What is important, what needs treating? How GPs perceive older patients’ multiple health problems: a mixed method research study

BMC Research Notes

Marie-Luise Dierks⁴  Eva Hummers-Pradier²  Birgitt Wiese¹  Heike Diederichs-Egidi²  Tanja Schleef²  Jennifer Wrede³  Ulrike Junius-Walker² 

[1] Institute of Biometrics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany;Institute of General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany;Institute of General Practice, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany;Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

关键词: Patient-centred care;    Family practice;    Old age;    Multimorbidity;    Health priorities;   

Others  :  1165928
DOI  :  10.1186/1756-0500-5-443

 received in 2012-02-24, accepted in 2012-08-10,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

GPs increasingly deal with multiple health problems of their older patients. They have to apply a hierarchical management approach that considers priorities to balance competing needs for treatment. Yet, the practice of setting individual priorities in older patients is largely unexplored. This paper analyses the GPs’ perceptions on important and unimportant health problems and how these affect their treatment.

Methods

GPs appraised the importance of health problems for a purposive sample of their older patients in semi-structured interviews. Prior to the interviews, the GPs had received a list of their patients’ health problems resulting from a geriatric assessment and were asked to rate the importance of each identified problem. In the interviews the GPs subsequently explained why they considered certain health problems important or not and how this affected treatment. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis and quantitative methods.

Results

The problems GPs perceive as important are those that are medical and require active treatment or monitoring, or that induce empathy or awareness but cannot be assisted further. Unimportant problems are those that are well managed problems and need no further attention as well as age-related conditions or functional disabilities that provoke fatalism, or those considered outside the GPs’ responsibility. Statements of professional actions are closely linked to explanations of important problems and relate to physical problems rather than functional and social patient issues.

Conclusions

GPs tend to prioritise treatable clinical conditions. Treatment approaches are, however, vague or missing for complex chronic illnesses and disabilities. Here, patient empowerment strategies are of value and need to be developed and implemented. The professional concepts of ageing and disability should not impede but rather foster treatment and care. To this end, GPs need to be able to delegate care to a functioning primary care team.

