Ants farm subterranean aphids mostly in single clone groups - an example of prudent husbandry for carbohydrates and proteins?

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Jacobus J Boomsma²  Franz J Weissing³  Ido Pen³  Daniel JC Kronauer¹  Aniek BF Ivens² 

[1] Laboratory of Insect Social Evolution, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA;Centre for Social Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark;Theoretical Biology, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, Groningen 9747 AG, The Netherlands

关键词: Clonal mixing;    Monoculture;    Symbiont competition;    Host-symbiont conflict;    Cultivation mutualism;   

Others  :  1140958
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2148-12-106

 received in 2012-01-09, accepted in 2012-05-16,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Mutualistic interactions are wide-spread but the mechanisms underlying their evolutionary stability and ecological dynamics remain poorly understood. Cultivation mutualisms in which hosts consume symbionts occur in phylogenetically diverse groups, but often have symbiont monocultures for each host. This is consistent with the prediction that symbionts should avoid coexistence with other strains so that host services continue to benefit relatives, but it is less clear whether hosts should always favor monocultures and what mechanisms they might have to manipulate symbiont diversity. Few mutualisms have been studied in sufficient genetic detail to address these issues, so we decided to characterize symbiont diversity in the complex mutualism between multiple root aphid species and Lasius flavus ants. After showing elsewhere that three of these aphid species have low dispersal and mostly if not exclusively asexual reproduction, we here investigate aphid diversity within and between ant nest mounds.

Results

The three focal species (Geoica utricularia, Forda marginata and Tetraneura ulmi) had considerable clonal diversity at the population level. Yet more than half of the ant mounds contained just a single aphid species, a significantly higher percentage than expected from a random distribution. Over 60% of these single-species mounds had a single aphid clone, and clones tended to persist across subsequent years. Whenever multiple species/clones co-occurred in the same mound, they were spatially separated with more than 95% of the aphid chambers containing individuals of a single clone.

