期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
Cyberbullying among Finnish adolescents – a population-based study
Arja H Rimpelä1  Riittakerttu Kaltiala-Heino1  Pirjo L Lindfors2 
[1] Department of Adolescent Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland;School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
关键词: Witnessing cyberbullying;    Cyberbullying;    Adolescents;   
Others  :  1162781
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-1027
 received in 2012-02-01, accepted in 2012-11-20,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Cyberbullying, threatening or harassing another via the internet or mobile phones, does not cause physically harm and thus the consequences are less visible. Little research has been performed on the occurrence of cyberbullying among adolescents or the perception of its seriousness. Only a few population-based studies have been published, none of which included research on the witnessing of cyberbullying. Here, we examined exposure to cyberbullying during the last year, and its frequency and perceived seriousness among 12 to 18-year-old adolescents in Finland. We studied four dimensions of cyberbullying: being a victim, bully, or both victim and bully of cyberbullying, and witnessing the cyberbullying of friends.

Methods

Self-administered questionnaires, including four questions on cyberbullying, were mailed to a representative sample of 12-, 14-, 16-, and 18-year-old Finns in 2009 (the Adolescent Health and Lifestyle Survey). The respondents could answer via the internet or paper questionnaire.

Results

The number of respondents was 5516 and the response rate was 56%. Girls more often than boys reported experiencing at least one dimension of cyberbullying during the last year. The proportion was highest among 14-year-olds and lowest among 18-year-olds of both sexes. Among girls, the most commonly encountered dimension was witnessing the cyberbullying of friends (16%); and being a victim was slightly more common than being a bully (11% vs. 9%). Among boys, an equal proportion, approximately 10%, had been a victim, a bully, or had witnessed cyberbullying. The proportion of bully-victims was 4%. Serious and disruptive cyberbullying was experienced by 2% of respondents and weekly cyberbullying by 1%; only 0.5% of respondents had been bullied weekly and considered bullying serious and disruptive.

Conclusions

Adolescents are commonly exposed to cyberbullying, but it is rarely frequent or considered serious or disruptive. Cyberbullying exposure differed between sexes, such that girls more often than boys witness cyberbullying of friends and boys more often act as the bully than girls. In future studies, the witnessing of cyberbullying and its consequences should be taken into account.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Lindfors et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150413080700504.pdf 166KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]David-Ferdon C, Hertz MF: Electronic media, violence, and adolescents: an emerging public health problem. J Adolesc Health 2007, 41(Suppl 1):1-5.
  • [2]Tokunaga RS: Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput Hum Behav 2010, 26:277-287.
  • [3]Wang J, Iannotti RJ, Nansel TR: School bullying among adolescents in the united states: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. J Adolesc Health 2009, 45:368-375.
  • [4]Kowalski RM, Limber SP: Electronic bullying among middle school students. J Adolesc Health 2007, 41(Suppl 1):22-30.
  • [5]Ybarra ML, Diener-West M, Leaf PJ: Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: implications for school intervention. J Adolesc Health 2007, 41(Suppl 1):42-50.
  • [6]Sourander A, Brunstein Klomek A, Ikonen M, Lindroos J, Luntamo T, Koskelainen M, Ristkari TMNS, Helenius H: Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: a population-based study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010, 67:720-728.
  • [7]Kiriakidis SP, Kavoura A: Cyberbullying: a review of the literature on harassment through the internet and other electronic means. Family & Community Health. Violence in Family and Community Health 2010, 33:82-93.
  • [8]Livingstone S, Haddon L, Görzig A, Olafsson K, with members of the EU Kids Online network: Risks and safety of European children. Initial findings from EU Online survey of 9–16year olds and their parents. http://www2.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/Initial_findings_report.pdf webcite. 21.11.2010
  • [9]Williams KR, Guerra NG: Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. J Adolesc Health 2007, 41(Suppl 1):14-21.
  • [10]Mishna F, Cook C, Gadalla T, Daciuk J, Solomon S: Cyber bullying behaviours among middle and high school students. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2010, 80:362-374.
  • [11]Wang J, Nansel TR, Iannotti RJ: Cyber and traditional bullying: differential association with depression. J Adolesc Health 2011, 48:415-417.
  • [12]Wolak J, Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D: Online Victimization of Youth: Five Years Later. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children Bulletin; 2006. http://unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV138.pdf webcite
  • [13]Ybarra M, Boyd D, Korcmaros J, Oppenheim J: Defining and measuring cyberbullying within the larger context of bullying victimization. J Adolesc Healthin press
  • [14]Juvonen J, Gross EF: Extending the school grounds? bullying experiences in cyberspace. J Sch Health 2008, 78:496-505.
  • [15]Raskauskas J, Stoltz AD: Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Dev Psychol 2007, 43:564-575.
  • [16]Patchin JW, Hinduja S: Bullies move beyond the schoolyard. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 2006, 4:148-169.
  • [17]Smith P, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N: Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psychiat 2008, 49:376-385.
  • [18]Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ, Wolak J, Finkelhor D: Examining characteristics and associated distress related to internet harassment: findings from the second youth internet safety survey. Pediatrics 2006, 118:1169-1177.
  • [19]Hinduja S, Patchin J: Cyberbullying: an exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant behaviour 2008, 29:129-156.
  • [20]Kaltiala-Heino R, Rimpelä M, Rantanen P, Rimpelä A: Bullying at school-an indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders. J Adol 2000, 23:661-674.
  • [21]Trolley B, Shields L, Hanel C: School cyber bullying: description, assessment & therapeutic intervention. J Technology in Counselling 2008., 1http://jtc.columbusstate.edu/Vol5_1/Trolley.htm webcite
  • [22]Willard N: Cyber bullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenges of online social aggression, threats, and distress. Champaign: Research Press; 2007.
  • [23]Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D, Wolak J, Ybarra ML, Turner H: Youth internet victimization in a broader victimization context. J Adolesc Health 2011, 48:128-134.
  • [24]Li Q: New bottle but old wine: a research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in Human Behaviour 2007, 23:1777-1791.
  • [25]Mason K: Cyberbullying: a preliminary assessment for school personnel. Psychol Schools 2008, 45:323-348.
  • [26]Bonanno AR: Bullied to the brink: an investigation of students at risk for depression and suicidal ideation. [abstract]. Humanities Soc Sci 2007, 68:s1323.
  • [27]Theriot M, Dulmus C, Sowers K, Johnson T: Factors relating to self-identification among bullying victims. Child Youth Serv Rev 2005, 27:979-994.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:15次 浏览次数:25次