期刊论文详细信息
BMC Psychiatry
Changed processing of visual sexual stimuli under GnRH-therapy – a single case study in pedophilia using eye tracking and fMRI
Jürgen L Müller1  Peter Dechent3  Helge Laubinger1  Peter Fromberger2  Kirsten Jordan2 
[1]Asklepios Forensic Psychiatric Hospital of Göttingen, Rosdorfer Weg 70, Göttingen 37081, Germany
[2]Department of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Rosdorfer Weg 70, Göttingen 37081, Germany
[3]Department of Cognitive Neurology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Robert-Koch-St. 40, Göttingen 37075, Germany
关键词: Antiandrogen therapy (ADT);    Subliminal;    Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI);    Eye movements;    Pedophilia;   
Others  :  1123583
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-244X-14-142
 received in 2013-05-17, accepted in 2014-04-30,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Antiandrogen therapy (ADT) has been used for 30 years to treat pedophilic patients. The aim of the treatment is a reduction in sexual drive and, in consequence, a reduced risk of recidivism. Yet the therapeutic success of antiandrogens is uncertain especially regarding recidivism. Meta-analyses and reviews report only moderate and often mutually inconsistent effects.

Case presentation

Based on the case of a 47 year old exclusively pedophilic forensic inpatient, we examined the effectiveness of a new eye tracking method and a new functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-design in regard to the evaluation of ADT in pedophiles. We analyzed the potential of these methods in exploring the impact of ADT on automatic and controlled attentional processes in pedophiles. Eye tracking and fMRI measures were conducted before the initial ADT as well as four months after the onset of ADT. The patient simultaneously viewed an image of a child and an image of an adult while eye movements were measured. During the fMRI-measure the same stimuli were presented subliminally.

Eye movements demonstrated that controlled attentional processes change under ADT, whereas automatic processes remained mostly unchanged. We assume that these results reflect either the increased ability of the patient to control his eye movements while viewing prepubertal stimuli or his better ability to manipulate his answer in a socially desirable manner. Unchanged automatic attentional processes could reflect the stable pedophilic preference of the patient. Using fMRI, the subliminal presentation of sexually relevant stimuli led to changed activation patterns under the influence of ADT in occipital and parietal brain regions, the hippocampus, and also in the orbitofrontal cortex. We suggest that even at an unconscious level ADT can lead to changed processing of sexually relevant stimuli, reflecting changes of cognitive and perceptive automatic processes.

Conclusion

We are convinced that our experimental designs using eye tracking and fMRI could prospectively add additional and valuable information in the evaluation of ADT in paraphilic patients and sex offenders. But with respect to the limited significance of this single case study, these first results are preliminary and further studies have to be conducted with healthy subjects and patients.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Jordan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150328175750607.pdf 1417KB PDF download
Figure 5. 70KB Image download
Figure 4. 87KB Image download
Figure 3. 39KB Image download
Figure 2. 58KB Image download
Figure 1. 53KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]American Psychiatric Association: DSM-IV-TR: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington D.C: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2000.
  • [2]Briken P, Kafka MP: Pharmacological treatments for paraphilic patients and sexual offenders. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2007, 20:609-613.
  • [3]Jordan K, Fromberger P, Stolpmann G, Muller JL: The role of testosterone in sexuality and paraphilia-a neurobiological approach. Part I: testosterone and sexuality. J Sex Med 2011, 8:2993-3007.
  • [4]Jordan K, Fromberger P, Stolpmann G, Muller JL: The Role of Testosterone in Sexuality and Paraphilia-A Neurobiological Approach. Part II: Testosterone and Paraphilia. J Sex Med 2011, 8:3008-3029.
  • [5]Briken P, Hill A, Berner W: Pharmacotherapy of paraphilias with long-acting agonists of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: a systematic review. J Clin Psychiatry 2003, 64:890-897.
  • [6]Eher R, Gnoth A, Birklbauer A, Pfäfflin F: Antiandrogene Medikation zur Senkung der Rückfälligkeit von Sexualstraftätern: ein kritischer Überblick. Recht Psychiatr 2007, 25:103-111.
