Does the perception of fairness and standard of care in the health system depend on the field of study? Results of an empirical analysis

BMC Health Services Research

Andy Zuchandke¹  Anne Prenzler²  Kathrin Damm² 

[1] Leibniz University Hannover, Center for Risk and Insurance, Königsworther Platz 1, D-30167 Hannover, Germany;Leibniz University Hannover, Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Königsworther Platz 1, D-30167 Hannover, Germany

关键词: Germany;    Field of study;    Perception;    Health care;    Standard of care;    Fairness;   

Others  :  1132745
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-166

 received in 2013-02-04, accepted in 2014-04-02,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The main challenge in the context of health care reforms and priority setting is the establishment and/or maintenance of fairness and standard of care. For the political process and interdisciplinary discussion, the subjective perception of the health care system might even be as important as potential objective criteria. Of special interest are the perceptions of academic disciplines, whose representatives act as decision makers in the health care sector. The aim of this study is to explore and compare the subjective perception of fairness and standard of care in the German health care system among students of medicine, law, economics, philosophy, and religion.

Methods

Between October 2011 and January 2012, we asked freshmen and advanced students of the fields mentioned above to participate in a paper and pencil survey. Prior to this, we formulated hypotheses. The data were analysed by micro econometric regression techniques.

Results

Data from 1,088 students were included in the study. Medical students, freshmen, and advanced students perceive the standard of care significantly as being better than non-medical students. Differences in the perception of fairness are not significant between the freshmen of the academic disciplines; however, they increase with the number of study terms. Besides the field of study, further variables such as gender and health status have a significant impact on perceptions.

