Diagnostic accuracy of WHO verbal autopsy tool for ascertaining causes of neonatal deaths in the urban setting of Pakistan: a hospital-based prospective study

BMC Pediatrics

Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta³  Rajiv Bhal⁴  Imran Ahmed²  Zaid Bhatti²  Zamir Suhag²  Kamran Sadiq²  Atif Habib²  Gul Nawaz Khan²  Ali Turab²  Ubaidullah Khan¹  Shabina Ariff²  Sajid Bashir Soofi² 

[1] Department of Pediatrics, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan;Department of Pediatrics & Center of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan;Center for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada;Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

关键词: Specificity;    Sensitivity;    diagnostic accuracy;    Causes;    Neonatal Death;    Verbal Autopsy;   

Others  :  1231042
DOI  :  10.1186/s12887-015-0450-4

 received in 2015-03-04, accepted in 2015-09-14,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Globally, clinical certification of the cause of neonatal death is not commonly available in developing countries. Under such circumstances it is imperative to use available WHO verbal autopsy tool to ascertain causes of death for strategic health planning in countries where resources are limited and the burden of neonatal death is high. The study explores the diagnostic accuracy of WHO revised verbal autopsy tool for ascertaining the causes of neonatal deaths against reference standard diagnosis obtained from standardized clinical and supportive hospital data.

Methods

All neonatal deaths were recruited between August 2006 –February 2008 from two tertiary teaching hospitals in Province Sindh, Pakistan. The reference standard cause of death was established by two senior pediatricians within 2 days of occurrence of death using the International Cause of Death coding system. For verbal autopsy, trained female community health worker interviewed mother or care taker of the deceased within 2–6 weeks of death using a modified WHO verbal autopsy tool. Cause of death was assigned by 2 trained pediatricians. The performance was assessed in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

Results

Out of 626 neonatal deaths, cause-specific mortality fractions for neonatal deaths were almost similar in both verbal autopsy and reference standard diagnosis. Sensitivity of verbal autopsy was more than 93 % for diagnosing prematurity and 83.5 % for birth asphyxia. However the verbal autopsy didn’t have acceptable accuracy for diagnosing the congenital malformation 57 %. The specificity for all five major causes of neonatal deaths was greater than 90 %.

