Practice of percutaneous needle autopsy; a descriptive study reporting experiences from Uganda

BMC Clinical Pathology

Robert Colebunders²  Yukari C Manabe⁶  Asafu Munema¹  Ann M Nelson⁷  Eric Van Marck³  Koen Van de Vijver⁸  Sam Kalungi⁵  Robert L Lukande¹  Janneke A Cox⁴ 

[1] Department of Pathology, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda;Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium;Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium;Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda;Department of Pathology, Mulago Hospital Complex, Kampala, Uganda;Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland;Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, USA;Department of Diagnostic Oncology & Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

关键词: Sub Saharan Africa;    Uganda;    Post mortem;    Tru-cut biopsy;    Ultra-sound guided biopsy;    Needle biopsy;    Minimal invasive autopsy;    Partial autopsy;    Needle autopsy;   

Others  :  1084443
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6890-14-44

 received in 2014-07-05, accepted in 2014-11-24,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Percutaneous needle autopsy can overcome a number of barriers that limit the use of complete autopsies. We performed blind-and ultrasound guided needle autopsies in HIV-infected adults in Uganda. In this study we describe in detail the methods we used, the ability of both procedures to obtain sufficient tissue for further examination and the learning curve of the operators over time.

Methods

If written informed consent was granted from the next of kin, we first performed a blind needle autopsy, puncturing brain, heart, lungs, liver, spleen and kidneys using predefined surface marking points. We then performed an ultrasound guided needle autopsy puncturing heart, liver, spleen and kidneys. The number of attempts, expected success and duration of the procedure were noted. A pathologist read the slides and indicated if the target tissue was present and of sufficient quality for pathological review. We report the predicted and true success rates, compare the yield of blind to ultrasound guided needle biopsies and evaluate the failure rate over time.

Results

Two operators performed 96 blind needle autopsies and 95 ultrasound guided needle autopsies. For blind needle biopsies true success rates varied from 56-99% and predicted success rates from 89-99%. For ultrasound guided needle biopsies true success rates varied from 72-100% and predicted success rates from 84-98%. Ultrasound guidance led to a significantly higher success rate in heart and left kidney. A learning curve was observed over time with decreasing failure rates with increasing experience and a shorter duration of the needle autopsy.

Conclusion

Needle autopsy can successfully obtain tissue for further pathological review in the vast majority of cases, with a decrease in failure rate with increasing experience of the operator. The benefit of ultrasound guidance will depend on the population, the disease and organ of interest and the local circumstances. Our results justify further evaluation of needle autopsies as a method to establish a cause of death.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Cox et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Terry R: Needle necropsy. J Clin Pathol 1955, 8(1):38-41.
• [2]Wellmann K: The needle autopsy: a retrospective evaluation of 394 consecutive cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1969, 52(4):441-444.
• [3]Guerra I, Ortiz E, Portu J, Atares B, Aldamiz-Etxebarria M, De Pablos M: Value of limited necropsy in HIV-positive patients. Pathol Res Pract 2001, 197(3):165-168.
• [4]Foroudi F, Cheung K, Duflou J: A comparison of the needle biopsy post mortem with the conventional autopsy. Pathology 1995, 27(1):79-82.
• [5]Baumgart KW, Cook M, Quin J, Painter D, Gatenby PA, Garsia RJ: The limited (needle biopsy) autopsy and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Pathology 1994, 26(2):141-143.
• [6]Huston BM, Malouf NN, Azar HA: Percutaneous needle autopsy sampling. Mod Pathol 1996, 9(12):1101-1107.
• [7]Flemming JA, Hurlbut DJ, Mussari B, Hookey LC: Liver biopsies for chronic hepatitis C: should nonultrasound-guided biopsies be abandoned? Can J Gastroenterol 2009, 23(6):425-430.
• [8]Maya ID, Maddela P, Barker J, Allon M: Percutaneous renal biopsy: comparison of blind and real-time ultrasound-guided technique. Semin Dial 2007, 20(4):355-358.
• [9]Sperandeo M, Rotondo A, Guglielmi G, Catalano D, Feragalli B, Trovato GM: Transthoracic ultrasound in the assessment of pleural and pulmonary diseases: use and limitations. Radiol Med 2014, 119(10):729-740.
• [10]Wong EB, Omar T, Setlhako GJ, Osih R, Feldman C, Murdoch DM, Martinson NA, Bangsberg DR, Venter WD: Causes of death on antiretroviral therapy: a post-mortem study from South Africa. PLoS One 2012, 7(10):e47542.
• [11]Cox JA, Lukande RL, Kalungi S, Van Marck E, Van de Vijver K, Kambugu A, Nelson AM, Manabe YC, Colebunders R: Needle autopsy to establish the cause of death in HIV-infected hospitalized adults in Uganda: a comparison to complete autopsy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2014, 67(2):169-176.