期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
Relationship between the physical environment and different domains of physical activity in European adults: a systematic review
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij1  Nico Van de Weghe3  Lea Maes2  Liesbet Goubert4  Jelle Van Cauwenberg5  Benedicte Deforche5  Veerle Van Holle1 
[1] Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium;Department of Public Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185 (Block A), B-9000, Ghent, Belgium;Department of Geography, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 (S8), B-9000, Ghent, Belgium;Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium;Department of Human Biometry and Biomechanics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050, Brussels, Belgium
关键词: Transportation;    Continent-specific;    Built environment;    Domain-specific physical activity;   
Others  :  1163056
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-807
 received in 2012-05-07, accepted in 2012-09-13,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

In the past decade, various reviews described the relationship between the physical environment and different physical activity (PA) domains. Yet, the majority of the current review evidence relies on North American/Australian studies, while only a small proportion of findings refer to European studies. Given some clear environmental differences across continents, this raises questions about the applicability of those results in European settings. This systematic review aimed at summarizing Europe-specific evidence on the relationship between the physical environment and different PA domains in adults.

Methods

Seventy eligible papers were identified through systematic searches across six electronic databases. Included papers were observational studies assessing the relationship between several aspects of the physical environment and PA in European adults (18-65y). Summary scores were calculated to express the strength of the relationship between each environmental factor and different PA domains.

Results

Convincing evidence on positive relationships with several PA domains was found for following environmental factors: walkability, access to shops/services/work and the composite factor environmental quality. Convincing evidence considering urbanization degree showed contradictory results, dependent on the observed PA domain. Transportation PA was more frequently related to the physical environment than recreational PA. Possible evidence for a positive relationship with transportation PA emerged for walking/cycling facilities, while a negative relationship was found for hilliness. Some environmental factors, such as access to recreational facilities, aesthetics, traffic- and crime-related safety were unrelated to different PA domains in Europe.

Conclusions

Generally, findings from this review of European studies are in accordance with results from North American/Australian reviews and may contribute to a generalization of the relationship between the physical environment and PA. Nevertheless, the lack of associations found regarding access to recreational facilities, aesthetics and different forms of safety are likely to be Europe-specific findings and need to be considered when appropriate interventions are developed. More research assessing domain-specific relationships with several understudied environmental attributes (e.g., residential density) is needed.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Van Holle et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150413090400313.pdf 335KB PDF download
Figure 1. 69KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]U.S.Department Of Health And Human Services: Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Georgia: USDHSS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996.
  • [2]Warburton D, Nicol C, Bredin S: Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Can Med Assoc J 2006, 174:801-809.
  • [3]Oja P, Titze S, Bauman A, de Geus B, Krenn P, Reger-Nash B, et al.: Health benefits of cycling: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Spor 2011, 21:496-509.
  • [4]Physical Inactivity: a global public health problem   . http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_inactivity/en/index.html webcite
  • [5]McLeroy K, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K: An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988, 15:351-377.
  • [6]Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J: An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health 2006, 27:297-322.
  • [7]Richard L, Gauvin L, Raine K: Ecological models revisited: their uses and evolution in health promotion over two decades. Annu Rev Public Health 2011, 307-326.
  • [8]Davison KK, Lawson CT: Do attributes in the physical environment influence children's physical activity? A review of the literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2006, 3:19. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [9]Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E: Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity - A review. Am J Prev Med 2002, 22:188-199.
  • [10]Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD: Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behavioral Med 2003, 25:80-91.
  • [11]McCormack G, Giles-Corti B, Lange A, Smith T, Martin K, Pikora TJ: An update of recent evidence of the relationship between objective and self-report measures of the physical environment and physical activity behaviours. J Sci Med Sport 2004, 7:81-92.
  • [12]Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis JF: Understanding environmental influences on walking - Review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med 2004, 27:67-76.
  • [13]Duncan MJ, Spence JC, Mummery WK: Perceived environment and physical activity: a meta-analysis of selected environmental characteristics. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2005, 2:11. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [14]Wendel-Vos W, Droomers M, Kremers S, Brug J, van Lenthe F: Potential environmental determinants of physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Obes Rev 2007, 8:425-440.
