期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
Associations between number of sick-leave days and future all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a population-based cohort study
Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz1  Kristina Alexanderson1  Charlotte Björkenstam1  Christina Lindholm1  Gunilla Ringbäck Weitoft2  Emma Björkenstam1 
[1] Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Berzelius väg 3, Stockholm SE-171 77, Sweden;National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词: Inpatient care;    Morbidity;    Gender;    Socioeconomic status;    Sick-leave days;    Mortality;   
Others  :  864973
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-733
 received in 2014-03-27, accepted in 2014-07-10,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

As the number of studies on the future situation of sickness absentees still is very limited, we aimed to investigate the association between number of sick-leave days and future all-cause and cause-specific mortality among women and men.

Methods

A cohort of 2 275 987 women and 2 393 248 men, aged 20–64 years in 1995 was followed 1996–2006 with regard to mortality. Data were obtained from linked authority-administered registers. The relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of mortality with and without a 2-year wash-out period were estimated by multivariate Poisson regression analyses. All analyses were stratified by sex, adjusting for socio demographics and inpatient care.

Results

A gradually higher all-cause mortality risk occurred with increasing number of sick-leave days in 1995, among both women (RR 1.11; CI 1.07-1.15 for those with 1–15 sick-leave days to RR 2.45; CI 2.36-2.53 among those with 166–365 days) and men (RR 1.20; CI 1.17-1.24 to RR 1.91; CI 1.85-1.97). Multivariate risk estimates were comparable for the different causes of death (circulatory disease, cancer, and suicide). The two-year washout period had only a minor effect on the risk estimates.

