Population attitudes towards research use of health care registries: a population-based survey in Finland

BMC Medical Ethics

Anssi Auvinen¹  Katariina Eloranta¹ 

[1] School of Health Sciences, FI-33014 University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

关键词: Research ethics;    Privacy;    Personal health records;    Medical records;    Informed consent;   

Others  :  1221115
DOI  :  10.1186/s12910-015-0040-x

 received in 2014-11-27, accepted in 2015-07-06,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Register-based research can provide important and valuable contributions to public health research, but involves ethical issues concerning the balance of public health benefits and individual autonomy. This study aimed to describe the opinions of the Finnish public about these issues.

Methods

Mail survey questionnaire sent to a random sample of 1000 Finns.

Results

Participation proportion was 42 %, with 258 women and 160 men. The majority of the participants (61 %) were willing to provide their identifiable health information for research. Almost half of the participants (48 %) would, nevertheless, like to be informed when their information is used. A third (30 %) indicated no need for informed consent in register-based research, a similar proportion felt it should be obtained for every study, and 40 % thought it necessary in some situations, such as studies addressing a sensitive study topic. As for the best policy for obtaining consent, the majority (86 %) favoured broader consent methods: one consent covering a certain register or a research topic. Half of the participants (55 %) desired a required ethical evaluation from register-based research addressing a sensitive issue. Privacy protection was the most common concern for register-based research. More than half of the participants were either content with the current Finnish laws concerning register-based research or wanted to liberalize them to advance research.