Conclusions

L. flavus “husbandry” is characterized by low aphid “livestock” diversity per colony, especially at the nest-chamber level, but it lacks the exclusive monocultures known from other cultivation mutualisms. The ants appear to eat most of the early instar aphids, so that adult aphids are unlikely to face limited phloem resources and scramble competition with other aphids. We suggest that such culling of carbohydrate-providing symbionts for protein ingestion may maintain maximal host yield per aphid while also benefitting the domesticated aphids as long as their clone-mates reproduce successfully. The cost-benefit logic of this type of polyculture husbandry has striking analogies with human farming practices based on slaughtering young animals for meat to maximize milk-production by a carefully regulated adult livestock population.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Ivens et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Stachowicz JJ: Mutualism, facilitation, and the structure of ecological communities. Bioscience 2001, 51:235-246.
• [2]Leigh EG: The evolution of mutualism. J Evol Biol 2010, 23:2507-2528.
• [3]Herre EA, Knowlton N, Mueller UG, Rehner SA: The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends Ecol Evol 1999, 14:49-53.
• [4]Edwards DP, Hassall M, Sutherland WJ, Yu DW: Selection for protection in an ant-plant mutualism: host sanctions, host modularity and the principal-agent game. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 2006, 273:595-602.
• [5]Weyl EG, Frederickson ME, Yu DW, Pierce NE: Economic contract theory tests models of mutualism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:15712-15716.
• [6]Kiers ET, Denison RF, Kawakita A, Herre EA: The biological reality of host sanctions and partner fidelity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:E7-E7.
• [7]Weyl EG, Frederickson ME, Yu DW, Pierce NE: Reply to Kiers et al.: Economic and biological clarity in the theory of mutualism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:E8.
• [8]Bshary R, Grutter AS: Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism. Nature 2006, 441:975-978.
• [9]Palmer TM, Doak DF, Stanton ML, Bronstein JL, Kiers ET, Young TP, Goheen JR, Pringle RM: Synergy of multiple partners, including freeloaders, increases host fitness in a multispecies mutualism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:17234-17239.
• [10]Kiers ET, Denison RF: Sanctions, cooperation, and the stability of plant-rhizosphere mutualisms. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2008, 39:215-236.
• [11]Poulsen M, Boomsma JJ: Mutualistic fungi control crop diversity in fungus-growing ants. Science 2005, 307:741-744.
• [12]Thompson J, Fernandez C: Temporal dynamics of antagonism and mutualism in a geographically variable plant-insect interaction. Ecology 2006, 87:103-112.
• [13]Moran NA, McCutcheon JP, Nakabachi A: Genomics and evolution of heritable bacterial symbionts. Annu Rev Genet 2008, 42:165-190.
• [14]Ivens ABF, Kronauer DJC, Pen I, Weissing FJ, Boomsma JJ: Reproduction and dispersal in an ant-associated root aphid community. Molecular Ecology 2012, 21:4257-4269.
• [15]Hata H, Kato M: A novel obligate cultivation mutualism between damselfish and Polysiphonia algae. Biol Lett 2006, 2:593-596.
• [16]West SA, Griffin AS, Gardner A: Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Curr Biol 2007, 17:R661-R672.
• [17]Login FH, Balmand S, Vallier A, Vincent-Monégat C, Vigneron A, Weiss-Gayet M, Rochat D, Heddi A: Antimicrobial peptides keep insect endosymbionts under control. Science 2011, 334:362-365.
• [18]Heie OE: The Aphidoidea (Hemiptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. I. Fauna Entomol Scand 1980, 9:1-236.
• [19]Hölldobler B, Wilson EO: The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA; 1990:522-529.
• [20]van Borm S, Buschinger A, Boomsma J, Billen J: Tetraponera ants have gut symbionts related to nitrogen-fixing root-nodule bacteria. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 2002, 269:2023-2027.
• [21]Wulff JL: Clonal organisms and the evolution of mutualism. In Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. Edited by Jackson JBC, Buss LW, Cook RE. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT; 1985:437-466.
• [22]Frank SA: Host-symbiont conflict over the mixing of symbiotic lineages. Proc R Soc London, Ser B 1996, 263:339-344.
• [23]Bronstein JL: The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecol Lett 2001, 4:277-287.
• [24]Archetti M, Úbeda F, Fudenberg D, Green J, Pierce NE, Yu DW: Let the right one in: a microeconomic approach to partner choice in mutualisms. Am Nat 2011, 177:75-85.
• [25]Hata H, Kato M: Weeding by the herbivorous damselfish Stegastes nigricans in nearly monocultural algae farms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2002, 237:227-231.
• [26]Bot ANM, Rehner SA, Boomsma JJ: Partial incompatibility between ants and symbiotic fungi in two sympatric species of Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Evolution 2001, 55:1980-1991.
