Non-paying partnerships and its association with HIV risk behavior, program exposure and service utilization among female sex workers in India

BMC Public Health

Suneeta Krishnan¹  Niranjan Saggurti²  Bidhubhusan Mahapatra²  Sandra Mary Travasso³ 

[1] Women’s Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 351 California Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, USA;Population Council, 142 Golf Links, New Delhi 110003, India;Division of Epidemiology, St John’s Research Institute, St John’s National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore 560034, India

关键词: India;    HIV prevention resources;    Non-paying partners;    Female sex workers;   

Others  :  1131962
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-248

 received in 2013-08-29, accepted in 2014-03-06,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

In India, HIV prevention programs have focused on female sex workers’ (FSWs’) sexual practices vis-à-vis commercial partners leading to important gains in HIV prevention. However, it has become apparent that further progress is contingent on a better understanding of FSWs’ sexual risks in the context of their relationships with non-paying partners. In this paper, we explored the association between FSWs’ non-paying partner status, including cohabitation and HIV risk behaviors, program exposure and utilization of program services.

Methods

We used data from the cross-sectional Integrated Behavioral and Biological Assessment (IBBA) survey (2009–2010) conducted among 8,107 FSWs in three high priority states of India- Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the association between non-paying partner and cohabitation status of FSWs with HIV risk behaviors, program exposure and utilization of program services.

Results

FSWs reporting a non-paying partner were more likely to be exposed to and utilize HIV prevention resources than those who did not have a non-paying partner. Analyses revealed that FSWs reporting a non-cohabiting non-paying partner were more likely to be exposed to HIV prevention programs (adjusted OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.3 – 2.1), attend meetings (adjusted OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2 – 1.8), and visit a sexually transmitted infections clinic at least twice in the last six months (adjusted OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.3 – 1.9) as compared to those reporting no non-paying partner. That said, FSWs with a non-paying partner rarely used condoms consistently and were more vulnerable to HIV infection because of being street-based (p < 0.001) and in debt (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

