Dynamics of the quorum sensing switch: stochastic and non-stationary effects

BMC Systems Biology

Javier Buceta¹  Marc Weber¹ 

[1] Computer Simulation and Modelling (Co.S.Mo.) Lab, Parc Científic de Barcelona, C/ Baldiri Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain

关键词: Synchronization;    Autoinducer;    Vibrio fischeri;    Stochastic modeling;    Noise;    Quorum sensing;   

Others  :  1143227
DOI  :  10.1186/1752-0509-7-6

 received in 2012-07-04, accepted in 2013-01-07,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

A wide range of bacteria species are known to communicate through the so called quorum sensing (QS) mechanism by means of which they produce a small molecule that can freely diffuse in the environment and in the cells. Upon reaching a threshold concentration, the signalling molecule activates the QS-controlled genes that promote phenotypic changes. This mechanism, for its simplicity, has become the model system for studying the emergence of a global response in prokaryotic cells. Yet, how cells precisely measure the signal concentration and act coordinately, despite the presence of fluctuations that unavoidably affects cell regulation and signalling, remains unclear.

Results

We propose a model for the QS signalling mechanism in Vibrio fischeri based on the synthetic strains lux01 and lux02. Our approach takes into account the key regulatory interactions between LuxR and LuxI, the autoinducer transport, the cellular growth and the division dynamics. By using both deterministic and stochastic models, we analyze the response and dynamics at the single-cell level and compare them to the global response at the population level. Our results show how fluctuations interfere with the synchronization of the cell activation and lead to a bimodal phenotypic distribution. In this context, we introduce the concept of precision in order to characterize the reliability of the QS communication process in the colony. We show that increasing the noise in the expression of LuxR helps cells to get activated at lower autoinducer concentrations but, at the same time, slows down the global response. The precision of the QS switch under non-stationary conditions decreases with noise, while at steady-state it is independent of the noise value.

