期刊论文详细信息
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
The effect of changing movement and posture using motion-sensor biofeedback, versus guidelines-based care, on the clinical outcomes of people with sub-acute or chronic low back pain-a multicentre, cluster-randomised, placebo-controlled, pilot trial
Terry Haines2  Robert Laird3  Peter Kent1 
[1] Research Department, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Hospital Lillebaelt, Institute of Regional Health Services Research, University of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark;Allied Health Research Unit, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia;Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
关键词: Technology;    Clinical trial;    Posture;    Movement;    Rehabilitation;    Low back pain;   
Others  :  1227764
DOI  :  10.1186/s12891-015-0591-5
 received in 2014-12-08, accepted in 2015-05-18,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The aims of this pilot trial were to (i) test the hypothesis that modifying patterns of painful lumbo-pelvic movement using motion-sensor biofeedback in people with low back pain would lead to reduced pain and activity limitation compared with guidelines-based care, and (ii) facilitate sample size calculations for a fully powered trial.

Methods

A multicentre (8 clinics), cluster-randomised, placebo-controlled pilot trial compared two groups of patients seeking medical or physiotherapy primary care for sub-acute and chronic back pain. It was powered for longitudinal analysis, but not for adjusted single-time point comparisons. The intervention group (n = 58) received modification of movement patterns augmented by motion-sensor movement biofeedback (ViMove, dorsaVi.com) plus guidelines-based medical or physiotherapy care. The control group (n = 54) received a placebo (wearing the motion-sensors without biofeedback) plus guidelines-based medical or physiotherapy care.

Primary outcomes were self-reported pain intensity (VAS) and activity limitation (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)), all on 0–100 scales. Both groups received 6–8 treatment sessions. Outcomes were measured seven times during 10-weeks of treatment and at 12, 26 and 52 week follow-up, with 17.0 % dropout. Patients were not informed of group allocation or the study hypothesis.

Results

Across one-year, there were significant between-group differences favouring the intervention group [generalized linear model coefficient (95 % CI): group effect RMDQ −7.1 (95 % CI–12.6;–1.6), PSFS −10.3 (−16.6; −3.9), QVAS −7.7 (−13.0; −2.4); and group by time effect differences (per 100 days) RMDQ −3.5 (−5.2; −2.2), PSFS −4.7 (−7.0; −2.5), QVAS −4.8 (−6.1; −3.5)], all p < 0.001. Risk ratios between groups of probability of improving by >30 % at 12-months = RMDQ 2.4 (95 % CI 1.5; 4.1), PSFS 2.5 (1.5; 4.0), QVAS 3.3 (1.8; 5.9).

The only device-related side-effects involved transient skin irritation from tape used to mount motion sensors.

Conclusions

Individualised movement retraining using motion-sensor biofeedback resulted in significant and sustained improvements in pain and activity limitation that persisted after treatment finished. This pilot trial also refined the procedures and sample size requirements for a fully powered RCT.