Conclusion

The WHO revised verbal autopsy tool had reasonable validity in determining causes of neonatal deaths. The tool can be used in resource limited community-based settings where neonatal mortality rate is high and death certificates from hospitals are not available.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Soofi et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]UNICEF, WHO, World Bank, UN Population Division: Levels and trends in child mortality report 2014: estimates developed by the Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. http://www. unicef.org/media/files/Levels_and_Trends_in_Child_Mortality_2014.pdf webcite
• [2]Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee AC, Waiswa P, Lalli M, Bhutta Z, Barros AJ, Christian P, Mathers C, Cousens SN. Every newborn. Progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014; 384(9938):189-205.
• [3]Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2012–13. NIPS and ICF International, Islamabad, Pakistan, and Calverton, Maryland, USA; 2013.
• [4]Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn JE, Rudan I, Campbell H, Cibulskis R, Li M, Mathers C, Black RE. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012; 379:2151-61.
• [5]Baqui AH, Darmstadt GL, Williams EK, Kumar V, Kiran TU, Panwar D, Srivastava VK et al.. Rates, timing and causes of neonatal deaths in rural India: implications for neonatal health programmes. Bull World Health Organ. 2006; 84(9):706-13.
• [6]Anker M, Black RE, Coldham C, Kalter HD, Quigley MA, Ross D, et al. A Standard Verbal Autopsy Method for Investigating Causes of Death in Infants and Children. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1999. Report No.: WHO/CDS/CSR/ISR/99.4.
• [7]Kalter HD, Gray RH, Black RE, Gultiano SA. Validation of postmortem interviews to ascertain selected causes of death in children. Int J Epidemiol. 1990; 19(2):380-6.
• [8]Quigley MA, Armstrong Schellenberg JR, Snow RW. Algorithms for verbal autopsies: a validation study in Kenyan children. Bull World Health Organ. 1996; 74(2):147-54.
• [9]Snow RW, Armstrong JR, Forster D, Winstanley MT, Marsh VM, Newton CR et al.. Childhood deaths in Africa: uses and limitations of verbal autopsies. Lancet. 1992; 340(8815):351-5.
• [10]Coldham C, Ross D, Quigley M, Segura Z, Chandramohan D. Prospective validation of a standardized questionnaire for estimating childhood mortality and morbidity due to pneumonia and diarrhoea. Trop Med Int Health. 2000; 5(2):134-44.
• [11]Kalter HD, Hossain M, Burnham G, Khan NZ, Saha SK, Ali MA et al.. Validation of caregiver interviews to diagnose common causes of severe neonatal illness. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1999; 13(1):99-113.
• [12]Marsh DR, Sadruddin S, Fikree FF, Krishnan C, Darmstadt GL. Validation of verbal autopsy to determine the cause of 137 neonatal deaths in Karachi, Pakistan. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003; 17(2):132-42.
• [13]Verbal autopsy standards: ascertaining and attributing cause of death. WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland; 2012.
• [14]Aggarwal AK, Kumar P, Pandit S, Kumar R. Accuracy of WHO verbal autopsy tool in determining major causes of neonatal deaths in India. PLoS One. 2013; 8(1):e54865.
• [15]International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. 2nd[10th revision]. WHO, Geneva; 2005.
• [16]Khanal S, Gc VS, Dawson P, Houston R. Verbal autopsy to ascertain causes of neonatal deaths in a community setting: a study from Morang, Nepal. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2011; 51(181):21-7.
• [17]Quigley MA, Chandramohan D, Rodrigues LC. Diagnostic accuracy of physician review, expert algorithms and data-derived algorithms in adult verbal autopsies. Int J Epidemiol. 1999; 28(6):1081-7.
• [18]Engmann C, Garces A, Jehan I, Ditekemena J, Phiri M. Causes of community stillbirths and early neonatal deaths in low-income countries using verbal autopsy: an International, Multicenter Study. J Perinatol. 2012; 32(8):585-92.
• [19]Prabhat J, Vendhan G, Prakash C, Rajesh K, Prem M, Neeraj Dhingra, et al. Prospective study of one million deaths in India. Rationale, design and validation results. PLoS Med. 2005;3(2):e18. Epub.
• [20]Yang G, Hu J, Rao KQ, Ma J, Rao C, Lopez AD et al.. Mortality Registration and surveillance in China; History, current situation and challenges. Popul Health Metr. 2005; 3(1):3. BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Freeman JV, Christian P, Khatry SK, Adhikari RK, LeClerq SC, Katz J, Darmstadt GL. Evaluation of neonatal verbal autopsy using physician review versus algorithm-based cause-of-death assignment in rural Nepal. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2005; 19(4):323-31.
• [22]Chandramohan D, Maude GH, Rodrigues LC, Hayes RJ. Verbal autopsies for adult deaths: their development and validation in a multicentre study. Trop Med Int Health. 1998; 3(6):436-46.
• [23]Mobley CC, Boerma JT, Titus S, Lohrke B, Shangula K, Black RE. Validation study of a verbal autopsy method for causes of childhood mortality in Namibia. J Trop Pediatr. 1996; 42(6):365-9.
• [24]Kahn K, Tollman SM, Garenne M, Gear JS. Validation and application of verbal autopsies in a rural area of south Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2005; 5:824-31.
• [25]Winbo IG, Serenius FH, Dahlquist GG, Källén BA. NICE, a new cause of death classification for still births and neonatal deaths. Neonatal and intrauterine death classification according to etiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1998; 27:499-504.