Conclusions

Our in silico experiments show that the response of the LuxR/LuxI system depends on the interplay between non-stationary and stochastic effects and that the burst size of the transcription/translation noise at the level of LuxR controls the phenotypic variability of the population. These results, together with recent experimental evidences on LuxR regulation in wild-type species, suggest that bacteria have evolved mechanisms to regulate the intensity of those fluctuations.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Weber and Buceta; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 1.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Bassler BL, Losick R: Bacterially speaking. Cell 2006, 125(2):237-46.
• [2]Saka Y, Lhoussaine C, Kuttler C, Ullner E, Thiel M: Theoretical basis of the community effect in development. BMC Syst Biol 2011, 5:54. BioMed Central Full Text
• [3]Antunes LCM, Ferreira RBR, Buckner MMC, Finlay BB: Quorum sensing in bacterial virulence. Microbiol (Reading, England) 2010, 156(Pt 8):2271-82.
• [4]Pai A, Tanouchi Y, Collins CH, You L: Engineering multicellular systems by cell-cell communication. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2009, 20(4):461-70.
• [5]Anderson JC, Clarke EJ, Arkin AP: Voigt Ca: Environmentally controlled invasion of cancer cells by engineered bacteria. J Mol Biol 2006, 355(4):619-27.
• [6]Ng WL, Bassler BL: Bacterial quorum-sensing network architectures. Annu Rev Genet 2009, 43:197-222.
• [7]Dockery JD, Keener JP: A mathematical model for quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bull Math Biol 2001, 63:95-116.
• [8]Cox C, Peterson G, Allen M, Lancaster J, McCollum J, Austin D, Yan L, Sayler G, Simpson M: Analysis of noise in quorum sensing. OMICS 2003, 7(3):317-334.
• [9]Goryachev AB, Toh DJ, Lee T: Systems analysis of a quorum sensing network: design constraints imposed by the functional requirements, network topology and kinetic constants. Bio Syst 2006, 83(2-3):178-87.
• [10]Williams JW, Cui X, Levchenko A, Stevens AM: Robust and sensitive control of a quorum-sensing circuit by two interlocked feedback loops. Mol Syst Biol 2008, 4(234):234.
• [11]Haseltine EL, Arnold FH: Implications of rewiring bacterial quorum sensing. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74(2):437-45.
• [12]Anetzberger C, Pirch T, Jung K: Heterogeneity in quorum sensing-regulated bioluminescence of Vibrio harveyi. Mol Microbiol 2009, 73(2):267-77.
• [13]Pérez PD, Hagen SJ: Heterogeneous response to a quorum-sensing signal in the luminescence of individual Vibrio fischeri. PLoS One 2010, 5(11):e15473.
• [14]Boedicker JQ, Vincent ME, Ismagilov RF: Microfluidic confinement of single cells of bacteria in small volumes initiates high-density behavior of quorum sensing and growth and reveals its variability. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2009, 48(32):5908-11.
• [15]Hagen SJ, Son M, Weiss JT, Young JH: Bacterium in a box: sensing of quorum and environment by the LuxI/LuxR gene regulatory circuit. J Biol Phys 2010, 36(3):317-327.
• [16]Tian T, Burrage K: Stochastic models for regulatory networks of the genetic toggle switch. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103(22):8372-7.
• [17]Wang J, Zhang J, Yuan Z, Zhou T: Noise-induced switches in network systems of the genetic toggle switch. BMC Syst Biol 2007, 1:50. BioMed Central Full Text
• [18]Frigola D, Casanellas L, Sancho JM, Ibañes M: Asymmetric stochastic switching driven by intrinsic molecular noise. PLoS One 2012, 7(2):e31407.
• [19]Danino T, Mondragón-Palomino O, Tsimring L, Hasty J: A synchronized quorum of genetic clocks. Nature 2010, 463(7279):326-330.
• [20]García-Ojalvo J, Elowitz M, Strogatz S: Modeling a synthetic multicellular clock: Repressilators coupled by quorum sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101(30):10955.
• [21]Karlsson D, Karlsson S, Gustafsson E, Normark BH, Nilsson P: Modeling the regulation of the competence-evoking quorum sensing network in Streptococcus pneumoniae. BioSystems 2007, 90:211-23.
• [22]Kuttler C, Hense BA: Interplay of two quorum sensing regulation systems of Vibrio fischeri. J Theor Biol 2008, 251:167-80.
• [23]Tanouchi Y, Tu D, Kim J, You L: Noise reduction by diffusional dissipation in a minimal quorum sensing motif. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4(8):e1000167.
• [24]Pai A, You L: Optimal tuning of bacterial sensing potential. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5(286):286.
• [25]Goryachev AB, Toh DJ, Wee KB, Zhang HB, Zhang LH, Lee T: Transition to quorum sensing in an Agrobacterium population: A stochastic model. PLoS Comput Biol 2005, 1(4):e37.
• [26]Romero-Campero FJ, Pérez-Jiménez MJ: A model of the quorum sensing system in Vibrio fischeri using P systems. Artif Life 2008, 14:95-109.
