Depression as a psychosocial consequence of occupational injury in the US working population: findings from the medical expenditure panel survey

BMC Public Health

Jaeyoung Kim¹ 

[1] Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Keimyung University, Daegu, South Korea

关键词: Medical expenditure panel survey;    Psychosocial consequences;    Depression;    Non-occupational injury;    Occupational injury;   

Others  :  1162378
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-303

 received in 2012-12-13, accepted in 2013-04-02,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Empirical evidence describing the psychosocial consequences of occupational injury is still limited. The effect of occupational injury on depression might pose unique challenges in workers compared with other kinds of injury. This study aimed to assess the differential impact of workplace injury compared with non-workplace injury on depression over time, and to identify the potential risk factors associated with post-injury depression in the US working population.

Methods

Using pooled panel data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2000–2006, a total of 35,155 workers aged 18–64 years who had been followed for about 18 months in each panel were analyzed. Injuries in the 4–5 months before baseline, and subsequent depression incidence during follow-up, were identified using ICD-9 codes for the medical conditions captured in personal interviews. A discrete time-proportional odds model was used.

Results

A total of 5.5% of workers with occupational injury at baseline reported depression at follow-up, compared with 4.7% of workers with non-occupational injury and 3.1% of workers without injuries. Those with occupational injuries had more severe injuries and required longer treatment, compared with those with non-occupational injuries. Only 39% of workers with workplace injuries were paid Workers’ Compensation (WC). The association between injury and depression appeared to be stronger for workplace injury, and the adjusted odds ratio for depression was 1.72 for those with occupational injury (95% CI: 1.27–2.32), and 1.36 for those with non-occupational injury (95% CI: 1.07–1.65) compared with the no-injury group, after controlling for relevant covariates. Occupational injury was associated with higher odds of developing depression over time. WC as a source of medical payment was associated with 33% higher odds of developing depression (95% CI: 1.01–1.74). Part-time work, shorter job tenure, and long working hours were independently associated with post-injury depression risk.

