Learning from the problems of problem-based learning

BMC Medical Education

Richard J Epstein¹ 

[1]Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong

关键词: knowledge management, medical education;   

Others  :  1164883
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6920-4-1

 received in 2003-10-31, accepted in 2004-01-09,  发布年份 2004

【 摘 要 】

Background

The last decade has witnessed a rapid expansion of biomedical knowledge. Despite this, fashions in medical education over the same period have shifted away from factual (didactic) teaching and towards contextual, or problem-based, learning (PBL). This paradigm shift has been justified by studies showing that PBL improves reasoning and communication while being associated with few if any detectable knowledge deficits.

Discussion

Analysis of the literature indicates that the recent rapid rise of PBL has closely paralleled the timing of the information explosion. The growing dominance of PBL could thus worsen the problems of information management in medical education via several mechanisms: first, by creating the impression that a defined spectrum of core factual knowledge suffices for clinical competence despite ongoing knowledge expansion (quality cost); second, by dissuading teachers from refining the educational utility of didactic modalities (improvement cost); and third, by reducing faculty time for developing reusable resources to impart factual knowledge more efficiently (opportunity cost).

Summary

These costs of PBL imply a need for strengthening the knowledge base of 21st-century medical graduates. New initiatives towards this end could include the development of more integrated cognitive techniques for facilitating the comprehension of complex data; the design of differentiated medical curricula for producing graduates with defined high-priority skill sets; and the encouragement of more cost-effective faculty teaching activities focused on the prototyping and testing of innovative commercializable educational tools.