  • [15]Saelens BE, Handy SL: Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40:S550-S566.
  • [16]Panter JR, Jones A: Attitudes and the environment as determinants of active travel in adults: what do and don't we know? J Phys Act Health 2010, 7:551-561.
  • [17]Cummins S, Macintyre S: Food environments and obesity - neighbourhood or nation? Int J Epidemiol 2006, 35:100-104.
  • [18]Rodrigue J-P, Comtois C, Slack B: The Geography of Transport Systems. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge; 2009.
  • [19]Pucher J, Buehler R: Making cycling irresistible: Lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transp Rev 2008, 28:495-528.
  • [20]Forsyth A, Krizek K: Promoting walking and bicyling: assessing the evidence to assist planners. Built Environment 2010, 36:429-446.
  • [21]Bassett DR, Pucher J, Buehler R, Thompson DL, Crouter SE: Walking, cycling, and obesity rates in Europe, North America, and Australia. J Phys Act Health 2008, 5:795-814.
  • [22]Sugiyama T, Neuhaus M, Cole R, Giles-Corti B, Owen N: Destination and Route Attributes Associated with Adults' Walking: A Review. Med Sci Sports Exer 2012, 44:1275-1286.
  • [23]Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. J Clin Epid 2009, 62:1006-1012.
  • [24]Bamana A, Tessier S, Vuillemin A: Association of perceived environment with meeting public health recommendations for physical activity in seven European countries. J Public Health 2008, 30:274-281.
  • [25]Bergman P, Grjibovski AM, Hagstromer M, Bauman A, Sjostrom M: Adherence to physical activity recommendations and the influence of socio-demographic correlates - a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2008, 8:367. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [26]Bergman P, Grjibovski AM, Hagstromer M, Sallis JF, Sjostrom M: The association between health enhancing physical activity and neighbourhood environment among Swedish adults - a population-based cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009, 6:8. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [27]Bertrais S, Preziosi P, Mennen L, Galan P, Hercberg S, Oppert JM: Sociodemographic and geographic correlates of meeting current recommendations for physical activity in middle-aged French adults: the Supplementation en Vitamines et Mineraux Antioxydants (SUVIMAX) Study. Am J Public Health 2004, 94:1560-1566.
  • [28]Bjork J, Albin M, Grahn P, Jacobsson H, Ardo J, Wadbro J, et al.: Recreational values of the natural environment in relation to neighbourhood satisfaction, physical activity, obesity and wellbeing. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008, 62:e2.
  • [29]Bolivar J, Daponte A, Rodriguez M, Sanchez JJ: The influence of individual, social and physical environment factors on physical activity in the adult population in Andalusia, Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010, 7:60-77.
  • [30]Bonnefoy XR, Braubach M, Moissonnier B, Monollbaev K, Robbel N: Housing and health in Europe: preliminary results of a pan-European study. Am J Public Health 2003, 93:1559-1563.
  • [31]Cochrane T, Davey RC, Gidlow C, Smith GR, Fairburn J, Armitage CJ, et al.: Small area and individual level predictors of physical activity in urban communities: a multi-level study in Stoke on Trent, England. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009, 6:654-677.
  • [32]Coombes E, Jones AP, Hillsdon M: The relationship of physical activity and overweight to objectively measured green space accessibility and use. Soc Sci Med 2010, 70:816-822.
  • [33]De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sallis JF, Saelens BE: Environmental correlates of physical activity in a sample of Belgian adults. Am J Health Promot 2003, 18:83-92.
  • [34]De Bourdeaudhuij I, Teixeira PJ, Cardon G, Deforche B: Environmental and psychosocial correlates of physical activity in Portuguese and Belgian adults. Public Health Nutr 2005, 8:886-895.
  • [35]de Geus B, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Jannes C, Meeusen R: Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with cycling for transport among a working population. Health Educ Res 2008, 23:697-708.
  • [36]Dygryn J, Mitas J, Stelzer J: The influence of built environment on walkability using Geographic Information System. J Hum Kinet 2010, 24:93-99.
  • [37]Ellaway A, Macintyre S, Bonnefoy X: Graffiti, greenery, and obesity in adults: secondary analysis of European cross sectional survey. Br Med J 2005, 331:611-612.