Conclusions

Workers with occupational injury were more likely to become depressed than those with non-occupational injury. The psychosocial consequences of occupational injury, including depression, deserve further exploration to adequately support those injured at work. This finding also emphasizes a need for early intervention to reduce the burden of depression associated with occupational injury.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Kim; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Kessler RC: The effects of stressful life events on depression. Annual Reviews in Psychology 1997, 48(1):191-214.
• [2]Bonde J: Psychosocial factors at work and risk of depression: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. Br Med J 2008, 65(7):438-445.
• [3]Cubbin C: Socioeconomic status and the occurrence of fatal and nonfatal injury in the United States. Am J Public Health 2000, 90(1):70-77.
• [4]Stansfeld S, Head J, Marmot M: Work-related Factors and Ill-health: The Whitehall II Study. 2000. [HSE Contract Research Report]
• [5]Mason S, Wardrope J, Turpin G, Rowlands A: Outcomes after injury: a comparison of workplace and nonworkplace injury. J Trauma 2002, 53(1):98-103.
• [6]Keogh JP, Nuwayhid I, Gordon JL, Gucer PW: The impact of occupational injury on injured worker and family: outcomes of upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in Maryland workers. Am J Ind Med 2000, 38(5):498-506.
• [7]Brown JA, Shannon HS, Mustard CA, McDonough P: Social and economic consequences of workplace injury: a population-based study of workers in British Columbia, Canada. Am J Ind Med 2007, 50(9):633-645.
• [8]Boden LI, Biddle EA, Spieler EA: Social and economic impacts of workplace illness and injury: current and future directions for research. Am J Ind Med 2001, 40(4):398-402.
• [9]Franche RL, Carnide N, Hogg-Johnson S, Cote P, Breslin FC, Bultmann U, Severin CN, Krause N: Course, diagnosis, and treatment of depressive symptomatology in workers following a workplace injury: a prospective cohort study. Can J Psychiatry 2009, 54(8):534-546.
• [10]Ezzati-Rice T, Rohde F, Greenblatt J: Sample Design of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component, 1998–2007. In Methodology Report. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. No. 22. (March)
• [11]Barell V, Aharonson-Daniel L, Fingerhut L, Mackenzie E, Ziv A, Boyko V, Abargel A, Avitzour M, Heruti R: An introduction to the Barell body region by nature of injury diagnosis matrix. Inj Prev 2002, 8(2):91-96.
• [12]D'Hoore W, Bouckaert A, Tilquin C: Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases. J Clin Epidemiol 1996, 49(12):1429-1433.
• [13]Swaen GM, van Amelsvoort LP, Bultmann U, Slangen JJ, Kant IJ: Psychosocial work characteristics as risk factors for being injured in an occupational accident. J Occup Environ Med 2004, 46(6):521-527.
• [14]Willett J, Singer J: Discrete-time survival analysis. In The sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Edited by Kaplan D. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2004:199.
• [15]Checkoway H, Pearce N, Kriebel D: Research methods in occupational epidemiology. USA: Oxford University Press; 2004.
• [16]Cohen S, Ezzati-Rice T, Yu W: The impact of survey attrition on health insurance coverage estimates in a National Longitudinal Health Care Survey. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2006, 6(3):111-125.
• [17]Maes M, Mylle J, Delmeire L, Altamura C: Psychiatric morbidity and comorbidity following accidental man-made traumatic events: incidence and risk factors. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000, 250(3):156-162.
• [18]Zatzick D, Jurkovich G, Rivara F, Wang J, Fan M, Joesch J, Mackenzie E: A national US study of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and work and functional outcomes after hospitalization for traumatic injury. Ann Surg 2008, 248(3):429-437.
• [19]Mason S, Turpin G, Woods D, Wardrope J, Rowlands A: Risk factors for psychological distress following injury. Br J Clin Psychol 2006, 45(2):217-230.
• [20]Bay E, Donders J: Risk factors for depressive symptoms after mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2008, 22(3):233-241.
• [21]Cubbin C, Smith GS: Socioeconomic inequalities in injury: criticial issues in design and analysis. Annual Reviews in Public Health 2002, 23(1):349-375.
• [22]Oh JH, Shin EH: Inequalities in nonfatal work injury: the significance of race, human capital, and occupations. SocSciMed 2003, 57(11):2173-2182.
• [23]Dawson S: Workers' compensation in Pennsylvania: the effects of delayed contested cases. J Health Soc Policy 1994, 6(1):87-100.
• [24]Dembe AE: The social consequences of occupational injuries and illnesses. Am J Ind Med 2001, 40(4):403-417.
• [25]Nyberg E, Stieglitz RD, Frommberger U, Berger M: Psychological disorders after severe occupational accidents. Versicherungsmedizin 2003, 55(2):76-81.
• [26]Kendler KS, Karkowski LM, Prescott CA: Causal relationship between stressful life events and the onset of major depression. Am J Psychiatry 1999, 156(6):837-841.
• [27]Butcher F: Aftermath: using research to understand the social and economic consequences of workplace injury and illness. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 2004, Dec, 23:181-194.
• [28]Keller SD: Quantifying social consequences of occupational injuries and illnesses: state of the art and research agenda. Am J Ind Med 2001, 40(4):438-451.
• [29]Strunin L, Boden LI: Family consequences of chronic back pain. Soc Sci Med 2004, 58(7):1385-1393.
• [30]Morse TF, Dillon C, Warren N, Levenstein C, Warren A: The economic and social consequences of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the Connecticut Upper-Extremity Surveillance Project (CUSP). Int J Occup Environ Health 1998, 4(4):209-216.
• [31]Pransky G, Benjamin K, Hill-Fotouhi C, Himmelstein J, Fletcher KE, Katz JN, Johnson WG: Outcomes in work-related upper extremity and low back injuries: results of a retrospective study. Am J Ind Med 2000, 37(4):400-409.
• [32]Rudolph L, Dervin K, Cheadle A, Maizlish N, Wickizer T: What do injured workers think about their medical care and outcomes after work injury? J Occup Environ Med 2002, 44(5):425-434.
• [33]Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA, Vander Stoep A: Tinker, tailor, soldier, patient: work attributes and depression disparities among young adults. SocSciMed 2004, 58(10):1889-1901.
• [34]Kleppa E, Sanne B, Tell G: Working overtime is associated with anxiety and depression: the Hordaland health study. J Occup Environ Med 2008, 50(6):658-666.