Trial Registration

German Trial Register (DRKS): 00000792

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Junius-Walker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Piccoliori G, Gerolimon E, Abholz HH: Geriatric assessment in general practice using a screening instrument: is it worth the effort? Results of a South Tyrol Study. Age Ageing 2008, 37:647-652.
• [2]Smith SM, O'Kelly S, O'Dowd T: GPs' and pharmacists' experiences of managing multimorbidity: a 'Pandora's box'. Br J Gen Pract 2010, 60:285-294.
• [3]Quinn T, McArthur K, Ellis G, Stott D: Functional assessment in older people. BMJ 2011, 343:d4681.
• [4]Norheim OF: Clinical Priority Setting. BMJ 2008, 337:a1846.
• [5]Dawes M: Co-morbidity: we need a guideline for each patient not a guideline for each disease. Fam Pract 2010, 27:1-2.
• [6]Junius-Walker U, Voigt I, Wrede J, Hummers-Pradier E, Lazic D, Dierks ML: Health and treatment priorities in patients with multimorbidity. Report on a workshop from the European General Practice Network meeting Research on multimorbidity in general practice“. Eur J Gen Pract 2010, 16:51-54.
• [7]Spicker P: What is a priority? J Health Serv Res Policy 2009, 14:112-116.
• [8]Arvidsson E, André M, Borgquist L, Carlsson P: Priority setting in primary health care – dilemmas and opportunities : a focus group study. BMC Fam Pract 2010, 11:71.
• [9]WONCA Europe: The European definition of general practice / family medicine. [http://www.woncaeurope.org/Definition%20GP-FM.htm webcite] accessed 02.01.12
• [10]Piccoliori G, Gerolimon E, Abholz HH: Geriatric assessment in general practice - a study of the South Tyrolean Academy of general practice. Z Allg Med 2005, 81:491-498. [German]
• [11]Junius-Walker U, Stolberg D, Steinke P, Theile G, Hummers-Pradier E, Dierks ML: Health and treatment priorities of older patients and their general practitioners: a cross-sectional study. Qual Prim Care 2011, 19:67-76.
• [12]Carmaciu C, Iliffe S, Kharicha K, Harari D, Swift C, Gillmann G, Stuck AE: Health risk appraisal in older people 3: prevalence, impact, and context of pain and their implications for GPs. Br J Gen Pract 2007, 57:630-635.
• [13]Krohne K, Brage S: How GPs in Norway conceptualise functional ability: a focus group study. Br J Gen Pract 2008, 58:850-855.
• [14]Memel D: Chronic disease or physical disability? The role of the general practitioner. Br J Gen Pract 1996, 46:109-113.
• [15]Rotar-Pavlic D, Svab I, Wetzels R: How do older patients and their GPs evaluate shared decision-making in healthcare? BMC Geriatr 2008, 8:9. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Deveugele M, Derese A, van den Brink Muinen A, Bensing J, de Maeseneer J: Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries. BMJ 2002, 325:472.
• [17]Sandholzer H, Hellenbrand W, v Renteln-Kruse W, van Weel C, Walker P: Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. In An evidence-based approach to assessing older people in primary care Edited by Williams I, Fischer G, Junius U, Sandholzer H, Jones D, Vass M. 2002, 1-53.
• [18]Mercer S, Reynolds W: Empathy and quality of care. Br J Gen Pract 2002, 52:S9-S13.
• [19]Coulter A, Elwyn G: What do patients want from high-quality general practice and how do we involve them in improvement? Br J Gen Pract 2002, 52:S22-S26.
• [20]Walmsley C: Medical professionalism – who cares? Clin Med 2006, 6:166-168.
• [21]Del Piccolo L, Mazzi M, Saltini A, Zimmermann C: Inter and intra individual variations in physicians' verbal behaviour during primary care consultations. Soc Sci Med 2002, 55:1871-1885.
• [22]Duberstein P, Chapman B, Epstein R, McCollumn K, Kravitz R: Physician personality characteristics and inquiry about mood symptoms in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 2008, 23:1791-1795.
• [23]Friedman N: Evidence-based medicine: the key to guidelines, disease and care management programmes. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2002, 31:446-451.
• [24]Walter U, Flick U, Neuber A, Fischer C, Schwartz FW: Alt und gesund? Altersbilder und Präventionskonzepte in der ärztlichen und pflegerischen Praxis. Alter(n) und Gesellschaft. Band 11. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2006.
• [25]De Ridder D, Geenen R, Kuijer R, Middendorp H: Psychological adjustment to chronic disease. Lancet 2008, 372:246-255.
• [26]Stanton A, Revenson T, Tennen H: Health psychology: psychological adjustment to chronic disease. Annu Rev Psychol 2007, 58:565-592.
• [27]Mola E, de Bonis J, Giancane R: Integrating patient empowerment as an essential characteristic of the discipline of general practice/family medicine. Eur J Gen Pract 2008, 14:89-94.
• [28]Aujoulat I, Hoore W, Deccache A: Patient empowerment in theory and practice: polysemy or cacophony? Pat Educ Couns 2007, 66:13-20.
• [29]Smith R: In search of non-disease“. BMJ 2002, 324:883-885.
• [30]Izaks G, Westendorp R: Ill or just old? Towards a conceptual framework of the relation between ageing and disease. BMC Geriatr 2003, 3:7. BioMed Central Full Text
• [31]Harries C, Forrest D, Harvey N, McClelland A, Bowling A: Which doctors are influenced by a patient’s age? A multimethod study of angina treatment in general practice, cardiology and gerontology. Qual Saf Health Care 2007, 16:23-27.
• [32]Allen J, Gay B, Crebolder H, Heyrman J, Svab I, Ram P, Evans P: The European definitions of the key features of the discipline of general practice: the role of the GP and core competencies. Br J Gen Pract 2002, 52:526-527.
• [33]van Weel C, Knotterus J: Evidence-based interventions and comprehensive treatment. Lancet 1999, 353:916-918.
• [34]Advisory Council on the Assessment of Developments in the Health Care System Coordination and Integration: Health Care in an Ageing Society. Special Report 2009. Abridged version; [http://www.svr-gesundheit.de/Gutachten/Gutacht09/gutacht09.htm webcite] accessed 02.01.2012
• [35]Hummers-Pradier E, Beyer M, Chevallier P, Eilat-Tsanani S, Lionis C, Peremans L, Petek D, Rurik I, Soler JK, Stoffers H, Topsever P, Ungan M, van Marwijk H, van Royen P: Research Agenda for general practice / family medicine and primary health care in Europe. Maastricht: European General Practice Research Network EGPRN; 2009.