  • [7]Guay DRP: Drug treatment of paraphilic and nonparaphilic sexual disorders. Clin Ther 2009, 31:1-31.
  • [8]Lösel F, Schmucker M: The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: a comprehensive meta-analysis. J Exp Criminol 2005, 1:117-146.
  • [9]Thibaut F, Barra FDL, Gordon H, Cosyns P, Bradford JMW: The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the biological treatment of paraphilias. World J Biol Psychiatry 2010, 11:604-655.
  • [10]Bancroft J, Tennent G, Loucas K, Cass J: The control of deviant sexual behaviour by drugs. I. Behavioural changes following oestrogens and anti-androgens. Br J Psychiatry 1974, 125:310-315.
  • [11]Bradford JM, Pawlak A: Double-blind placebo crossover study of cyproterone acetate in the treatment of the paraphilias. Arch Sex Behav 1993, 22:383-402.
  • [12]Cooper AJ: A placebo-controlled trial of the antiandrogen cyproterone acetate in deviant hypersexuality. Compr Psychiatry 1981, 22:458-465.
  • [13]Cooper AJ, Cernovovsky Z: The effect of cyproterone actetate on sleeping and waking penile erections in pedophiles: Possible implications for treatment. Can J Psychiatry 1992, 37:33-39.
  • [14]Cooper AJ, Sandhu S, Losztyn S, Cernovsky Z: A double-blind placebo controlled trial of medroxyprogesterone acetate and cyproterone acetate with seven pedophiles. Can J Psychiatry 1992, 37:687-693.
  • [15]Hucker S, Langevin R, Bain J: A double blind trial of sex drive reducing medication in pedophiles. Sex Abuse 1988, 1:227-242.
  • [16]Kiersch TA: Treatment of sex offenders with Depo-Provera. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1990, 18:179-187.
  • [17]McConaghy N, Blaszczynski A, Kidson W: Treatment of sex offenders with imaginal desensitization and/or medroxyprogesterone. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1988, 77:199-206.
  • [18]Murray MA, Anderson DC, Bancroft JHJ, Tennant TG, Carr PJ: Sex-hormone-binding globulin, luteinizing hormone and testosterone in man: effects of oestrogen and cyproterone acetate. Proceedings of the Society for Endocrinology 1973, xxi-xxii.
  • [19]Schober JM, Kuhn PJ, Kovacs PG, Earle JH, Byrne PM, Fries RA: Leuprolide acetate suppresses pedophilic urges and arousability. Arch Sex Behav 2005, 34:691-705.
  • [20]Wincze JP, Bansal S, Malamud M: Effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate on subjective arousal, arousal to erotic stimulation, and nocturnal penile tumescence in male sex offenders. Arch Sex Behav 1986, 15:293-305.
  • [21]O'Donohue W, Regev LG, Hagstrom A: Problems with the DSM-IV diagnosis of pedophilia. Sex Abuse 2000, 12:95-105.
  • [22]Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE: The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005, 73:1154-1163.
  • [23]Blanchard R, Klassen P, Dickey R, Kuban ME, Blak T: Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychol Assess 2001, 13:118-126.
  • [24]Freund K, Blanchard R: Phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989, 57:100-105.
  • [25]Freund K, Watson RJ: Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of a phallometric test: An update of phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. Psychol Assess 1991, 3:254-260.
  • [26]Marshall WL: Phallometric assessments of sexual interests: an update. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2014, 16:428.
  • [27]Thornton D, Laws DR: Cognitive Approaches to the Assessment of Sexual Interest in Sexual Offenders. Wiley-Blackwell: West Sussex, Oxford, Malden; 2009.
