期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
Contribution of community-based newborn health promotion to reducing inequities in healthy newborn care practices and knowledge: evidence of improvement from a three-district pilot program in Malawi
Abdullah H Baqui3  Rashed Shah3  Fannie Kachale1  Evelyn Zimba4  Emmanuel Chimbalanga4  Reuben Ligowe4  Deborah Sitrin2  Tanya Guenther2  Bareng AS Nonyane3  Jennifer A Callaghan-Koru3 
[1] Department of Reproductive Health, Malawi Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi;Save the Children, Washington, DC, USA;International Center for Maternal and Newborn Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA;Save the Children, Lilongwe, Malawi
关键词: Maternal health;    Health surveillance assistants;    Malawi;    Equity;    Community health workers;    Newborn health;   
Others  :  1161575
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-1052
 received in 2013-06-19, accepted in 2013-10-29,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Inequities in both health status and coverage of health services are considered important barriers to achieving Millennium Development Goal 4. Community-based health promotion is a strategy that is believed to reduce inequities in rural low-income settings. This paper examines the contributions of community-based programming to improving the equity of newborn health in three districts in Malawi.

Methods

This study is a before-and-after evaluation of Malawi’s Community-Based Maternal and Newborn Care (CBMNC) program, a package of facility and community-based interventions to improve newborn health. Health Surveillance Assistants (HSAs) within the catchment area of 14 health facilities were trained to make pregnancy and postnatal home visits to promote healthy behaviors and assess women and newborns for danger signs requiring referral to a facility. “Core groups” of community volunteers were also trained to raise awareness about recommended newborn care practices. Baseline and endline household surveys measured the coverage of the intervention and targeted health behaviors for this before-and-after evaluation. Wealth indices were constructed using household asset data and concentration indices were compared between baseline and endline for each indicator.

Results

The HSAs trained in the intervention reached 36.7% of women with a pregnancy home visit and 10.9% of women with a postnatal home visit within three days of delivery. Coverage of the intervention was slightly inequitable, with richer households more likely to receive one or two pregnancy home visits (concentration indices (CI) of 0.0786 and 0.0960), but not significantly more likely to receive a postnatal visit or know of a core group. Despite modest coverage levels for the intervention, health equity improved significantly over the study period for several indicators. Greater improvements in inequities were observed for knowledge indicators than for coverage of routine health services. At endline, a greater proportion of women from the poorest quintile knew three or more danger signs for pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum mothers than did women from the least poor quintile (change in CI: -0.1704, -0.2464, and -0.4166, respectively; p < 0.05). Equity also significantly improved for coverage of some health behaviors, including delivery at a health facility (change in CI: -0.0591), breastfeeding within the first hour (-0.0379), and delayed bathing (-0.0405).

