期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Mothers’ perspectives on the perinatal loss of a co-twin: a qualitative study
Judith Rankin3  Claire Campbell2  Nicholas D Embleton2  Ruth Graham1  Judy Richards3 
[1] School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England NE1 7RU, UK;Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Neonatal Service, Newcastle upon Tyne, England NE2 4AE, UK;Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, England NE2 4AE, UK
关键词: Trauma;    Grief;    Twins;    Multiple pregnancy;    Bereavement;   
Others  :  1219962
DOI  :  10.1186/s12884-015-0579-z
 received in 2014-10-24, accepted in 2015-05-28,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

There is a growing body of literature exploring the emotional impact of perinatal loss upon parents but only limited research focussing specifically on the views and experiences of parents who have experienced a loss from a twin or higher order pregnancy. We undertook a qualitative study to provide an in-depth understanding of the experiences of mothers who have had a loss from a twin pregnancy and subsequently continued visiting hospital whilst their surviving twin was cared for.

Methods

A qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews. Mothers were recruited from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Fetal Medicine department. Fourteen interviews were carried out with mothers who had experienced a loss in pregnancy or the neonatal period and had a surviving twin on the neonatal unit. Data were analysed using a generative thematic approach.

Results

The analysis identified three key themes in the accounts mothers gave of their experiences: the status of ‘special’; the importance of trust; and control and empowerment. Where the surviving co-twin remained in hospital for many weeks, mothers described the emotional support of health professionals as crucial to their wellbeing. Few mothers sought formal bereavement support, instead they kept their grief ‘on hold’ in order to support their surviving baby. Due to the trauma of their loss, mothers reflected that they had been unable to make informed decisions, in particular in relation to the funeral of their deceased baby.

