期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medicine
Age-related frailty and its association with biological markers of ageing
Thomas B. L. Kirkwood1  Kenneth Rockwood2  Thomas von Zglinicki1  Carol Jagger5  Carmen Martin-Ruiz4  Joanna Collerton5  Arnold Mitnitski3 
[1] Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences and Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK;Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 2E1, NS, Canada;Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 2E1, NS, Canada;Institute of Neuroscience and Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK;Institute of Health and Society and Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK
关键词: Newcastle 85+ study;    Inflammation;    Immunosenescence;    Frailty phenotype;    Frailty index;    Frailty;    Deficit accumulation;    Cellular ageing;    Biomarkers;    Ageing;   
Others  :  1219064
DOI  :  10.1186/s12916-015-0400-x
 received in 2015-02-23, accepted in 2015-06-12,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The relationship between age-related frailty and the underlying processes that drive changes in health is currently unclear. Considered individually, most blood biomarkers show only weak relationships with frailty and ageing. Here, we examined whether a biomarker-based frailty index (FI-B) allowed examination of their collective effect in predicting mortality compared with individual biomarkers, a clinical deficits frailty index (FI-CD), and the Fried frailty phenotype.

Methods

We analyzed baseline data and up to 7-year mortality in the Newcastle 85+ Study (n = 845; mean age 85.5). The FI-B combined 40 biomarkers of cellular ageing, inflammation, haematology, and immunosenescence. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to stratify participants into FI-B risk strata. Stability of the risk estimates for the FI-B was assessed using iterative, random subsampling of the 40 FI-B items. Predictive validity was tested using Cox proportional hazards analysis and discriminative ability by the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

The mean FI-B was 0.35 (SD, 0.08), higher than the mean FI-CD (0.22; SD, 0.12); no participant had an FI-B score <0.12. Higher values of each FI were associated with higher mortality risk. In a sex-adjusted model, each one percent increase in the FI-B increased the hazard ratio by 5.4 % (HR, 1.05; CI, 1.04–1.06). The FI-B was more powerful for mortality prediction than any individual biomarker and was robust to biomarker substitution. The ROC analysis showed moderate discriminative ability for 7-year mortality (AUC for FI-CD = 0.71 and AUC for FI-B = 0.66). No individual biomarker’s AUC exceeded 0.61. The AUC for combined FI-CD/FI-B was 0.75.