• [27]Koseska A, Zaikin A, Kurths J, García-Ojalvo J: Timing cellular decision making under noise via cell-cell communication. PLoS One 2009, 4(3):e4872.
• [28]Melke P, Sahlin P, Levchenko A, Jönsson H: A cell-based model for quorum sensing in heterogeneous bacterial colonies. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6(6):e1000819.
• [29]Lyell NL, Dunn AK, Bose JL, Stabb EV: Bright mutants of Vibrio fischeri ES114 reveal conditions and regulators that control bioluminescence and expression of the lux operon. J Bacteriol 2010, 192(19):5103-14.
• [30]Sitnikov D, Shadel G, Baldwin T: Autoinducer-independent mutants of the LuxR transcriptional activator exhibit differential effects on the twolux promoters ofVibrio fischeri. Mol Syst Biol 1996, 252(5):622-625.
• [31]Shadel G, Baldwin T: Identification of a distantly located regulatory element in the luxD gene required for negative autoregulation of the Vibrio fischeri luxR gene. J Biol Chem 1992, 267(11):7690.
• [32]Gillespie D: Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J Phys Chem 1977, 81(25):2340-2361.
• [33]Rosenfeld N, Young JW, Alon U, Swain PS, Elowitz MB: Gene regulation at the single-cell level. Sci (New York, N.Y.) 2005, 307(5717):1962-5.
• [34]Canela-Xandri O, Sagués F, Buceta J: Interplay between intrinsic noise and the stochasticity of the cell cycle in bacterial colonies. Biophys J 2010, 98(11):2459-68.
• [35]Lu T, Volfson D, Tsimring L, Hasty J: Cellular growth and division in the Gillespie algorithm. Syst Biol (Stevenage) 2004, 1:121.
• [36]Kærn M, Elston T, Blake W, Collins J: Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nat Rev Genet 2005, 6(6):451-464.
• [37]Yu J, Xiao J, Ren X, Lao K, Xie XS: Probing gene expression in live cells, one protein molecule at a time. Sci (New York, N.Y.) 2006, 311(5767):1600-3.
• [38]Cai L, Friedman N, Xie XS: Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level. Nature 2006, 440(7082):358-62.
• [39]Ozbudak EM, Thattai M, Kurtser I, Grossman AD, van Oudenaarden A: Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nat Genet 2002, 31:69-73.
• [40]Bennett MR, Hasty J: Microfluidic devices for measuring gene network dynamics in single cells. Nat Rev Genet 2009, 10(9):628-38.
• [41]Urbanowski M, Lostroh C, Greenberg E: Reversible acyl-homoserine lactone binding to purified Vibrio fischeri LuxR protein. J Bacteriol 2004, 186(3):631.
• [42]Kaufmann G, Sartorio R, Lee S, Rogers C, Meijler M, Moss J, Clapham B, Brogan A, Dickerson T, Janda K: Revisiting quorum sensing: discovery of additional chemical and biological functions for 3-oxo-N-acylhomoserine lactones. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102(2):309.
• [43]Roberts C, Anderson KL, Murphy E, Projan SJ, Mounts W, Hurlburt B, Smeltzer M, Overbeek R, Disz T, Dunman PM: Characterizing the effect of the Staphylococcus aureus virulence factor regulator, SarA, on log-phase mRNA half-lives. J Bacteriol 2006, 188(7):2593-603.
• [44]Kaplan H, Greenberg E: Diffusion of autoinducer is involved in regulation of the Vibrio fischeri luminescence system. J Bacteriol 1985, 163(3):1210.
• [45]Reshes G, Vanounou S, Fishov I, Feingold M: Timing the start of division in E. coli: a single-cell study. Phys Biol 2008, 5(4):046001.
• [46]Trueba F, Koppes L: Exponential growth of Escherichia coli B/r during its division cycle is demonstrated by the size distribution in liquid culture. Arch Microbiol 1998, 169:491-496.
• [47]Hong D, Saidel WM, Man S, Martin JV: Extracellular noise-induced stochastic synchronization in heterogeneous quorum sensing network. J theor biol 2007, 245(4):726-736.
• [48]Zhou T, Chen L, Aihara K: Molecular communication through stochastic synchronization induced by extracellular fluctuations. Phys rev lett 2005, 95(17):178103.
• [49]Horsthemke W, Lefever R: Noise-induced transitions: theory and applications in physics, chemistry and biology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 1984.
• [50]Pérez PD, Weiss JT, Hagen SJ: Noise and crosstalk in two quorum-sensing inputs of Vibrio fischeri. BMC Syst Biol 2011, 5:153. BioMed Central Full Text
• [51]Teng SW, Wang Y, Tu KC, Long T, Mehta P, Wingreen NS, Bassler BL, Ong NP: Measurement of the copy number of the master quorum-sensing regulator of a bacterial cell. Biophys J 2010, 98(9):2024-31.
• [52]Tu KC, Long T, Svenningsen SL, Wingreen NS, Bassler BL: Negative feedback loops involving small regulatory RNAs precisely control the Vibrio harveyi quorum-sensing response. Mol cell 2010, 37(4):567-79.
• [53]Balázsi G, van Oudenaarden A, Collins JJ: Cellular decision making and biological noise: from microbes to mammals. Cell 2011, 144(6):910-25.
• [54]Acar M, Becskei A, van Oudenaarden A: Enhancement of cellular memory by reducing stochastic transitions. Nature 2005, 435(7039):228-32.
• [55]Nené NR, García-Ojalvo J, Zaikin A: Speed-dependent cellular decision making in nonequilibrium genetic circuits. PLoS One 2012, 7(3):e32779.