• [27]Aanen DK, Licht HHD, Debets AJM, Kerstes NAG, Hoekstra RF, Boomsma JJ: High symbiont relatedness stabilizes mutualistic cooperation in fungus-growing termites. Science 2009, 326:1103-1106.
• [28]Mueller UG, Scott JJ, Ishak HD, Cooper M, Rodrigues A: Monoculture of leafcutter ant gardens. PLoS One 2010, 5(9):e12668.
• [29]Ivens ABF, Nash DR, Poulsen M, Boomsma JJ: Caste-specific symbiont policing by workers of Acromyrmex fungus-growing ants. Behav Ecol 2009, 20:378-384.
• [30]Pontin AJ: A preliminary note on the eating of aphids by ants of the genus Lasius (Hym., Formicidae). Entomol Mon Mag 1958, 94:9-11.
• [31]Muir DA: The ant-aphid-plant relationship in West Dunbartonshire. J Anim Ecol 1959, 28:133-140.
• [32]Pontin AJ: The prey of Lasius niger (L.) and L. flavus (F.) (Hym., Formicidae). Entomol Mon Mag 1961, 97:135-137.
• [33]Pontin AJ: Numbers and distribution of subterranean aphids and their exploitation by the ant Lasius flavus (Fabr.). Ecol Entomol 1978, 3:203-207.
• [34]Godske L: Aphids in nests of Lasius flavus F. in Denmark I: faunistic description. Entomol Medd 1991, 59:85-89.
• [35]Seifert B: Die Ameisen Mittel- und Nordeuropas. Lutra, Görlitz; 2007:280.
• [36]Ivens ABF, Kronauer DJC, Boomsma JJ: Characterisation and cross-amplification of polymorphic microsatellite loci in ant-associated root-aphids. Conserv Genet Resour 2011, 3:73-77.
• [37]Godske L: Aphids in nests of Lasius flavus F. in Denmark II: population dynamics. Entomol Medd 1992, 60:21-26.
• [38]Yao I: Contrasting patterns of genetic structure and dispersal ability in ant-attended and non-attended Tuberculatus aphids. Biol Lett 2010, 6:282-286.
• [39]Vantaux A, Billen J, Wenseleers T: Levels of clonal mixing in the black bean aphid Aphis fabae, a facultative ant mutualist. Mol Ecol 2011, 20:4772-4785.
• [40]Palfner G, Casanova-Katny M, Read D: The mycorrhizal community in a forest chronosequence of Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.] in Northern England. Mycorrhiza 2005, 15:571-579.
• [41]Arnold A, Herre E: Canopy cover and leaf age affect colonization by tropical fungal endophytes: Ecological pattern and process in Theobroma cacao (Malvaceae). Mycologia 2003, 95:388-398.
• [42]Bever JD, Richardson SC, Lawrence BM, Holmes J, Watson M: Preferential allocation to beneficial symbiont with spatial structure maintains mycorrhizal mutualism. Ecol Lett 2009, 12:13-21.
• [43]Noë R, Hammerstein P: Biological markets - supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1994, 35:1-11.
• [44]Smart L: Asymmetric interactions between ants, aphids and plants. PhD thesis. University of Bath, Bath; 1991:206-280.
• [45]Fischer MK, Shingleton AW: Host plant and ants influence the honeydew sugar composition of aphids. Funct Ecol 2001, 15:544-550.
• [46]Larsen CS: Biological changes in human populations with agriculture. Annu Rev Anthropol 1995, 24:185-213.
• [47]Odum EP, Pontin AJ: Population density of underground ant, Lasius Flavus, as determined by tagging with P-32. Ecology 1961, 42:186-188.
• [48]Boomsma JJ, Van Loon AJ: Structure and diversity of ant communities in successive coastal dune valleys. J Anim Ecol 1982, 51:957-974.
• [49]Laland KN, Boogert NJ: Niche construction, co-evolution and biodiversity. Ecol Econ 2010, 69:731-736.
• [50]Offenberg J: Balancing between mutualism and exploitation: the symbiotic interaction between Lasius ants and aphids. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2001, 49:304-310.
• [51]Ben-Dov Y, Fischer BL: The mutualism of Melissotarsus ants and armoured scale insects in Africa and Madagascar: distribution, host plants and biology. Entomol Hell 2010, 19:45-53.
• [52]Pontin AJ: Some records of predators and parasites adapted to attack aphids attended by ants. Entomol Mon Mag 1959, 95:154-155.
• [53]Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R: Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 1991, 10:506-513.
• [54]Ivens ABF, Van de Sanden M, Bakker J: MLGSim 2.0: a newly updated program that allows clone detection using a Monte Carlo simulation approach. http://www.rug.nl/fmns-research/theobio/downloads webcite
• [55]Stenberg P, Lundmark M, Saura A: MLGsim: a program for detecting clones using a simulation approach. Mol Ecol Notes 2003, 3:329-331.
• [56]R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing Vienna. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Austria; 2011.
• [57]Pontin AJ: Population stabilization and competition between the ants Lasius flavus (F) and L. niger (L). J Anim Ecol 1961, 30:47-54.
• [58]Pontin AJ: Further considerations of competition and the ecology of the ants Lasius flavus (F) and L. niger (L). J Anim Ecol 1963, 32:565-574.
• [59]Olff H, De Leeuw J, Bakker J, Platerink R, Van Wijnen H, De Munck W: Vegetation succession and herbivory in a salt marsh: changes induced by sea level rise and silt deposition along an elevational gradient. J Ecol 1997, 85:799-814.
• [60]Boomsma JJ, Isaaks JA: Effects of inundation and salt on the survival of ants in a sandy coastal plain. Ecol Entomol 1982, 7:121-130.