The risk of obesity by assessing infant growth against the UK-WHO charts compared to the UK90 reference: findings from the Born in Bradford birth cohort study

BMC Pediatrics

Noël Cameron¹  John Wright³  William Johnson² 

[1] Centre for Global Health and Human Development, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK;Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 2nd Street S, Suite #300, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA;Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, BD9 6RJ, UK

关键词: Longitudinal studies;    Obesity;    Infant;    Postnatal growth;    Growth charts;   

Others  :  1170728
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2431-12-104

 received in 2012-03-05, accepted in 2012-07-23,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

The new growth charts in the UK, the UK-WHO charts, comprise prescriptive data from the WHO standard between two weeks and four years of age. Little is known about the development of obesity risk in normal UK infants, who are necessarily not fed according to the WHO recommendations and do not live in constraint-free environments (the selection criteria of the WHO standard source sample), using the new charts. Here, we investigated infant growth trajectories and traits indicative of childhood obesity using the UK-WHO charts, with the aim to clearly document the implications of adopting the new charts on UK growth monitoring practice.

Methods

Mixed effects models were applied to serial weight and length data from 2181 infants (1187 White; 994 Pakistani) in the Born in Bradford birth cohort study to produce curves from 10 days to 15 months of age. Individual monthly estimates were converted to Z-scores and were plotted by sex and ethnic group. The relative risks (RR) of traits indicative of childhood obesity, including high BMI and rapid weight gain, using the UK-WHO charts compared to the previously used UK90 reference were calculated for all infants together and for White and Pakistani infants separately.

Results

Both ethnic groups demonstrated patterns of growth similar to the UK-WHO charts in length but not in weight. The resulting pattern for BMI was remarkable, with an average gain of 1.0 Z-score between two and 12 months of age. The UK-WHO charts were significantly (p < 0.05) more likely than the UK90 reference to classify BMI above the 91^st centile after age six months (RR 1.427-2.151) and weight and BMI gain between birth (one month for BMI) and 12 months of age greater than two centile bands (RR 1.214 and 1.470, respectively).