Conclusions

Many biological processes are implicated in ageing. The systemic effects of these processes can be elucidated using the frailty index approach, which showed here that subclinical deficits increased the risk of death. In the future, blood biomarkers may indicate the nature of the underlying causal deficits leading to age-related frailty, thereby helping to expose targets for early preventative interventions.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Mitnitski et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150715025422797.pdf 771KB PDF download
Fig. 3. 18KB Image download
Fig. 2. 50KB Image download
Fig. 1. 16KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Kirkwood TB. Understanding the odd science of aging. Cell. 2005; 120:437-47.
  • [2]Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013; 381:752-62.
  • [3]Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. ScientificWorldJournal. 2001; 1:323-36.
  • [4]Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Frailty defined by deficit accumulation and geriatric medicine defined by frailty. Clin Geriatr Med. 2011; 27:17-26.
  • [5]Goggins WB, Woo J, Sham A, Ho SC. Frailty index as a measure of biological age in a Chinese population. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005; 60:1046-51.
  • [6]Gu D, Dupre ME, Sautter J, Zhu H, Liu Y, Yi Z. Frailty and mortality among Chinese at advanced ages. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009; 64:279-89.
  • [7]Yang Y, Lee LC. Dynamics and heterogeneity in the process of human frailty and aging: evidence from the U.S. older adult population. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010; 65B:246-55.
  • [8]Kulminski AM, Ukraintseva SV, Culminskaya IV, Arbeev KG, Land KC, Akushevich L et al.. Cumulative deficits and physiological indices as predictors of mortality and long life. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008; 63:1053-9.
  • [9]Krishnan M, Beck S, Havelock W, Eeles E, Hubbard RE, Johansen A. Predicting outcome after hip fracture: using a frailty index to integrate comprehensive geriatric assessment results. Age Ageing. 2014; 43:122-6.
  • [10]Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Nontraditional risk factors combine to predict Alzheimer disease and dementia. Neurology. 2011; 77:227-34.
  • [11]Wallace LM, Theou O, Kirkland SA, Rockwood MR, Davidson KW, Shimbo D et al.. Accumulation of non-traditional risk factors for coronary heart disease is associated with incident coronary heart disease hospitalization and death. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e90475.
  • [12]Kennedy CC, Ioannidis G, Rockwood K, Thabane L, Adachi JD, Kirkland S et al.. A Frailty Index predicts 10-year fracture risk in adults age 25 years and older: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporosis Int. 2014; 25:2825-32.
  • [13]Schoufour JD, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K, Evenhuis HM, Echteld MA. Development of a frailty index for older people with intellectual disabilities: results from the HA-ID study. Res Dev Disabil. 2013; 34:1541-55.
  • [14]Rockwood MR. MacDonald E, Sutton E, Rockwood K, Baron M; Canadian Scleroderma Research Group. Frailty index to measure health status in people with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2014; 41:698-705.
  • [15]Collerton J, Martin-Ruiz C, Davies K, Hilkens CM, Isaacs J, Kolenda C et al.. Frailty and the role of inflammation, immunosenescence and cellular ageing in the very old: cross-sectional findings from the Newcastle 85+ Study. Mech Ageing Dev. 2012; 133:456-66.
  • [16]Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J et al.. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001; 56:M146-56.
  • [17]Kirkwood TBL. A systematic look at an old problem. Nature. 2008; 451:644-7.
  • [18]Kirkwood TBL. Systems biology of ageing and longevity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011; 366:64-70.
  • [19]Howlett S, Rockwood M, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Standard laboratory tests to identify older adults at increased risk of death. BMC Med. 2014; 12:171. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [20]Howlett SE, Rockwood K. New horizons in frailty: ageing and the deficit-scaling problem. Age Ageing. 2013; 42:416-23.
  • [21]Collerton J, Barrass K, Bond J, Eccles M, Jagger C, James O et al.. The Newcastle 85+ study: biological, clinical and psychosocial factors associated with healthy ageing: study protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2007; 7:14. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [22]Collerton J, Davies K, Jagger C, Kingston A, Bond J, Eccles MP et al.. Health and disease in 85 year olds: baseline findings from the Newcastle 85+ cohort study. BMJ. 2009; 339:b4904.
  • [23]Davies K, Collerton JC, Jagger C, Bond J, Barker SA, Edwards J et al.. Engaging the oldest old in research: lessons from the Newcastle 85+ study. BMC Geriatr. 2010; 10:64. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [24]Martin-Ruiz C, Jagger C, Kingston A, Collerton J, Catt M, Davies K et al.. Assessment of a large panel of candidate biomarkers of ageing in the Newcastle 85+ study. Mech Ageing Dev. 2011; 132:496-502.
  • [25]Saum KU, Dieffenbach AK, Müller H, Holleczek B, Hauer K, Brenner H. Frailty prevalence and 10-year survival in community-dwelling older adults: results from the ESTHER cohort study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014; 29:171-9.
  • [26]Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Limits to deficit accumulation in elderly people. Mech Ageing Dev. 2006; 127:494-6.
  • [27]Bennett S, Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. A limit to frailty in very old, community-dwelling people: a secondary analysis of the Chinese longitudinal health and longevity study. Age Ageing. 2013; 42:372-7.
  • [28]Armstrong JJ, Mitnitski A, Launer LJ, White LR, Rockwood K. Frailty in the Honolulu-Asia aging study: deficit accumulation in a male cohort followed to 90% mortality. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015; 70:125-31.
  • [29]Abdelhafiz AH, Loo BE, Hensey N, Bailey C, Sinclair A. The U-shaped relationship of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and adverse outcomes in later life. Aging Dis. 2012; 3:454-64.
  • [30]Hubbard RE, O’Mahony MS, Savva GM, Calver BL, Woodhouse KW. Inflammation and frailty measures in older people. J Cell Mol Med. 2009; 13:3103-9.
  • [31]Okumiya K, Matsubayashi K, Wada T, Fujisawa M, Osaki Y, Doi Y et al.. A U-shaped association between home systolic blood pressure and four-year mortality in community-dwelling older men. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999; 47:1415-21.
  • [32]Varadhan R, Yao W, Matteini A, Beamer BA, Xue QL, Yang H et al.. Simple biologically informed inflammatory index of two serum cytokines predicts 10 year all-cause mortality in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014; 69:165-73.
  • [33]Romero-Ortuno R, Walsh CD, Lawlor BA, Kenny RA. A frailty instrument for primary care: findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). BMC Geriatr. 2010; 10:57. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [34]Collerton J, Martin-Ruiz C, Kenny A, Barrass K, von Zglinicki T, Kirkwood T et al.. Newcastle 85+ Core Study Team. Telomere length is associated with left ventricular function in the oldest old: the Newcastle 85+ study. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28:172-6.
  • [35]Woo J, Tang NL, Suen E, Leung JC, Leung PC. Telomeres and frailty. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008; 29:642-8.
  • [36]Saum KU, Dieffenbach AK, Müezzinler A, Müller H, Holleczek B, Stegmaier C et al.. Frailty and telomere length: cross-sectional analysis in 3537 older adults from the ESTHER cohort. Exp Gerontol. 2014; 58:250-5.
  • [37]Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA, Gill TM, Rockwood K. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr. 2008; 8:24. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [38]Parks RJ, Fares E, Macdonald JK, Ernst MC, Sinal CJ, Rockwood K et al.. A procedure for creating a frailty index based on deficit accumulation in aging mice. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012; 67:217-27.
  • [39]Whitehead JC, Hildebrand BA, Sun M, Rockwood MR, Rose RA, Rockwood K et al.. A clinical frailty index in aging mice: comparisons with frailty index data in humans. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014; 69:621-32.
  • [40]Fontana L, Kennedy BK, Longo VD, Seals D, Melov S. Medical research: treat ageing. Nature. 2014; 511:405-7.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:112次 浏览次数:37次