  • [38]Engbers LH, Hendriksen IJ: Characteristics of a population of commuter cyclists in the Netherlands: perceived barriers and facilitators in the personal, social and physical environment. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010, 7:89. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [39]Foster C, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M: Environmental perceptions and walking in English adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004, 58:924-928.
  • [40]Foster C, Hillsdon M, Jones A, Grundy C, Wilkinson P, White M, et al.: Objective measures of the environment and physical activity - results of the Environment and Physical Activity Study in English adults. J Phys Act Health 2009, 6:S70-S80.
  • [41]Foster CE, Panter JR, Wareham NJ: Assessing the impact of road traffic on cycling for leisure and cycling to work. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8:61. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [42]Fromel K, Mitas J, Kerr J: The associations between active lifestyle, the size of a community and SES of the adult population in the Czech Republic. Health Place 2009, 15:447-454.
  • [43]Gast GC, Frenken FJ, van Leest LA, Wendel-Vos GC, Bemelmans WJ: Intra-national variation in trends in overweight and leisure time physical activities in The Netherlands since 1980: stratification according to sex, age and urbanisation degree. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007, 31:515-520.
  • [44]Gidlof-Gunnarsson A, Ohrstrom E: Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: the potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landsc Urban Plan 2007, 83:115-126.
  • [45]Guthold R, Ono T, Strong KL, Chatterji S, Morabia A: Worldwide variability in physical inactivity - A 51-country survey. Am J Prev Med 2008, 34:486-494.
  • [46]Harrison RA, Gemmell I, Heller RF: The population effect of crime and neighbourhood on physical activity: an analysis of 15,461 adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007, 61:34-39.
  • [47]Hillsdon M, Panter J, Foster C, Jones A: The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity. Public Health 2006, 120:1127-1132.
  • [48]Jones A, Hillsdon M, Coombes E: Greenspace access, use, and physical activity: Understanding the effects of area deprivation. Prev 2009, 49:500-505.
  • [49]Kamphuis CB, van Lenthe FJ, Giskes K, Huisman M, Brug J, Mackenbach JP: Socioeconomic status, environmental and individual factors, and sports participation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40:71-81.
  • [50]Keijer MJN, Rietveld P: How do people get to the railway station? The Dutch experience. Transport Plan Techn 2000, 23:215-235.
  • [51]Kwasniewska M, Kaczmarczyk-Chalas K, Pikala M, Broda G, Kozakiewicz K, Pajak A, et al.: Socio-demographic and lifestyle correlates of commuting activity in Poland. Prev Med 2010, 50:257-261.
  • [52]Maas J, Verheij RA, Spreeuwenberg P, Groenewegen PP: Physical activity as a possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: A multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health 2008, 8:206. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [53]Maat K, Timmermans HJP: Influence of the residential and work environment on car use in dual-earner households. Transp Res: Part A: Pol Practice 2009, 43:654-664.
  • [54]Mason P, Kearns A, Bond L: Neighbourhood walking and regeneration in deprived communities. Health Place 2011, 17:727-737.
  • [55]Miles R: Neighborhood disorder, perceived safety, and readiness to encourage use of local playgrounds. Am J Prev Med 2008, 34:275-281.
  • [56]Milosevic M, Golubic R, Mustajbegovic J, Jelinic JD, Holcer NJ, Kern J: Regional pattern of physical inactivity in Croatia. Coll Antropol 2009, 33:35-38.
  • [57]Molina-Garcia J, Castillo I, Sallis JF: Psychosocial and environmental correlates of active commuting for university students. Prev Med 2010, 51:136-138.
  • [58]Ogilvie D, Mitchell R, Mutrie N, Petticrew M, Platt S: Personal and environmental correlates of active travel and physical activity in a deprived urban population. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008, 5:43. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [59]Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sugiyama T, Leslie E, Cerin E, Van Dyck D, Bauman A: Bicycle use for transport in an Australian and a Belgian city: associations with built-environment attributes. J Urban Health 2010, 87:189-198.
  • [60]Panter J, Jones A, Hillsdon M: Equity of access to physical activity facilities in an English city. Prev Med 2008, 46:303-307.
