期刊论文详细信息
BMC Cancer
Evaluation of the walk-through inflatable colon as a colorectal cancer education tool: results from a pre and post research design
Janeth I Sanchez2  Rebecca Palacios1  Adrianna Cole2  Mary A O’Connell2 
[1] Department of Public Health Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
[2] Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
关键词: Health education;    Screening;    Hispanic Americans;    Practice;    Attitudes;    Health knowledge;    Educational tools;    Colorectal cancer;   
Others  :  1134692
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2407-14-626
 received in 2013-10-21, accepted in 2014-08-21,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a disease that can be prevented through early detection. Through the use of effective educational tools, individuals can become better informed about CRC and understand the importance of screening and early detection. The walk through Inflatable Colon is an innovative educational resource developed to engage and educate communities on CRC and the importance of receiving screening at the appropriate ages.

Methods

The Inflatable Colon Assessment Survey (ICAS) assessed knowledge and behavioral intentions to obtain screening and promote CRC awareness. New Mexico State University faculty, staff, and students completed a consent form, took the pre-ICAS, toured the Inflatable Colon, and completed the post-ICAS. The majority of participants (92%) were young adults, mostly college students, under the age of 30 yrs.

Results

Overall, participants demonstrated increases in CRC knowledge and awareness after touring the inflatable colon (p-values < 0.001). Interestingly, both males and Hispanics had lower CRC awareness at pre-test, but exhibited maximum awareness gains equal to that of females and non Hispanic Whites after touring the IC. Behavioral intentions to obtain CRC screening in the future and to promote CRC awareness also increased (p-value < 0.001). Gender differences in behavioral intentions to act as advocators for CRC education were found (p < 0.05), with females being more likely to educate others about CRC than males.