Conclusions

The Finnish public is supportive of register-based research, but the requirement for informed consent divides opinions and many would at least like to be informed of the research use of their information.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Eloranta and Auvinen.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Gliklich R, Dreyer R, Leavy M, editors. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide. 3rd ed. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2014. Publication No. 13(14)-EHC111. http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/registries-guide-3.cfm. Accessed 1 Apr 2015.
• [2]Rosén M, Hakulinen T. Use of Disease Registers. In: Handbook of epidemiology. Wolfgang A, Pigeot I, editors. Springer, Berlin; 2005: p.231-47.
• [3]Sorensen HT. Regional administrative health registries as a resource in clinical epidemiology: A study of options, strengths, limitations and data quality provided with examples of use. Int J Risk Saf Med. 1997; 10(1):1-22.
• [4]Thygesen LC, Ersboll AK. When the entire population is the sample: strengths and limitations in register-based epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014; 29(8):551-8.
• [5]Rosen M. Data needs in studies on equity in health and access to care--ethical considerations. Acta Oncol. 1999; 38(1):71-5.
• [6]Ludvigsson JF, Otterblad-Olausson P, Pettersson BU, Ekbom A. The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009; 24(11):659-67.
• [7]Olsen J. Register-based research: some methodological considerations. Scand J Public Health. 2011; 39(3):225-9.
• [8]Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. Oxford University Press, New York; 2001.
• [9]Coughlin SS. Ethical issues in epidemiologic research and public health practice. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006; 3:16. BioMed Central Full Text
• [10]Gostin LO. Health information: reconciling personal privacy with the public good of human health. Health Care Anal. 2001; 9(3):321-35.
• [11]Fairchild AL, Johns DM. Beyond bioethics: reckoning with the public health paradigm. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(8):1447-50.
• [12]Coughlin SS, Beauchamp TL, Weed DL. Ethics and epidemiology. 2nd. ed. New York: Oxford University Press; cop. 2009.
• [13]Coughlin SS. Ethics in epidemiology at the end of the 20th century: ethics, values, and mission statements. Epidemiol Rev. 2000; 22(1):169-75.
• [14]Regidor E. The use of personal data from medical records and biological materials: ethical perspectives and the basis for legal restrictions in health research. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59(9):1975-84.
• [15]Thurston WE, Burgess MM, Adair CE. Commentary: ethical issues in the use of computerized databases for epidemiologic and other health research. Chronic Dis Can. 1999; 20(3):127-31.
• [16]Etzioni A. On a communitarian approach to bioethics. Theor Med Bioeth. 2011; 32(5):363-74.
• [17]Public Health Ethics: Key Concepts and Issues in Policy and Practice. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2011.
• [18]Horner JS. Research, ethics and privacy: the limits of knowledge. Public Health. 1998; 112(4):217-20.
• [19]Hill EM, Turner EL, Martin RM, Donovan JL. "Let's get the best quality research we can": public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: a systematic review and qualitative study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:72. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Childress JF, Faden RR, Gaare RD, Gostin LO, Kahn J, Bonnie RJ et al.. Public health ethics: mapping the terrain. J Law Med Ethics. 2002; 30(2):170-8.
• [21]Miller FG. Research on medical records without informed consent. J Law Med Ethics. 2008; 36(3):560-6.
• [22]Marshall PA, Rotimi C. Ethical Challenges in Community-Based Research. Am J Med Sci. 2001; 322(5):241-5.
• [23]Lehtonen LA. Government registries containing sensitive health data and the implementation of EU directive on the protection of personal data in Finland. Med Law. 2002; 21(3):419-25.
• [24]European Commision: Commision proposes a comprehensive reform of the data protection rules. 2013. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/newsroom/data-protection/news/120125_en.htm. Accessed 3 Dec 2013.
• [25]Andersen MR, Storm HH. Cancer registration, public health and the reform of the European data protection framework: Abandoning or improving European public health research? Eur J Cancer. 2015; 51(9):1028-38.
• [26]Fears R, Brand H, Frackowiak R, Pastoret PP, Souhami R, Thompson B. Data protection regulation and the promotion of health research: getting the balance right. QJM. 2014; 107(1):3-5.
• [27]Nyren O, Stenbeck M, Gronberg H. The European Parliament proposal for the new EU General Data Protection Regulation may severely restrict European epidemiological research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014; 29(4):227-30.
• [28]Di Iorio CT, Carinci F, Oderkirk J. Health research and systems´ governance are at risk: should the right to data protection override health? J Med Ethics 2013 05.12.2013;0:1–5. doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101603.
• [29]Clerkin P, Buckley BS, Murphy AW, MacFarlane AE. Patients' views about the use of their personal information from general practice medical records in health research: a qualitative study in Ireland. Fam Pract. 2013; 30(1):105-12.
• [30]Willison DJ, Schwartz L, Abelson J, Charles C, Swinton M, Northrup D et al.. Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: what is the opinion of the Canadian public? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007; 14(6):706-12.
• [31]King T, Brankovic L, Gillard P. Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases. Int J Med Inf. 2012; 81(4):279-89.
• [32]Robling MR, Hood K, Houston H, Pill R, Fay J, Evans HM. Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study. J Med Ethics. 2004; 30(1):104-9.
• [33]Asai A, Ohnishi M, Nishigaki E, Sekimoto M, Fukuhara S, Fukui T. Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: preliminary findings based on focus group interviews. BMC Med Ethics. 2002; 3:E1. BioMed Central Full Text
• [34]Barrett G, Cassell JA, Peacock JL, Coleman MP. National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer Registry. BMJ. 2006; 332(7549):1068-72.
• [35]Buckley BS, Murphy AW, MacFarlane AE. Public attitudes to the use in research of personal health information from general practitioners' records: a survey of the Irish general public. J Med Ethics. 2011; 37(1):50-5.
• [36]Molster C, Bower C, O'Leary P. Community attitudes to the collection and use of identifiable data for health research--is it an invasion of privacy? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007; 31(4):313-7.
• [37]Page SA, Mitchell I. Patients' opinions on privacy, consent and the disclosure of health information for medical research. Chronic Dis Can. 2006; 27(2):60-7.
• [38]Bak H. Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the "Deficit Model" of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Soc Sci Q. 2001; 82(4):779-95.
• [39]Official Statistics of Finland (OSF): Educational structure of population. ISSN = 2242-2919. Appendix table 1. Population aged 15 or over by level of education and gender 2012 . Helsinki: Statistics Finland. 2013. http://www.stat.fi/til/vkour/2012/vkour_2012_2013-12-04_tau_001_en.html. Accessed 4 Dec 2013.
• [40]Official Statistics of Finland (OSF): Population structure.ISSN = 1797-5395. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. 2013. http://www.tilastokeskus.fi/til/vaerak/index_en.html. Accessed 2 Mar 2014.