【 授权许可】

   
2004 Epstein; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Kreisman JJ: The curandero's apprentice: a therapeutic integration of folk and medical healing. Am J Psychiatry 1975, 132:81-83.
• [2]Bleakley A: Pre-registration house officers and ward-based learning: a 'new apprenticeship' model. Med Educ 2002, 36:9-15.
• [3]Britto JA: Residency experienced – in pursuit of structured apprenticeship. Ann Roy Coll Surg 1995, 77(supp 2):64-66.
• [4]Taylor KL, Chudley AE: Meeting the needs of future physicians: a core curriculum initiative for postgraduate medical education at a Canadian university. Med Educ 2001, 35:973-82.
• [5]Markova T, Roth LM: E-conferencing for delivery of residency didactics. Acad Med 2002, 77:748-49.
• [6]Minor S, Poenaru D: The in-house education of clinical clerks in surgery and the role of housestaff. Am J Surg 2002, 184:471-5.
• [7]Rosenberg WM, Sackett DL: On the need for evidence-based medicine. Therapie 1996, 51:212-7.
• [8]Phinney AO, Hager WD: Teaching senior medical students in an office setting: the apprentice system revisited. Conn Med 1998, 62:337-41.
• [9]Turner TH, Collinson SR, Fry HS: Doctor in the house: the medical student as academic, attendant and apprentice. Med Teach 2001, 23:514-16.
• [10]Rolfe IE, Sanson-Fisher RW: Translating learning skills into practice: a new strategy for learning clinical skills. Med Educ 2002, 36:345-52.
• [11]Marckmann G: Teaching science vs. the apprentice model – do we really have the choice? Med Health Care Philos 2001, 4:85-89.
• [12]Wallace AG: Educating tomorrow's doctors: the thing that really matters is that we care. Acad Med 1997, 72:253-58.
• [13]Norman GR, Schmidt HG: Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts. Med Educ 2000, 34:721-8.
• [14]Finucane PM, Johnson SM, Prideaux DJ: Problem-based learning: its rationale and efficacy. Med J Aust 1998, 168:429-30.
• [15]Hunt RE, Newman RG: Medical knowledge overload: a disturbing trend for physicians. Health Care Manage Rev 1997, 22:70-75.
• [16]Laine C, Weinberg DS: How can physicians keep up-to-date? Annu Rev Med 1999, 50:99-110.
• [17]Collins FS, Morgan M, Patrinos A: The human genome project: lessons from large-scale biology. Science 2003, 300:286-90.
• [18]Carlile S, Barnet S, Sefton A, Uther J: Medical problem based learning supported by intranet technology: a natural student centred approach. Int J Med Inf 1998, 50:225-33.
• [19]Smith HC: A course director's perspectives on problem-based learning curricula in biochemistry. Acad Med 2002, 77:1189-98.
• [20]Webster C, McLinden S, Begler K: Why Johnny can't reengineer health care processes with information technology. Medinfo 1995, 8:1283-7.
• [21]Monkhouse WS, Farrell TB: Tomorrow's doctors: today's mistakes? Clin Anat 1999, 12:131-4.
• [22]Maudsley G, Strivens J: 'Science', 'critical thinking' and 'competence' for tomorrow's doctors: a review of terms and concepts. Med Educ 2000, 34:53-60.
• [23]Riley MW: Reducing 'information overload' in the teaching of pharmacology: the '200 Drug List'. J Med Educ 1984, 59:508-11.
• [24]Achike FI, Ogle CW: Information overload in the teaching of pharmacology. J Clin Pharmacol 2000, 40:177-83.
• [25]Vidic B, Weitlauf HM: Horizontal and vertical integration of academic disciplines in the medical school curriculum. Clin Anat 2002, 15:233-5.
• [26]Verhoeven BH, Verwijnen GM, Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP: Growth of medical knowledge. Med Educ 2002, 36:711-17.
• [27]Simpson JG, Furnace J, Crosby J, et al.: The Scottish doctor – learning outcomes for the medical undergraduate in Scotland – a foundation for competent and reflexive practitioners. Med Teach 2002, 24:136-43.
• [28]Whipp JL, Ferguson DJ, Wells LM, Iacopino AM: Rethinking knowledge and pedagogy in dental education. J Dent Educ 2000, 64:860-66.
• [29]Hammel J, Royeen CH, Bagatell N, Chandler B, Jensen G, Loveland R, Stone G: Student perspectives on problem-based learning in an occupational therapy curriculum: a multiyear qualitative evaluation. Am J Occup Ther 1999, 53:199-206.
• [30]Cullen R: The medical specialist: information gateway or gatekeeper for the family practitioner. Bull Med Lib Assoc 1997, 85:348-55.
• [31]Maudsley G: Making sense of trying not to teach: an interview study of tutors' ideas of problem-based learning. Acad Med 2002, 77:162-72.
• [32]Hay PJ, Katsikitis M: The 'expert' in problem-based and case-based learning: necessary or not? Med Educ 2001, 35:22-26.
• [33]Jones A, McArdle PJ, O'Neill PA: Perceptions of how well graduates are prepared for the role of pre-registration house officer: a comparison of outcomes from a traditional and an integrated PBL curriculum. Med Educ 2002, 36:16-25.