Conclusion

Educational efforts conducted in early adulthood may serve to promote healthier lifestyles (e.g., physical activity, healthy nutrition, screening). These educated young adults may also serve to disseminate CRC information to high-risk friends and relatives. The walk through Inflatable Colon can increase CRC knowledge and intentions to get screened among a young and diverse population.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Sanchez et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150306043326797.pdf 559KB PDF download
Figure 2. 62KB Image download
Figure 1. 88KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts & Figures 2013. Atlanta GA: American Cancer Society; 2013. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-036845.pdf webcite
  • [2]Sanchez JI, Palacios R, Thompson B, Martinez V, O’Connell MA: Assessing Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors and Knowledge among At-Risk Hispanics in Southern New Mexico. J Cancer Ther 2013, 04(06):15-25.
  • [3]Naishadham D, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Siegel R, Cokkinides V, Jemal A: State disparities in colorectal cancer mortality patterns in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011, 20(7):1296-1302.
  • [4]Richardson L, Tai E, Rim S, Joseph D, Plescia M: Vital Signs: Colorectal Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality — United States, 2002–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011, 60:884-889.
  • [5]Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, Eheman C, Zauber AG, Anderson RN, Jemal A, Schymura MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Seeff LC, van Ballegooijen M, Goede SL, Ries LA: Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer 2010, 116(3):544-573.
  • [6]Shaukat A, Mongin S, Geisser M, Lederle F, Bond J, Mandel J, Church T: Long-term mortality after screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2013, 369(12):1106-1114.
  • [7]Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML: Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011, 103(2):117-128.
  • [8]Warren JL, Yabroff KR, Meekins A, Topor M, Lamont EB, Brown ML: Evaluation of trends in the cost of initial cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008, 100(12):888-897.
  • [9]Brown M, Riley G, Schussler N, Etzioni R: Estimating health care costs related to cancer treatment from SEER-Medicare data. Med Care 2002, 40:104-117.
  • [10]Ó Céilleachair A, Hanly P, Skally M, O’Neill C, Fitzpatrick P, Kapur K, Staines A, Sharp L: Cost comparisons and methodological heterogeneity in cost-of-illness studies: the example of colorectal cancer. Med Care 2013, 51(4):339-350.
  • [11]Klabunde CN, Vernon SW, Nadel M, Breen N, Seeff LC, Brown ML: Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: A comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average risk adults. Med Care 2005, 43(9):939-944.
  • [12]Crookes DM, Njoku O, Rodriguez MC, Mendez EI, Jandorf L: Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening through Group Education in Community-Based Settings. J Cancer Educ 2014, 29(2):296-303.
  • [13]Filippi MK, Braiuca S, Cully L, James AS, Choi WS, Greiner KA, Daley CM: American Indian perceptions of colorectal cancer screening: viewpoints from adults under age 50. J Cancer Educ 2013, 28(1):100-108.
  • [14]Jones RM, Woolf SH, Cunningham TD, Johnson RE, Krist AH, Rothemich SF, Vernon SW: The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 2010, 38(5):499-507.
  • [15]McLachlan SA, Clements A, Austoker J: Patients’ experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context–a systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 2012, 86(2):137-146.
  • [16]Fernandez ME, Wippold R, Torres-Vigil I, Byrd T, Freeberg D, Bains Y, Guajardo J, Coughlin SS, Vernon SW: Colorectal cancer screening among Latinos from U.S. cities along the Texas-Mexico border. Cancer Causes Control 2008, 19(2):195-206.
  • [17]US Preventative Services Task Force: Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med 2008, 149:627-637.
  • [18]Meyer JE, Narang T, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Pochapin MB, Christos PJ, Sherr DL: Increasing incidence of rectal cancer in patients aged younger than 40 years: an analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Cancer 2010, 116(18):4354-4359.
  • [19]Siegel RL, Jemal A, Ward EM: Increase in incidence of colorectal cancer among young men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009, 18(6):1695-1698.
  • [20]Ogden C, Carroll M, Curtin L, Lamb M, Flegal K: Prevalence of High Body Mass Index in US Children and Adolescents, 2007–2008. JAMA 2010, 303(3):242-249.
  • [21]Ha EJ, Caine-Bish N: Effect of nutrition intervention using a general nutrition course for promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among college students. J Nutr Educ Behav 2009, 41(2):103-109.
  • [22]Levy BT, Daly JM, Xu Y, Ely JW: Mailed fecal immunochemical tests plus educational materials to improve colon cancer screening rates in Iowa Research Network (IRENE) practices. J Am Board Fam Med 2012, 25(1):73-82.
  • [23]Meade C, McKinney W, Barnas G: Educating patients with limited literacy skills: the effectiveness of printed and videotaped methods about colon cancer. Am J Public Health 1994, 84(1):119-121.
  • [24]Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ: The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 61(2):173-190.
  • [25]Moseley D, Higgins S, Bramald R, Hardman F, Miller J, Mroz M, Tse H, Newton D, Thompson I, Williamson J, Halligan J, Bramald S, Newton L, Tymms P, Henderson B, Stout J: Ways forward with ICT: effective pedagogy using information and communications technology in literacy and numeracy in primary schools. Newcastle University; 1999. Newcastle upon Tyne, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001369.htm webcite
  • [26]Moseley D, Baumfield V, Elliott J, Gregson M, Higgins S, Miller J, Newton D: Frameworks for thinking: a handbook for teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
  • [27]von Wagner C, Steptoe A, Wolf MS, Wardle J: Health literacy and health actions: a review and a framework from health psychology. Health Educ Behav 2009, 36(5):860-877.
  • [28]Redwood D, Provost E, Asay E, Ferguson J, Muller J: Giant inflatable colon and community knowledge, intention, and social support for colorectal cancer screening. Prev Chronic Dis 2013, 10:E40.
  • [29]Chen E-L: A Review of Learning Theories from Visual Literacy. J Educ Comp Design Online Learn 2004, 5:1-8.
  • [30]Coronado G, Farias A, Thompson B, Godina R, Oderkirk W: Attitudes and beliefs about colorectal cancer among Mexican Americans in communities along the US-Mexico border. Ethn Dis 2006, 16:421-427.
  • [31]Moralez E, Rao S, Livaudais J, Thompson B: Improving knowledge and screening for colorectal cancer among Hispanics: Overcoming barriers through a PROMOTORA-led home-based educational intervention. J Cancer Educ 2012, 27(3):533-539.
  • [32]Sanderson P, Weinstein N, Teufel-Shone N, Martinez M: Assessing Colorectal Cancer Screening Knowledge at Tribal Fairs. Prev Chronic Dis 2011, 8(1):1-10.
  • [33]Garcia-Retamero R, Cokely E: Effective communication of risks to young adults: using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. J Exp Psychol Appl 2011, 17(3):270-287.
  • [34]Leahey TM, Gokee LaRose J, Fava JL, Wing RR: Social influences are associated with BMI and weight loss intentions in young adults. Obesity 2011, 19(6):1157-1162.
  • [35]Ritvo P, Myers R, Paszat L, Serenity M, Perez D, Rabeneck L: Gender differences in attitudes impeding colorectal cancer screening. BMC Public Health 2013, 13:500. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [36]Katz ML, Fisher JL, Fleming K, Paskett ED: Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012, 21(1):45-52.
  • [37]Gonzales M, Nelson H, Rhyne RL, Stone SN, Hoffman RM: Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer Screening in New Mexico Hispanics and Non-Hispanic Whites. J Community Health 2012, 37:61279-61288.
  • [38]Dreier M, Borutta B, Seidel G, Kreusel I, Toppich J, Bitzer E, Dierks M-L, Walter U: Development of a comprehensive list of criteria for evaluating consumer education materials on colorectal cancer screening. BMC Public Health 2013, 13:843. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [39]Kentucky Cancer Program: Kentucky is blue about colon cancer. 2013. http://www.kycancerprogram.org/files/pdf-documents/KCP%20Newsletter%202011%20for%20website.pdf webcite. Accessed Oct. 1
  • [40]New Mexico Colorectal Cancer Program: Strollin’ Colon. 2013. http://www.cancernm.org/crc/crc-news.html webcite. Accessed Oct. 1
  • [41]Hart A, Barone T, Mayberry J: Increasing compliance with colorectal cancer screening: the development of effective health education. Health Educ Res 1997, 12(2):171-180.
  • [42]National Cancer Institute: Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results: Stat Fact Sheets Colon and Rectum. 2013. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html webcite. Accessed August 7
  • [43]Ostlin P, Eckermann E, Mishra US, Nkowane M, Wallstam E: Gender and health promotion: a multisectoral policy approach. Health Promot Int 2006, 21(Suppl 1):25-35.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:27次 浏览次数:34次