This trial (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry NCT01572779) was equally funded by dorsaVi P/L and the Victorian State Government.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Kent et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150929034848124.pdf 1913KB PDF download
Fig. 5. 25KB Image download
Fig. 4. 25KB Image download
Fig. 3. 26KB Image download
Fig. 2. 80KB Image download
Fig. 1. 37KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M et al.. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380(9859):2163-2196.
  • [2]Luo X, Pietrobon R, Sun SX, Liu GG, Hey L. Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States. Spine. 2004; 29(1):79-86.
  • [3]Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain. 2000; 84(1):95-103.
  • [4]Deyo R, Rainville J, Kent D. What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA. 1992; 268(6):760-765.
  • [5]Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Bleasel J et al.. Prevalence of and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2009; 60(10):3072-3080.
  • [6]Spengler DM, David DP. Industrial low back pain: A practical approach. In: Industrial low back pain: A comprehensive approach. Wiesel SW, editor. The Michie Company, Charlottesville, VA, USA; 1985: p.869-871.
  • [7]Kent PM, Keating JL. Classification in non-specific low back pain - what methods do primary care clinicians currently use? Spine. 2005; 30:1433-1440.
  • [8]Keller A, Hayden J, Bombardier C, van Tulder M. Effect sizes of non-surgical treatments of non-specific low-back pain. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(11):1776-1788.
  • [9]Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Koes BW. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; 3: Article ID CD000335
  • [10]Rubinstein SM, van Middelkoop M, Assendelft WJ, de Boer MR, van Tulder MW. Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain: an update of a Cochrane review. Spine. 2011; 36(13):E825-E846.
  • [11]Walker BF, French SD, Grant W, Green S. Combined chiropractic interventions for low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 4: Article ID CD005427
  • [12]Artus M, van der Windt D. Small effects of treatments for non-specific low back pain: how can we improve patients’ outcomes? Rheumatology. 2009; 48(5):464-465.
  • [13]Kent P, Mjøsund HL, Petersen DH. Does targeting manual therapy and/or exercise improve patient outcomes in nonspecific low back pain? – A systematic review. BMC Med. 2010; 8:22.
  • [14]Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW, Irrgang JJ, Johnson KK, Majkowski GR et al.. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141(12):920-928.
  • [15]Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn K, Foster NE et al.. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011; 378(9802):1560-1571.
  • [16]Van Dillen LR, Sahrmann SA, Norton BJ, Caldwell CA, McDonnell MK, Bloom N. The effect of modifying patient-preferred spinal movement and alignment during symptom testing in patients with low back pain: A preliminary report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84((3 Suppl 1)):22-313.
  • [17]Vibe Fersum K, O’Sullivan P, Skouen JS, Smith A, Kvåle A. Efficacy of classification-based cognitive functional therapy in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2012; 17(6):916-928.
  • [18]Hodges P, van den Hoorn W, Dawson A, Cholewicki J. Changes in the mechanical properties of the trunk in low back pain may be associated with recurrence. J Biomech. 2009; 42(1):61-66.
  • [19]Van Daele U, Hagman F, Truijen S, Vorlat P, Van Gheluwe B, Vaes P. Decrease in postural sway and trunk stiffness during cognitive dual-task in nonspecific chronic low back pain patients, performance compared to healthy control subjects. Spine. 2010; 35(5):583-589.
  • [20]Brumagne S, Cordo P, Lysens R, Verschueren S, Swinnen S. The role of paraspinal muscle spindles in lumbosacral position sense in individuals with and without low back pain. Spine. 2000; 25(8):989-994.
  • [21]Descarreaux M, Blouin JS, Teasdale N. Repositioning accuracy and movement parameters in low back pain subjects and healthy control subjects. Eur Spine J. 2005; 14(2):185-191.
  • [22]Sheeran L, Sparkes V, Caterson B, Busse-Morris M, van Deursen R. Spinal position sense and trunk muscle activity during sitting and standing in nonspecific chronic low back pain: classification analysis. Spine. 2012; 37(8):E486-E495.
  • [23]Dunk NM, Callaghan JP. Lumbar spine movement patterns during prolonged sitting differentiate low back pain developers from matched asymptomatic controls. Work. 2010; 35(1):3-14.
  • [24]Gregory DE, Callaghan JP. Prolonged standing as a precursor for the development of low back discomfort: an investigation of possible mechanisms. Gait Posture. 2008; 28(1):86-92.
  • [25]Williams MM, Hawley JA, McKenzie RA, van Wijmen PM. A comparison of the effects of two sitting postures on back referred pain. Spine. 1991; 16(10):1185-1191.
  • [26]Hodges P, Richardson C. Inefficient muscular stabilisation of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain - a motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine. 1996; 21(22):2640-2650.