FSWs with cohabiting partners were more likely to be exposed to HIV prevention program and utilize services, suggesting that this program was successful in reaching vulnerable groups. However, this subgroup was unlikely to use condoms consistently with their non-paying partners and was more vulnerable, being street based and in debt. The next generation of HIV prevention interventions in India should focus on addressing relationship factors like risk communication and condom negotiation, including specific vulnerabilities like indebtedness and street based solicitation among women in sex work.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Travasso et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]National AIDS Control Organisation: NACO Annual Report 2010–2011. New- Delhi, India: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India; 2011.
• [2]Gurung A, Narayanan P, Prabhakar P, Das A, Ranebennur V, Tucker S, Narayana L, Radha R, Prakash K, Touthang J, Sono CZ, Wi T, Morineau G, Neilsen G: Large-scale STI services in Avahan improve utilization and treatment seeking behaviour amongst high-risk groups in India: an analysis of clinical records from six states. BMC Public Health 2011, 11(6):S10.
• [3]Ramakrishnan L, Gautam A, Goswami P, Kallam S, Adhikary R, Mainkar M, Ramesh BM, Morineau G, George B, Paranjape R: Programme coverage, condom use and STI treatment among FSWs in a large-scale HIV prevention programme: results from cross-sectional surveys in 22 districts in southern India. Sex Transm Infect 2010, 86(Suppl 1):i62-i68.
• [4]UNAIDS: World AIDS Day Report, 2011. 2011. Geneva, Switzerland: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)
• [5]USAID INDIA: HIV/AIDS Health Profile. 2010. New Delhi, India
• [6]Krishnan S, Dunbar MS, Minnis AM, Medlin CA, Gerdts CE, Padian NS: Poverty, gender inequities, and women’s risk of human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008, 1136:101-110.
• [7]Sudha S, Morrison S, Zhu L: Violence against women, symptom reporting, and treatment for reproductive tract infections in Kerala State, Southern India. Health Care Women Int 2007, 28(3):268-284.
• [8]Jacob ME, Abraham S, Surya S, Minz S, Singh D, Abraham VJ, Prasad J, George K, Kuruvilla A, Jacob KS: A community health programme in rural Tamil Nadu, India: the need for gender justice for women. Reprod Health Matters 2006, 14(27):101-108.
• [9]Namasivayam A, Osuorah DC, Syed R, Antai D: The role of gender inequities in women’s access to reproductive health care: a population-level study of Namibia, Kenya, Nepal, and India. Int J Womens Health 2012, 4:351-364.
• [10]World Health Organization: Gender inequalities and HIV. 2012. Geneva: WHO
• [11]Haddad S, Narayana D, Mohindra K: Reducing inequalities in health and access to health care in a rural Indian community: an India-Canada collaborative action research project. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2011, 11(2):S3.
• [12]El-Bassel N, Witte SS, Wada T, Gilbert L, Wallace J: Correlates of partner violence among female street-based sex workers: substance abuse, history of childhood abuse, and HIV risks. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2001, 15(1):41-51.
• [13]Ward H, Day S, Weber J: Risky business: health and safety in the sex industry over a 9 year period. Sex Transm Infect 1999, 75(5):340-343.
• [14]Deering KN, Boily MC, Lowndes CM, Shoveller J, Tyndall MW, Vickerman P, Bradley J, Gurav K, Pickles M, Moses S, Ramesh BM, Washington R, Rajaram S, Alary M: A dose–response relationship between exposure to a large-scale HIV preventive intervention and consistent condom use with different sexual partners of female sex workers in southern India. BMC Public Health 2011, 11(6):S8.
• [15]Ramesh BM, Beattie TS, Shajy I, Washington R, Jagannathan L, Reza-Paul S, Blanchard JF, Moses S: Changes in risk behaviours and prevalence of sexually transmitted infections following HIV preventive interventions among female sex workers in five districts in Karnataka state, south India. Sex Transm Infect 2010, 86(Suppl 1):i17-i24.
• [16]Kumar R, Mehendale SM, Panda S, Venkatesh S, Lakshmi P, Kaur M, Prinja S, Singh T, Virdi NK, Bahuguna P, Sharma AK, Singh S, Godbole SV, Risbud A, Manna B, Thirumugal V, Roy T, Sogarwal R, Pawar ND: Impact of targeted interventions on heterosexual transmission of HIV in India. BMC Public Health 2011, 11:549. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Dandona R, Dandona L, Kumar GA, Gutierrez JP, McPherson S, Samuels F, Bertozzi SM, Team AFS: Demography and sex work characteristics of female sex workers in India. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2006, 6:5. BioMed Central Full Text
• [18]Dandona R, Dandona L, Gutierrez JP, Kumar AG, McPherson S, Samuels F, Bertozzi SM, Team AFS: High risk of HIV in non-brothel based female sex workers in India. BMC Public Health 2005, 5:87. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Reed E, Gupta J, Biradavolu M, Devireddy V, Blankenship KM: The context of economic insecurity and its relation to violence and risk factors for HIV among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India. Public Health Rep 2010, 125(Suppl 4):81-89.
• [20]Panchanadeswaran S, Johnson SC, Sivaram S, Srikrishnan AK, Zelaya C, Solomon S, Go VF, Celentano D: A descriptive profile of abused female sex workers in India. J Health Popul Nutr 2010, 28(3):211-220.
• [21]Shahmanesh M, Wayal S, Cowan F, Mabey D, Copas A, Patel V: Suicidal behavior among female sex workers in Goa, India: the silent epidemic. Am J Public Health 2009, 99(7):1239-1246.
• [22]Beattie TS, Bhattacharjee P, Ramesh BM, Gurnani V, Anthony J, Isac S, Mohan HL, Ramakrishnan A, Wheeler T, Bradley J, Blanchard JF, Moses S: Violence against female sex workers in Karnataka state, south India: impact on health, and reductions in violence following an intervention program. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:476. BioMed Central Full Text
• [23]Avahan: The India AIDS Initiative. The Business of HIV Prevention at Scale. New-Delhi, India: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; 2008.
• [24]Chandrasekaran P, Dallabetta G, Loo V, Mills S, Saidel T, Adhikary R, Alary M, Lowndes CM, Boily MC, Moore J, Avahan Evaluation, Partners: Evaluation design for large-scale HIV prevention programmes: the case of Avahan, the India AIDS initiative. AIDS 2008, 22(Suppl 5):S1-S15.
• [25]National Institute of Health and Family Welfare and National AIDS Control Organization: Annual HIV sentinel surveillance country report: 2006. 2007. New Delhi
• [26]Saidel T, Adhikary R, Mainkar M, Dale J, Loo V, Rahman M, Ramesh BM, Paranjape RS: Baseline integrated behavioural and biological assessment among most at-risk populations in six high-prevalence states of India: design and implementation challenges. AIDS 2008, 22(Suppl 5):S17-S34.
• [27]Somanath RP, Saggurti N, Mishra RM, Parimi P: The association between noncommercial partnerships and risk of HIV among female Sex workers: evidences from a cross-sectional behavioral and biological survey in Southern India. AIDS Res Treat 2013. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/108630 webcite
• [28]Suryavanshi N, Erande A, Pisal H, Shankar AV, Bhosale RA, Bollinger RC, Phadke M, Sastry J: Repeated pregnancy among women with known HIV status in Pune, India. AIDS Care 2008, 20(9):1111-1118.
• [29]Wayal S, Cowan F, Warner P, Copas A, Mabey D, Shahmanesh M: Contraceptive practices, sexual and reproductive health needs of HIV-positive and negative female sex workers in Goa, India. Sex Transm Infect 2011, 87(1):58-64.
• [30]Deering KN, Bhattacharjee P, Bradley J, Moses SS, Shannon K, Shaw SY, Washington R, Lowndes CM, Boily MC, Ramesh BM, Rajaram S, Gurav K, Alary M: Condom use within non-commercial partnerships of female sex workers in southern India. BMC Public Health 2011, 11:S11.
• [31]Hoffman L, Nguyen HT, Kershaw TS, Niccolai LM: Dangerous subtlety: relationship-related determinants of consistency of condom use among female sex workers and their regular, non-commercial partners in Hai Phong, Vietnam. AIDS Behav 2011, 15(7):1372-1380.
• [32]Gutierrez JP, McPherson S, Fakoya A, Matheou A, Bertozzi SM: Community-based prevention leads to an increase in condom use and a reduction in sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and female sex workers (FSW): the Frontiers Prevention Project (FPP) evaluation results. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:497. BioMed Central Full Text
• [33]Halli SS, Ramesh BM, O’Neil J, Moses S, Blanchard JF: The role of collectives in STI and HIV/AIDS prevention among female sex workers in Karnataka, India. AIDS Care 2006, 18(7):739-749.
• [34]Wechsberg WM, Luseno WK, Kline TL, Browne FA, Zule WA: Preliminary findings of an adapted evidence-based woman-focused HIV intervention on condom use and negotiation among at-risk women in Pretoria, South Africa. J Prev Interv Community 2010, 38(2):132-146.
• [35]National AIDS Control Organization: National AIDS Control Programme Phase IV “Environmental Assessment and Revision of Infection Control and Waste Management Plan”. 2012. New-Delhi, India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India