• [34]Kaufman DM, Mann KV: Comparing achievement on the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part I of students in conventional and problem-based learning curricula. Acad Med 1998, 73:852-3.
• [35]Antepohl W, Herzig S: Problem-based learning versus lecture-based learning in a course of basic pharmacology: a controlled randomized study. Med Educ 1999, 33:106-13.
• [36]Alleyne T, Shirley A, Bennett C, et al.: Problem-based compared with traditional methods at the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies: a model study. Med Teach 2002, 24:273-9.
• [37]Whitfield CF, Mauger EA, Zwicker J, Lehman EB: Differences between students in problem-based and lecture-based curricula measured by clerkship performance ratings at the beginning of the third year. Teach Learn Med 2002, 14:211-17.
• [38]Prince KJ, van Mameren H, Hylkema N, Drukker J, Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP: Does problem-based learning lead to deficiencies in basic science knowledge? Med Educ 2003, 37:15-21.
• [39]Albanese M: Problem-based learning: why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills. Med Educ 2000, 34:729-38.
• [40]Thomas RE: Problem-based learning: measurable outcomes. Med Educ 1997, 31:320-29.
• [41]Colliver JA: Educational theory and medical education practice: a cautionary note for medical school faculty. Acad Med 2002, 77:1217-20.
• [42]Hsu SC, Ong GH: Evaluation of problem-based learning: a lecturer's perspective. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2001, 30:524-7.
• [43]Miflin BM, Campbell CB, Price DA: A conceptual framework to guide the development of self-directed, lifelong learning in problem-based medical curricula. Med Educ 2000, 34:299-306.
• [44]Mennin SP, Martinez-Burrola N: The cost of problem-based vs. traditional medical education. Med Educ 1986, 20:187-94.
• [45]Doucet MD, Purdy RA, Kaufman DM, Langille DB: Comparison of problem-based learning and lecture format in continuing medical education based on headache diagnosis and management. Med Educ 1998, 32:590-96.
• [46]Jonas HS, Etzel SI, Barzansky B: Educational programs in US medical schools. JAMA 1991, 266:913-20.
• [47]Nowacek GA, Bailey BA, Sturgill BC: Influence of the interview on the evaluation of applicants to medical school. Acad Med 1996, 71:1093-95.
• [48]Carrothers RM, Gregory SW, Gallagher TJ: Measuring emotional intelligence of medical school applicants. Acad Med 2000, 75:456-63.
• [49]Edwards JC, Elam CL, Wagoner NE: An admission model for medical schools. Acad Med 2001, 76:1207-12.
• [50]Barnard D, Quill T, Hafferty FW, Arnold R, Plumb J, Bulger R, Field M: Preparing the ground: contributions of the preclinical years to medical education for care near the end of life. Acad Med 1999, 74:499-505.
• [51]Weiss SC: Humanities in medical education: revisiting the doctor-patient relationship. Med Law 2000, 19:559-67.
• [52]Kirklin D: Responding to the implications of the genetics revolution for the education and training of doctors: a medical humanities approach. Med Educ 2003, 37:168-73.
• [53]Walsh WJ: The McMaster programme of medical education, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: developing problem-solving activities. Public Health Pap 1978, 70:69-77.
• [54]Thorne S: Medical school tuition fees reach record levels as MD incomes shrink. Can Med Assoc J 1996, 155:979-81.
• [55]Godwin M, Seguin R, Wilson R: Queen's University alternative funding plan: effect on patients, staff and faculty in the Department of Family Medicine. Can Fam Phys 2000, 46:1438-44.
• [56]Kwong JC, Dhalla IA, Streiner DL, Baddour RE, Waddell AE, Johnson IL: Effects of rising tuition fees on medical school class composition and financial outlook. Can Med Assoc J 2002, 166:1023-28.
• [57]Robins LS, White CB, Fantone JC: The difficulty of sustaining curricular reforms: a study of "drift" at one school. Acad Med 2000, 75:801-05.
• [58]Kenny AJ, Kendall S: Serving two masters: quality teaching and learning versus economic rationalism. Nurs Educ Today 2001, 21:648-55.
• [59]Woolliscroft JO, Van Harrison R, Anderson MB: Faculty views of reimbursement changes and clinical training: a survey of award-winning clinical teachers. Teach Learn Med 2002, 14:77-86.
• [60]Gelijns AC, Thier SO: Medical innovation and institutional interdependence: rethinking university-industry connections. JAMA 2002, 287:72-77.
• [61]Harden RM, Hart IR: An international virtual medical school (IVIMEDS): the future for medical education? Med Teach 2002, 24:261-67.
• [62]Cohen JR, Fox S: Developing a new faculty practice plan with a model for funding flow between the hospital and the plan. Acad Med 2003, 78:119-2.
• [63]Adler MD, Johnson KB: Quantifying the literature of computer-aided instruction in medical education. Acad Med 2000, 75:1025-8.