Conclusions

The change to the UK-WHO charts means that normal UK infants risk being diagnosed as being on a trajectory toward childhood obesity. National estimates of obesity will have to be recalculated for previous years to allow longitudinal comparison. The new charts do not allow a focused prevention effort for targeting programmes at infants most at risk of becoming obese, because the use of the 91^st or 98^th centile on the UK-WHO charts will identify many more infants as being at risk than the same centiles on the UK90 reference. Now more than ever, research is needed to develop a large scale childhood obesity prevention programme which could ideally be integrated with routine infant growth monitoring practice.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Johnson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Department of Health: Healthy weight, healthy lives: a cross-government strategy for England. Department of Health, London, UK; 2008.
• [2]Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health: The national standard Personal Child Health Record (PCHR). , ; 2009. http://www.healthforallchildren.co.uk webcite
• [3]Buchan IE, Bundred PE, Kitchiner DJ, Cole TJ: Body mass index has risen more steeply in tall than in short 3-year olds: serial cross-sectional surveys 1988–2003. Int J Obes 2007, 31(1):23-9.
• [4]Bundred P, Kitchiner D, Buchan I: Prevalence of overweight and obese children between 1989 and 1998: population based series of cross sectional studies. BMJ 2001, 322(7282):326-8.
• [5]Druet C, Stettler N, Sharp S, Simmons RK, Cooper C, Davey-Smith G, Ekelund U, Levy-Marchal C, Jarvelin MR, Kuh D, Ong KK: Prediction of childhood obesity by infancy weight gain: an individual-level meta-analysis. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012, 26(1):19-26.
• [6]Ekelund U, Ong K, Linne Y, Neovius M, Brage S, Dunger DB, Wareham NJ, Rossner S: Upward weight percentile crossing in infancy and early childhood independently predicts fat mass in young adults: the Stockholm Weight Development Study (SWEDES). Am J Clin Nutr 2006, 83(2):324-30.
• [7]Ong KK, Ahmed ML, Emmett PM, Preece MA, Dunger DB: Association between postnatal catch-up growth and obesity in childhood: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2000, 320(7240):967-71.
• [8]Freeman JV, Cole TJ, Chinn S, Jones PR, White EM, Preece MA: Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990. Arch Dis Child 1995, 73(1):17-24.
• [9]WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group: WHO Child Growth Standards: Methods and development: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age. World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland; 2006.
• [10]De Onis M, Garza C, Victora CG, Onyango AW, Frongillo EA, Martines J: The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study: planning, study design, and methodology. Food Nutr Bull 2004, 25(1 Suppl):S15-26.
• [11]Goldstein H, Tanner JM: Ecological considerations in the creation and the use of child growth standards. Lancet 1980, 15(1):582-5.
• [12]Cole TJ, Williams AF, Wright CM: Revised birth centiles for weight, length and head circumference in the UK-WHO growth charts. Ann Hum Biol 2011, 38(1):7-11.
• [13]Bolling K, Grant C, Hamlyn B, Thornton A: Infant feeding survey 2005. Information Centre; Part of the Government Statistical Services, London, UK; 2006.
• [14]Griffiths LJ, Smeeth L, Hawkins SS, Cole TJ, Dezateux C: Effects of infant feeding practice on weight gain from birth to 3 years. Arch Dis Child 2009, 94(8):577-82.
• [15]Howe LD, Tilling K, Galobardes B, Smith GD, Ness AR, Lawlor DA: Socioeconomic disparities in trajectories of adiposity across childhood. Int J Pediatr Obes 2011, 6(2):144-53.
• [16]Ong KK, Preece MA, Emmett PM, Ahmed ML, Dunger DB, ALSPAC Study Team: Size at birth and early childhood growth in relation to maternal smoking, parity and infant breast-feeding: longitudinal birth cohort study and analysis. Pediatr Res 2002, 52(6):863-867.
• [17]Wright C, Lakshman R, Emmett P, Ong KK: Implications of adopting the WHO 2006 Child Growth Standard in the UK: two prospective cohort studies. Arch Dis Child 2008, 93(7):566-9.
• [18]Raynor P, Born in Bradford Collaborative Group: Born in Bradford, a cohort study of babies born in Bradford, and their parents: protocol for the recruitment phase. BMC Public Health 2008, 8:327. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Cameron N: The measurement of human growth. Guilford and King's Lynn. Croom Helm, UK; 1984.
• [20]Johnson W: The growth of Bradford infants. PhD thesis. Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK; 2010.
• [21]Johnson W, Cameron N, Dickson P, Emsley S, Raynor P, Seymour C, Wright J: The reliability of routine anthropometric data collected by health workers: a cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud 2009, 46(3):310-6.
• [22]Goldstein H: Multilevel statistical models. Wiley-Blackwell, London, UK; 2010.
• [23]Berkey CS, Reed RB: A model for describing normal and abnormal growth in early childhood. Hum Biol 1987, 59(6):973-87.
• [24]Cameron N, Preece MA, Cole TJ: Catch-up growth or regression to the mean? Recovery from stunting revisited. Am J Hum Biol 2005, 17(4):412-7.
• [25]Bates B, Lennox A, Bates C, Swan G: National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Headline results from Years 1 and 2 (combined) of the rolling programme 2008/9–2009/10. Department of Health, UK; 2011.
• [26]Baker JL, Michaelsen KF, Rasmussen KM, Sorensen TI: Maternal prepregnant body mass index, duration of breastfeeding, and timing of complementary food introduction are associated with infant weight gain. Am J Clin Nutr 2004, 80(6):1579-88.
• [27]Heinig MJ, Nommsen LA, Peerson JM, Lonnerdal B, Dewey KG: Energy and protein intakes of breast-fed and formula-fed infants during the first year of life and their association with growth velocity: the DARLING Study. Am J Clin Nutr 1993, 58(2):152-61.
• [28]De Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Garza C, Yang H, WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group: Comparison of the World Health Organisation (WHO) Child Growth Standards and the National Center for Health Statistics/WHO international growth reference: implications for child health programmes. Public Health Nutr 2006, 9(7):942-947.
• [29]De Onis M, Garza C, Onyango AW, Borghi E: Comparison of the WHO child growth standards and the CDC 2000 growth charts. J Nutr 2007, 137(1):144-8.
• [30]World Health Organisation Working Group on Infant Growth: An evaluation of infant growth. World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland; 1994.