Conclusions

Our study highlighted that there are a specific set of issues for mothers who have lost a baby from a twin pregnancy. Relatively small changes to practice however, made a significant difference to wellbeing during their time in hospital with a surviving twin. Findings from this research will provide insight into the needs of bereaved mothers, will inform healthcare planning and the development of care packages.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Richards et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150720024152703.pdf 454KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Beemsterboer S, Homburg R, Gorter NA, Schats R, Hompes P, Lambalk C. The paradox of declining fertility but increasing twinning rates with advance maternal Age. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21:1531-2.
  • [2]Russell RB, Petrini JR, Damus K, Mattison DR, Schwartz RH. The changing epidemiology of multiple births in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101:129-35.
  • [3]Reynolds M, Schieve L, Martin J, Jeng G, Macaluso M. Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, united states, 1997–2000. Pediatrics. 2003; 11:1169-1162.
  • [4]Tandberg A, Bjørge T, Nygård O, Børdahl PE, Skjaerven R. Trends in incidence and mortality for triplets in Norway 1967–2006: the influence of assisted reproductive technologies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010; 117:667-75.
  • [5]Keith LG, Papiernik E, Keith DM, Luke B. Multiple pregnancy: epidemiology, gestation, and perinatal outcome. Parthenon Publishing Group, Carnforth; 1995.
  • [6]Glinianaia SV, Obeysekera MA, Sturgis S, Bell R. Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in monochromic and dichorionic twins: a population based study. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26:2549-57.
  • [7]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Multiple pregnancy: The management of twin and triplet pregnancies in the antenatal period. http://www. nice.org.uk/guidance/cg129 webcite
  • [8]Hughes P, Riches S. Psychological aspects of perinatal loss. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 15:107-11.
  • [9]Hutti M. Social and professional support needs of families after perinatal loss. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2005; 34:630-8.
  • [10]Gold KJ, Dalton VK, Shwenk TL. Hospital care for parents after perinatal death. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109:1156-66.
  • [11]Einaudi MA, Le Coz P, Malzac P, Michel F, D’Ercole C, Gire C. Parental experience following perinatal death: exploring the issues to make progress. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010; 151:143-8.
  • [12]Flenady V, Wilson T. Support for mothers, fathers and families after perinatal death. Cochrane review. Wiley and Sons, Sussex; 2011.
  • [13]Mills TA, Ricklesford C, Cooke A, Heazell AEP, Whitworth M, Lavender T. Parent’s experiences and expectations of care in pregnancy after stillbirth or neonatal death: a metasynthesis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014; 121:943-50.
  • [14]Henley A, Schott J. The death of a baby before, during, or shortly after birth. Good practice from the parents’ perspectives. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008; 13:325-8.
  • [15]Lewis M: Better care, better lives. Improving outcomes for children, young people and their families living with life limiting and life threatening conditions. http://www. dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_083108.pdf webcite
  • [16]Redshaw M, Rowe R, Henderson J. Listening to parents after stillbirth or the loss of their baby after birth. National perinatal epidemiology unit. Oxford University, Oxford; 2014.
  • [17]McGrath JM. Supporting parents Who lose a child of a multiple birth: a critical review of research in the neonatal intensive care unit. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2011; 4:204-13.
  • [18]Lee KE. Critical review of the literature: Parental grief after the loss of a multiple. J Neonate Nurs. 2012; 18:226-31.
  • [19]De Kleine M, Cuisinier M, Kollee L, Bethlehem G, De Graauw K. Guidance after twin and singleton neonatal death. Arch Dis Child. 1995; 36:125-6.
  • [20]Bryan E. The death of a new-born twin: how can support for parents be improved? Acta Genet Stat Med. 1986; 35:115-8.
  • [21]Bryan EM. The Death of a twin. Palliat Med. 1995; 9:187-92.
  • [22]Lewis E, Bryan EM. Management of perinatal loss of a twin. BMJ. 1988; 19:1321-3.
  • [23]Wallbank S, Robertson N. Midwife and nurse responses to miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death: A critical review of qualitative research. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2008; 6:100-6.
  • [24]Attia L, Nolan A. Caring for parents following the death of a twin: A student’s experience. Br J Midwifery. 2011; 19:665-9.
  • [25]Pector EA. Views of bereaved multiple-birth parents on life support decisions, the dying process and discussions surrounding death. J Perinatol. 2004; 24:4-10.
  • [26]Swanson PB, Kane RT, Pearsall-Jones JG, Swanson CF, Croft ML. How couples cope with a death of a twin or higher order multiple. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2009; 12:392-402.
  • [27]Parkes CM. Bereavement. Brit J of Psychiat. 1985; 146:11-7.
  • [28]Pector EA, Smith-Levitin M. Mourning and psychological issues in multiple birth loss. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002; 2002(7):247-56.
  • [29]Cuisinier M, DeKleine M, Kollee L, Bethlehem G, DeGraauw C. Grief following the loss of a newborn twin compared to a singleton. Acta Paediatr. 1996; 85:339-43.
  • [30]Wilson AL, Fenton LJ, Stevens DC, Soule DJ. The death of a newborn twin: an analysis of parental bereavement. Pediatrics. 1982; 70:587-91.
  • [31]Bryan EM. Loss in higher multiple pregnancy and multifetal pregnancy reduction. Twin Res. 2002; 5(3):169-74.
  • [32]Glaser B, Strauss L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago; 1967.
  • [33]Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative Research in Health Care. Blackwell Publications, Oxford; 2006.
  • [34]Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res in Psych. 2006; 3:77-101.
  • [35]Ely M, Vinz R, Downing M, Anzul M. On writing qualitative research: living by words. Routledge Falmer, London; 1997.
  • [36]Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. dth ed. Sage Publication, London; 2006.
  • [37]Phillips S. Labouring the emotions: expanding the remit of nursing work? J Adv Nurs. 1996; 24:139-43.
  • [38]Mitchell D, Smith P. Learning from the past: emotional labour and learning disability nursing. J Learn Disabil. 2003; 7:109-17.
  • [39]Mc Queen A. Emotional intelligence in nursing work. J Adv Nurs. 2004; 49:101-8.
  • [40]Henderson A. Emotional labour and nursing: an under-appreciated aspect of caring work. Nurs Inq. 2001; 8:130-8.
  • [41]Bolton SC. Changing faces: nurses as emotional jugglers. Sociol Health Ill. 2001; 23:85-100.
  • [42]Rando T. The increasing prevalence of complicated mourning: the onslaught is just beginning. Omega-J Death Dying. 1992; 26:43-59.
  • [43]Parkes CM. Bereavement and mental illness. Brit J Med Psych. 1965; 38:13-26.
  • [44]The Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Perinatal Mortality, 2009 (Second Edition). http://www. stillbirthalliance.org.au/doc/Section_1_Version_2.2_April_2009.pdf webcite
  • [45]Kollanti J. The context and long-term impacts of multiple birth loss: a peer support network perspective. Twin Res. 2002; 5:165-8.
  • [46]Cuff J. Personal experiences of bereaved twins, parents of twins and their carers. Twin Res. 2002; 5:236-44.
  • [47]Latour B, Woolgar S. Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts. Sage, London; 1979.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:9次 浏览次数:33次