Conclusions

Although these results indicate promising improvements for newborn health in Malawi, the extent to which the CBMNC program contributed to these improvements in coverage and equity are not known. The strategies through which community-based programs are implemented likely play an important role in their ability to improve equity, and further research and program monitoring are needed to ensure that the poorest households are reached by community-based health programs.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Callaghan-Koru et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150413032925469.pdf 241KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Braveman P, Gruskin S: Defining equity in health. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003, 57(4):254-258.
  • [2]Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J: 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet 2005, 365(9462):891-900.
  • [3]Ronsmans C, Graham WJ: Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet 2006, 368(9542):1189-1200.
  • [4]Wang L: Health outcomes in poor countries and policy options: empirical findings from Demographic and Health Surveys. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2002.
  • [5]Ensor T, Cooper S: Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. Health Policy Plan 2004, 19(2):69-79.
  • [6]Victora CG, Wagstaff A, Schellenberg JA, Gwatkin D, Claeson M, Habicht J-P: Applying an equity lens to child health and mortality: more of the same is not enough. Lancet 2003, 362(9379):233-241.
  • [7]Filmer D: Fever and its treatment among the more and less poor in sub-Saharan Africa. Health Policy Plan 2005, 20(6):337-346.
  • [8]Wagstaff A, Bustreo F, Bryce J, Claeson M, the Who-World Bank Child H, Poverty Working G: Child health: reaching the poor. Am J Public Health 2004, 94(5):726-736.
  • [9]Sastry N: Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in developing countries: the case of child survival in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Demography 2004, 41(3):443-464.
  • [10]Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker N, de Bernis L: Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? Lancet 2005, 365(9463):977-988.
  • [11]Tudor Hart J: The inverse care Law. Lancet 1971, 297(7696):405-412.
  • [12]United Nations Children’s Fund: State of the World’s Children 2009: Maternal and Newborn Health. New York: UNICEF; 2009:2008.
  • [13]Bhutta ZA, Chopra M, Axelson H, Berman P, Boerma T, Bryce J, Bustreo F, Cavagnero E, Cometto G, Daelmans B, et al.: Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000–10): taking stock of maternal, newborn, and child survival. Lancet 2010, 375(9730):2032-2044.
  • [14]Houweling TAJ, Ronsmans C, Campbell OMR, Kunst AE: Huge poor-rich inequalities in maternity care: an international comparative study of maternity and child care in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 2007, 85(10):745-754.
  • [15]Knippenberg R, Lawn JE, Darmstadt GL, Begkoyian G, Fogstad H, Walelign N, Paul VK: Systematic scaling up of neonatal care in countries. Lancet 2005, 365(9464):1087-1098.
  • [16]Boerma JT, Bryce J, Kinfu Y, et al.: Mind the gap: equity and trends in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health services in 54 Countdown countries. Lancet 2008, 371(9620):1259-1267.
  • [17]Haines A, Sanders D, Lehmann U, Rowe AK, Lawn JE, Jan S, Walker DG, Bhutta Z: Achieving child survival goals: potential contribution of community health workers. Lancet 2007, 369(9579):2121-2131.
  • [18]UNICEF: Narrowing the Gaps to Meet the Goals. New York, NY: UNICEF; 2010.
  • [19]Kumar V, Mohanty S, Kumar A, Misra RP, Santosham M, Awasthi S, Baqui AH, Singh P, Singh V, Ahuja RC, et al.: Effect of community-based behaviour change management on neonatal mortality in Shivgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008, 372(9644):1151-1162.
  • [20]Baqui AH, El-Arifeen S, Darmstadt GL, Ahmed S, Williams EK, Seraji HR, Mannan I, Rahman SM, Shah R, Saha SK, et al.: Effect of community-based newborn-care intervention package implemented through two service-delivery strategies in Sylhet district, Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008, 371(9628):1936-1944.
  • [21]Bhutta ZA, Soofi S, Cousens S, Mohammad S, Memon ZA, Ali I, Feroze A, Raza F, Khan A, Wall S, et al.: Improvement of perinatal and newborn care in rural Pakistan through community-based strategies: a cluster-randomised effectiveness trial. Lancet 2011, 377(9763):403-412.
  • [22]Kirkwood BR, Manu A, Tawiah-Agyemang C, ten Asbroek G, Gyan T, Weobong B, Lewandowski RE, Soremekun S, Danso S, Pitt C, et al.: NEWHINTS cluster randomised trial to evaluate the impact on neonatal mortality in rural Ghana of routine home visits to provide a package of essential newborn care interventions in the third trimester of pregnancy and the first week of life: trial protocol. Trials 2010, 11:58. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [23]Waiswa P, Peterson SS, Namazzi G, Ekirapa EK, Naikoba S, Byaruhanga R, Kiguli J, Kallander K, Tagoola A, Nakakeeto M: The Uganda Newborn Study (UNEST): an effectiveness study on improving newborn health and survival in rural Uganda through a community-based intervention linked to health facilities-study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials 2012, 13(1):213. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [24]Tomlinson M, Doherty T, Jackson D, Lawn JE, Ijumba P, Colvin M, Nkonki L, Daviaud E, Goga A, Sanders D: An effectiveness study of an integrated, community-based package for maternal, newborn, child and HIV care in South Africa: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2011, 12(1):236. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [25]Saving Newborn Lives: Saving Newborn Lives: Program Brief. Washington, DC: Save the Children; 2011.
  • [26]WHO/UNICEF: Home visits for the newborn child: a strategy to improve survival. Geneva/New York: WHO/UNICEF; 2009.
  • [27]Malawi National Statistics Office and MEASURE DHS-ICF Macro: Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2010. Zomba: NSO and ICF Macro; 2011.
  • [28]National Statistics Office Malawi: 2008 Population and Housing Census: Preliminary Report. Government of Malawi: Zomba, Malawi; 2008.
