期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medicine
Preventing pre-eclampsia – are dietary factors the key?
Rosalie M Grivell1  Cecelia O’Brien1  Jodie M Dodd1 
[1] Department of Perinatal Medicine, Women’s and Babies Division, The Women’s and Children’s Hospital, North Adelaide, Australia
关键词: Dietary factors;    Randomised trials;    Systematic review;    Hypertension;    Pre-eclampsia;   
Others  :  1121434
DOI  :  10.1186/s12916-014-0176-4
 received in 2014-09-09, accepted in 2014-09-09,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Pre-eclampsia is a common pregnancy related condition, which contributes significantly both to maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The precise pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia is uncertain, and the development of effective preventive strategies remains elusive.

Schoenaker and colleagues conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies reporting dietary intake and dietary patterns. The findings indicated that women with a low dietary calcium intake were more likely to be diagnosed with gestational hypertension, while there was a suggestion (although not statistically significant) of a beneficial effect of a diet rich in fruits and vegetables on risk of pre-eclampsia.

This is in contrast to the findings of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised trials in pregnancy evaluating calcium supplementation and anti-oxidant vitamin C and E supplementation.

The validity of any systematic review is reliant on both the underlying methodology and the quality of each of the included studies; the review by Schoenaker and colleagues is limited by the observational nature of the included studies.

Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/157/abstract webcite.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Dodd et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150212022629576.pdf 171KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M: Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2005, 365:785-799.
  • [2]Geographic variation in the incidence of hypertension in pregnancy: World Health Organization International Collaborative Study of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988, 158:80–83.
  • [3]Wallis AB, Saftlas AF, Hsia J, Atrash HK: Secular trends in the rates of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and gestational hypertension, United States, 1987-2004. Am J Hypertens 2008, 21:521-526.
  • [4]Roberts CL, Ford JB, Algert CS, Antonsen S, Chalmers J, Cnattingius S, Gokhale M, Kotelchuck M, Melve KK, Langridge A, Morris C, Morris JM, Nassar N, Norman JE, Norrie J, Sørensen HT, Walker R, Weir CJ: Population-based trends in pregnancy hypertension and pre-eclampsia: an international comparative study. BMJ Open 2011, 1:e000101.
  • [5]Duley L: The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol 2009, 33:130-137.
  • [6]Ronsmans C, Graham WJ: Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet 2006, 368:1189-1200.
  • [7]Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PF: WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 2006, 367:1066-1074.
  • [8]The World Health Report 2005: Make Every Mother and Child Count. WHO, Geneva; 2005.
  • [9]Lewis G: The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH): Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing Maternal Deaths to Make Motherhood Safer 2003-2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: 2007.
  • [10]Lewis G, Drife JO: Why Mothers Die 2000-2002: The Sixth Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: 2004.
  • [11]Altman D, Carroli G, Duley L, Farrell B, Moodley J, Neilson J, Smith D: Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002, 359:1877-1890.
  • [12]National Insitute for Health Care Excellence: Hypertension in Pregnancy: The Management of Hypertensive Disorders during Pregnancy. London: 2010.
  • [13]Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ: Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2007, 335:974.
  • [14]Fisher KA, Lugar A, Spargo BH, Lindeheimer MD: Hypertension in pregnancy: Clinical-pathological correlations and remote prognosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 1981, 60:267-276.
  • [15]Laws PJ, Li Z, Sullivan EA: Australia’s Mothers and Babies 2008. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2010.
  • [16]Kramer MS, Séguin L, Lydon J, Goulet L: Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2000, 14:194-210.
  • [17]Hewitt BG, Newnham JP: A review of the obstetric and medical complications leading to the delivery of infants of very low birthweight. Med J Aust 1988, 149:234.
  • [18]Saigal S, Doyle LW: An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 2008, 371:261-269.
  • [19]Strauss RS: Adult functional outcome of those born small for gestational age. Twenty-six year follow up of the 1970 British Birth Cohort. JAMA 2000, 283:625-632.
  • [20]Barker DJ: Mothers, Babies and Disease in Later Life. Harcourt Brace & Co, London; 1998.
  • [21]Schoenaker: 2014.
  • [22]Duley L, Henderson-Smart DJ, Meher S, King JF: Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007., 2
  • [23]Hofmeyr GJ, Atallah AN, Duley L: Calcium supplementation during pregnancy for preventing hypertensive disorders and related problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010., 8
  • [24]Radaelli T, Uvena-Celebrezze J, Minium J, Huston-Presley L, Catalano P, Hauguel-de Mouzon S: Maternal interleukin-6: marker of fetal growth and adiposity. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2006, 13:53-57.
  • [25]NHMRC Evidence Hierarchy: designations of ‘levels of evidence’ for intervention studies NHMRC levels of evidence and grades for recommendations 2009.
  • [26]Cook DA: Randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis in medical education: What role do they play? Med Teach 2012, 34:468-473.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:14次 浏览次数:11次