Conclusions

Our results show that there are differences in the perception of fairness and standard of care between academic disciplines, which might influence the interdisciplinary discussion on health care reforms and priority setting.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Damm et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Health Data: How Does Germany Compare 2013. http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Briefing-Note-GERMANY-2013.pdf webcite
• [2]Davis K, Schoen C, Schoenbaum SC, Doty MM, Holmgren AL, Kriss JL, Shea KK: Mirror Mirror on the Wall: An International Update on the Comparative Performance of American Health Care. The Commonwealth Fund. 2007. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/Files/Publications/Fund%20Report/2007/May/Mirror%20%20Mirror%20on%20the%20Wall%20%20An%20International%20Update%20on%20the%20Comparative%20Performance%20of%20American%20Healt/1027_Davis_mirror_mirror_international_update_v2.pdf webcite
• [3]Härpfer M, Cacace M, Rothgang H: And Fairness for all? Wie gerecht ist die Finanzierung im deutschen Gesundheitssystem? Eine Berechnung des Kakwani-Index auf Basis der EVS [And Fairness for all? How fair is the financing of the German health system? A calculation of the Kakwani index based on the EVS]. ZeS-Working Paper 4; 2009. http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/39351/1/609490079.pdf webcite
• [4]Döring A, Paul F: The German healthcare system. EPMA J 2010, 1(4):535-547.
• [5]Daniels N, Bryant J, Castano RA, Dantes OG, Khan KS, Pannarunothai S: Benchmarks of fairness for health care reform: a policy tool for developing countries. Bull World Health Organiz [online] 2000, 78(6):740-750.
• [6]Daniels N, Light DW, Caplan RL: Benchmarks of fairness for health care reform. New York Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.
• [7]Tragakes E, Vienonen M: Key issues in rationing and priority setting for health care services. Health Services Management: WHO/EURO; 1998:1-9.
• [8]von der Schulenburg JM: Entscheidungsunterstützung durch gesundheitsökonomische Evaluation in Deutschland aus Perspektive der Wissenschaft [Decision support through economic evaluation from the perspective of science in Germany]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2012, 55(5):660-667.
• [9]Ubel PA, Goold SD: ‘Rationing’ Health Care. Not All Definitions Are Created Equal. Arch Internal Med 1998, 158(3):209-214.
• [10]von der Schulenburg JM, Vauth C, Mittendorf T, Greiner W: Methods for determining cost-benefit ratios for pharmaceuticals in Germany. Eur J Health Econ 2007, 8(Suppl 1):5-31.
• [11]Singer P: Why we must ration health care. New York: Times Magazine; http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/19/magazine/19healthcare-t.html?pagewanted=all webcite
• [12]German Ethics Council: Nutzen und Kosten im Gesundheitswesen - Zur normativen Funktion ihrer Bewertung [Opinion on the analysis of utility and costs in healthcare : The normative function of their analysis]. http://www.ethikrat.org/dateien/pdf/stellungnahme-nutzen-und-kosten-im-gesundheitswesen.pdf webcite
• [13]Harris J: QALYfying the value of life. J Med Ethics 1987, 13(3):117-123.
• [14]Taurek JM: Should the numbers count? Phil Publ Aff 1977, 6(4):293-316.
• [15]Brock DW: Broadening the bioethics agenda. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2000, 10(1):21-38.
• [16]Central Ethics Committee at the German Medical Association: Priorisierung medizinischer Leistungen im System der Gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung (GKV) [Priority setting of medical services in the statutory health insurance (SHI) system]. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2007, 104(40):A2750-A2754.
• [17]Williams A, Evans JG: The rationing debate. Rationing health care by age. Br Med J 1997, 314(7083):820-825.
• [18]Brockmann H: Why is less money spent on health care for the elderly than for the rest of the population? Health care rationing in German hospitals. Soc Sci Med 2002, 55(4):593-608.
• [19]Schwappach DL: Resource allocation, social values and the QALY: a review of the debate and empirical evidence. Health Expect 2002, 5(3):210-222.
• [20]Otsuka M: Saving Lives, Moral Theory, and the Claims of Individuals. Phil Publ Aff 2006, 34(2):109-135.
• [21]Zupanic M, Hofmann M, Osenberg D, Gardeik K, Jansen P, Fischer MR: The aimed or feared professional future of medical students at the University of Witten/Herdecke. GMS Z Med Ausbildung 2011, 28(2):1-12.
• [22]Osenberg D, Huenges B, Klock M, Huenges J, Weismann N, Rusche H: Wer wird denn noch Chirurg? Zukunftspläne der Nachwuchswissenschaftler an deutschen Universitäten [Who will become a surgeon? Future plans of young scientists at German universities]. DGU Mitt Nachr 2012, 62:79-86.
• [23]Griffith CH, Wilson JF: The loss of student idealism in the 3rd-year clinical clerkships. Eval Health Prof 2001, 24(1):61-71.
• [24]Annis LF, Annis DB: Philosophy and liberal education. Metaphilosophy 1979, 10:82-93.
• [25]Keller DR: An introduction to ethics for teaching. Teaching Ethics 2010, 11(1):1-54.
