A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Jon A Hyett²  Qiushuang Li¹  Adrienne Gordon²  Camille H Raynes-Greenow¹ 

[1] Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia;Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

关键词: Cross-sectional study;    Qualitative analysis;    Fetal movement;    Pregnancy;   

Others  :  1151048
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2393-13-32

 received in 2012-12-17, accepted in 2013-01-24,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Maternal perception of fetal movements has been used as a measure of fetal well-being. Yet a Cochrane review does not recommend formal fetal movement counting compared to discretional fetal movement counting. There is some evidence that suggests that the quality of fetal movements can precede quantitative changes however there has been almost no assessment of how women describe movements and whether these descriptions may be useful in a clinical setting. Therefore we aimed to examine maternal perception of fetal movements using a qualitative framework.

Methods

Using a cross-sectional design we identified women during routine antenatal care at a tertiary referral hospital, in Sydney, Australia. Eligible women were pregnant ≥ 28 weeks, carrying a single child, > 18 years old, and with sufficient English literacy to self-complete a questionnaire. Post-natally the medical records were reviewed and demographic, pregnancy and fetal outcome data were extracted. Text responses to questions regarding maternal descriptions of fetal movements throughout pregnancy, were analysed using thematic analysis in an explicit process.

Results

156 women participated. There was a general pattern to fetal movement descriptions with increasing gestation, beginning with words such as “gentle”, to descriptions of “strong” and “limb” movements, and finally to “whole body” movements. Women perceived and described qualitative changes to fetal movements that changed throughout gestation. The majority (83%) reported that they were asked to assess fetal movements in an implicit qualitative method during their antenatal care. In contrast, only 16% regularly counted fetal movements and many described counting as confusing and reported that the advice they had received on counting differed.

Conclusions

This is the first study to use qualitative analysis to identify that pregnant women perceive fetal movements and can describe them in a relatively homogenous way throughout pregnancy that follow a general pattern of fetal growth and development. These findings suggest that women’s perception of fetal wellbeing based on their own assessment of fetal movement is used in an ad hoc method in antenatal care by clinicians.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Raynes-Greenow et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Berbey R, Manduley A, Vigil-De GP: Counting fetal movements as a universal test for fetal wellbeing. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001, 74(3):293-295.
• [2]Unterscheider J, Horgan RP, Greene RA, Higgins JR: The management of reduced fetal movements in an uncomplicated pregnancy at term: Results from an anonymous national online survey in the Republic of Ireland. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010, 30(6):578-581.
• [3]Rayburn WF: Fetal movement monitoring. Clin Obstet Gyneco 1995, 38:59-67.
• [4]Harrington K, Thompson O, Jordan L, Page J, Carpenter RG, Campbell S: Obstetric outcome in women who present with a reduction in fetal movements in the third trimester of pregnancy. J Perinat Med 1998, 26:77-82.
• [5]Sergent F, Lefevre A, Verspyck E, Marpeau L: Decreased fetal movements in the third trimester: what to do? Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2005, 11:861-869.
• [6]Froen JF: A kick from within–fetal movement counting and the cancelled progress in antenatal care. J Perinat Med 2004, 32(1):13-24.
• [7]Froen J, Arnestad M, Frey K, Vege A, Saugstad OD, Stray-Pedersen B: Risk Factors for sudden intrauterine unexplained death: Epidemiologic characteristics of singleton cases in Oslo, Norway 1986–1995. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001, 184(4):694-702.
• [8]Efkarpidis S, Alexopoulos E, Kean L, Liu D, Fay T: Case–control study of factors associated with intrauterine fetal deaths. MedGenMed 2004, 6(2):53.
• [9]Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Frøen JF, Smith GC, et al.: Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011, 377(9774):1331-1340.
• [10]Freda MC, Mikhail MS, Pollizotto R, Mazloom E, Merkatz IR: A comparison of compliance and acceptability of two fetal movement counting methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992, 166:413.
• [11]Gomez L, Padilla L, De La Vega G, Bautista F, Villar A: Compliance with a fetal movement chart by high risk patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003, 189(6):s179.
• [12]Grant A, Elbourne D, Valentin L, Alexander S: Routine formal fetal movement counting and risks of antepartum late deaths in nomally formed singletons. Lancet 1989, 2:345-347.
• [13]Lobb MO, Beazley JM, Haddad NG: A controlled study of daily fetal movement counts in the prevention of stillbirths. J Obstet Gynaecol Re 1985, 6:87-91.
• [14]Mangesi L, Hofmeyr GJ, Smith V: Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, Art. No.(1):CD004909.
• [15]De Vries JI, Visser GH, Prechtl H: The emergence of fetal behaviour. I. Qualitative aspects. Early Hum Dev 1982, 7(4):301-322.
• [16]Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green-top Guideline 57 February 201: Reduced Fetal Movements. Available here: http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/reduced-fetal-movements-green-top-57 webcite
• [17]Rådestad I, Säflund K, Wredling R, Erlandsson KLH: Women’s perceptions of fetal movements in full-term pregnancy. Sex Reprod Healthc 2012, 3:113-116.
• [18]Stacey T, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA, et al.: Maternal perception of fetal activity and late stillbirth risk: findings from the Auckland stillbirth study. Birth 2011, 38:311-316.
• [19]Gordon A, Raynes-Greenow CH, Bond D, Jones R, Morris JM, Jeffery HE: Maternal Perception of fetal movements: Quality vs quantity?. Sydney: The Sydney Stillbirth Study, in Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand 15th Annual Congress; 2011.
• [20]Gordon A, Raynes-Greenow CH, Bond D, Jones R, Morris JM, Jeffery HE: Maternal perception of fetal movements: pilot data from the Sydney Stillbirth Study. Sydney: Joint Conference of the International Stillbirth Alliance and the International Society for the Prevention of Infant Death; 2010.
• [21]Daly J, Kellehear A, Gliksman M: The public health researcher: A methodological approach. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press; 1997:611-618.
• [22]Hart H: Fetal and infant movements and the young nervous system. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006, 48:547.
• [23]Olesen AG, Svare JA: Decreased fetal movements: background, assessment, and clinical management. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004, 83(9):818-826.
• [24]Minors DS, Waterhouse JM: The effect of maternal posture, meals and time of day on fetal movements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1979, 86(9):717-723.
• [25]Luchinger AB, Hadders-Algra M, Kan CM, Van De Vries JIP: Fetal Onset of General Movements. Pediatr Res 2008., 63(2)
• [26]Holm Tveit JV, Saastad E, Stray-Pedersen B, Børdahl PE, Frøen JF: Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in women presenting with decreased fetal movements in late pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009, 88(12):1345-1351.
• [27]Ministry of Health, NSW, Maternity - Decreased Fetal Movements in the Third Trimester: Policy Guidelines. Document GL2011_012: 2011. http://www0.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/g/2011/GL2011_012.html webcite
• [28]Heazell AEP, Froen JF: Methods of fetal movement counting and the detection of fetal compromise. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008, 28(2):147-154.
• [29]Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J: Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health C 2007, 19(6):349-357.
• [30]Tuffnell DJ, Cartmill RS, Lilford RJ: Fetal movements; factors affecting their perception. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991, 39:165-167.