BMC Public Health | |
Does feeling respected influence return to work? Cross-sectional study on sick-listed patients’ experiences of encounters with social insurance office staff | |
Gert Helgesson1  Kristina Alexanderson3  Daniel Olsson2  Maja Wessel1  Niels Lynöe1  | |
[1] Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics (CHE), Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-171 77, Sweden;Department of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Unit of Biostatistics, Division of Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;Department of Clinical Neuroscience (CNS), Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden | |
关键词: Sweden; Social insurance office staff; Return to work; Long-term sickness absentees; Ethics; Encounters; | |
Others : 1162412 DOI : 10.1186/1471-2458-13-268 |
|
received in 2012-05-23, accepted in 2013-03-08, 发布年份 2013 |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Previous research shows that how patients perceive encounters with healthcare staff may affect their health and self-estimated ability to return to work. The aim of the present study was to explore long-term sick-listed patients’ encounters with social insurance office staff and the impact of these encounters on self-estimated ability to return to work.
Methods
A random sample of long-term sick-listed patients (n = 10,042) received a questionnaire containing questions about their experiences of positive and negative encounters and item lists specifying such experiences. Respondents were also asked whether the encounters made them feel respected or wronged and how they estimated the effect of these encounters on their ability to return to work. Statistical analysis was conducted using 95% confidence intervals (CI) for proportions, and attributable risk (AR) with 95% CI.
Results
The response rate was 58%. Encounter items strongly associated with feeling respected were, among others: listened to me, believed me, and answered my questions. Encounter items strongly associated with feeling wronged were, among others: did not believe me, doubted my condition, and questioned my motivation to work. Positive encounters facilitated patients’ self-estimated ability to return to work [26.9% (CI: 22.1-31.7)]. This effect was significantly increased if the patients also felt respected [49.3% (CI: 47.5-51.1)]. Negative encounters impeded self-estimated ability to return to work [29.1% (CI: 24.6-33.6)]; when also feeling wronged return to work was significantly further impeded [51.3% (CI: 47.1-55.5)].
Conclusions
Long-term sick-listed patients find that their self-reported ability to return to work is affected by positive and negative encounters with social insurance office staff. This effect is further enhanced by feeling respected or wronged, respectively.
【 授权许可】
2013 Lynöe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
Figure 6. | 80KB | Image | download |
Figure 1. | 34KB | Image | download |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
Figure 6.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]De Rijk A, Nijhuis F, Alexanderson K: Gender differences in work modifications and changed job characteristics during the return-to-work process: a prospective cohort study. J Occup Rehabil 2009, 19(2):185-193.
- [2]Cohen DA, Aylward M, Rollnick S: Inside the fitness for work consultation: a qualitative study. Occup Med (Lond) 2009, 59(5):347-352.
- [3]Cohen D, Marfell N, Webb K, Robling M, Aylward M: Managing long-term worklessness in primary care: a focus group study. Occup Med (Lond) 2010, 60(2):121-126.
- [4]Coutu M, Baril R, Durand M, Cote D, Rouleau A, Cadieux G: Transforming the meaning of pain: An important step for the return to work. Work 2010, 35:209-19.
- [5]Cunningham I, James P: Absence and return to work: Towards a research agenda. Personnel Review 2000, 29(1):33-47.
- [6]Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F: Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 1998, 8(2):113-139.
- [7]Dekkers-Sanchez PM, Hoving JL, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH: Factors associated with long-term sick leave in sick-listed employees: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 2008, 65(3):153-157.
- [8]Elfving B, Asell M, Ropponen A, Alexanderson K: What factors predict full or partial return to work among sickness absentees with spinal pain participating in rehabilitation? Disabil Rehabil 2009, 31(16):1318-1327.
- [9]Ahrberg Y, Landstad BJ, Bergroth A, Ekholm J: Desire, longing and vanity: emotions behind successful return to work for women on long-term sick leave. Work 2010, 37(2):167-77.
- [10]Landstad BJ, Wendelborg C, Hedlund M: Factors explaining return to work for long-term sick workers in Norway. Disabil Rehabil 2009, 31(15):1215-1226.
- [11]Landstad B, Hedlund M, Wendelborg C, Brataas H: Long-term sick workers experience of professional support for re-integration back to work. Work 2009, 32(1):39-48.
- [12]Hansen A, Edlund C, Henningsson M: Factors relevant to a return to work: a multivariate approach. Work 2006, 26(2):179-90.
- [13]Allebeck P, Mastekaasa A: Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 5. Risk factors for sick leave – general studies. Scand J Public Health 2004, 63:49-108.
- [14]Ostlund G, Alexanderson K, Cedersund E, Hensing G: It was really nice to have someone”: Lay people with musculoskeletal disorders request supportive relationships in rehabilitation. Scand J Public Health 2001, 29(4):285-291.
- [15]Nilsson M, Olsson M, Petersson LM, Wennman-Larsen A, Alexanderson K: Return to work after breast cancer: women’s experiences of encounters with different stakeholders. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2011, 15:267-274.
- [16]Östlund G, Borg K, Wide P, Hensing G, Alexanderson K: Clients’ perceptions of contacts within health care and social insurance offices. Scand J Public Health 2003, 31(4):275-282.
- [17]Lynöe N, Wessel M, Olsson D, Alexandersson K, Helgesson G: Respectful encounters and return to work – empirical study of long-term sick-listed patients’ experiences of Swedish healthcare. BMJ Open 2011, Jan 1, 1(2):e000246.
- [18]Hansen A, Edlund C, Bränholm IB: Significant resources needed for return to work after sick leave. Work 2005, 25(3):231-40.
- [19]Svensson T, Müssener U, Alexanderson K: Pride, empowerment and return to work: On the significance of promoting positive social emotions among sickness absentees. Work 2006, 27:57-65.
- [20]Svensson T, Karlsson A, Alexanderson K, Nordqvist C: Shame-inducing encounters Negative emotional aspects of sickness-absentees' interactions with rehabilitation professionals. J Occup Rehabil 2003 Sep, 13(3):183-95.
- [21]Klanghed U, Svensson T, Alexanderson A: Positive encounters with rehabilitation professionals reported by persons with experience of sickness absence. Work 2004, 22(3):247-54.
- [22]Lehnert-Batar A: pARtial: pARtial package, R package Version 0.1. 2006.
- [23]Wessel M, Helgesson G, Juth N, Olsson D, Alexanderson K, Lynöe N: When do patients feel wronged? Empirical study of sick-listed patients’ experiences with healthcare encounters. Eur J Public Health 2012. Epub ahead of print
- [24]Müssener U, Festin K, Upmark M, Alexanderson K: Positive experiences of encounters with healthcare and social insurance professionals among people on long-term sick leave. J Rehabil Med 2008 Nov, 40(10):805-11.
- [25]Swartling MS, Hagberg J, Alexanderson K, Wahlström RA: Sick-listing as a psychosocial work problem: a survey of 3997 Swedish physicians. J Occup Rehabil 2007, 17(3):398-408.
- [26]Malterud K, Thesen J: When the helper humiliates the patient: a qualitative study about unintended intimidations. Scand J Public Health 2008, 36(1):92-98.