The impact of patient preference on dialysis modality and hemodialysis vascular access

BMC Nephrology

Kenneth Scott Brimble²  Christine M Ribic²  Michael Walsh¹  Patrick T Keating¹ 

[1] Division of Nephrology, Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Ave. E, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada;FRCP(C), Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Ave. E, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada

关键词: Predialysis education;    Central venous catheter;    Home hemodialysis;    Peritoneal dialysis;   

Others  :  1082721
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2369-15-38

 received in 2013-08-06, accepted in 2014-02-14,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Home-based dialysis, including peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD), is associated with improved health related quality of life and reduced health resource costs. It is uncertain to what extent initial preferences for dialysis modality influence the first dialysis therapy actually utilized. We examined the relationship between initial dialysis modality choice and first dialysis therapy used.

Methods

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) from a single centre who started dialysis after receiving modality education were included in this study. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to assess the independent association of patient characteristics and initial dialysis modality choice with actual dialysis therapy used and starting hemodialysis (HD) with a central venous catheter (CVC).

Results

Of 299 eligible patients, 175 (58.5%) initially chose a home-based therapy and 102 (58.3%) of these patients’ first actual dialysis was a home-based therapy. Of the 89 patients that initially chose facility-based HD, 84 (94.4%) first actual dialysis was facility-based HD. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for first actual dialysis as a home-based therapy was 29.0 for patients intending to perform PD (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.7-78.8; p < 0.001) and 12.4 for patients intending to perform HHD (95% CI 3.29-46.6; p < 0.001). Amongst patients whose first actual dialysis was HD, an initial choice of PD or not choosing a modality was associated with an increased risk of starting dialysis with a CVC (adjusted OR 3.73, 95% CI 1.51-9.21; p = 0.004 and 4.58, 95% CI 1.53-13.7; p = 0.007, respectively).