  • [28]Gray NS, Snowden RJ: The implicit association test as a measure of sexual interest. In Cognitive Approaches to the Assessment of Sexual Interest in Sexual Offenders. Edited by Thornton D, Laws DR. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:101-123. [Hollin CR, McMurran M (Series Editor): Wiley Series in Clinical Forensic Psychology]
  • [29]Glasgow DV: Affinity: The development of a self-report assessment of paedophile sexual interest incorporating a viewing time validity measure. In Cognitive Approaches to the Assessment of Sexual Interest in Sexual Offenders. Edited by Thornton D, Laws DR, Thornton D, Laws DR. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:59-84. [Hollin CR, McMurran M (Series Editor): Wiley Series in Clinical Forensic Psychology]
  • [30]Sachsenmaier SJ, Gress CLZ: The abel assessment for sexual interests - 2: a critical review. In Cognitive Approaches to the Assessment of Sexual Interest in Sexual Offenders. Edited by Thornton D, Laws DR. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:31-57. [Hollin CR, McMurran M (Series Editor): Wiley Series in Clinical Forensic Psychology]
  • [31]Mokros A, Dombert B, Osterheider M, Zappala A, Santtila P: Assessment of pedophilic sexual interest with an attentional choice reaction time task. Arch Sex Behav 2010, 39:1081-1090.
  • [32]Flak VE, Beech AR, Humphreys GW: The rapid serial visual presentation test of sexual interest in child molesters. In Cognitive Approaches to the Assessment of Sexual Interest in Sexual Offenders. Edited by Thornton D, Laws DR. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:145-158. [Hollin CR, McMurran M (Series Editor): Wiley Series in Clinical Forensic Psychology]
  • [33]Smith P, Waterman M: Processing bias for sexual material: the emotional stroop and sexual offenders. Sex Abuse 2004, 16:163-171.
  • [34]Fromberger P, Jordan K, von Herder J, Steinkrauss H, Nemetschek R, Stolpmann G, Müller JL: Initial orienting towards sexually relevant stimuli: Preliminary evidence from eye movement measures. Arch Sex Behav 2012, 41:919-928.
  • [35]Spiering M, Everaerd W: The sexual unconscious. In The Psychophysiology of Sex. Edited by Janssen E. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press; 2007:166-183.
  • [36]Fromberger P, Jordan K, Steinkrauss H, von Herder J, Stolpmann G, Kroner-Herwig B, Muller JL: Eye movements in pedophiles: automatic and controlled attentional processes while viewing prepubescent stimuli. J Abnorm Psychol 2013, 122:587-599.
  • [37]Fromberger P, Jordan K, Steinkrauss H, von Herder J, Witzel J, Stolpmann G, Kroner-Herwig B, Muller JL: Diagnostic accuracy of eye movements in assessing pedophilia. J Sex Med 2012, 9:1868-1882.
  • [38]Stoléru S, Fonteille V, Cornélis C, Joyal C, Moulier V: Functional neuroimaging studies of sexual arousal and orgasm in healthy men and women: a review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012, 36:1481-1509.
  • [39]Stoléru S, Gregoire MC, Gerard D, Decety J, Lafarge E, Cinotti L, Lavenne F, Le Bars D, Vernet-Maury E, Rada H, Collet C, Mazoyer B, Forest MG, Magnin F, Spira A, Comar D: Neuroanatomical correlates of visually evoked sexual arousal in human males. Arch Sex Behav 1999, 28:1-21.
  • [40]Wiebking C, Northoff G: Neuroimaging in Pedophilia. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2013, 15:1-9.
  • [41]Dressing H, Obergriesser T, Tost H, Kaumeier S, Ruf M, Braus DF: Homosexuelle Pädophilie und funktionelle Netzwerke - eine fMRI-Fallstudie. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2001, 69:539-544.
  • [42]Cohen LJ, Nikiforov K, Gans S, Poznansky O, McGeoch P, Weaver C, King EG, Cullen K, Galynker I: Heterosexual male perpetrators of childhood sexual abuse: a preliminary neuropsychiatric model. Psychiatr Q 2002, 73:313-336.
  • [43]Wiebking C, Witzel J, Walter M, Gubka U, Northoff G: Vergleich der emotionalen und sexuellen Prozessierung zwischen Gesunden und Patienten mit einer Pädophilie- eine kombinierte Studie aus Neuropsychologie und fMRT. Forensische Psychiatrie Psychotherapie Werkstattschriften 2006, 13:79-93.