  • [27]Silfies SP, Mehta R, Smith SS, Karduna AR. Differences in feedforward trunk muscle activity in subgroups of patients with mechanical low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90(7):1159-1169.
  • [28]Hides J, Gilmore C, Stanton W, Bohlscheid E. Multifidus size and symmetry among chronic LBP and healthy asymptomatic subjects. Man Ther. 2008; 13(1):43-49.
  • [29]Hides JA, Jull GA, Richardson CA. Long-term effects of specific stabilizing exercises for first-episode low back pain. Spine. 2001; 26(11):E243-E248.
  • [30]Wallwork TL, Stanton WR, Freke M, Hides JA. The effect of chronic low back pain on size and contraction of the lumbar multifidus muscle. Man Ther. 2009; 14(5):496-500.
  • [31]de Jager JP, Ahern MJ. Improved evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain: guidelines from the National Health and Medical Research Council are now available. Med J Aust. 2004; 181(10):527-528.
  • [32]Savigny P, Kuntze S, Watson P, Underwood M, Ritchie G, Cotterell M et al.. Low back pain - Early management of persistent non-specific low back pain. National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care and Royal College of General Practitioners, London; 2009.
  • [33]van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, del Real MT, Hutchinson A et al.. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2006; 15 Suppl 2:S169-S191.
  • [34]Hodges PW, Cholewicki J. Functional control of the spine, in movement, stability & lumbopelvic pain. Movement, Stability & Lumbopelvic Pain - Integration of Research and Therapy. Vleeming A, Mooney V, Stoeckart R, editors. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh; 2007.
  • [35]Hoogendoorn W, Bongers P, de Vet H, Douwes M, Koes B, Miedema M et al.. Flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work are risk factors for low back pain. Spine. 2000; 25(23):3087-3092.
  • [36]Bryan M, Hawson S. The benefits of Pilates exercise in orthopaedic rehabilitation. Tech Orthop. 2003; 18(1):126-129.
  • [37]McKenzie R, May S. Lumbar Spine, Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy. 2nd ed. Spinal Publications Ltd, Waikanae, New Zealand; 2003.
  • [38]Richardson C, Jull G, Hodges P, Hides J. Therapeutic exercise for spinal segmental stabilization in low back pain: scientific basis and clinical approach. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh; 1999.
  • [39]Dursun N, Dursun E, Kilic Z. Electromyographic biofeedback-controlled exercise versus conservative care for patellofemoral pain syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82(12):1692-1695.
  • [40]Killip S, Mahfoud Z, Pearce K. What is an intracluster correlation coefficient? Crucial concepts for primary care researchers. Ann Fam Med. 2004; 2(3):204-208.
  • [41]Mazor KM, Sabin JE, Boudreau D, Goodman MJ, Gurwitz JH, Herrinton LJ. Cluster randomized trials: opportunities and barriers identified by leaders of eight health plans. Med Care. 2007; 45(10 Supl 2)):S29-S37.
  • [42]Murray DM, Varnell SP, Blitstein JL. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94(3):423-432.
  • [43]Group AAMPG. Chapter 4: Acute low back pain. Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain. Australian Academic Press, Bowen Hills, Queensland; 2003.
  • [44]Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006; 15 Suppl 2:S192-S300.
  • [45]Ronchi AJ, Lech M, Taylor NF, Cosic I, editors. A reliability study of the new Back Strain Monitor based on clinical trials. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:693-6. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649247.
  • [46]Charry E, Umer M, Taylor S, editors. Design and validation of an ambulatory inertial system for 3-D measurements of low back movements. Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP 2011); 2011. IEEE Conference Publications (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org) DOI: 10.1109/ISSNIP.2011.6146618
  • [47]Ikeda DM, McGill SM. Can altering motions, postures, and loads provide immediate low back pain relief: a study of 4 cases investigating spine load, posture, and stability. Spine. 2012; 37(23):E1469-E1475.
  • [48]O’Sullivan P. Diagnosis and classification of chronic low backpain disorders: Maladaptive movement and motor control impairments as underlying mechanism. Man Ther. 2005; 10:242-255.
  • [49]O’Sullivan PB, Beales DJ. Diagnosis and classification of pelvic girdle pain disorders—Part 1: A mechanism based approach within a biopsychosocial framework. Man Ther. 2007; 12:86-97.
  • [50]Patrick D, Deyo R, Atlas S, Singer D, Chapin A, Keller R. Assessing health related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine. 1995; 20(17):1899-1908.
  • [51]Froud R, Eldridge S, Underwood M. Reporting methods in back pain trials. Part I: Outcome measures. Palma de Mallorca International Forum IX Primary Care Research On Low Back Pain, Palma de Mallorca; 2007.
  • [52]Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther. 2002; 82(1):8-24.
  • [53]Davies C, Nitz A. Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire ccompared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev. 2009; 14(6):399-408.
