PMID 18637724
• [11]Brewer NT, Weinstein ND, Cuite CL, Herrington JE: Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Ann Behav Med 2004, 27(2):125-130.
• [12]Centers for Disease Control (CDC): Lyme disease knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors- Connecticut. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1992, 41(28):505-507.
• [13]Cartter ML, Farley TA, Ardito HA, Hadler JL: Lyme disease prevention–knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors among high school students in an endemic area. Conn Med 1989, 53(6):354-356.
• [14]Kok G: Planmatige ontwikkeling van op theorieën en evidentie gebaseerde gezondheidsbevordering, met als voorbeeld de ziekte van Lyme. Infectieziektenbulletin 2006, 17(3):102-103.
• [15]Maat A, Konings F: Teek it or leave it? Onderzoek van GGD West-Brabant naar preventieve maatregelen tegen tekenbeten. Infectieziektenbulletin 2010, 7:221-223. in Dutch, available from: http://www.rivm.nl/teekit webcite
• [16]Norman P, Boer H, Seydel ER: Protection Motivation Theory. In Predicting health behaviour. Edited by Conner M, Norman P. Berkshire. UK: Open University Press; 2005:81-126.
• [17]Champion VL, Skinner CS: The Health Belief Model. In Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. Edited by Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. San Francisco. CA: Jossey Bass; 2008:45-65.
• [18]Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects: Manual for the review of medical research involving human subjects. http://www.ccmo-online.nl webcite
• [19]Bults M, Beaujean DJMA, de Zwart O, Kok G, van Empelen P, van Steenbergen JE: Perceived risk, anxiety, and behavioural responses of the general public during the early phase of the Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the Netherlands: results of three consecutive online surveys. BMC Publ Health 2011, 11:2. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Brug J, Aro AR, Oenema A, de Zwart O, Richardus JH, Bisschop GD: SARS risk perception, knowledge, precautions, and information sources, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 2004, 10L:1486-1489.
• [21]de Zwart O, Veldhuijzen IK, Elam G, Aro AR, Abraham T, Bishop GD, Richardus JH, Brug J: Avian influenza riks perception, Europe and Asia. Emerg Infect Dis 2007, 13:290-293.
• [22]Phillips CB, Liang MH, Sangha O, Wright EA, Fossel AH, Lew RA, Fossel KK, Shadick NA: Lyme disease and preventive behaviors in residents of Nantucket Island, Massachusetts. Am J Prev Med 2001, 20(3):219-224.
• [23]Shadick NA, Daltroy LH, Phillips CB, Liang US, Liang MH: Determinants of tick-avoidance behaviors in an endemic area for Lyme disease. Am J Prev Med 1997, 13(4):265-270.
• [24]Herrington JE: Risk perceptions regarding ticks and Lyme Disease: a national survey. Am J Prev Med 2004, 26:135-140.
• [25]Corapi KM, White MI, Phillips CB: Strategies for primary and secondary prevention of Lyme disease. Nature Clinical Practice 2007, 3:20-25.
• [26]de Mik EL, van Pelt W, Docters-van Leeuwen B: The geographical distribution of tick bites and erythema migrans in general practice in the Netherlands. Int J Epidemiol 1997, 26:451-457.
• [27]Slovic P: Perception of risk. Science 1987, 236:280-285.
• [28]Mowbray F, Amlot R, Rubin GJ: Ticking all the boxes? A systematic review of education and communication interventions to prevent tick-borne disease. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2012, 18:1-9.
• [29]Laweless KA, Brown SW, Cartter M: Applying educational psychology and instructional technology to health care issues: Combating Lyme disease. Int J Instr Media 1997, 24:287-297.