  • [44]Walter M, Witzel J, Wiebking C, Gubka U, Rotte M, Schiltz K, Bermpohl F, Tempelmann C, Bogerts B, Heinze HJ, Northoff G: Pedophilia is linked to reduced activation in hypothalamus and lateral prefrontal cortex during visual erotic stimulation. Biol Psychiatry 2007, 62:698-701.
  • [45]Sartorius A, Ruf M, Kief C, Demirakca T, Bailer J, Ende G, Henn FA, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Dressing H: Abnormal amygdala activation profile in pedophilia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2008, 258:271-277.
  • [46]Schiffer B, Paul T, Gizewski E, Forsting M, Leygraf N, Schedlowski M, Kruger THC: Functional brain correlates of heterosexual paedophilia. Neuroimage 2008, 41:80-91.
  • [47]Schiffer B, Krueger T, Paul T, de Greiff A, Forsting M, Leygraf N, Schedlowski M, Gizewski E: Brain response to visual sexual stimuli in homosexual pedophiles. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2008, 33:23-33.
  • [48]Ponseti J, Granert O, Jansen O, Wolff S, Beier K, Neutze J, Deuschl G, Mehdorn H, Siebner H, Bosinski H: Assessment of pedophilia using hemodynamic brain response to sexual stimuli. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012, 69:187-194.
  • [49]Poeppl TB, Nitschke J, Dombert B, Santtila P, Greenlee MW, Osterheider M, Mokros A: Functional cortical and subcortical abnormalities in pedophilia: a combined study using a choice reaction time task and fMRI. J Sex Med 2011, 8:1660-1674.
  • [50]Habermeyer B, Esposito F, Handel N, Lemoine P, Klarhofer M, Mager R, Dittmann V, Seifritz E, Graf M: Immediate processing of erotic stimuli in paedophilia and controls: a case control study. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:88. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [51]Hull EM: Sex, drugs and gluttony: how the brain controls motivated behaviors. Physiol Behav 2011, 104:173-177.
  • [52]Pfaus JG: Pathways of sexual desire. J Sex Med 2009, 6:1506-1533.
  • [53]Schiffer B, Gizewski E, Kruger T: Reduced neuronal responsiveness to visual sexual stimuli in a pedophile treated with a long-acting LH-RH agonist. J Sex Med 2009, 6:892-894.
  • [54]Moulier V, Fonteille V, Pelegrini-Issac M, Cordier B, Baron-Laforet S, Boriasse E, Durand E, Stoleru S: A pilot study of the effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy on brain activation pattern in a man with pedophilia. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 2012, 56:50-60.
  • [55]Habermeyer B, Händel N, Lemoine P, Klarhöfer M, Seifritz E, Dittmann V, Graf M: LH-RH agonists modulate amygdala response to visual sexual stimulation: A single case fMRI study in pedophilia. Neurocase 2012, 18:489-495.
  • [56]Brooks SJ, Savov V, Allzén E, Benedict C, Fredriksson R, Schiöth HB: Exposure to subliminal arousing stimuli induces robust activation in the amygdala, hippocampus, anterior cingulate, insular cortex and primary visual cortex: a systematic meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Neuroimage 2012, 59:2962-2973.
  • [57]Janssen E, Everaerd W, Spiering M, Janssen J: Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: toward an information processing model of sexual arousal. J Sex Res 2000, 37:8-23.
  • [58]Spiering M, Everaerd W, Janssen E: Priming the sexual system: implicit versus explicit activation. J Sex Res 2003, 40:134-145.
  • [59]Gillath O, Mikulincer M, Birnbaum GE, Shaver PR: Does subliminal exposure to sexual stimuli have the same effects on Men and Women? J Sex Res 2007, 44:111-121.
  • [60]Childress AR, Ehrman RN, Wang Z, Li Y, Sciortino N, Hakun J, Jens W, Suh J, Listerud J, Marquez K, Franklin T, Langleben D, Detre J, O'Brien CP: Prelude to passion: limbic activation by “unseen” drug and sexual cues. PLoS One 2008, 3:e1506.
  • [61]Gillath O, Canterberry M: Neural correlates of exposure to subliminal and supraliminal sexual cues. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2012, 7:924-936.