Conclusions

Although initially choosing a home-based therapy substantially increases the probability of the first actual dialysis being home-based, many patients who initially prefer a home-based therapy start with facility-based HD. Programs that continually re-evaluate patient preferences and reinforce the values of home based therapies that led to the initial preference may improve home-based therapy uptake and improve preparedness for starting HD.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Keating et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Manns BJ, Walsh MW, Culleton BF, Hemmelgarn B, Tonelli M, Schorr M, Klarenbach S, Alberta Kidney Disease Network: Nocturnal hemodialysis does not improve overall measures of quality of life compared to conventional hemodialysis. Kidney Int 2009, 75:542-549.
• [2]Cameron JI, Whiteside C, Katz J, Devins GM: Differences in quality of life across renal replacement therapies: a meta-analytic comparison. Am J Kidney Dis 2000, 35:629-637.
• [3]Klarenbach S, Manns B: Economic evaluation of dialysis therapies. Semin Nephrol 2009, 29:524-532.
• [4]Mendelssohn DC, Mullaney SR, Jung B, Blake PG, Mehta RL: What do American nephologists think about dialysis modality selection? Am J Kidney Dis 2001, 37:22-29.
• [5]Khawar O, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lo WK, Johnson D, Mehrotra R: Is the declining use of long-term peritoneal dialysis justified by outcome data? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007, 2:1317-1328.
• [6]Miskulin DC, Meyer KB, Athienites NV, Martin AA, Terrin N, Marsh JV, Fink NE, Coresh J, Powe NR, Klag MJ, Levey AS: Comorbidity and other factors associated with modality selection in incident dialysis patients: the CHOICE study. Choices for healthy outcomes in caring for End-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2002, 39:324-336.
• [7]van de Luijtgaarden MW, Noordzij M, Stel VS, Ravani P, Jarraya F, Collart F, Schӧ n S, Leivestad T, Puttinger H, Wanner C, Jager KJ: Effects of comorbid and demographic factors on dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in Europe. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011, 26:2940-2947.
• [8]Blake PG, Finkelstein FO: Why is the proportion of patients doing peritoneal dialysis declining in North America? Perit Dial Int 2001, 21:107-114.
• [9]Mehrotra R, Marsh D, Vonesh E, Peters V, Nissenson A: Patient education and access of ESRD patients to renal replacement therapies beyond in-center hemodialysis. Kidney Int 2005, 68:378-390.
• [10]Chanouzas D, Ng KP, Fallouh B, Baharani J: What influences patient choice of treatment modality at the pre-dialysis stage? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012, 27:1542-1547.
• [11]Huang HC, Wang JY, Chang CC, Chiu PF, Chiang MC, Yang Y: Nonclinical factors associated with treatment with peritoneal dialysis in ESRD patients in Taiwan. Perit Dial Int 2010, 30:638-643.
• [12]Curtis BM, Ravani P, Malberti F, Kennett F, Taylor PA, Djurdjev O, Levin A: The short- and long-term impact of multi-disciplinary clinics in addition to standard nephrology care on patient outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005, 20:147-154.
• [13]Stack AG: Impact of timing of nephrology referral and pre-ESRD care on mortality risk among new ESRD patients in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2003, 41:310-318.
• [14]Hemmelgarn BR, Manns BJ, Zhang J, Tonelli M, Klarenbach S, Walsh M, Culleton BF: Association between multidisciplinary care and survival for elderly patients with chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007, 18:993-999.
• [15]Levin A, Hemmelgarn B, Culleton B, Tobe S, McFarlane P, Ruzicka M, Burns K, Manns B, White C, Madore F, Moist L, Klarenbach S, Barrett B, Foley R, Jindal K, Senior P, Pannu N, Shurraw S, Akbari A, Cohn A, Reslerova M, Deved V, Mendelssohn D, Nesrallah G, Kappel J, Tonelli M, Canadian Society of Nephrology: Guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease. CMAJ 2008, 179:1154-1162.
• [16]Marron B, Ortiz A, de SP, Martin-Reyes G, de AG, Lamas JM, Martínez Ocaña JC, Arrieta J, Martínez F, Spanish Group for CKD: Impact of end-stage renal disease care in planned dialysis start and type of renal replacement therapy--a Spanish multicentre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006, 21(Suppl 2):ii51-ii55.
• [17]Korevaar JC, Feith GW, Dekker FW, van Manen JG, Boeschoten EW, Bossuyt PM, Krediet RT, NECOSAD Study Group: Effect of starting with hemodialysis compared with peritoneal dialysis in patients new on dialysis treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Kidney Int 2003, 64:2222-2228.
• [18]Canadian Institute for Health Information: Treatment of End-Stage Organ Failure in Canada, 1999 to 2008—CORR 2010 Annual Report. Ottawa: CIHI; 2010.
• [19]Gilg J, Castledine C, Fogarty D: UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report. Bristol, UK: UK Renal Registry; 2010.
• [20]U S Renal Data System: USRDS 2012 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases: Bethesda, MD; 2012.
• [21]Marron B, Martinez Ocaña JC, Salgueira M, Barril G, Lamas JM, Martin M, Sierra T, Rodríguez-Carmona A, Soldevilla A, Martínez F, Spanish Group for CKD: Analysis of patient flow into dialysis: role of education in choice of dialysis modality. Perit Dial Int 2005, 25(Suppl 3):S56-S59.
• [22]Goovaerts T, Jadoul M, Goffin E: Influence of a pre-dialysis education programme (PDEP) on the mode of renal replacement therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005, 20:1842-1847.
• [23]Liebman SE, Bushinsky DA, Dolan JG, Veazie P: Differences between dialysis modality selection and initiation. Am J Kidney Dis 2012, 59:550-557.
• [24]Hanko J, Romann A, Taylor P, Copland M, Beaulieu M: Optimizing AVF creation prior to dialysis start: the role of predialysis renal replacement therapy choices. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012, 27:4205-4210.
• [25]Stack AG, Molony DA, Rahman NS, Dosekun A, Murthy B: Impact of dialysis modality on survival of new ESRD patients with congestive heart failure in the United States. Kidney Int 2003, 64:1071-1079.