Ultrasonic reflection coefficient and surface roughness index of OA articular cartilage: relation to pathological assessment

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Wu-fan Chen²  Yu-bo Fan¹  De-yu Li¹  Yue-xiang Wang³  Qing Wang²  Hai-jun Niu¹ 

[1] Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China;School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;Department of Ultrasound, People Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China

关键词: Ultrasound reflection coefficient;    Ultrasound roughness index;    High-frequency ultrasound;    Osteoarthritis;   

Others  :  1150416
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-13-34

 received in 2011-10-13, accepted in 2012-03-10,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Early diagnosis of Osteoarthritis (OA) is essential for preventing further cartilage destruction and decreasing severe complications. The aims of this study are to explore the relationship between OA pathological grades and quantitative acoustic parameters and to provide more objective criteria for ultrasonic microscopic evaluation of the OA cartilage.

Methods

Articular cartilage samples were prepared from rabbit knees and scanned using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Three quantitative parameters, including the roughness index of the cartilage surface (URI), the reflection coefficients from the cartilage surface (R) and from the cartilage-bone interface (R_bone) were extracted. The osteoarthritis grades of these cartilage samples were qualitatively assessed by histology according to the grading standards of International Osteoarthritis Institute (OARSI). The relationship between these quantitative parameters and the osteoarthritis grades was explored.

Results

The results showed that URI increased with the OA grade. URI of the normal cartilage samples was significantly lower than the one of the OA cartilage samples. There was no significant difference in URI between the grade 1 cartilage samples and the grade 2 cartilage samples. The reflection coefficient of the cartilage surface reduced significantly with the development of OA (p < 0.05), while the reflection coefficient of the cartilage-bone interface increased with the increase of grade.

Conclusion

High frequency ultrasound measurements can reflect the changes in the surface roughness index and the ultrasound reflection coefficients of the cartilage samples with different OA grades. This study may provide useful information for the quantitative ultrasonic diagnosis of early OA.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Niu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Brandt K, Doherty M, Lohmander S: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. London: Oxford University Press; 1998.
• [2]Arden N, Nevitt MC: Osteoarthritis: epidemiology. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006, 20:3-25.
• [3]Mow VC, Gu WY, Chen FH: Structure and function of articular cartilage and meniscus. In Basic orthopaedic biomechanics and mechano-biology. 3rd edition. Edited by Mow VC, Huiskes R. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005:181-258.
• [4]Ihara H: Double-contrast CT arthrography of the cartilage of the patellofemoral joint. Clin Orthop 1985, 198:50-55.
• [5]Gagliardi JA, Chung EM, Chandnani VP, Keslin KL, Christensen KP, Null RN, Radvany MG, Hansen MF: Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994, 163:629-636.
• [6]Nieminen MT, Toyras J, Rieppo J, Hakumaki JM, Silvennoinen J, Helminen HJ, Jurvelin JS: Quantitative MR microscopy of enzymatically degraded articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 2000, 43:676-681.
• [7]Burstein D, Bashir A, Gray ML: MRI techniques in early stages of cartilage disease. Invest Radiol 2000, 35:622-638.
• [8]Hardy PA, Ridler AC, Chiarot CB, Plewes DB, Henkelman RM: Imaging articular cartilage under compression-cartilage elastography. Magn Reson Med 2005, 53:1065-1073.
• [9]Lopez O, Amrami KK, Manduca A, Rossman PJ, Ehman RL: Developments in dynamic MR elastography for in vitro biomechanical assessment of hyaline cartilage under high-frequency cyclical shear. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 25:310-320.
• [10]Roemer FW, Mohr A, Lynch JA, Meta MD, Guermazi A, Genant HK: Micro-CT arthrography: a pilot study for the ex vivo visualization of the rat knee joint. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005, 184:1215-1219.
• [11]Saarakkala S, Töyräs J, Hirvonen J, Laasanen MS, Lappalainen R, Jurvelin JS: Ultrasonic quantitation of superficial degradation of articular cartilage. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004, 30:783-792.
• [12]Saied A, Cherin E, Gaucher H, Laugier P, Gillet P, Floquet J, Netter P, Berger G: Assessment of articular cartilage and subchondral bone: subtle and progressive changes in experimental osteoarthritis using 50 MHz echography in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 1997, 12:1378-1386.
• [13]Suh JKF, Youn I, Fu FH: An in situ calibration of an ultrasound transducer: a potential application for an ultrasonic indentation test of articular cartilage. J Biomech 2001, 34:1347-1353.
• [14]Wang Q: Ultrasonic characterization of transient and inhomogeneous swelling behavior and progressive degeneration of articular cartilage. In PhD Thesis. The HongKong Polytechnic University, Department of Health Technology and Informatics; 2007.
• [15]Wang Y, Guo Y, Zhang L, Niu H, Xu M, Zhao B, Wan W: Ultrasound biomicroscopy for the detection of early osteoarthritis in an animal model. Acad Radiol 2011, 18:167-173.
• [16]Niu HJ, Wang Q, Zheng YP, Fan YB: A new method for computing the uniaxial modulus of articular cartilages using modified inhomogeneous triphasic model. Acta Mechanica Sinica 2010, 26:121-126.
• [17]Zheng YP, Niu HJ, Mak AFT, Huang YP: Ultrasonic measurement of depth-dependent transient behaviors of articular cartilage under compression. J Biomech 2005, 38:1830-1837.
• [18]Hattori K, Ikeuchi K, Morita Y, Takakura Y: Quantitative ultrasonic assessment for detecting microscopic cartilage damage in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2005, 7:38-46. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Nieminen HJ, Toyras J, Rieppo J, Nieminen MT, Hirvonen J, Korhonen R, Jurvelin JS: Real-time ultrasound analysis of articular cartilage degradation in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002, 28:519-525.
• [20]Pellaumail B, Watrin A, Loeuille D, Netter P, Berger G, Laugier P, Saïed A: Effect of articular cartilage proteoglycan depletion on high frequency ultrasound backscatter. Osteoarthr Cartilage 2002, 10:535-541.
• [21]Pritzker KP, Gay S, Jimenez SA, Ostergaard K, Pelletier JP, Revell PA, Salter D, van den Berg WB: Osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology: grading and staging. Osteoarthr Cartilage 2006, 14:13-29.
• [22]Arokoski JP, Jurvelin JS, Väätäinen U, Väätäinen U, Helminen HJ: Normal and pathological adaptations of articular cartilage to joint loading. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2000, 10:186-198.
• [23]Freeman MA: Is collagen fatigue failure a cause of osteoarthrosis and prosthetic component migration? A hypothesis. J Orthop Res 1999, 17:3-8.
• [24]Bland YS, Ashhurst DE: Development and ageing of the articular cartilage of the rabbit knee joint: distribution of the fibrillar collagens. Anat Embryol 1996, 194:607-619.
• [25]Joiner GA, Bogoch ER, Pritzker KP, Buschmann MD, Chevrier A, Foster FS: High frequency acoustic parameters of human and bovine articular cartilage following experimentally-induced matrix degradation. Ultrasonic Imaging 2001, 23:106-116.
• [26]Kim HK, Babyn PS, Harasiewicz KA, Gahunia HK, Pritzker KP, Foster FS: Imaging of immature articular cartilage using ultrasound backscatter microscopy at 50 MHz. J Orthop Res 1995, 13:963-970.
• [27]Julkunen P, Iivarinen J, Brama PA, Arokoski J, Jurvelin JS, Helminen HJ: Maturation of collagen fibril network structure in tibial and femoral cartilage of rabbits. Osteoarthr Cartilage 2010, 18:406-415.