  • [54]Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N. Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 1: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations. Eur Spine J. 2006; 15:1705-1716.
  • [55]Kent P, Lauridsen HH. Managing missing scores on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine. 2011; 36:1878-1884.
  • [56]Abbott JH, Schmitt JS. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale was valid for group-level change comparisons and between-group discrimination. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014.
  • [57]Hall AM, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira ML, Costa LO. The patient-specific functional scale is more responsive than the Roland Morris disability questionnaire when activity limitation is low. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(1):79-86.
  • [58]Zusman M. The Absolute Visual Analogue Scale (AVAS) as a measure of pain intensity. Aust J Physiother. 1986; 32:244-246.
  • [59]Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Kinney RK. Predicting outcome of chronic back pain using clinical predictors of psychopathology: a prospective analysis. Health Psychol. 1995; 14(5):415-420.
  • [60]Ohnhaus EE, Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1975; 1(4):379-384.
  • [61]de Vet HC, Heymans MW, Dunn KM, Pope DP, van der Beek AJ, Macfarlane GJ et al.. Episodes of low back pain: a proposal for uniform definitions to be used in research. Spine. 2002; 27(21):2409-2416.
  • [62]Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993; 52(2):157-168.
  • [63]Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Brennan GP. Predictive validity of initial fear avoidance beliefs in patients with low back pain receiving physical therapy: is the FABQ a useful screening tool for identifying patients at risk for a poor recovery? Eur Spine J. 2008; 17(1):70-79.
  • [64]McCracken LM, Gross RT, Aikens J, Carnrike CL. The assessment of anxiety and fear in persons with chronic pain: a comparison of instruments. Behav Res Ther. 1996; 34(11–12):927-933.
  • [65]Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Pozzi GC et al.. Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: which one is the best? Spine. 2008; 33(22):2459-2463.
  • [66]Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001; 94(2):149-158.
  • [67]Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M et al.. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine. 2008; 33(1):90-94.
  • [68]Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, Herbert RD, Refshauge K. Specific stabilisation exercise for spinal and pelvic pain: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother. 2006; 52(2):79-88.
  • [69]Hauggaard A, Persson AL. Specific spinal stabilisation exercises in patients with low back pain - a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev. 2007; 12:233-248.
  • [70]Macedo LG, Maher CG, Latimer J, McAuley JH. Motor control exercise for persistent, nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2009; 89(1):9-25.
  • [71]May S, Johnson R. Stabilisation exercises for low back pain: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2008; 94:179-189.
  • [72]Rackwitz B, de Bie R, Limm H, von Garnier K, Ewert T, Stucki G. Segmental stabilizing exercises and low back pain. What is the evidence? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2006; 20(7):553-567.
  • [73]Slade SC, Keating JL. Trunk-strengthening exercises for chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006; 29(2):163-173.
  • [74]Slade SC, Keating JL. Unloaded movement facilitation exercise compared to no exercise or alternative therapy on outcomes for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007; 30(4):301-311.
  • [75]van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Verhagen AP, Ostelo RW, Koes BW, van Tulder MW. Exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific low-back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 24(2):193-204.
  • [76]Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Hodges PW. Changes in recruitment of the abdominal muscles in people with low back pain ultrasound measurement of muscle activity. Spine. 2004; 29(2):2560-2566.
  • [77]Ernst E, Canter PH. The Alexander technique: a systematic review of controlled clinical trials. Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde. Research in complementary and natural classical medicine. 2003; 10(6):9-325.
  • [78]Little P, Lewith G, Webley F, Evans M, Beattie A, Middleton K et al.. Randomised controlled trial of Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage (ATEAM) for chronic and recurrent back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2008; 42(12):965-968.
  • [79]Lim EC, Poh RL, Low AY, Wong WP. Effects of Pilates-based exercises on pain and disability in individuals with persistent nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 41(2):70-80.
  • [80]Donovan JJ, Radosevich DJ. A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don’t. J App Psychol. 1999; 84(5):795-805.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:19次 浏览次数:9次