  • [62]Oei NY, Rombouts SA, Soeter RP, van Gerven JM, Both S: Dopamine modulates reward system activity during subconscious processing of sexual stimuli. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012, 37:1729-1737.
  • [63]Hare RD: Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist. Multi-Health Systems: Toronto, ON, Canada; 2003.
  • [64]Mokros A, Hollerbach P, Vohs K, Nitschke J, Eher R, Habermeyer E: Normative data for the psychopathy checklist–revised in German-speaking countries: a meta-analysis. Crim Justice Behav 2013, 40:1397-1412.
  • [65]Wechsler D: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). London: Pearson; 1999.
  • [66]Kinsey AC, Pomeroy WR, Martin CE: Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1948.
  • [67]Seto MC, Harris GT, Rice ME, Barbaree HE: The screening scale for pedophilic interests predicts recidivism among adult sex offenders with child victims. Arch Sex Behav 2004, 33:455-466.
  • [68]Seto MC, Lalumiere ML: A brief screening scale to identify pedophilic interests among child molesters. Sex Abuse 2001, 13:15-25.
  • [69]Rambow J, Elsner K, Feelgood S, Hoyer J: Einstellungen zum Kindesmissbrauch. Z Sexualforsch 2008, 21:341-355.
  • [70]Müller-Isberner R, Cabeza SG, Eucker S: SVR-20 - Die Vorhersage sexueller Gewalt mit dem SVR20. Haina: Institut für Forensische Psychiatrie Haina; 2000.
  • [71]Pacific Psychological Assessment Corporation: The NRP (Not Real People) stimulus set for the assessment of sexual interest. Victoria, BC: Pacific Psychological Assessment Corporation; 2004.
  • [72]Mokros A, Butz M, Dombert B, Santtila P, Bäuml K-H, Osterheider M: Judgment of age and attractiveness in a paired comparison task: Testing a picture set developed for diagnosing paedophilia. Leg Criminol Psychol 2011, 16:323-334.
  • [73]Laws DR, Gress CLZ: Seeing things differently: the viewing time alternative to penile plethysmography. Leg Criminol Psychol 2004, 9:183-196.
  • [74]Tanner JM: Growing up. Sci Am 1973, 229:34-43.
  • [75]Lang PJ, Bradley MB, Cuthbert BN: International Affective Picture System, 2001. In NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida; 2001.
  • [76]Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H, Grefkes C, Fink GR, Amunts K, Zilles K: A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 2005, 25:1325-1335.
  • [77]Houts FW, Taller I, Tucker DE, Berlin FS: Androgen deprivation treatment of sexual behavior. In Adv Psychosom Med, Volume 31. Switzerland: Basel; 2011:149-163.
  • [78]Caseras X, Garner M, Bradley BP, Mogg K: Biases in visual orienting to negative and positive scenes in dysphoria: An eye movement study. J Abnorm Psychol 2007, 116:491-497.
  • [79]Gao X, Wang Q, Jackson T, Zhao G, Liang Y, Chen H: Biases in orienting and maintenance of attention among weight dissatisfied women: an eye-movement study. Behav Res Ther 2011, 49:252-259.
  • [80]Dew ITZ, Cabeza R: The porous boundaries between explicit and implicit memory: behavioral and neural evidence. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2011, 1224:174-190.
  • [81]Park K, Seo JJ, Kang HK, Ryu SB, Kim HJ, Jeong GW: A new potential of blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) functional MRI for evaluating cerebral centers of penile erection. Int J Impot Res 2001, 13:73-81.
  • [82]Leranth C, Prange-Kiel J, Frick KM, Horvath TL: Low CA1 spine synapse density is further reduced by castration in male non-human primates. Cereb Cortex 2004, 14:503-510.
  • [83]Schiltz K, Witzel J, Northoff G, Zierhut K, Gubka U, Fellmann H, Kaufmann J, Tempelmann C, Wiebking C, Bogerts B: Brain pathology in pedophilic offenders: evidence of volume reduction in the right amygdala and related diencephalic structures. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007, 64:737-746.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:20次 浏览次数:19次