Conclusion

Even a low number of sick-leave days was associated with a higher risk for premature death in the following 11 years, also when adjusting for morbidity. This was the case for both women and men and also for cause-specific mortality. More knowledge is warranted on the mechanisms leading to higher mortality risks among sickness absentees, as sickness certification is a common measure in health care, and most sick leave is due to diagnoses you do not die from.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Björkenstam et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140726045730795.pdf 191KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Vingård E, Alexanderson K, Norlund A: Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 9. Consequences of being on sick leave. Scand J Public Health 2004, 32(63):207-215.
  • [2]Ferrie JE, Vahtera J, Kivimaki M, Westerlund H, Melchior M, Alexanderson K, Head J, Chevalier A, Leclerc A, Zins M, Goldberg M, Singh-Manoux A: Diagnosis-specific sickness absence and all-cause mortality in the GAZEL study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009, 63(1):50-55.
  • [3]Head J, Ferrie JE, Alexanderson K, Westerlund H, Vahtera J, Kivimaki M: Diagnosis-specific sickness absence as a predictor of mortality: the Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ 2008, 337:a1469.
  • [4]Gjesdal S, Ringdal PR, Haug K, Maeland JG, Vollset SE, Alexanderson K: Mortality after long-term sickness absence: prospective cohort study. Eur J Public Health 2008, 18(5):517-521.
  • [5]Kivimaki M, Head J, Ferrie JE, Shipley MJ, Vahtera J, Marmot MG: Sickness absence as a global measure of health: evidence from mortality in the Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ 2003, 327(7411):364.
  • [6]Kivimaki M, Head J, Ferrie JE, Singh-Manoux A, Westerlund H, Vahtera J, Leclerc A, Melchior M, Chevalier A, Alexanderson K, Zins M, Goldberg M: Sickness absence as a prognostic marker for common chronic conditions: analysis of mortality in the GAZEL study. Occup Environ Med 2008, 65(12):820-826.
  • [7]Vahtera J, Pentti J, Kivimaki M: Sickness absence as a predictor of mortality among male and female employees. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004, 58(4):321-326.
  • [8]Wang M, Alexanderson K, Runeson B, Head J, Melchior M, Perski A, Mittendorfer-Rutz E: Are all-cause and diagnosis-specific sickness absence, and sick-leave duration risk indicators for suicidal behaviour? A nationwide register-based cohort study of 4.9 million inhabitants of Sweden. Occup Environ Med 2014, 71(1):12-20.
  • [9]Lund T, Kivimaki M, Christensen KB, Labriola M: Socio-economic differences in the association between sickness absence and mortality: the prospective DREAM study of Danish private sector employees. Occup Environ Med 2009, 66(3):150-153.
  • [10]Marmot M, Feeney A, Shipley M, North F, Syme SL: Sickness absence as a measure of health status and functioning: from the UK Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995, 49(2):124-130.
  • [11]Alexanderson K, Kilbom A, Messing K, Bildt Thorbjörnsson C: Measuring health. Indicators for working women. In Women’s health at work. Stockholm: National Institute for Working Life; 1998.
  • [12]Marmot M: The status syndrome. How social standing affects our health and longevity. New York: Time Books, Henry Holt and Company, LLC; 2004.
  • [13]Alexanderson K, Norlund A: Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 1. Aim, background, key concepts, regulations, and current statistics. Scand J Public Health 2004, 32(63):12-30.
  • [14]National Board of Health and Welfare: Health in Sweden: The national public health report 2012. Scand J Public Health Suppl 2012, 40(9 suppl):293.
  • [15]OECD: Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers. Paris, France: OECD; 2009.
  • [16]Ahlgren C, Hammarström A: Back to work? Gendered experiences of rehabilitation. Scand J Public Health 2000, 28(2):88-94.
  • [17]Ostlin P, Danielsson M, Diderichsen F, Härenstam A, Lindberg G (Eds): Gender inequalities in health: a Swedish perspective. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press; 2002.
  • [18]Sen G, Ostlin P (Eds): Gender Equity in Health. The Shifting Frontiers of Evidence and Action. New York: Routledge; 2010.
  • [19]Östlund G, Cedersund E, Hensing G, Alexanderson K: Domestic strain: a hindrance in rehabilitation? Scand J Caring Sci 2004, 18:49-56.
  • [20]Mastekaasa A: Sickness absence in female- and male-dominated occupations and workplaces. Soc Sci Med 2005, 60(10):2261-2272.
  • [21]Waddell G (Ed): The back pain revolution. 2nd edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004.
  • [22]Waddell G, Burton K: Is work good for your health and well-being?. London: TSO; 2006.
  • [23]Hansson T, Jensen I: Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 6. Sickness absence due to back and neck disorders. Scand J Public Health Suppl Review 2004, 32(63 suppl):109-151.
  • [24]Perk J, Alexanderson K: Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 8. Sick leave due to coronary artery disease or stroke. Scand J Public Health 2004, 32(63):181-206.
  • [25]Floderus F, Göransson S, Alexanderson K, Aronsson G: Self-estimated life situation in patients on long-term sick leave. J Rehabil Med 2005, 37:291-299.
  • [26]Geyer S, Hemstrom O, Peter R, Vagero D: Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006, 60(9):804-810.
  • [27]Gallo V, Mackenbach JP, Ezzati M, Menvielle G, Kunst AE, Rohrmann S, Kaaks R, Teucher B, Boeing H, Bergmann MM, Tjønneland A, Dalton SO, Overvad K, Redondo ML, Agudo A, Daponte A, Arriola L, Navarro C, Gurrea AB, Khaw KT, Wareham N, Key T, Naska A, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Masala G, Panico S, Contiero P, Tumino R, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, et al.: Social inequalities and mortality in Europe–results from a large multi-national cohort. PLoS One 2012, 7(7):e39013.
  • [28]Allebeck P, Mastekaasa A: Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 5. Risk factors for sick leave - general studies. Scand J Public Health Suppl 2004, 63:49-108.
  • [29]Qin P, Agerbo E, Mortensen PB: Suicide risk in relation to socioeconomic, demographic, psychiatric, and familial factors: a national register-based study of all suicides in Denmark, 1981–1997. Am J Psychiatry 2003, 160(4):765-772.
  • [30]Qin P, Agerbo E, Westergard-Nielsen N, Eriksson T, Mortensen PB: Gender differences in risk factors for suicide in Denmark. Br J Psychiatry 2000, 177:546-550.
  • [31]Beautrais AL: Suicides and serious suicide attempts: two populations or one? Psychol Med 2001, 31(5):837-845.
  • [32]Hawton K, van Heeringen K: Suicide. Lancet 2009, 373(9672):1372-1381.
  • [33]Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, Feychting M, Kim JL, Reuterwall C, Heurgren M, Olausson PO: External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health 2011, 11:450.
  • [34]National Board of Health and Welfare: Causes of Death 2010. Västerås, Sweden: National Board of Health and Welfare; 2010.
  • [35]Hensing G, Alexanderson K, Allebeck P, Bjurulf P: How to measure sickness absence? Literature review and suggestion of five basic measures. [Review] [50 refs]. Scand J Soc Med 1998, 26(2):133-144.
  • [36]Hensing G: Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 4. Methodological aspects in sickness-absence research. Scand J Public Health 2004, 32(63):44-48.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:12次