  • [61]Panter JR, Jones AP: Associations between physical activity, perceptions of the neighbourhood environment and access to facilities in an English city. Soc Sci Med 2008, 67:1917-1923.
  • [62]Panter JR, Jones AP, Van Sluijs EM, Griffin SJ, Wareham NJ: Environmental and psychological correlates of older adult's active commuting. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011, 43:1235-1243.
  • [63]Parkes A, Kearns A: The multi-dimensional neighbourhood and health: a cross-sectional analysis of the Scottish Household Survey, 2001. Health Place 2006, 12:1-18.
  • [64]Parkin J, Wardman M, Page M: Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data. Transportation 2008, 35:93-109.
  • [65]Pascual C, Regidor E, Martinez D, Elisa CM, Dominguez V: Socioeconomic environment, availability of sports facilities, and jogging, swimming and gym use. Health Place 2009, 15:553-561.
  • [66]Pitsavos C, Panagiotakos DB, Lentzas Y, Stefanadis C: Epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity in socio-demographic, lifestyle and psychological characteristics of men and women in Greece: the ATTICA Study. BMC Public Health 2005, 5:37. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [67]Poortinga W: Perceptions of the environment, physical activity, and obesity. Soc Sci Med 2006, 63:2835-2846.
  • [68]Rutten A, Abel T, Kannas L, von Lengerke T, Luschen G, Diaz JAR, et al.: Self reported physical activity, public health, and perceived environment: results from a comparative European study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001, 55:139-146.
  • [69]Rutten A, Abu-Omar K: Perceptions of environmental opportunities for physical activity in the European Union. Soz Praventiv Med 2004, 49:310-317.
  • [70]Santana P, Santos R, Nogueira H: The link between local environment and obesity: a multilevel analysis in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, Portugal. Soc Sci Med 2009, 68:601-609.
  • [71]Santos MS, Vale MS, Miranda L, Mota J: Socio-demographic and perceived environmental correlates of walking in Portuguese adults–a multilevel analysis. Health Place 2009, 15:1094-1099.
  • [72]Santos R, Silva P, Santos P, Ribeiro JC, Mota J: Physical activity and perceived environmental attributes in a sample of Portuguese adults: Results from the Azorean Physical Activity and Health Study. Prev Med 2008, 47:83-88.
  • [73]Shenassa ED, Liebhaber A, Ezeamama A: Perceived safety of area of residence and exercise: a pan-European study. Am J Epidemiol 2006, 163:1012-1017.
  • [74]Sigmundova D, El Ansari W, Sigmund E: Neighbourhood environment correlates of physical activity: a study of eight Czech regional towns. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2011, 8:341-357.
  • [75]Stafford M, Cummins S, Ellaway A, Sacker A, Wiggins RD, Macintyre S: Pathways to obesity: Identifying local, modifiable determinants of physical activity and diet. Soc Sci Med 2007, 65:1882-1897.
  • [76]Stahl T, Rutten A, Nutbeam D, Bauman A, Kannas L, Abel T, et al.: The importance of the social environment for physically active lifestyle - results from an international study. Soc Sci Med 2001, 52:1-10.
  • [77]Stronegger WJ, Titze S, Oja P: Perceived characteristics of the neighborhood and its association with physical activity behavior and self-rated health. Health Place 2010, 16:736-743.
  • [78]Sundquist K, Eriksson U, Kawakami N, Skog L, Ohlsson H, Arvidsson D: Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking behavior: the Swedish Neighborhood and Physical Activity (SNAP) study. Soc Sci Med 2011, 72:1266-1273.
  • [79]Titze S, Stronegger WJ, Janschitz S, Oja P: Environmental, social, and personal correlates of cycling for transportation in a student population. J Phys Act Health 2007, 4:66-79.
  • [80]Titze S, Stronegger WJ, Janschitz S, Oja P: Association of built-environment, social-environment and personal factors with bicycling as a mode of transportation among Austrian city dwellers. Prev Med 2008, 47:252-259.
  • [81]Toftager M, Ekholm O, Schipperijn J, Stigsdotter U, Bentsen P, Gronbaek M, et al.: Distance to green space and physical activity: a danish national representative survey. J Phys Act Health 2011, 8:741-749.
