Guidance strategies for a participatory ergonomic intervention to increase the use of ergonomic measures of workers in construction companies: a study design of a randomised trial

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Monique HW Frings-Dresen²  Judith K Sluiter²  Henk F van der Molen¹  Steven Visser² 

[1] Arbouw, P.O. Box 213, Harderwijk 3840 AE, The Netherlands;Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands

关键词: Construction industry;    Physical work demands;    Ergonomic measures;    Participatory ergonomics;   

Others  :  1128612
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-15-132

 received in 2013-07-23, accepted in 2014-04-10,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

More than seven out of 10 Dutch construction workers describe their work as physically demanding. Ergonomic measures can be used to reduce these physically demanding work tasks. To increase the use of ergonomic measures, employers and workers have to get used to other working methods and to maintaining them. To facilitate this behavioural change, participatory ergonomics (PE) interventions could be useful. For this study a protocol of a PE intervention is adapted in such a way that the intervention can be performed by an ergonomics consultant through face-to-face contacts or email contacts. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the face-to-face guidance strategy and the e-guidance strategy on the primary outcome measure: use of ergonomic measures by individual construction workers, and on the secondary outcome measures: the work ability, physical functioning and limitations due to physical problems of individual workers.

Methods/Design

The present study is a randomised intervention trial of six months in 12 companies to establish the effects of a PE intervention guided by four face-to-face contacts (N = 6) or guided by 13 email contacts (N = 6) on the primary and secondary outcome measures at baseline and after six months. Construction companies are randomly assigned to one of the guidance strategies with the help of a computer generated randomisation table. In addition, a process evaluation for both strategies will be performed to determine reach, dose delivered, dose received, precision, competence, satisfaction and behavioural change to find possible barriers and facilitators for both strategies. A cost-benefit analysis will be performed to establish the financial consequences of both strategies. The present study is in accordance with the CONSORT statement.

Discussion

The outcome of this study will help to 1) evaluate the effect of both guidance strategies, and 2) find barriers to and facilitators of both guidance strategies. When these strategies are effective, implementation within occupational health services can take place to guide construction companies (and others) with the implementation of ergonomic measures.

Trail registration

Trailnumber: ISRCTN73075751, Date of registration: 30 July 2013.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Visser et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Arbouw: Atlas of workers health surveillance data in construction industry of 2012 (In Dutch: Bedrijfstakatlas 2012). http://www.arbouw.nl/producten/tools/bedrijfstakatlas-2012 webcite [Accessed on April 2013]
• [2]Van der Molen HF, Grouwstra R, Kuijer PPFM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW: Efficacy of adjusting working height and mechanizing of transport on physical work demands and local discomfort in construction work. Ergonomics 2004, 47:772-783.
• [3]Jensen LK, Friche C: Effects of training to implement new tools and working methods to reduce knee load in floor layers. Appl Ergon 2007, 38:655-665.
• [4]Vink P, Miedema M, Koningsveld EAP, van der Molen HF: Physical effects of new devices for bricklayers. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2002, 8:71-82.
• [5]Jensen LK, Friche C: Effects of training to implement new working methods to reduce knee strain in floor layers. A two-year follow-up. Occup Environ Med 2008, 65:20-27.
• [6]Jensen LK, Friche C: Implementation of new working methods in the floor-laying trade: Long-term effects on knee load and knee complaints. Am J Ind Med 2010, 53:615-627.
• [7]Van der Molen HF, Sluiter JK, Hulshof CTJ, Vink P, Frings-Dresen MHW: Effectiveness of measures and implementation strategies in reducing physical work demands due to manual handling at work. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005, 31(Suppl 2):75-87.
• [8]Van der Molen HF, Sluiter JK, Hulshof CTJ, Vink P, van Duivenbooden CJ, Frings-Dresen MHW: Conceptual framework for the implementation of interventions in the construction industry. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005, 31(Suppl 2):96-103.
• [9]Haines H, Wilson JR, Vink P, Koningsveld EAP: Validating a framework for participatory ergonomics (the PEF). Ergonomics 2002, 45:309-327.
• [10]Vink P, Koningsveld EAP, Molenbroek JF: Positive outcomes of participatory ergonomics in terms of greater comfort and higher productivity. Appl Ergon 2006, 37:537-546.
• [11]Straker L, Burgess-Limerick R, Pollock C, Egeskov R: A randomized and controlled trial of a participative ergonomics intervention to reduce injuries associated with manual tasks: physical risk and legislative compliance. Ergonomics 2004, 47:166-188.
• [12]Van der Molen HF, Sluiter JK, Hulshof CTJ, Vink P, van Duivenbooden CJ, Holman R, Frings-Dresen MHW: Implementation of participatory ergonomics intervention in construction companies. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005, 31:191-204.
• [13]De Jong AM, Vink P: Participatory ergonomics applied in installation work. Appl Ergon 2002, 33:439-448.
• [14]Rivilis I, van Eerd D, Cullen K, Cole DC, Irvin E, Tyson J, Mahood Q: Effectiveness of participatory ergonomic intervention on health outcomes: a systematic review. Appl Ergon 2008, 39:342-358.
• [15]Haukka E, Leino-Arjas P, Viikari-Juntura E, Takala EP, Malmivaara A, Hopsu L, Mutanen P, Ketola R, Virtanen T, Pehkonen I, Holtari-Leino M, Nykänen J, Stenholm S, Nykyri E, Riihimäki H: A randomised controlled trial on whether a participatory ergonomics intervention could prevent musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Environ Med 2008, 65:849-956.
• [16]Van Eerd D, Cole D, Irvin E, Mahood Q, Keown K, Theberge N, Village J, St. Vincent M, Cullen K: Process and implementation of participatory ergonomic interventions: A systematic review. Ergonomics 2010, 53:1153-1166.
• [17]Baker TB, Gustafson DH, Shaw B, Hawkins R, Pingree S, Roberts L, Strecher V: Relevance of CONSORT reporting criteria for research on eHealth interventions. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 81S:S77-S86.
• [18]Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D: CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010, 340:698-702.
• [19]Boschman JS, van der Molen HF, van Duivenbooden CJ, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW: A trial of a job-specific workers’ health surveillance program for construction workers: study protocol. BMC Public Health 2011, 11:743-750. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Boschman JS, van der Molen HF, Frings-Dresen MHW: Evaluation of the Campaign “Lichter Werkt”: is the use of Ergonomic Measures Increased? In In Dutch: Evaluatie van de compagne Lichter Werkt: is het gebruik van hulpmiddelen toegenomen?. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam; 2013. Reportnumber 13–04
• [21]Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A: Work Ability Index. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1998.
• [22]Van der Zee KL, Sanderman R, Heyink JW, de Haes H: Psychometric qualities of the RAND 36-item health survey 1.0: a multidimensional measure of general health status. Int J Behav Med 1996, 3:104-122.
• [23]Linnan L, Steckler A: Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
• [24]Murta SG, Sanderson K, Oldenburg B: Process evaluation in occupational stress management programs: a systemic review. Am J Health Promot 2007, 21:248-254.
• [25]Fleiss JL, Tytun A, Ury SHK: A sample approximation for calculating sample sizes for comparing independent proportions. Biometrics 1980, 36:343-346.
• [26]Driessen MT, Groenewoud K, Proper KI, Anema JR, Bongers PM, van der Beek AJ: What are possible barriers and facilitators to implementation of a Participatory Ergonomics programme? Implement Sci 2010, 5:64-72. BioMed Central Full Text