• [26]Annis LF, Annis DB: The impact of philosophy on students' critical thinking ability. Contemp Educ Psychol 1979, 4(3):219-226.
• [27]Lungen M, Stollenwerk B, Messner P, Lauterbach KW, Gerber A: Waiting times for elective treatments according to insurance status: a randomized empirical study in Germany. Int J Equity Health 2008, 7:1.
• [28]Krobot KJ, Miller WC, Kaufman JS, Christensen DB, Preisser JS, Ibrahim MA: The Disparity in Access to New Medication by Type of Health Insurance: lessons from Germany. Med Care 2004, 42(5):487-491.
• [29]Schwierz C, Wübker A, Wübker A, Kuchinke BA: Discrimination in waiting times by insurance type and financial soundness of German acute care hospitals. Eur J Health Econ 2011, 12(5):405-416.
• [30]Winkelmann R, Boes S: Analysis of Microdata. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2009:171-202.
• [31]Wooldridge JM: Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2002:451-517.
• [32]Buskirk TD: Significance Level. In Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Edited by Lavrakas PJ. SAGE Publications; http://knowledge.sagepub.com/view/survey/n532.xml webcite
• [33]Wooldridge JM: Introductory Econometrics - A Modern Approach. Mason: Thomson publishing; 2009:117-167.
• [34]Ahlert M, Schwettmann L, Funke K: Thresholds, productivity, and context - an experimental study on determinants of distributive behaviour. Soc Choice Welf 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0652-8 webcite
• [35]Ahlert M, Felder S, Vogt B: Which patients do I treat? An experimental study with economists and Physicians. Health Econ Rev 2012, 2(1):1. BioMed Central Full Text
• [36]Strech D, Danis M, Löb M, Marckmann G: Ausmaß und Auswirkungen von Rationierung in deutschen Krankenhäusern: Ärztliche Einschätzungen aus einer repräsentativen Umfrage [Extent and impact of bedside rationing in German hospitals: Results of a representative survey among physicians]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2009, 134(24):1261-1266.
• [37]Professional association of the medical students in Germany (bvmd): Positionspapier zur Rationierung im Gesundheitswesen [Position paper on health care rationing]. http://bvmd.de/fileadmin/intern_alle/Positionspapiere/2011/2011-05-01_Positionspapier_Rationierung.pdf webcite
• [38]Koch K, Miksch A, Schürmann C, Joos S, Sawicki PT: The German Health Care System in International Comparison: the Primary Care Physicians’ Perspective. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011, 108(15):255-261.
• [39]Testerman JK, Morton KR, Loo LK, Worthley JS, Lamberton HH: The natural history of cynicism in physicians. Acad Med 1996, 71(10 Suppl):43-45.
• [40]Newton BW, Barber L, Clardy J, Cleveland E, O'Sullivan P: Is there hardening of the heart during medical school? Acad Med 2008, 83(3):244-249.
• [41]Branch WT: Supporting the moral development of medical students. J Gen Intern Med 2000, 15(7):503-508.
• [42]Sawicki PT: Qualität der Gesundheitsversorgung in Deutschland - Ein randomisierter simultaner Sechs-Länder-Vergleich aus Patientensicht [Quality of Health Care in Germany - A Six-Country Comparison]. Med Klin (Munich) 2005, 15;100(11):755-768.
• [43]European Commission: Patient safety and quality of healthcare. Special Eurobarometer 327 / Wave 72.2; 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_327_de.pdf webcite
• [44]Schoen C, Osborn R, Huynh PT, Doty M, Zapert K, Peugh J, Davis K: Taking the Pulse of Health Care Systems: Experiences of Patients with Health Problems in Six Countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005. Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-509-525. http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/early/2005/11/28/hlthaff.w5.509.full.pdf webcite
• [45]Schoen C, Osborn R, How SK, Doty MM, Peugh J: In Chronic Condition: experiences of Patients with Complex Health Care Needs, In Eight Countries, 2008. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009, 28(1):w1-w16.
• [46]Zuchandke A, Reddemann S, Krummaker S, von der Schulenburg JM: Impact of the introduction of the social long-term care insurance in Germany on financial security assessment in case of long-term care need. Geneva Pap Risk Insurance 2010, 35:626-643.
• [47]Lange A, Prenzler A, Zuchandke A: How do insured perceive their financial security in the event of illness? – A panel data analysis for Germany. Value Health 2012, 15(5):743-749.
• [48]Green C, Gerard : Exploring the social value of health-care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. Health Econ 2009, 18(8):951-976.
• [49]Diederich A, Schreier M: Einstellung zu Priorisierung in der medizinischen Versorgung: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsbefragung [Attitude toward prioritization in medical care: results of a representative population survey]. FOR 655 Working Paper 2010, 27. http://www.priorisierung-in-der-medizin.de/documents/FOR655_Nr27_Diederich_Schreier.pdf webcite
• [50]Boes S, Winkelmann R: Ordered Response Models. In Modern Econometric Analysis: Surveys on Recent Developments. Edited by Hübler O, Frohn F. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2006:167-182.