  • [82]Van Dyck D, Deforche B, Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I: Neighbourhood walkability and its particular importance for adults with a preference for passive transport. Health Place 2009, 15:496-504.
  • [83]Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, Sallis JF, Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I: Neighborhood SES and walkability are related to physical activity behavior in Belgian adults. Prev Med 2010, 50(Suppl 1):S74-S79.
  • [84]Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, De Bourdeaudhuij I: Urban–rural differences in physical activity in Belgian adults and the importance of psychosocial factors. J Urban Health 2011, 88:154-167.
  • [85]Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, Giles-Corti B, Sallis JF, Owen N, et al.: Environmental and psychosocial correlates of accelerometer-assessed and self-reported physical activity in Belgian adults. Int J Behav Med 2011, 8:235-245.
  • [86]Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I: Relationships between neighborhood walkability and adults' physical activity: How important is residential self-selection? Health Place 2011, 17:1011-1014.
  • [87]Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, De Bourdeaudhuij I: Do adults like living in high-walkable neighborhoods? Associations of walkability parameters with neighborhood satisfaction and possible mediators. Health Place 2011, 17:971-977.
  • [88]van Lenthe FJ, Brug J, Mackenbach JP: Neighbourhood inequalities in physical inactivity: the role of neighbourhood attractiveness, proximity to local facilities and safety in the Netherlands. Soc Sci Med 2005, 60:763-775.
  • [89]Van Tuyckom C: Macro-environmental factors associated with leisure-time physical activity: a cross-national analysis of EU countries. Scand J Public Health 2011, 39:419-426.
  • [90]Vandenbulcke G, Thomas I, de Geus B, Degraeuwe B, Torfs R, Meeusen R, et al.: Mapping bicycle use and the risk of accidents for commuters who cycle to work in Belgium. Transp Pol 2009, 16:77-87.
  • [91]Vandenbulcke G: Cycle commuting in Belgium: spatial determinants and "re-cycling" strategies. Transp Res: Part A: Pol Practice 2011, 45:118-137.
  • [92]Wendel-Vos GC, Schuit AJ, de Niet R, Boshuizen HC, Saris WH, Kromhout D: Factors of the physical environment associated with walking and bicycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004, 36:725-730.
  • [93]Wendel-Vos GCW, van Hooijdonk C, Uitenbroek D, Agyemang C, Lindeman EM, Droomers M: Environmental attributes related to walking and bicycling at the individual and contextual level. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008, 62:689-694.
  • [94]Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D: Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health 2003, 93:1552-1558.
  • [95]Cerin E, Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD: Neighborhood environment walkability scale: Validity and development of a short form. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006, 38:1682-1691.
  • [96]Cerin E, Conway TL, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Sallis JF: Cross-validation of the factorial structure of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS) and its abbreviated form (NEWS-A). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009, 6:32. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [97]de Melo LL, Menec V, Porter MM, Ready AE: Personal factors, perceived environment, and objectively measured walking in old age. J Aging Phys Act 2010, 18:280-291.
  • [98]Cerin E, Sit CH, Cheung MC, Ho SY, Lee LC, Chan WM: Reliable and valid NEWS for Chinese seniors: measuring perceived neighborhood attributes related to walking. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010, 7:84. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [99]Reis JP, Bowles HR, Ainsworth BE, Dubose KD, Smith S, Laditka JN: Nonoccupational physical activity by degree of urbanization and U.S. geographic region. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004, 12:2093-2098.
  • [100]Pont K, Ziviani J, Wadley D, Bennett S, Abbott R: Environmental correlates of children's active transportation: A systematic literature review. Health Place 2009, 15:849-862.
  • [101]Prins RG, Oenema A, van der Horst K, Brug J: Objective and perceived availability of physical activity opportunities: differences in associations with physical activity behavior among urban adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009, 6:70. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [102]Gebel K, Bauman A, Owen N: Correlates of non-noncordance between perceived and objective measures of walkability. Ann Behav Med 2009, 37:228-238.
  • [103]McCormack GR, Shiell A: In search of causality: a systematic review of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity among adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8:125. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [104]Loukaitou-Sideris A, Eck JE: Crime prevention and active living. Am J Health Promot 2007, 21:380-389.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:28次 浏览次数:32次