  • [29]World Bank: World Development Report 2010: Development and Climate Change. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2010.
  • [30]UNDP: Human Development Report. New York: UNDP; 2010.
  • [31]Malawi Ministry of Health: A Joint Programme of Work for a Health Sector-Wide Approach (SWAP) 2004–2010. Lilongwe: Government of Malawi; 2004.
  • [32]O’Neil M, Jarrah Z, Nkosi L, Collins D, Perry C, Jackson J, Kuchande H, Mlambala A: Evaluation of Malawi’s Emergency Human Resources Program. Cambridge, MA: Management Sciences for Health and DFID; 2010.
  • [33]Health, United States. http://www.statehealthfacts.org/ webcite
  • [34]Gwatkin D, Kataika E, Cardinal I, Kemp J: Malawi’s Health SWAp: Bringing essential services closer to the poor? Malawi Med J 2007, 18(1):1.
  • [35]Nsona H, Mtimuni A, Daelmans B, Callaghan-Koru JA, Gilroy K, Mgalula L, Kachule T, Zamasiya T: Scaling-up integrated community case management of childhood illness: update from Malawi. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2012. In Press
  • [36]Sarriot E, WInch P, Weiss WM, Wagman J: Methodology and Sampling Issues for KPC Surveys. Calverton, MD: ORC Macro; 1999.
  • [37]Bennett S, Woods T, Liyanage WM, Smith DL: A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries. World Health Stat Q 1991, 44(3):98-106.
  • [38]World Health Organization: Training for Mid-level Managers: The EPI Coverage Survey. Geneva: WHO Expanded Program on Immunization; 1991.
  • [39]StataCorp: Stata Survey Data Reference Manual. Volume 11. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2009.
  • [40]Wagstaff A, Doorslaer E: Overall versus socioeconomic health inequality: a measurement framework and two empirical illustrations. Health Econ 2004, 13(3):297-301.
  • [41]Wagstaff A: Socioeconomic inequalities in child mortality: comparisons across nine developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 2000, 78(1):19-29.
  • [42]Victora CG, Barros AJD, Axelson H, Bhutta ZA, Chopra M, França GVA, Kerber K, Kirkwood BR, Newby H, Ronsmans C: How changes in coverage affect equity in maternal and child health interventions in 35 Countdown to 2015 countries: an analysis of national surveys. Lancet 2012, 380(9848):1149-1156.
  • [43]Malawi National Statistics Office and ORC Macro: Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2004. Calverton, MD: ORC Macro; 2005.
  • [44]Habicht JP, Victora CG, Vaughan JP: Evaluation designs for adequacy, plausibility and probability of public health programme performance and impact. Int J Epidemiol 1999, 28(1):10-18.
  • [45]Joseph A: Are traditional birth attendants good for improving maternal and perinatal health? Yes. BMJ 2011, 342:d3310.
  • [46]Fotso JC, Mukiira C: Perceived quality of and access to care among poor urban women in Kenya and their utilization of delivery care: harnessing the potential of private clinics? Health Policy Plan 2011, 27(6):505-515.
  • [47]Kiguli J, Ekirapa-Kiracho E, Okui O, Mutebi A, MacGregor H, Pariyo GW: Increasing access to quality health care for the poor: community perceptions on quality care in Uganda. Patient Preference Adherence 2009, 3:77.
  • [48]Duong DV, Binns CW, Lee AH: Utilization of delivery services at the primary health care level in rural Vietnam. Soc Sci Med 2004, 59(12):2585-2595.
  • [49]Amooti-Kaguna B, Nuwaha F: Factors influencing choice of delivery sites in Rakai district of Uganda. Soc Sci Med 2000, 50(2):203-213.
  • [50]Saving Newborn Lives: Malawi Health Services Assessment Finding. Washington, DC: Save the Children; 2012.
  • [51]Bishai D, Suzuki E, McQuestion M, Chakraborty J, Koenig M: The role of public health programmes in reducing socioeconomic inequities in childhood immunization coverage. Health Policy Plan 2002, 17(4):412-419.
  • [52]Ali M, Emch M, Tofail F, Baqui AH: Implications of health care provision on acute lower respiratory infection mortality in Bangladeshi children. Soc Sci Med 2001, 52(2):267-277.
  • [53]Littrell M, Moukam LV, Libite R, Youmba JC, Baugh G: Narrowing the treatment gap with equitable access: mid-term outcomes of a community case management program in Cameroon. Health Policy Plan 2012, 28(7):705-716.
  • [54]Nsungwa-Sabiiti J, Peterson S, Pariyo G, Ogwal-Okeng J, Petzold MG, Tomson G: Home-based management of fever and malaria treatment practices in Uganda. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2007, 101(12):1199-1207.
  • [55]Oxford Policy Management: External Evaluation of the Lady Health Worker Programme, Pakistan: Quantitative Survey Report. Oxford, UK: Oxford Policy Management; 2009.
  • [56]Callaghan J: Evaluating the scale-up of community case management in Malawi: Health systems supports, health worker attitudes, and equity of service provision. Dissertation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health; 2011.
  • [57]CIA: The World Fact Book. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency; 2011.
  • [58]Ravallion M, Chen S, Sangraula P: New evidence on the urbanization of global poverty. Popul Dev Rev 2007, 33(4):667-701.
  • [59]Marsh DR, Gilroy KE, Van de Weerdt R, Wansi E, Qazi S: Community case management of pneumonia: at a tipping point? Bull World Health Organ 2008, 86(5):381-389.
  • [60]Bhutta ZA, Lassi ZS, Pariyo G, Huicho L: Global Experience of Community Health Workers for Delivery of Health Related Millennium Development Goals: A Systematic Review, Country Case Studies, and Recommendations for Integration into National Health Systems. Geneva: Global Health Workforce Alliance and World Health Organization; 2010.
  • [61]Ad S, Tiedje KE, Recht J, Bjelic I, Hamer DH: Community case management of childhood illnesses: policy and implementation in Countdown to 2015 countries. Bull World Health Organ 2012, 90:183-190.
  • [62]Nsona H, Mtimuni A, Daelmans B, Callaghan-Koru JA, Gilroy K, Mgalula L, Kachule T, Zamasiya T: Scaling up integrated community case management of childhood illness: update from Malawi. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2012, 87(5 Suppl):54-60.
  • [63]Bemelmans M, Van Den Akker T, Ford N, Philips M, Zachariah R, Harries A, Schouten E, Hermann K, Mwagomba B, Massaquoi M: Providing universal access to antiretroviral therapy in Thyolo, Malawi through task shifting and decentralization of HIV/AIDS care. Trop Med Int Health 2010, 15(12):1413-1420.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:10次